A comparison of immunohistochemical and molecular methods used for analyzing the BRAF V600E gene mutation in malignant melanoma in Taiwan

An Extremely Rare Case of Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Kidney

Malignant melanoma (MM) is a tumor that usually occurs in the skin, but this malignant tumor can also develop in extracutaneous tissues, including urogenital tissues. In regard to MM occurring in urogenital tissues, bladder origin is common but renal primary MM is extremely rare. In the Department of Emergency and Urology at Gifu Municipal Hospital, a tumor of the right kidney was detected in a computed tomography scan to determine the cause of severe pain in the lower extremities of a 45-year-old Japanese woman. With the clinical diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma, resection of the right kidney was performed under laparoscopy. The cut surface of the tumor encapsulated by a thick fibrous capsule was dark brown, and the tumor cells with large nuclei, large nucleoli, acidophil cytoplasm, and numerous melanin granules showed papillary, solid, or alveolar growth. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for Melan A and human melanoma black 45 (HMG45) but negative for transcription factor E3 (TFE3), transcription factor EB (TFEB), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9), and AEl/AE3. We conducted careful and detailed examinations, including an association of the patient's medical history, but there were no indications for tumors, particularly MM, in any organs. Therefore, she was ultimately diagnosed with primary kidney MM.

Principles of Analytic Validation of Immunohistochemical Assays: Guideline Update

CONTEXT.—

In 2014, the College of American Pathologists developed an evidence-based guideline to address analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays. Fourteen recommendations were offered. Per the National Academy of Medicine standards for developing trustworthy guidelines, guidelines should be updated when new evidence suggests modifications.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess evidence published since the release of the original guideline and develop updated evidence-based recommendations.

DESIGN.—

The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and update the original guideline recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS.—

Two strong recommendations, 1 conditional recommendation, and 12 good practice statements are offered in this updated guideline. They address analytic validation or verification of predictive and nonpredictive assays, and recommended revalidation procedures following changes in assay conditions.

CONCLUSIONS.—

While many of the original guideline statements remain similar, new recommendations address analytic validation of assays with distinct scoring systems, such as programmed death receptor-1 and analytic verification of US Food and Drug Administration approved/cleared assays; more specific guidance is offered for validating immunohistochemistry performed on cytology specimens.

BRAF V600E Mutations and Beyond: A Molecular Perspective of Melanoma from a Tertiary Cancer Referral Center of India

Vaibhavi VengurlekarObjectives  Malignant melanoma demonstrates frequently occurring mutations of genes in the serine/threonine kinase pathway, namely BRAF, NRAS, and neurofibromin 1. There is rare documentation of a detailed analysis of these mutations in cases of melanoma among Indian patients. We present molecular features in cases of malignant melanoma, diagnosed at a tertiary cancer referral center in India, over a period of 8 years (2011-2018). Materials and Methods  This study was performed on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues of 88 histologically confirmed cases of malignant melanoma. BRAF gene alterations were studied by both Sanger sequencing and real-time polymerase chain reaction techniques ( n  = 74). Molecular testing for BRAF and NRAS gene alterations was accomplished in 74/88 cases (80%). Molecular test results were correlated with clinicopathological features using IBM SPSS Statistical software 25.0. Results  The age ranged from 13 to 79 years (median = 57), with a M:F ratio of 1.4:1. BRAF mutations were observed in 12/74 (16.21%) patients, including V600E ( n  = 7), A594T ( n  = 1), T599 = ( n  = 2), V600K ( n  = 1), and Q612P ( n  = 1), while NRAS mutations were observed in 6/38 (15.7%) patients. Among various subtypes, nodular melanoma was the most frequent subtype (33%) among cutaneous malignant melanomas. Among non-cutaneous melanomas, mucosal melanomas were observed in 37.5% of cases. Conclusion  This constitutes one of the few reports on comprehensive analysis of molecular alterations underlying melanomas in Indian patients. A larger sample size, with more extensive molecular markers, would yield additional information on the disease manifestation.

Malignant melanotic nerve sheath tumor in pleural effusion: Deceitful cytology with significant repercussions

Malignant melanotic nerve sheath tumor (MMNST) is an exceedingly rare and aggressive neoplasm of Schwann cell origin that has seldom been described in the cytopathology literature. Herein we present a case of a 60-year-old female with a 3.8 cm presacral mass that was diagnosed as a MMNST. A molecular workup demonstrated TERT promoter -124C > T and TET2 Q891* gene mutations. Within 2 years of her initial diagnosis, she had developed widespread metastasis and pleural effusions. A cytologic workup of the pleural fluid revealed clusters of vacuolated epithelioid cells with enlarged nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and occasional multinucleation. The lesional cells were positive for SOX10, S100-protein, Melan-A, and HMB45, while negative for Calretinin, MOC31, and monoclonal CEA. In this clinicopathologic context, a diagnosis of metastatic MMNST was rendered. Awareness of this entity and its clinical presentation, along with a critical understanding of its molecular findings and that of imitators, is crucial in achieving an accurate diagnosis.

BRAF Mutation Analysis in Primary Acral Melanoma of 41 Cases from South of Iran

Background & Objective

Acral melanoma (AM) is a common type of cutaneous melanoma that occurs in the skin of the palms, soles, and nail beds. This malignancy, like other types of cancer, has different genetic alterations. To date, despite decades of research the roles of oncogenic BRAF mutations in the pathogenesis of AM has not been fully clarified. The present study was designed to identify V600E mutation in patients with AM from the south of Iran.

Methods

The samples were collected from the pathology lab archive of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (2015-2020). A total of 41 patients with primary invasive AM underwent excisional biopsy or amputation were collected to evaluate BRAF V600E mutation using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing.

Results

Total number of 41cases (21 male and 20 female) and age range of 34-87 years were enrolled. The histological subtypes were 24 acral lentiginous melanomas (ALM), 10 cases of nodular melanoma (NM), and 7 cases of superficial spreading melanoma (SSM). In our study, only one case (a 44-year-old male with nail bed AM and the histological subtype of acral lentigenous melanoma) showed BRAF-V600E mutation.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the population of our interest showed a very low prevalence of this mutation providing novel insights into the pathobiology of AM and its related treatment.

Characterization and Clinical Utility of BRAFV600 Mutation Detection Using Cell-Free DNA in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Simple Summary

The choice of cancer drug(s) for the treatment of advanced melanoma is based on the types of gene alterations that are present in the patient’s tumor(s). Sometimes, the tumor sample that is obtained from surgery may be degraded, and the test does not provide a reliable result, leading to the selection of the wrong treatment, and, consequently, poor outcomes for the patient. Surgery to obtain fresh tumor samples is inconvenient. In recent years, scientists have learned that fragments of genes from dying cells, including tumors, are constantly being released into the blood. This study shows that the presence of altered genes can be reliably determined using easy-to-obtain blood samples. The study also shows that, while there is a small rate of error with the commonly used tests based on the tumor tissue sample, retests using blood samples may be a less invasive and rapid alternative for identifying the BRAF mutation status and selecting the right treatment for these patients.

Abstract

Tissue-based tests for BRAF^V600 mutation-positive melanoma involve invasive biopsy procedures, and can lead to an erroneous diagnosis when the tumor samples degrade. Herein, we explored a minimally invasive, cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA)-based platform, to retest patients for BRAF^V600 mutations. This phase 2 study enrolled adult patients with unresectable/metastatic melanoma. A prescreening testing phase evaluated the concordance between a prior tissue-based BRAF^V600 mutation test result and a subsequent plasma cfDNA-based test result. A treatment phase evaluated the patients who were confirmed as BRAF^V600 mutation-positive, and were treated with cobimetinib plus vemurafenib. It was found that 35/54 patients (64.8%) with a mutant BRAF status by prior tissue test had a positive BRAF^V600 mutation with the cfDNA test. Further, 7/118 patients (5.9%) with a wild-type BRAF status had a positive BRAF^V600 mutation cfDNA test; tissue retests on archival samples confirmed BRAF^V600 mutation positivity in 5/7 patients (71.4%). One of these patients received BRAF pathway-targeted therapy (cobimetinib plus vemurafenib), and had progression-free survival commensurate with previous experience. In the overall cobimetinib plus vemurafenib-treated population, 29/36 patients (80.6%) had an objective response. The median progression-free survival was 13.6 months (95% confidence interval, 9.5–16.5). Cell-free DNA–based tests may be a fast and convenient option to identify BRAF mutation status in melanoma patients, and help inform treatment decisions.

BRAF mutation testing in melanoma: results from a German observational multicenter study

Quality control of BRAF mutation testing methods used in routine practice is crucial for optimal treatment selection. In this prospective study, we assessed the impact of patient/sample characteristics on BRAF mutation testing results in patients with melanoma, during clinical practice. Data were collected on routine testing practices and documented mutation status in patients with melanoma stages IIIB, IIIC, or IV across 28 diagnostic pathology centers in Germany. Patient/sample data collected included: patient age, location of primary melanoma and metastases, origin of sample, melanoma subtype, and quality of tissue. Statistical influence of patient/sample characteristics on BRAF mutation rate was assessed using multiple logistic regression analyses and statistical models developed to predict the probability of BRAF mutations for individual patient cohorts. Data/samples from 642 patients with melanoma were analyzed. BRAF mutations were documented in 241/642 patients (37.5%). The primary statistical model to predict BRAF mutation rates included: age (continuous), origin of sample, method of mutation analysis, and quality of tissue. Analyses of post hoc collected data identified major deviations between documented mutation rates included in this study vs. routinely recorded mutation rates for three centers. When samples from these centers were excluded, the influence of testing method was no longer statistically significant. The final model included patient age, origin of sample (including metastasis location), and quality of tissue. Once validated in an independent population, this type of model could allow pathology centers to compare the performance of their testing methods with what would be expected based on patient, tumor, and sample characteristics.

Prognostic Role of BRAFV600E Cellular Localization in Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Approximately half of cutaneous melanoma tissues harbor BRAF^V600E mutations, resulting in a constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Nuclear-cytoplasmic transport machinery is dysregulated in neoplastic cells and alters the key regulatory proteins that can lead to tumor progression and drug resistance. The significance of nuclear localization of BRAF^V600E has not been fully understood. We examined the clinical significance of intracellular localization of BRAF^V600E in cutaneous melanoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Immunohistochemical analysis of BRAF^V600E was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of cutaneous melanoma (n = 91). Staining intensity was graded in a blinded manner. Correlations to clinical factors were analyzed by Fisher's exact test and 2-tailed t-test. Localization of BRAF^V600E was determined in melanoma cells, and we investigated their resistance to BRAF^V600E-specific inhibitor according to nuclear localization in both in vitro and in vivo models.

RESULTS

We included 91 patients, of whom 32% (29 of 91) had cytoplasmic BRAF^V600E. Nuclear BRAF^V600E was observed in 30% (27 of 91). Overall, BRAF^V600E expression correlated with TNM stage (p = 0.011), mitotic activity (p = 0.010), and ulceration (p = 0.045). Nuclear BRAF^V600E expression correlated with overall clinical stage (p < 0.001), tumor size (p < 0.001), regional lymph node (p < 0.017), depth of invasion (p = 0.005), Clark level (p < 0.001), mitotic activity (p < 0.001), ulceration (p < 0.001), and margin status (p = 0.017). On a cellular level, BRAF^V600E was identified in the nucleus, and its translocation was serum dependent. Our in vitro and in vivo data revealed sequestration of BRAF^V600E in the cytosol-sensitized resistant cells to vemurafenib; nuclear retention of BRAF^V600E was associated with aggressiveness and drug resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Nuclear localization of BRAF^V600E is associated with melanoma aggressiveness. Further multi-institutional studies are warranted to confirm the clinical relevance of nuclear localization of BRAF^V600E.