Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients enrolled in clinical trials compared with those of patients outside clinical trials in advanced gastric cancer

PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS UPFRONT SURGERY FOR ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection remains the main curative therapeutic modality for advanced gastric cancer. Recently, the association of preoperative chemotherapy has allowed the improvement of results without increasing surgical complications.

AIMS

To evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A retrospective review of gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy was performed. Patients were divided into two groups for analysis: upfront surgery and preoperative chemotherapy. The propensity score matching analysis, including 9 variables, was applied to adjust for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of the 536 patients included, 112 (20.9%) were referred for preoperative chemotherapy. Before the propensity score matching analysis, the groups were different in terms of age, hemoglobin level, node metastasis at clinical stage- status, and extent of gastrectomy. After the analysis, 112 patients were stratified for each group. Both were similar for all variables assigned in the score. Patients in the preoperative chemotherapy group had less advanced postoperative p staging (p=0.010), postoperative n staging (p<0.001), and pTNM stage (p<0.001). Postoperative complications, 30- and 90-days mortality were similar between both groups. Before the propensity score matching analysis, there was no difference in survival between the groups. After the analysis, patients in the preoperative chemotherapy group had better overall survival compared to upfront surgery group (p=0.012). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that American Society of Anesthesiologists III/IV category and the presence of lymph node metastasis were factors significantly associated with worse overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with increased survival in gastric cancer. There was no difference in the postoperative complication rate and mortality compared to upfront surgery.

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer treated in and out of randomized clinical trials of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Although several randomized trials (RCTs) showed survival benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer (AGC), these trials could enroll patients who fulfilled the strict eligibility criteria or waited for certain screening period for central assessment of PD-L1 status.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared characteristics and clinical outcomes of the patients with AGC who received first-line chemotherapy in control arm of RCTs with ICIs (control group) or clinical practice (practice group) at our institution from February 2016 to April 2019.

RESULTS

The control group had a better baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS0, 81.2% vs. 51.4%, p < 0.001) and a longer interval from first visit to first-line chemotherapy initiation (19 days vs. 9 days, p < 0.001) than the practice group. Median overall survival (OS) was 20.3 months in control group and 15.7 months in practice group, with a trend of longer OS in control group than that in practice group (hazard ratio, 0.71; p = 0.062). More patients in control group were treated with subsequent chemotherapy including ICIs.

CONCLUSION

Patients with AGC in RCTs of ICIs had a better PS or a higher chance to receive subsequent chemotherapy, resulting in a better prognosis than those treated in clinical practice. This information should be considered when interpreting RCT results and applying new treatments into clinical practice.

Safety Analysis of Apatinib Combined with Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Carcinoma: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Objective

To study the safety of apatinib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma (GCA).

Methods

74 patients with advanced GCA treated in the oncology department of Weifang People's Hospital (January 2019–January 2020) were enrolled in this study and equally split into study group (SG) and reference group (RG) according to the odd and even admission numbers. RG underwent chemotherapy alone, while SG received apatinib combined with chemotherapy. The clinical indicators of serum matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), serum interleukin-2 receptor (SIL-2R), and immune cell level were detected in the two groups before and after treatment to analyze the therapeutic effect of different treatment methods on patients with advanced gastric carcinoma.

Results

No obvious differences in gender ratio, average age, average BMI, pathological staging, pathological types, organ metastasis types, and residence were observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). The short-term follow-up results showed that the disease control rate (DCR) in SG was markedly higher compared with RG (P < 0.05). The MMP-9 and SIL-2R levels in both groups after treatment decreased (P < 0.05), and the levels in SG after treatment were notably lower compared with RG (P < 0.001). Compared with RG, CD3⁺, CD4⁺, and CD4⁺/CD8⁺ levels in SG after treatment were notably higher (P < 0.001), while the CD8⁺ level was notably lower (P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (MPFS) and overall survival (OS) in SG were markedly higher compared with RG (P < 0.001). The GQOLI-74 scores in both groups after treatment increased (P < 0.001), and the GQOLI-74 score in SG after treatment was markedly higher compared with RG (P < 0.001). The total incidence of adverse reactions was lower in SG than in RG (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Apatinib combined with chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone in effectively improving treatment outcomes in patients with advanced GCA.