Risk of febrile neutropenia and early treatment cessation in men receiving standard and dose-reduced 3-weekly docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of febrile neutropenia and neutropenia in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer receiving docetaxel

PURPOSE

The incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in adults with castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving docetaxel in real-world settings has not been well studied since the expanded role of hormonal treatments. The study objective was to determine the incidence of FN and neutropenia among adults with mCRPC receiving docetaxel. Secondary objectives were to quantify outcomes of patients who develop FN and to identify predictors for FN in this population.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted which included adults with mCRPC receiving docetaxel at the Ottawa Hospital over a 5-year period. Charts were reviewed to collect clinical data to determine the incidence of FN and neutropenia. A multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of FN.

RESULTS

In patients receiving docetaxel for mCRPC, the incidence of FN and neutropenia was 34/137 (25%) and 45/137 (33%), respectively. Among 34 patients who developed FN, 94% required hospitalization for FN for a mean of 5 days (± 2.8) and 6% died. Following FN, 53% required at least 1 treatment delay and 71% had at least 1 dose reduction. Age category (OR 2.025, 95% CI 1.13-3.627) and presence of multiple comorbidities (OR 1.466, 95% CI 1.01-2.258) increased the risk of FN.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of FN and neutropenia in the clinical setting in patients receiving docetaxel for mCRPC is higher than previously reported and high enough to consider primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony stimulating factors in high-risk groups. Age and multiple comorbidities were identified as risk factors.

Prevention of docetaxel-associated febrile neutropenia with primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in Chinese metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Asian prostate cancer (PC) patients are particularly susceptible to docetaxel-related febrile neutropenia (FN). We evaluated primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) for preventing FN in Chinese patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive PC (mHSPC) and castration-resistant PC (mCRPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from two cohorts of 377 Chinese patients with mHSPC (100; 26.5%) and mCRPC (277; 73.5%) treated with docetaxel at six public oncology centres were analysed with multivariate regression. Primary GCSF prophylaxis was defined as administration within 5 days of starting docetaxel. The primary outcome was FN within 21 days of the first docetaxel cycle (1st FN).

RESULTS

Primary GCSF was given to 71 (18.8%) patients. FN occurred in 61 patients (16.2%) including 37 (9.8%) during the first cycle. Among patients who developed 1st cycle FN (n = 37) or not (n = 340), 2 and 69 received primary GCSF (5.4 vs. 20.3%, P = .03). Primary GCSF was associated with an overall reduced risk of 1st cycle FN (odds ratio [OR] = 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.96, P = .04), and similar trends were observed in the mHSPC (OR = 0.36, P = .35) and mCRPC (OR = 0.16, P = .08) subgroups. Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (>1) was associated with an increased risk of 1st FN (OR = 3.90; 95% CI: 1.66-9.13, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

To alleviate the risk of docetaxel-related FN, primary GCSF prophylaxis is suggested for Asian mCRPC and mHSPC patients, particularly those with poor performance status.

The impact of a tailored follow-up intervention on comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer - a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can identify health problems in older persons. In addition, CGA includes intervention towards the identified problems. With follow up, more problems may be identified and the interventions can be adjusted. We wanted to compare CGA with or without tailored follow-up in a randomised design.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients 70+ years referred for oncology treatment with four primary tumour sites. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either control group with no follow-up or intervention group with a tailored follow-up by a multidisciplinary team. Primary outcome was adherence to cancer treatment. Secondary outcomes were daily life activities, physical performance and hospitalisation.

RESULTS

In total, 363 participants were randomised. After randomisation only 301 were planned to receive specific cancer treatment. Median age was 75 years. Among the 301 participants, 52% of control group vs. 61% of intervention group completed treatment. Risk Rate (RR): 1.16 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.95-1.42), p = .14. The impact varied between the included tumour-sites, p < .01. We found no difference in 90 days physical performance or daily life activities between groups. During the study period, 55% of controls vs. 47% in the intervention group were admitted to hospital, RR: 0.86 (95%CI: 0.69-1.07), p = .19.

CONCLUSION

In frail and vulnerable patients with cancer, a tailored follow-up on CGA showed no differences in ability to complete initially planned cancer treatment. The impact varied between the included tumour sites. We did not find any impact of tailored follow-up on daily life activities, physical performance or hospitalisation.

Docetaxel dose-intensity effect on overall survival in patients with metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Several studies assessed the association of docetaxel dose intensity (DI) and efficacy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with contradicting conclusions. In this retrospective analysis, we will assess whether the docetaxel DI used in patients with metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) is associated with overall survival (OS).

METHODS

All patients with mCSPC treated at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre that received docetaxel chemotherapy between June 2014 and September 2017 were identified. The association between relative dose intensity (RDI) and OS was assessed using univariate and multivariable Cox model adjusting for age, Gleason score, burden of disease, visceral involvement, de novo metastases and baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA).

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included in the analysis. Only 35 patients (43%) were able to complete the planned treatment with a RDI of at least 90%. On a univariate analysis, higher RDI and number of cycles of docetaxel received were associated with longer OS. For every 10% decrease in RDI, the risk of death increased by 23% (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.4, P = 0.001). For every increment of one cycle (and up to six), the risk of death decreased by 27% (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.88, P = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, reduced RDI was the only predictor significantly associated with OS (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.36, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that in mCSPC, reduced docetaxel RDI is associated with shorter survival. Unnecessary dose reductions, treatment delays and early discontinuation should be avoided. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may be considered to maintain standard DI.