The assessment of the optimal number of examined lymph nodes and prognostic models based on lymph nodes for predicting survival outcome in patients with stage N3b gastric cancer

Development and external validation of a novel nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with ascending colon adenocarcinoma after surgery: a population-based study

Background

This study aimed to develop and validate a novel nomogram to predict the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with ascending colon adenocarcinoma after surgery.

Methods

Patients with ascending colon adenocarcinoma were enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1973 to 2015 and randomly divided into a training set (5930) and a validation set (2540). The cut-off values for age, tumour size and lymph node ratio (LNR) were calculated via X-tile software. In the training set, independent prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, and a nomogram incorporating these factors was subsequently built. Data from the validation set were used to assess the reliability and accuracy of the nomogram and then compared with the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. Furthermore, external validation was performed from a single institution in China.

Results

A total of 8470 patients were enrolled from the SEER database, 5930 patients were allocated to the training set, 2540 were allocated to the internal validation set and a separate set of 473 patients was allocated to the external validation set. The optimal cut-off values of age, tumour size and lymph node ratio were 73 and 85, 33 and 75 and 4.9 and 32.8, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox multivariate regression revealed that age, AJCC 8th edition T, N and M stage, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tumour differentiation, chemotherapy, perineural invasion and LNR were independent risk factors for patient CSS. The nomogram showed good predictive ability, as indicated by discriminative ability and calibration, with C statistics of 0.835 (95% CI, 0.823–0.847) and 0.848 (95% CI, 0.830–0.866) in the training and validation sets and 0.732 (95% CI, 0.664–0.799) in the external validation set. The nomogram showed favourable discrimination and calibration abilities and performed better than the AJCC TNM staging system.

Conclusions

A novel validated nomogram could effectively predict patients with ascending colon adenocarcinoma after surgery, and this predictive power may guide clinicians in accurate prognostic judgement.

D2 lymphadenectomy with complete mesogastrium excision vs. conventional D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer

Background:

The complete mesogastrium excision (CME) based on D2 radical gastrectomy is believed to significantly reduce the local-regional recurrence compared with D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer, and it is widely used in China. This study aimed to explore whether D2 + CME is superior to D2 on surgical outcomes during gastrectomy from Chinese data.

Methods:

Feasible studies comparing the D2 + CME (D2 + CME group) and D2 (D2 group) published up to March 2020 are searched from electronic databases. The data showing surgical and complication outcomes are extracted to be pooled and analyzed.

Results:

Fourteen records including 1352 patients were included. The D2 + CME group had a shorter mean operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = —16.72 min, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −26.56 to −6.87 min, P < 0.001), lower mean blood loss (WMD = −39.08 mL, 95% CI: −49.94 to −28.21 mL, P < 0.001), higher mean number of retrieved lymph nodes (WMD = 2.13, 95% CI: 0.58–3.67, P = 0.007), shorter time to first flatus (WMD = −0.31 d, 95% CI: −0.53 to − 0.10 d, P = 0.005), and postoperative hospital days (WMD = −1.09, 95% CI: −1.92 to −0.25, P = 0.010) than the D2 group. Subgroup analysis suggested that the advantages from the D2 + CME group were obvious in traditional open radical gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, and distal gastrectomy compared with D2 group. The evaluations of post-operative complications showed that the patients who underwent D2 + CME had a lower incidence of post-operative complications than the patients who underwent D2 surgery alone (relative risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45–0.87, P = 0.003). The D2 radical gastrectomy plus CME improved 3-year overall survival (OS) (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02–1.32, P = 0.020) and lowered the local recurrence rate (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28–0.94, P = 0.030). The patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery or total gastrectomy had more significant advantages compared between D2 + CME and D2 groups in 3-year OS.

Conclusion:

The data from China show that D2 radical gastrectomy plus CME are reliable procedures and safety compared to D2 radical gastrectomy with faster recovery, lower risk, and better prognosis.

Benchmarks for nodal yield and ratio for node-positive gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

We aimed to elucidate prognostic markers of node-positive gastric cancers with a focus on examined lymph nodes and lymph node ratio.

METHODS

Patients treated with curative-intent gastrectomy at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1995-2019 were evaluated. Patients with non-metastatic, node-positive gastric cancers were considered for analysis.

RESULTS

Of 775 patients, 281 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 58 years, 61% were male, 51% were White, 65% received preoperative therapy, and 71% of tumors were located in the gastric body. The median overall survival was 3.6 years, and 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 91%, 41%, and 29%, respectively. pN3 category was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 1.79, P = .001) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 1.92, P = .004). Nodal burden was associated with aggressive biologic traits in primary tumors, including higher rates of lymphovascular and perineural invasion and lower preoperative therapy response rates. By receiver-operative characteristic analysis, threshold values of ≥30 examined lymph nodes and <30% lymph node ratio were most discriminant for overall survival. On adjusted analysis, positive margins, additional organ resection, <30 examined lymph nodes, and ≥30% lymph node ratio were associated with worse recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Among patients with high node burden (pN3), <30 examined lymph nodes remained significant on adjusted survival analysis.

CONCLUSION

Greater than or equal to 30 examined lymph nodes and <30% lymph node ratio were significantly associated with longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival, independent of lymphadenectomy type. These prognostic benchmarks should be considered in the surgical management of gastric cancer in the United States.

High expression of PIG11 correlates with poor prognosis in gastric cancer

P53-induced gene 11 (PIG11) is an early transcription-related target of p53 that is involved in cell apoptosis and tumor development. However, its biological function in gastric cancer (GC) tissues and relationship with the prognosis of patients with GC have remained elusive. In the present retrospective study, 60 fresh and 790 paraffin-embedded samples of GC were obtained from the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (Nantong, China) with complete clinical data from all patients. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and tissue microarray-immunohistochemical analysis were used to determine the expression of PIG11 in the respective GC tissues. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to determine the diagnostic utility of PIG11 expression in GC. Furthermore, three online databases, including Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), Oncomine and Kaplan-Meier plotter, were used for bioinformatics analysis of PIG11. PIG11 expression in GC tissues was high, which was positively correlated with invasive depth (P<0.001), lymph node metastasis (P<0.001), distant metastasis (P=0.019), TNM staging (P<0.001) and carcinoembryonic antigen in serum (P<0.001), and negatively associated with the overall survival of patients with GC. The ROC curve analysis suggested that based on PIG11 expression, it was possible to distinguish GC tissues from adjacent normal tissues (P<0.0001) with a sensitivity and specificity of 81.67 and 76.67%, respectively. In addition, Cox logistic regression analysis demonstrated that high PIG11 expression is a novel biomarker for unfavorable prognosis of patients with GC. Furthermore, the results obtained from the GEPIA database indicated that PIG11 expression is correlated with TNF, carcinoembryonic antigen related cell adhesion molecule 5, phosphatidylinositol-4, 5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha, VEGFA and kinase insert domain receptor. Therefore, PIG11 expression may be associated with the malignancy of GC and may serve as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for GC.

Novel Prognostic Models Predicting the Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma Based on Metastatic Lymph Node Status

BACKGROUND

In cutaneous melanoma (CM), the present methods of lymph node (LN) staging have not sufficiently utilized the prognostic information of metastatic LNs. In this study, we aimed to construct prognostic nomograms based on the number of positive LNs (PLNs) and other clinicopathologic characteristics of CM patients.

METHODS

Two prognostic models were constructed in the none/single PLN (PLN_none/single) and multiple PLN (PLN_multiple) cohorts, respectively. Independent prognostic predictors associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the above two cohorts were integrated to construct two nomograms for predicting the probability of 2-, 4-, and 6-year CSS in the PLN_none/single and PLN_multiple cohorts. The nomograms were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), the calibration plots, and the decision curve analyses (DCAs).

RESULTS

A total of 31,065 CM cases were included in this study. Factors included in the prognostic nomogram for patients in the PLN_none/single cohort were age, sex, race, marital status, insurance, primary tumor site, T stage, and number of PLNs, while factors included in the nomogram for cases in the PLN_multiple cohort included age, sex, marital status, insurance, primary tumor site, T stage, and number of PLNs. The AUC values for 2-, 4-, and 6-year CSS in the validation group of the PLN_none/single cohort were 0.833, 0.811, and 0.818, respectively, while in the validation group of the PLN_multiple cohort, the AUC values for 2-, 4,- and 6-year CSS were 0.720, 0.723, and 0.745, respectively. Compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition staging system, our two nomograms showed better predictive values. Additionally, the calibration plots and DCA curves for 2-, 4-, and 6-year CSS prediction demonstrated good coordination and net benefit in both the PLN_none/single and PLN_multiple cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Our nomograms, based on the number of PLNs and other clinicopathologic characteristics, showed good predictive ability for predicting the survival of CM patients.