Psoriasis and cancer. An Australian/New Zealand narrative

Recommendations from the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Psoriasis Working Group on the Management of Patients with Cancer and Psoriasis

Several studies suggest that patients with psoriasis have a higher incidence of neoplasms, especially of the skin, which could be associated with the use of therapies to treat psoriasis. Furthermore, the evidence available on the safety profile of some treatments in this context, and the management of these patients is scarce, which is why clinical practice guidelines with recommendations on the management of psoriasis in cancer patients are ambiguous. This study provides recommendations on the management and use of the therapies currently available for these patients. They are the result of a Delphi consensus reached by 45 dermatologists of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Psoriasis Working Group, whose goal is to help specialists in the field in their decision-making processes.

[Translated article] Recommendations from the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Psoriasis Working Group on the Management of Patients with Cancer and Psoriasis

Several studies suggest that patients with psoriasis have a higher incidence of neoplasms, especially of the skin, which could be associated with the use of therapies to treat psoriasis. Furthermore, the evidence available on the safety profile of some treatments in this context, and the management of these patients is scarce, which is why clinical practice guidelines with recommendations on the management of psoriasis in cancer patients are ambiguous. This study provides recommendations on the management and use of the therapies currently available for these patients. They are the result of a Delphi consensus reached by 45 dermatologists of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Psoriasis Working Group, and their goal is to help specialists in the field in their decision-making processes.

Integrated bioinformatics combined with machine learning to analyze shared biomarkers and pathways in psoriasis and cervical squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Psoriasis extends beyond its dermatological inflammatory manifestations, encompassing systemic inflammation. Existing studies have indicated a potential risk of cervical cancer among patients with psoriasis, suggesting a potential mechanism of co-morbidity. This study aims to explore the key genes, pathways, and immune cells that may link psoriasis and cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CESC).

Methods

The cervical squamous cell carcinoma dataset (GSE63514) was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Two psoriasis-related datasets (GSE13355 and GSE14905) were merged into one comprehensive dataset after removing batch effects. Differentially expressed genes were identified using Limma and co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and machine learning random forest algorithm (RF) was used to screen the hub genes. We analyzed relevant gene enrichment pathways using GO and KEGG, and immune cell infiltration in psoriasis and CESC samples using CIBERSORT. The miRNA-mRNA and TFs-mRNA regulatory networks were then constructed using Cytoscape, and the biomarkers for psoriasis and CESC were determined. Potential drug targets were obtained from the cMAP database, and biomarker expression levels in hela and psoriatic cell models were quantified by RT-qPCR.

Results

In this study, we identified 27 key genes associated with psoriasis and cervical squamous cell carcinoma. NCAPH, UHRF1, CDCA2, CENPN and MELK were identified as hub genes using the Random Forest machine learning algorithm. Chromosome mitotic region segregation, nucleotide binding and DNA methylation are the major enrichment pathways for common DEGs in the mitotic cell cycle. Then we analyzed immune cell infiltration in psoriasis and cervical squamous cell carcinoma samples using CIBERSORT. Meanwhile, we used the cMAP database to identify ten small molecule compounds that interact with the central gene as drug candidates for treatment. By analyzing miRNA-mRNA and TFs-mRNA regulatory networks, we identified three miRNAs and nine transcription factors closely associated with five key genes and validated their expression in external validation datasets and clinical samples. Finally, we examined the diagnostic effects with ROC curves, and performed experimental validation in hela and psoriatic cell models.

Conclusions

We identified five biomarkers, NCAPH, UHRF1, CDCA2, CENPN, and MELK, which may play important roles in the common pathogenesis of psoriasis and cervical squamous cell carcinoma, furthermore predict potential therapeutic agents. These findings open up new perspectives for the diagnosis and treatment of psoriasis and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

Biological Therapy for Psoriasis in Cancer Patients: An 8-Year Retrospective Real-Life Study

Background: It is now recognized that psoriasis plays a key role in the development of several comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome. Some authors have hypothesized that patients with psoriasis may have an increased risk of developing certain types of cancer. The efficacy and safety of biologic drugs are well-documented in clinical trials and in real-life studies. However, there is limited evidence on the safety of the use of biologic treatments in cancer patients with psoriasis, and the use of this therapeutic class in patients with a pre-existing or concomitant malignancy is still debated. Methods: We have conducted a retrospective observational study of a group of oncology patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with biologic therapy at the Dermatology Clinic of the University of Naples Federico II, during the period from 2016 to 2024. We included 20 adult patients; in 15 of them the diagnosis of neoplasm preceded the start of treatment biologic, while four of these patients had been diagnosed with cancer during the course of therapy biologics. Results: The most represented neoplasms in our population were breast carcinoma, prostate carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, and chronic lymphatic leukemia. Anti-IL17 drugs were the most frequently prescribed (47.7%), followed by anti-IL23p19 (36.8%), anti-IL-12/23 (10.5%) and anti-TNF alpha (5.26%). All patients showed improvement of psoriasis after starting the therapy. Conclusions: Our experience supports the effectiveness and safety of biological therapy for psoriasis in patients with a history of cancer or recent onset neoplasia.

Investigation of the causal relationship between breast cancer and autoimmune diseases: A bidirectional mendelian randomization study

A clear bidirectional relationship exists between malignant cancers including breast cancer and different autoimmune diseases. However, none of the studies have assessed whether this association is causal and none have used Mendelian randomization for determining this relationship. This study therefore investigated the causal relationship between autoimmune diseases and breast cancer using the Mendelian randomization approach. Summary statistical data were obtained from genome-wide association studies to investigate the causal relationship between different autoimmune diseases including Graves' disease, Sjögren's syndrome, Crohn disease, systemic sclerosis, and psoriasis and breast cancer risk. The results revealed no strong evidence to support the causal relationship between Graves disease (odds ratio [OR] = 0.9958; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9982-1.0035), Sjögren's syndrome (OR = 1.0018; 95% CI: 0.9950-1.0087), Crohn disease (OR = 2.1195, 95% CI: 0.1872-23.9978), systemic sclerosis (OR = 1.0024; 95% CI: 0.997-1.0079), and psoriasis (OR = 1.0016; 95% CI: 0.9913-1.0121) to breast cancer risk. A similar result was obtained in the reverse Mendelian randomization analysis. Our study provides evidence that autoimmune diseases might not have a causal relationship with breast cancer risk in the European population and concludes that shared genetic effects or environmental confounders.

Pan-cancer investigation of psoriasis-related BUB1B gene: genetical alteration and oncogenic immunology

Unknown factors contribute to psoriasis' hyperproliferative, chronic, inflammatory, and arthritic features. Psoriasis patients have been linked to an increased risk of cancer, though the underlying genetics remain unknown. Since our prior research indicated that BUB1B contributes to the development of psoriasis, we designed and carried out this investigation using bioinformatics analysis. Using the TCGA database, we investigated the oncogenic function of BUB1B in 33 tumor types. To sum up, our work sheds light on BUB1B's function in pan-cancer from various perspectives, including its pertinent signaling pathways, mutation locations, and connection to immune cell infiltration. BUB1B was shown to have a non-negligible role in pan-cancer, which is connected to immunology, cancer stemness, and genetic alterations in a variety of cancer types. BUB1B is highly expressed in a variety of cancers and may serve as a prognostic marker. This study is anticipated to offer molecular details on the elevated cancer risk that psoriasis sufferers experience.

Association between psoriasis and lung cancer: two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses

BACKGROUND

Observational studies reported an association between psoriasis and risk of lung cancer. However, whether psoriasis is causally associated with lung cancer is unclear.

METHODS

Genetic summary data of psoriasis were retrieved from two independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Genetic information of lung cancer was retrieved from GWAS of International Lung Cancer Consortium. A set of quality control steps were conducted to select instrumental tools. We performed two independent two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses and a meta-analysis based on the two independent MR estimates to assess the causal relationship between psoriasis and lung cancer (LUCA) as well as its subtypes, squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

RESULTS

Between-SNP heterogeneity was present for most MR analyses, whereas horizontal pleiotropy was not detected for all MR analyses. Multiplicative random-effect inverse variance weighted (IVW-MRE) method was therefore selected as the primary MR approach. Both IVW-MRE estimates from the two independent MR analyses suggested that there was no significant causal relationship between psoriasis and LUCA as well as its histological subtypes. Sensitivity analyses using other four MR methods gave similar results. Meta-analysis of the two IVW-MRE derived MR estimates yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 1.00 (95% CI 0.95-1.06) for LUCA, 1.01 (95% CI 0.93-1.08) for LUSC, and 0.97 (95% CI 0.90-1.06) for LUAD.

CONCLUSION

Our results do not support a genetic association between psoriasis and lung cancer and its subtypes. More population-based and experimental studies are warranted to further dissect the complex correlation between psoriasis and lung cancer.

Biologic treatment of psoriasis in oncologic patients

INTRODUCTION

There is a complex interplay between psoriasis and cancer, with therapeutic implications. Patients with psoriasis have an increased risk of developing several types of cancer, and safety concerns have arisen regarding biologic therapies and cancer. On the other hand, biologics can provide adequate control of psoriasis that appears or worsens as an immune-related adverse event following immune enhancing checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer, thus allowing prosecution of oncologic treatment without impairing its efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis under biological treatment and cancer who were treated at our Department between January 2009 and June 2022.

RESULTS

We included 31 adult patients with psoriasis and cancer; in 16 the diagnosis of cancer preceded the inception of biological treatment, and 9 of those patients were in remission. Most malignancies arose in the genitourinary system, followed by breast, hematologic, colorectal, thyroid, and others. Anti-IL23p19 biologics were most frequently used (36%), followed by anti-TNF (32%), anti-IL-17 (16%) and anti-IL-12/23 (16%) agents. All patients showed improvement of psoriasis after biologic initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologic treatment for moderate-severe psoriasis should be considered in oncologic patients since it is not formally contraindicated and is safe. Moreover, the efficacy and safety profile of IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors may be advantageous for those patients.

European recommendations for management of immune checkpoint inhibitors-derived dermatologic adverse events. The EADV task force 'Dermatology for cancer patients' position statement

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) opened a new era in oncologic therapy. The favourable profile of ICIs in terms of efficacy and safety can be overshadowed by the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Dermatologic irAEs (dirAEs) appear in about 40% of patients undergoing immunotherapy and mainly include maculopapular, psoriasiform, lichenoid and eczematous rashes, auto-immune bullous disorders, pigmentary disorders, pruritus, oral mucosal lesions, hair and nail changes, as well as a few rare and potentially life-threatening toxicities. The EADV task force Dermatology for Cancer Patients merged the clinical experience of the so-far published data, incorporated the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of each specific dirAEs, and released dermatology-derived, phenotype-specific treatment recommendations for cutaneous toxicities (including levels of evidence and grades of recommendation). The basic principle of management is that the interventions should be tailored to serve the equilibrium between patients' relief from the symptoms and signs of skin toxicity and the preservation of an unimpeded oncologic treatment.

Understanding the enigmatic association between mycosis fungoides and psoriasis: Report of two cases and review of the literature

Psoriatic patients present an increased risk for developing lymphoma, particularly cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). To what degree psoriasis itself through chronic immune stimulation, or the immunosuppressive medications used for its treatment or comorbidities (obesity, diabetes mellitus, etc), or lifestyle (smoking, alcohol, diet, etc) may play a role in the onset of MF is not yet clear. Psoriasis and Mycosis Fungoides (MF), the most common variant of CTCL, represent two distinct entities sharing common pathogenetic mechanisms and a wide spectrum of common clinical features associated with the abnormal activation of T-cells. The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between MF and psoriasis by presenting two cases with clinical and histopathologic features of both psoriasis and MF with a particular emphasis on the time of presentation of both disorders, the use of previous immunosuppressive drugs as well as the therapeutic management of patients. Biopsy of the cutaneous lesions before the introduction of biologics should be incorporated in clinical practice. Biopsy of the cutaneous lesion should also be performed in the case of appearance of psoriasiform lesions during biologic treatment for autoimmune disorders because this may represent an indolent form of MF. Psoriatic patients with poor or no-response to treatment should be examined thoroughly for MF using immunochemistry and, if necessary, molecular biology techniques. In concomitant MF and psoriasis, combination treatment may be beneficial for both entities. Finally, a large multicentric registry of MF patients who were treated for benign dermatoses (i.e. eczema, psoriasis) with classic immunosuppressive drugs and/or biologics is needed to collect data and further clarify the enigmatic relationship between psoriasis, MF and immunosuppressive treatment.

Risk of lymphohematologic malignancies in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between chronic plaque psoriasis and lymphohematologic malignancies (LHMs) remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk of LHMs in patients with psoriasis according to the best evidence.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies was undertaken to assess the association of psoriasis with different LHMs. A literature search for relevant studies was performed on February 28, 2021. The random-effects model in conducting meta-analyses was applied. To evaluate the risk of bias, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed.

RESULTS

A total of 25 observational studies were selected, comprising collectively 2,501,652 subjects. A significantly increased risk for LHM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 1.24-2.94) and lymphoma (HR, 1.27; 1.08-1.50) in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis compared to the general population was found. In detail, increased risks for Hodgkin lymphoma (HR, 1.71; 1.27-2.30), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR, 1.27; 1.08-1.50), multiple myeloma (HR, 1.32; 1.03-1.69), and leukemia (HR, 1.28; 1.00-1.65) were found. The risk of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma was markedly augmented in patients with psoriasis (HR, 6.22; 3.39-11.42).

LIMITATIONS

Possible ascertainment bias related to the diagnosis of LHMs.

CONCLUSION

The increased risk of LHMs, particularly cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, in patients with psoriasis could be related to exposure to systemic immunosuppressive therapies, comorbidities, and sustained immune activation, particularly in the skin.

Biological Therapies or Apremilast in the Treatment of Psoriasis in Patients with a History of Hematologic Malignancy: Results from a Retrospective Study in 21 Patients

Background

Few studies addressing the safety and efficacy of biological therapy (BT) or apremilast (APR) in patients with psoriasis with a history of hematologic malignancy (HM) exist.

Aim

To describe the tolerance and efficacy of BT and APR in moderate-to-severe psoriasis in patients with a history of in-remission or evolving HM.

Methodology

A retrospective, multicenter chart review of the tolerance and efficacy of BT or APR in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and a clinical history of in-remission or evolving HM.

Results

Twenty-one patients with severe psoriasis and a history of HM were included in France by the GEM Resopso study group. Of the 16 patients treated with one or more BT lines, none showed recurrence of their HM which was considered as stable or in remission, and only 2 patients showed an evolution of their HM which had been considered as stable at the beginning of treatment. In the 10 patients treated with APR, the HM of one patient who also received BT worsened. The 3 evolutions did not impact the treatment with BT or APR. Tolerance was very satisfactory, with a low occurrence of infections. Regarding efficacy, only one patient treated with APR did not achieve any notable clinical improvement.

Conclusion

Despite supportive data regarding tolerance, the heterogeneity of the analyzed population and limited available data, BT and APR should be used with caution in this patient population and investigations on larger cohorts should be conducted to further assess their tolerance in this patient population.

Erythroderma: psoriasis or lymphoma? A diagnostic challenge and therapeutic pitfall

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis and lymphoma risk is widely debated, but few is known about misdiagnosis risk between erythrodermic psoriasis and lymphoma . In fact erythroderma might represent a clinical presentation of psoriasis, cutaneous T cell lymphomas and skin dissemination of systemic lymphomas.

METHODS

All patients referred to psoriasis outpatient service with a diagnosis of erythrodermic psoriasis were re-examined. Among them, all the patients with a subsequent lymphoma diagnosis were included. For each patient data concerning age, gender, age at erythroderma onset, age at lymphoma diagnosis, immune-suppressive therapy, type of lymphoma and relative stage, lymphoma treatment and outcome were obtained.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (15 females and 10 males) with a diagnosis of erythrodermic psoriasis were retrieved. Among them, 9 patients (5 males and 4 females) were affected by erythrodermic lymphoma, including 4 patients with Sèzary syndrome, 3 with mycosis fungoides, and 2 with peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified. Prior to lymphoma diagnosis all the patients (9/9) received cyclosporine, two (2/9) of them methotrexate, one (1/9) azatioprine, and two (2/9) systemic corticosteroids. The prognosis of our patients was poor, due to immune-suppressive drugs administration in patients with undiagnosed lymphoma. The only exception was one (1/9) patient with Sèzary syndrome still alive with disease after 120 months of follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of patients with erythroderma, multiple skin biopsies and specific peripheral blood studies like flow cytometry and T-cell receptor gene rearrangement analysis are required in order to avoid misdiagnosis risk between psoriasis and lymphoma.

Immune checkpoint-mediated psoriasis: A multicenter European study of 115 patients from the European Network for Cutaneous Adverse Event to Oncologic Drugs (ENCADO) group

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-mediated psoriasis poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

OBJECTIVE

To report data on ICI-mediated psoriasis, emerging from the largest cohort to date, to our knowledge, and to propose a step-by-step management algorithm.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients with ICI-mediated psoriasis were retrospectively reviewed across 9 institutions.

RESULTS

We included a cohort of 115 individuals. Grade 1, 2, and 3 disease severity was reported in 60 of 105 (57.1%, 10 missing data), 34 of 105 (32.4%), and 11 of 105 (10.5%), respectively. The ratio between exacerbation and de novo cases was 1:4.3. The most common systemic therapy was acitretin (23 patients, 20.1%), followed by systemic steroids (8 patients, 7%), apremilast (7 patients, 6.1%), methotrexate (5 patients, 4.3%) and biologics (4 patients, 3.6%). Overall, 29 of 112 patients (25.9%) interrupted and 20 of 111 (18%) permanently discontinued ICIs because of psoriasis. Body surface area of greater than 10% at baseline had a 3.6 increased risk for ICI treatment modification (odds ratio, 3.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-10.45; P = .03) and a 6.4 increased risk for permanent discontinuation (odds ratio, 6.41; 95% confidence interval, 2.40-17.11; P < .001). Guttate psoriasis and grade 2 or 3 disease were significant positive predictors for antitumor response of ICI, whereas pruritus was a negative predictor.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSION

Acitretin, apremilast, and methotrexate are safe and effective modalities for ICI-mediated psoriasis. In most cases, ICI can be completed unhindered. A therapeutic algorithm is proposed.

Practical recommendations for systemic treatment in psoriasis in case of coexisting inflammatory, neurologic, infectious or malignant disorders (BETA-PSO: Belgian Evidence-based Treatment Advice in Psoriasis; part 2)

Background

Psoriasis patients carry an increased risk for associated comorbidities. Dermatologists have to be aware of the effects of systemic treatments not only on psoriasis but also on co‐occurring diseases. In case of other coexisting inflammatory diseases, the right psoriasis treatment may improve both disorders. For infectious and malignant disorders, some treatments have to be avoided as they may be harmful.

Objective

The primary objective of this project was to collect evidence for the creation of practice guidelines for systemic treatment of psoriasis (BETA‐PSO: Belgian Evidence‐based Treatment Advice in Psoriasis).

Methods

Evidence‐based recommendations were formulated using a quasi‐Delphi methodology after a systematic search of the literature and a consensus procedure involving eight psoriasis experts.

Results

Recommendations are given on the use of systemic treatment in psoriatic arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, demyelinating disorders, hepatitis B and C, HIV and cancer.

Conclusion

This expert opinion is a practical guide for dermatologists when handling psoriasis patients with these specific conditions.

Beyond skin deep: addressing comorbidities in psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease that is commonly encountered in primary care and is associated with significant morbidity that extends beyond the skin manifestations. Psoriasis is associated with an elevated risk of psoriatic arthritis, cardiovascular disease, obesity, insulin resistance, mental health disorders, certain types of malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease and other immune-related disorders, and hepatic and renal disease. Enhanced recognition of these comorbidities may lead to earlier diagnosis and potentially better overall health outcomes. Psoriatic nail involvement, severe skin disease and obesity are associated with a greater risk of psoriatic arthritis. Individuals with psoriasis should be routinely screened for psoriatic arthritis to allow for early intervention to improve long term prognosis. Life expectancy is reduced in people with psoriasis due to a variety of causes, with cardiovascular disease and malignancy being the most common aetiologies. Psoriasis affects several factors that contribute to worsened quality of life and increased risk of depression and anxiety. Effective therapies are now available that have been shown to concurrently improve skin disease, quality of life and psychiatric symptoms. As the concordance between psychosocial impact and objective disease severity does not always correlate, it is essential to tailor management strategies specifically to the needs of each individual. Cigarette smoking and excess alcohol consumption are among the most important modifiable risk factors that increase the likelihood of psoriasis development and severity of skin disease. This provides a compelling rationale for smoking cessation and limiting alcohol intake in people with psoriasis beyond their traditional harmful health consequences.

The unforeseen during biotechnological therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: How to manage pregnancy and breastfeeding, infections from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and HIV, surgery, vaccinations, diagnosis of malignancy, and dose tapering

The use of biotechnological therapies for moderate-to-severe psoriasis is ever-expanding and it is becoming increasingly more frequent to encounter different unforeseen events during their use, such as fertile patients becoming pregnant and breastfeeding, development of infections due to personal habits like tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, or HIV, scheduling of surgical procedures, need of vaccinations, development of malignancy, and evaluation of dose tapering. As any clinician may experience at least one of these unexpected events, it should be good practice to know how to manage them. Thus, a practical analysis has been proposed in this study.

Risk of mycosis fungoides in psoriatic patients: a critical review

Psoriasis has been controversially associated with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and mycosis fungoides (MF). Also patients who developed MF after systemic treatment for psoriasis have been reported, and some authors suggested that the association between MF and psoriasis is not infrequent. We performed an extensive literature review in order to examine the risk of developing MF in psoriatic patients with a systematic search of the English-language databases. An increased risk for lymphoma overall in psoriatic patients has been found only by three out of seven studies. The risk of developing MF in psoriatic patients has been investigated by different studies in different populations and with different methodologies presenting bias and limitations, and it seems reasonable that misclassification between psoriasis and MF may explain the association reported. In contrast to the large number of psoriatic patients treated with biologicals, only 27 case reports of MF after biological therapy for psoriasis have been reported, and in 10 cases, the initial psoriasis diagnoses were then revised as MF. A true association between MF and psoriasis is possible, but the real incidence and prevalence are still unknown. The reported higher risk of developing MF in psoriatic patients should be reconsidered in the light of the bias of misclassification and the low magnitude reported in previous studies. There is not enough evidence to support a causal relation among biological therapies and MF in psoriatic patients.

How lifestyle factors and their associated pathogenetic mechanisms impact psoriasis

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS

Psoriasis is a skin disorder affecting approximately 2-3% of the global population. While research has revealed a strong genetic component, there are few studies exploring the extent to which lifestyle factors influence psoriasis pathogenesis. The aim of this review was to describe the role of lifestyle factors as both a potential cause and treatment for psoriasis. The review also examines the underlying mechanisms through which these lifestyle factors may operate.

METHODS

This narrative review aims to incorporate current knowledge relating to both lifestyle and pathogenetic factors that contribute to and alleviate psoriasis presentation. Studies reporting the effect of an inflammatory diet and potential dietary benefits are reported, as well as insights into the effects of stress, smoking and alcohol, insulin resistance and exercise.

RESULTS

Poor nutrition and low Omega 3 fatty acid intake, likely combined with fat malabsorption caused by gut dysbiosis and systemic inflammation, are associated with psoriasis. The data strongly suggest that improvements to disease severity can be made through dietary and lifestyle interventions and increased physical activity. Less conclusive, although worthy of mention, is the beneficial effect of bile acid supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Lifestyle interventions are a promising treatment for psoriasis and its associated co-morbidities. However, gaps and inadequacies exist within the literature, e.g. methodology, absence of a unified scoring system, lack of controlled clinical data and lack of studies without simultaneous usage of biologics or alternative therapies. Future directions should focus on high quality cohort studies and clinical trials.