The landscape of vitiligo in Latin America: a call to action

Vitiligo is a chronic pigmentary condition and severely impacts patient quality of life (QoL). It is an underrecognized burden for patients, healthcare systems, and society in Latin America (LA). This paper examines the journey of a vitiligo patient in LA and assesses the disease landscape. Americas Health Foundation (AHF) assembled a panel of six Argentine, Brazilian, Colombian, and Mexican vitiligo experts. On 10-12 May 2022, they met in a virtual meeting. Each panelist wrote a short paper on barriers to vitiligo diagnosis and treatment in LA before the meeting. AHF staff moderated as the panel reviewed and modified each paper over three days. The panel approved the recommendations based on research, professional opinion, and personal experience. The panel agreed that lack of disease awareness and research, social ostracization, and limited therapeutic options hinder patients in their quest for diagnosis and treatment. In addition to the medical and psychological difficulties associated with vitiligo, problems connected to the Latin American healthcare system may negatively impact diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Access to timely diagnosis and treatment is crucial for improving outcomes. Governments, medical societies, academics, patient organizations, industry, and the public must unite to eliminate these challenges.

Understanding of Pathomechanisms and Clinical Practice for Vitiligo

Vitiligo is a disease caused by the acquired depletion of melanocytes and/or melanocyte precursor cells in response to genetic and environmental factors, resulting in depigmentation of the entire body. It is roughly divided into segmental and non-segmental vitiligo, and it has been found that abnormalities of melanocytes themselves and dysregulation of autoimmune responses to melanocytes are greatly involved in the pathology of non-segmental vitiligo. Segmental vitiligo pathology is largely unknown; however, it has been suggested that it may be caused by skin or melanocyte mosaicism. Treatments for vitiligo include topical therapy, ultraviolet therapy, and surgical transplantation, and it is extremely important to correctly understand the pathology to perform optimal treatment. In recent years, the development of vitiligo treatments using Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors has progressed rapidly. We herein outline the latest pathology of vitiligo, from general vitiligo treatment to the progress of clinical trials using JAK inhibitors, along with what clinicians should consider in archiving precision medicine, including my own ideas thereon.

Implementation of the vitiligo area scoring index in clinical studies of patients with vitiligo: a scoping review

The vitiligo area scoring index (VASI) is a validated, reliable clinician-reported outcome measure widely used to assess the extent of skin depigmentation seen in patients with vitiligo and to measure patient responses to therapies for vitiligo in clinical trials. However, its implementation in studies is inconsistent and makes comparing results across different studies difficult. The aim of this scoping review is to summarize interventional clinical studies that applied the VASI to measure vitiligo and identify variability in VASI implementation. A systematic search of Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. Interventional studies published between January 1946 and October 2020 that used the VASI as an outcome measure for assessing vitiligo response were reviewed for methodological approach. Great heterogeneity was found within the 55 included interventional studies that used VASI as an outcome measure. A total of 9 VASI subtypes were described by the authors within 10 intervention categories. VASI determined study eligibility in one study. Body surface area was most frequently established using inconsistent methods. We found unclear or ambiguously scaled assessments of depigmentation. Most VASI outcomes were reported as mean absolute difference, percentage VASI improvement, and percentage of patients who achieved the VASI endpoint. The VASI score was over 100 in one study. Our scoping review revealed many VASI methodology variations in interventional clinical studies of vitiligo. While VASI is a standard method to measure vitiligo changes, substantial heterogeneity in methodology limits reliable comparison and interpretation of findings from different clinical trials. Our findings may be used as a foundation to standardize the VASI outcome measure methodology, allowing for improved clinician training and rigorous data analysis across vitiligo research groups worldwide.

Reliability analysis of a novel measurement system for quantifying human skin color

Background

Precision is crucial in determining the appropriate procedure for implementing further trials. We conducted a study to explore the reliability of a novel measuring system for human skin color.

Methods

The novel skin color measuring system was used to capture the skin color of four volunteers (2 males and 2 females) from the same location on each subject by the same operator. The measurement was repeated for different poses and instrument factors (camera and shooting protocol) in the red, green, and blue (RGB) system. The average color depth in each image was calculated and converted from 0 to 255. The spread of measures and the Bland-Altman plot was displayed to determine each variance source's random error, with the interclass correlation coefficients applied to reflect the reliability.

Result

The RGB color depth in the experiment ranged from 190, 152, and 122 to 208, 170, and 142. The 95% confidential interval of the differences from the means in RGB colors for the different protocols were ±2.8, ±2.6, and ±2.1, respectively. The largest variation in the replicate trials was observed when subjects were in a supine position (standard deviation: 2). The interclass correlation coefficients were greater than 90%, suggesting that the developed system is highly precise.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that the developed device could stably and reliably detect human skin color across different common sources of variation, and thus could be applied clinically to explore relationships between health/disease and skin color changes.

Vitiligo International Task force for an Agreed List of core data (VITAL): study protocol of a vitiligo core outcome set (COS) and contextual factors for clinical trials, registries, and clinical practice

Background

There is a lack of consensus related to the collection of standardized data for individuals with vitiligo enrolled in clinical trials and registries as well as those seen in clinical practice which causes difficulty in accurately interpreting, comparing, and pooling of data.

Several years ago, efforts to initiate work on developing core outcome sets were performed and a consensus was reached in 2015 on the first core domain set for vitiligo clinical trials.

Methods/design

This project aims to further develop a core outcome set for vitiligo clinical trials as well as create internationally agreed-upon core outcome sets for registries and clinical practice. These core outcome sets will include a core domain set and a core measurement instruments set and will be supplemented by contextual factors, including baseline and treatment-related characteristics. In a preparatory exercise, the 2015 core domain set will be re-evaluated and will serve as the basis for the list of outcome domains used to initiate the consensus process. This project will consist of two parts. Part 1 will focus on the selection of a core domain set, or “what to measure” and contextual factors, for each setting based on electronic surveys (e-Delphi technique) and a conclusive consensus meeting by a large group of international stakeholders. Part 2 will include selection of core measurement instruments, or “how to measure,” and measurement details (e.g., scale and timing) for the core domain sets and contextual factors agreed upon in part 1. Part 2 will be based on consensus meetings with stakeholders involved in part 1 and will be guided by C3 (CHORD-COUSIN Collaboration), Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME), COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) recommendations including information on measurement properties of available instruments (systematic review and expert/patient opinion). At the end of part 2, all stakeholders involved will be invited to participate in a final meeting in which the ultimate core data sets (core outcome sets and contextual factors) will be presented and the dissemination plan and implementation goals will be defined.

Discussion

This project will harmonize data collection between clinical trials, registries, and clinical practices, facilitating new insights in vitiligo.

Trial registration

This study is registered in the Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database and on the C3 (CHORD-COUSIN Collaboration) website.

Measurement instruments for the core outcome set of congenital melanocytic naevi and an assessment of the measurement properties according to COSMIN: a systematic review

Background

Congenital melanocytic naevi (CMN) can impact on patients' lives due to their appearance and the risk they carry of neurological complications or melanoma development. The development of a core outcome set (COS) will allow standardised reporting and enable comparison of outcomes. This will help to improve guidelines. In previous research, relevant stakeholders reached a consensus over which core outcomes should be measured in any future care or research. The next step of the COS development is to select the appropriate measurement instruments.

Aim

Step 1: to update a systematic review identifying all core outcomes and measurement instruments available for CMN. Step 2: to evaluate the measurement properties of the instruments for the core outcomes.

Methods

This study was registered in PROSPERO and performed according to the PRISMA checklist. Step 1 includes a literature search in EMBASE (Ovid), PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify core outcomes and instruments previously used in research of CMN. Step 2 yields a systematic search for studies on the measurement properties of instruments that were either developed or validated for CMN, including a methodological quality assessment following the COSMIN methodology.

Results

Step 1 included twenty-nine studies. Step 2 yielded two studies, investigating two quality of life measurement instruments.

Conclusion

Step 1 provided an overview of outcomes and instruments used for CMN. Step 2 showed that additional research on measurement properties is needed to evaluate which instruments can be used for the COS of CMN. This study informs the instrument selection and/or development of new instruments.

Oral mini-pulse therapy in vitiligo: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence supporting the use of alternative treatments for patients with nonstable vitiligo.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review the effects of oral mini-pulse (OMP) therapy in the management of nonsegmental vitiligo.

METHODS

The following databases were searched between inception and May 2020 for relevant studies: Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Embase. All randomized controlled trials that compared OMP therapy with any other active treatment or placebo for nonstable vitiligo were included. The Cochrane's risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias (ROB) in selected studies, and the overall quality of evidence of each outcome was assessed using the Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

Four studies met our selection criteria. All of them were conducted in India and included 246 patients. OMP therapy included betamethasone or dexamethasone. The duration of treatment was 6 months in all studies. Up to 32% of patients achieved a repigmentation rate of >75% when OMP therapy was administered as monotherapy. No difference was observed between OMP therapy and other treatments in arresting the disease, and weight gain was the most frequent adverse effect. The overall ROB in all included studies was relatively high because of the randomization process, outcome measurement and informed selection of outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of these studies, OMP therapy did not demonstrate additional value compared with other treatments. Hence, there is an urgent need to conduct high-quality clinical trials to evaluate this therapy.

Development and Validation of a New Scoring Tool to Evaluate the Clinical Evolution of Adult Patients with Nonsegmental Vitiligo

BACKGROUND

Vitiligo has an unpredictable course and a variable response to treatment. Furthermore, the improvement of some vitiligo lesions cannot be considered a guarantee of a similar response to the other lesions. Instruments for patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) can be an alternative to measure complex constructions such as clinical evolution.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to validate a PROM that allows to measure the clinical evolution of patients with nonsegmental vitiligo in a simple but standardized way that serves to gather information for a better understanding of the disease.

METHODS

The instrument was created through expert consensus and patient participation. For the validation study, a prospective cohort design was performed. The body surface area affected was measured with the Vitiligo Extension Score (VES), the extension, the stage, and the spread by the evaluation of the Vitiligo European Task Force assessment (VETFa). Reliability was determined with test-retest, construct validity through hypothesis testing, discriminative capacity with extreme groups, and response capacity by comparing initial and final measurements.

RESULTS

Eighteen semi-structured interviews and 7 cognitive interviews were conducted, and 4 dermatologists were consulted. The instrument Clinical Evolution-Vitiligo (CV-6) was answered by 119 patients with a minimum of primary schooling. A wide range was observed in the affected body surface; incident and prevalent cases were included. The average time to answer the CV-6 was 3.08 ± 0.58 min. In the test-retest (n = 53), an intraclass correlation coefficient was obtained: 0.896 (95% CI 0.82-0.94; p < 0.001). In extreme groups, the mean score was 2 (2-3) and 5 (4-6); p < 0.001. The initial CV-6 score was different from the final one and the change was verified with VES and VETFa (p < 0.05, n = 92).

CONCLUSIONS

The CV-6 instrument allows patient collaboration, it is simple and brief, and it makes it easier for the doctor to focus attention on injuries that present changes at the time of medical consultation.