1
|
Zeng H, Zheng D, Witlox WJA, Levy A, Traverso A, Kong FM(S, Houben R, De Ruysscher DKM, Hendriks LEL. Risk Factors for Brain Metastases in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:889161. [PMID: 35756675 PMCID: PMC9226404 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.889161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients is controversial. Risk factors for brain metastasis (BM) development are largely lacking, hampering personalized treatment strategies. This study aimed to identify the possible risk factors for BM in SCLC.We systematically searched the Pubmed database (1 January 1995 to 18 January 2021) according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eligibility criteria: studies reporting detailed BM data with an adequate sample size (randomized clinical trials [RCTs]: N ≥50; non-RCTs: N ≥100) in patients with SCLC. We summarized the reported risk factors and performed meta-analysis to estimate the pooled hazard ratios (HR) if enough qualified data (i.e., two or more studies; the same study type; the same analysis method; and HRs retrievable) were available. In total, 61/536 records were eligible (18 RCTs and 39 non-RCTs comprising 13,188 patients), in which 57 factors were reported. Ten factors qualified BM data for meta-analysis: Limited stage disease (LD) (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.17-0.67; P = 0.002) and older age (≥65) (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92; P = 0.01) were associated with less BM; A higher T stage (≥T3) (HR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.16-2.56; P = 0.007) was a significant risk factor for BM. Male sex (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.99-1.54; P = 0.06) tended to be a risk factor, and better PS (0-1) (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.42-1.02; P = 0.06) tended to have less BM. Smoking, thoracic radiotherapy dose were not significant (P >0.05). PCI significantly decreased BM (P <0.001), but did not improve OS in ED-SCLC (P = 0.81). A higher PCI dose did not improve OS (P = 0.11). The impact on BM was conflicting between Cox regression data (HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.26-1.31; P = 0.20) and competing risk regression data (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99; P = 0.04). Compared to M0-M1a, M1b was a risk factor for OS (P = 0.01) in ED-SCLC, but not for BM (P = 0.19). As regular brain imaging is rarely performed, high-quality data is lacking. Other factors such as N-stage and blood biomarkers had no qualified data to perform meta-analysis. In conclusion, younger age, higher T stage, and ED are risk factors for BM, suggesting that PCI should be especially discussed in such cases. Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis and well-designed RCTs are needed to better identify more risk factors and further confirm our findings. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021228391, identifier CRD42021228391.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiyan Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Danyang Zheng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Willem J. A. Witlox
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Alberto Traverso
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Feng-Ming (Spring) Kong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Ruud Houben
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Dirk K. M. De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Lizza E. L. Hendriks
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xue S, Zeng H, Yan S, Wang Q, Jia X. Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Controversial Area. Front Oncol 2022; 12:772282. [PMID: 35198438 PMCID: PMC8858935 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.772282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignant tumor that is prone to lead to the development of brain metastases (BM). The application of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been regarded as an important technological advance made in cancer therapy to reduce the occurrence of BM and improve patient survival. The benefits of PCI in the treatment of limited-stage SCLC have been confirmed. However, there has been continuous controversy about the indications and advantages of PCI for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) because of the conflicting results from two prospective trials. In this review, we aimed to discuss the relevant controversy and progress made in the clinical application of PCI in ES-SCLC.
Collapse
|
3
|
Rittberg R, Banerji S, Kim JO, Rathod S, Dawe DE. Treatment and Prevention of Brain Metastases in Small Cell Lung Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 44:629-638. [PMID: 34628433 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis will develop in 50% of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients throughout disease course. Development of CNS metastasis poses a particular treatment dilemma due to the accompanied cognitive changes, poor permeability of the blood-brain barrier to systemic therapy and relatively advanced state of disease. Survival of patients with untreated SCLC brain metastases is generally <3 months with whole brain radiotherapy used as first-line management in most SCLC patients. To prevent development of CNS metastasis prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is recommended in limited stage disease, after response to chemotherapy and radiation, while PCI may be considered in extensive stage disease after favorable response to upfront treatment. Neurocognitive toxicity with whole brain radiotherapy and PCI is a concern and remains difficult to predict. The mechanism of toxicity is likely multifactorial, but a potential mechanism of injury to the hippocampus has led to hippocampal sparing radiation techniques. Treatment of established non-small cell lung cancer CNS metastases has increasingly focused on using stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) and it is tempting to extrapolate these results to SCLC. In this review, we explore the evidence surrounding the prediction, prevention, detection, and treatment of CNS metastases in SCLC. We further review whether existing evidence supports extrapolating less toxic treatments to SCLC patients with CNS metastases and discuss trials that may shed more light on this question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah Rittberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba
- Departments of Hematology and Medical Oncology
| | - Shantanu Banerji
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba
- Departments of Hematology and Medical Oncology
- Research Institute in Oncology and Hematology at CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | | | | - David E Dawe
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba
- Departments of Hematology and Medical Oncology
- Research Institute in Oncology and Hematology at CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Utility of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the MRI Screening Era. Clin Lung Cancer 2021; 22:e808-e816. [PMID: 33966983 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conflicting data exists regarding the benefit of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). We sought to retrospectively review outcomes of patients within our network with ES-SCLC treated with and without PCI between 2009 and 2020. METHODS Endpoints assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator were overall survival (OS), freedom from death with uncontrolled intracranial disease (UI-DFS), brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), and symptomatic BMFS (SBMFS). Log-rank test was performed for univariate comparison of outcomes, with Cox regression performed for univariate and multivariable analysis of OS and UI-DFS. RESULTS Some 250 patients were determined to be eligible for PCI based on any response to upfront chemotherapy, with 46 patients excluded owing to lack of negative staging brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Brain MRI was performed both at diagnosis and near completion of chemotherapy in 108 patients, with brain metastases identified near completion of chemotherapy in 17 patients (15.7%), excluding them from further analysis. Median OS in remaining eligible 187 patients was 9.0 months, with 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS of 21.9%. PCI was associated with improved UI-DFS, BMFS, and SBMFS. However, PCI was not associated with improved OS in the entire cohort or the propensity matched cohort. CONCLUSION Our study suggests screening with MRI following chemotherapy is important because of the identification of unsuspected brain metastases in nearly 16% of patients with response to chemotherapy. PCI is associated with reduction in brain metastases, without a demonstrable impact on OS in the era of MRI screening.
Collapse
|
5
|
Prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small cell lung cancer in The Netherlands: A population-based study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 27:157-163. [PMID: 33665386 PMCID: PMC7903055 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) use declined in The Netherlands. Independent predictors for prescription of PCI were identified. An alarming increase of practice variation was observed. Alternative MRI surveillance is not strictly adhered to.
Introduction Controversy has arisen regarding the benefit of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), particularly since the 2017 Takahashi trial publication that supports MRI surveillance in extensive-stage (ES-)SCLC. The primary aim of this study was to assess trends and determinants in PCI use over the years 2010–2018. A secondary aim was to determine contemporary practice considerations among radiation oncologists (ROs). Methods A nationwide population-based cohort study was conducted using the Netherlands Cancer Registry data on all newly diagnosed SCLC patients (2010–2018). The change in PCI frequency over the years and determinants for PCI were analyzed using logistic regression models. Second, an online survey was performed among Dutch lung cancer ROs in 2020. Results Among 10,264 eligible patients, 4,894 (47%) received PCI. Compared to 2010–2014, PCI use significantly decreased in 2017–2018 in ES-SCLC (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.60–0.77) and LS-SCLC (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.47–0.67). Incidence year, age, performance status, and thoracic radiotherapy were independent determinants for PCI. Among 41 survey participants, PCI was recommended always/sometimes/never by 22%/71%/7% in ES-SCLC and 54%/44%/2% in LS-SCLC. For ES-SCLC and LS-SCLC, 63% and 25% of ROs, respectively, confirmed influence of the Takahashi trial on PCI recommendations. Denial of such influence was associated with insufficient institutional MRI capacity. Conclusions A significant declining trend of PCI use in both ES-SCLC and LS-SCLC was observed in The Netherlands since 2017. The Takahashi trial seems an explanation for this trend even in LS-SCLC, with differential influence of the trial depending on institutional MRI capacity. An alarming increase in practice variation regarding PCI was found which stresses the importance of ongoing trials.
Collapse
|
6
|
Real-World Adherence to Guideline-Recommended Treatment for Small Cell Lung Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 43:236-242. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
7
|
Should Stereotactic Radiosurgery Be Considered for Salvage of Intracranial Recurrence after Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation or Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer? A Population-Based Analysis and Literature Review. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2019; 51:75-87.e2. [PMID: 31759940 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2019.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) improves survival and prevents intracranial recurrence (IR) in limited stage (LS) and extensive stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, despite PCI, IR affects 12%-45%, and limited data exist regarding salvage brain reirradiation (ReRT). We performed a population-based review of IR in SCLC. METHODS Demographic, treatment, and outcome data of consecutive patients (N = 371) with SCLC assessed at a tertiary cancer centre (01/2013-12/2015) were abstracted, and summary statistics calculated. Kaplan-Meier estimates and univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA) via the Cox proportional hazard model were performed. RESULTS Median age was 66.1 years, and 59.8% were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2. Median survival was 24 months (95% CI 18.3-29.7 months) for LS (N = 103) and 7 months (95% CI 6.1-7.9 months) for ES (N = 268). 72 of 103 patients with LS and 97 of 214 of those with ES received PCI. 54 of 268 ES presented with brain metastases (BM) of whom 46 of 54 received whole brain RT (WBRT). 18.9% (32/169) recurred post-PCI (13 LS; 19 ES) and 30.4% (14/46) recurred after WBRT. Of those who recurred/progressed after cranial RT, 56.5% (26/46) had <5 BM, 39.1% had no extracranial disease, and 50% were ECOG 0-2. In retrospect, 17 of 46 would have been candidates for salvage stereotactic radiosurgery: 13 post-PCI and 4 post-WBRT. CONCLUSIONS This cohort challenges commonly held beliefs that IR is always diffuse, associated with clinical deterioration, and synchronous with systemic failure. Approximately 1 in 3 SCLC patients with IR after PCI or WBRT appear clinically appropriate for salvage stereotactic radiosurgery.
Collapse
|
8
|
Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive disease small cell lung cancer: An endless debate. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 143:95-101. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
9
|
Ge W, Xu H, Yan Y, Cao D. The effects of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus control on survival of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 14 trials. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:155. [PMID: 30139360 PMCID: PMC6107943 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1101-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recent Japanese study suggested prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) failed to improve survival of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, previous studies showed that PCI was beneficial in reducing the rate of mortality for extensive-stage SCLC. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of PCI on the survival of patients diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC by meta-analysis. METHODS PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM) were systematically searched to identify eligible clinical studies assessing the efficacy of PCI in extensive-stage SCLC patients. After extracting survival data, brain metastasis, and response rates, the pooled estimates were calculated. RESULTS A total of 14 clinical studies were included, involving 1221 cases in the PCI group and 5074 in the control group. The results showed that PCI significantly improved overall survival (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47, 0.69; p < 0.001) and brain metastasis (risk ratio (RR) =0.47, 95%CI: 0.33, 0.69; p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis along with sensitivity analysis suggested that PCI effects on overall survival were independent of region, pre-PCI brain metastasis status and PCI administration timing. CONCLUSION PCI improves overall survival in extensive-stage SCLC. More randomized controlled trials are needed to verify our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Ge
- Department of Oncology, RenMin Hospital of WuHan University, WuHan, 430000 Hubei China
| | - Huilin Xu
- Department of Oncology, The Fifth Hospital of WuHan, WuHan, 430000 Hubei China
| | - Yafei Yan
- Department of Oncology, RenMin Hospital of WuHan University, WuHan, 430000 Hubei China
| | - Dedong Cao
- Department of Oncology, RenMin Hospital of WuHan University, WuHan, 430000 Hubei China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Efficacy of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer who were confirmed to have no brain metastasis via magnetic resonance imaging after initial chemoradiotherapy. Oncotarget 2018; 9:17664-17674. [PMID: 29707139 PMCID: PMC5915147 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is recommended for patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) who achieved good response to definitive chemoradiotherapy. However, most clinical studies lacked brain imaging scans before PCI. Our study aimed to investigate whether PCI has a survival benefit in patients who have no brain metastases (BM) confirmed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before PCI. Results Eighty patients were included in this study. Sixty patients received PCI (PCI group) and 20 patients did not (non-PCI group). OS was not significantly different between the two groups. The median OS time was 4.3 years (95% CI: 2.6 years–8.6 years) in the PCI group and was not reached (NR) (95% CI: 1.9 years–NR) in the non-PCI group (p = 0.542). Moreover, no differences were observed in the 3-year rates of PFS (46.2% and 44.4%, p = 0.720) and cumulative incidence of BM (24.0% vs. 27%, p = 0.404). Conclusions Our result suggests that PCI may not have a survival benefit in patients with LD-SCLC confirmed to have no BM after initial therapy, even if patients achieve a good response to definitive chemoradiotherapy. Patients and Methods We retrospectively evaluated patients with LD-SCLC who were confirmed to have no BM via MRI after initial chemoradiotherapy at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between September 2002 and August 2015. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cumulative incidence of BM were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method between patients who received PCI and those who did not. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics.
Collapse
|
11
|
Maeng CH, Song JU, Shim SR, Lee J. The Role of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2018. [PMID: 29526825 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is controversial in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of PCI in these patients. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS We identified five studies comprising 984 patients, of whom 448 received PCI and 536 did not receive PCI. In pooled estimates, PCI did not statistically improve OS compared with controls (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.11; I2 = 77%; p = 0.19). However, the PCI group had a significant advantage in 1-year survival compared to the no-PCI group (37.1% versus 27.1%; risk ratio = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.80-0.95; I2 = 47%; p = 0.002), and the pooled estimates indicated that progression-free survival and the risk of brain metastasis were associated with significant benefit in the PCI group (HR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.70-0.98; I2 = 22%; p = 0.03; and HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.23-0.50; I2 = 0%; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that PCI in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer may lead to a significant benefit in 1-year survival, progression-free survival, and the risk of brain metastasis, despite the lack of a significant advantage in OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Hoon Maeng
- Division of Medical Oncology-Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae-Uk Song
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Ryul Shim
- Institute for Clinical Molecular Biology Research, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jonghoo Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|