Surgical resection and long-term survival outcome for non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison of Victorian population-based studies spanning a decade

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Improved long-term survival following pulmonary resections for non-small cell lung cancer: results of a nationwide study from Iceland

Background

We studied the outcome of pulmonary resection with curative intent for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a nationwide study covering a 24-year period, focusing on survival.

Methods

All patients who underwent pulmonary resection for NSCLC in Iceland in the period 1991-2014 were reviewed for demographics, TNM stage and survival. Median length of follow-up was 45 months. Three 8-year periods were compared, overall survival was estimated, and prognostic factors for survival were identified.

Results

Altogether, 652 surgical resections were performed on 644 individuals (52% females): 492 lobectomies (75%), 77 pneumonectomies (12%), and 83 sublobar resections (13%). Mean age increased from 65 to 68 yrs during the study period (P=0.002). The number of cases operated at stage IA increased substantially between the first and last periods (29% vs. 37%; P<0.001). Survival improved from 75% to 88% at 1 year and from 38% to 53% at 5 years (P<0.001). Independent prognostic factors for mortality were advanced TNM stage (HR =2.68 for stage IIIA vs. I), age (HR =1.04), ischaemic heart disease (HR =1.26), any minor complication (HR =1.26), and sublobar resection (HR =1.33), but surgical margins free from tumour growth (HR =0.59) and treatment during the latter two eight-year periods were predictors of lower mortality. The best survival was seen between 2007 and 2014 (HR =0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.78; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Survival of patients who have undergone pulmonary resection for NSCLC has improved significantly in Iceland. This may be explained by the increased number of patients diagnosed at lower stages and improved preoperative staging, with fewer understaged patients.

Clinical outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background

We compared video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SABR) to explore clinical outcomes in the treatment of patients with early stage NSCLC.

Methods

Major medical databases were systematically searched to identify studies on VATS and SBRT published between January 2010 and October 2015. English publications of stage I and II NSCLC with adequate patients and SBRT doses were included. A multivariate random effects model was used to perform meta‐analysis to compare overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) between VATS and SBRT, adjusting for median age and operable patient numbers.

Results

Thirteen VATS (3436 patients) and 24 SBRT (4433) studies were eligible. The median age and follow‐up duration was 68 years and 42 months for VATS and 74 years and 29.4 months for SBRT patients. After adjusting for the proportion of operable patients and median age, the estimated OS rates at one, two, three, and five years with VATS were 94%, 89%, 84%, and 69% compared with 96%, 94%, 89%, and 82% for SBRT. The estimated DFS rates at one, two, three, and five years with VATS were 97%, 93%, 87%, and 77% compared with 86%, 80%, 73%, and 58% for SBRT.

Conclusion

Before adjustment, patients treated with SBRT had poorer clinical outcomes compared to those treated with VATS. A substantial difference between median age and operability exists between patients treated with SBRT and VATS. After adjusting for these differences, OS and DFS did not differ significantly between the two techniques.