Different patterns of treatment-related adverse events of programmed cell death-1 and its ligand-1 inhibitors in different cancer types: A meta-analysis and systemic review of clinical trials

Differences in immune-related toxicity between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study in patients with advanced cancer

Immunotherapy with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors has become an essential treatment strategy for a growing number of malignancies. These treatments have a risk for immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Pooled analyses based on clinical trials show a favorable toxicity profile for treatment with PD-L1 compared to PD-1 inhibitors. This study aimed to investigate differences in IRAEs between patients with advanced solid malignances treated with PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors in a real-world setting. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at four Swedish Regions. Patients (n = 605) treated for advanced cancer with a PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitor in monotherapy between June 2016 and August 2022 were included. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common malignant disease (n = 251; 41.5%), followed by malignant melanoma (n = 173; 28.6%), renal cell carcinoma (n = 71; 11.7%) and urothelial carcinoma (n = 35; 5.8%). Among patients receiving PD-L1 inhibitors, NSCLC (94.4%) was the predominant malignancy, whereas for those treated with PD-1 inhibitor, malignant melanoma constituted the most prevalent malignancy (34.5%). Discontinuation of treatment due to IRAEs overall and IRAEs grade ≥ 2 were significantly less common in patients treated with PD-L1 compared to PD-1 inhibitors [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.38 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.16-0.88) and OR: 0.63 (95% CI 0.35-0.98) respectively]. Any grade IRAE, IRAE grade ≥ 3 and multiple IRAEs were numerically more frequent in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.In conclusion, our study of patients with advanced solid malignancies in a real-world setting supports the results from clinical trials demonstrating a favorable toxicity profile for PD-L1 inhibitors versus PD-1 inhibitors.

Safety and efficacy of radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

It is now widely accepted that radiotherapy (RT) can provoke a systemic immune response, which gives a strong rationale for the combination of RT and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, RT is a double-edged sword that not only enhances systemic antitumor immune response, but also promotes immunosuppression to some extent. Nevertheless, many aspects regarding the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy remain unknown. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in order to assess the safety and efficacy of RT/chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and ICI combination therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods

PubMed and several other databases were searched (according to specific criteria) to find relevant studies published prior to the 28th of February 2022.

Results

3,652 articles were identified for screening and 25 trials containing 1,645 NSCLC patients were identified. For stage II-III NSCLC, the one- and two-year overall survival (OS) was 83.25% (95% confidence interval (CI): 79.42%-86.75%) and 66.16% (95% CI: 62.3%-69.92%), respectively. For stage IV NSCLC, the one- and two-year OS was 50% and 25%. In our study, the pooled rate of grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) and grade 5 AEs was 30.18% (95% CI: 10.04%-50.33%, I2: 96.7%) and 2.03% (95% CI: 0.03%-4.04%, I2: 36.8%), respectively. Fatigue (50.97%), dyspnea (46.06%), dysphagia (10%-82.5%), leucopenia (47.6%), anaemia (5%-47.6%), cough (40.09%), esophagitis (38.51%), fever (32.5%-38.1%), neutropenia (12.5%-38.1%), alopecia (35%), nausea (30.51%) and pneumonitis (28.53%) were the most common adverse events for the combined treatment. The incidence of cardiotoxicity (0%-5.00%) was low, but it was associated with a high mortality rate (0%-2.56%). Furthermore, the incidence of pneumonitis was 28.53% (95% CI: 19.22%-38.88%, I2: 92.00%), grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis was 5.82% (95% CI: 3.75%-8.32%, I2: 57.90%) and grade 5 was 0%-4.76%.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the addition of ICIs to RT/CRT for NSCLC patients may be both safe and feasible. We also summarize details of different RT combinations with ICIs to treat NSCLC. These findings may help guide the design of future trials, the testing of concurrent or sequential combinations for ICIs and RT/CRT could be particularly useful to guide the treatment of NSCLC patients.

Efficacy and safety of radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for locally advanced stages of esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Radiotherapy (RT)/Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are important treatments for all stages of esophageal cancer (EC). The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with RT/CRT seems to be promising avenue for the treatment of EC. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in order to assess the safety and efficacy of RT/CRT and ICI combination therapy for EC patients.

Methods

PubMed and several other databases were searched (according to specific criteria) to find relevant studies published prior to the 31st of December 2021.

Results

1962 articles were identified for screening, and six trials containing 668 patients were identified and pooled to determine the one- and two-year overall survival (OS), which were 84.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 69.9%-100%) and 68.3% (95% CI: 49.0%-95.1%), respectively. Additionally, the rate of pooled grade 3-5 adverse reactions was 41.0% (95% CI: 31.2%-51.2%). The rate of specific grade 3-5 adverse reactions are as follows: lymphopenia (36.8%-60%), esophagitis (20%), anastomotic leakage (18%), esophageal fistula (10%), pain (10%), leukopenia (5.3%-10%), esophageal hemorrhage (2.5%-5%), chyle leakage (3%), fatigue (5%), cough (2.7%-5%), diarrhea (2.7%), pulmonary embolism (2.5%) and allergic reaction (2.5%). The pooled rate of pneumonitis of grade 3-5 and grade 1-5 was 0.8% (95% CI: 0.1%-0.16%, I2: 0%) and 5.4% (95% CI: 2.0%-14.2%, I2: 82%). For thoracic complication, esophagitis was 63.6% (95% CI: 42.4%-80.6%), which appeared to be more frequent with the combination of ICIs to RT/CRT (12%-37.7%). Other thoracic complications include esophageal hemorrhage (2.5%-10%), esophageal fistula (6%-10%) and anastomotic leakage (6%-21%). Additionally, some of the trials did not report cardiac related adverse reactions. The subgroup analyses also revealed that the pooled rate patients with grade 3-5 pneumonitis was higher for CRT/RT with concurrent and sequential ICI treatment (1.9%) than other groups (0.8%).

Conclusion

This study suggests that the addition of ICIs to RT/CRT for EC patients may be both safe and feasible. However, larger randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Overview of Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND

Recognition and management of adverse events (AEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use by cancer patients requires expertise from multiple disciplines. Greater awareness of potential AEs may result in earlier recognition, appropriate management, and better patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this overview of systematic reviews was to synthesize and consolidate systematic review evidence describing the incidence proportion and severity of AEs associated with various ICI therapies across different cancers.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of four databases was conducted to identify systematic reviews that describe the incidence proportion and severity of AEs related to ICI therapy in cancer patients. A systematic review was eligible if it included adults with cancer; on ICI alone or in combination with another ICI, chemotherapy, or targeted therapy; severity (graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and incidence proportion of AEs and whether it reported its eligibility criteria. AEs of interest were identified through an iterative ranking exercise by key stakeholders and knowledge users. Extraction of PICOTTS elements and quality indicators (AMSTAR-2) were used to manage overlap of primary studies across systematic reviews at the outcome level. Cancer subtypes were mapped to drug class and AE severity.

RESULTS

Overall, 129 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria for data mapping. Systematic reviews reported incidence proportions for more than 76 AEs, of which 34 were identified as AEs of interest. After overlap assessment, 65 systematic reviews were chosen for data extraction. The three AEs with the highest median incidence were fatigue (18.3%, interquartile range [IQR] 15.0-28.0%), diarrhea (15.3%, IQR 9.7-29.2%) and rash (14.4%, IQR 10.3-19.2%). The three AEs (high-grade) with the highest median incidence were diarrhea (1.5%, IQR 1.2-6.0%), colitis (1.3%, IQR 0.6-6.1%) and neutropenia (1.2%, IQR 0.4-3.3%). Incidence proportions of high-grade AEs were often considerably lower than all-grade AEs and combination therapy (ICI combinations or combinations of ICI with chemotherapy or targeted therapy) was responsible for some of the highest incidence proportions regardless of AE. Rare AEs and certain cancer subtypes were not well reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Early recognition of AEs associated with ICIs requires expertise from diverse specialists, not just oncologists. Greater awareness of potential AEs may result in earlier recognition, appropriate management, and better patient outcomes.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42021231593.

Neoadjuvant programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicenter, single-arm study

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy has significantly improved the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The CheckMate 159 trial showed that neoadjuvant therapy with a single-drug programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor (nivolumab) achieved major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR) in 45% and 15%of participants, respectively. We conducted an open-label single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of resectable NSCLC.

Methods

This study was conducted in a total of 2 hospitals in the Chinese cities of Xi'an and Chongqing, and included eligible patients over 18 years of age with clinically staged IIA-IIIB NSCLC. All patients were scheduled to receive surgery within 4-6 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment (3-4 cycles) consisting of PD-1 inhibitors combined with a conventional chemotherapy regimen on day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Results

Twenty-three patients, 22 males, and 1 female with just one of them with no smoking habits) were diagnosed with NSCL C in a stage IIA (3 cases), IIB (3 cases), IIIA (8 cases), and IIIB (9cases) and no druggable driver mutations/translocations were addressed to receive neoadjuvant treatment between June 2018 and June 2020. The treatment was well tolerated with just 3 typical immune-related adverse events (hyperthyroidism, hyperglycemia, and rash) recorded. There was a partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) in 17 (73.9%) and 6 (26.1%) patients, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 73.9% according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v.1.1). Six of these patients resulted in pCR (30%) while ten of them showed a MPR (50%). Twenty patients underwent surgical resection after treatment, while further 3 refused surgery. Surgical procedure included video-assisted thoracoscopic resection (10 cases), Vinci Robot surgery (4 cases), and thoracotomy in 4 cases while there were secondary compliance-related thoracotomy in two cases. The pathology analysis revealed a R0 in 19 cases (19/20, 95%).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the neoadjuvant approach with chemotherapy and PD-1 blocking mAbs is safe and active in patients with resectable NSCLC where is associated with a promising high ORR, MPR and pCR.