A retrospective review of UVA1 treatment: An Australian experience from a single centre

Clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation of ultraviolet A1 treatment in early-stage mycosis fungoides

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas primarily involving the skin. Early-stage MF is characterised by non-specific skin lesions and non-diagnostic biopsies. While skin-focused treatments, such as PUVA and narrowband UVB (nbUVB), are the most frequently recommended treatments, the UVA1 efficacy has been researched in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical aspects of UVA1 treatment in patients with early-stage MF.

METHODS

The modified severity weighted assessment scale (mSWAT) was used for total skin body scoring before and after treatment. Skin punch biopsies were taken from the patients before and after treatment. UVA1 therapy was performed five times each week.

RESULTS

This study included 26 patients with early-stage MF. The total number of UVA1 sessions varied between 15 and 34. Complete response was observed in 8 (30.8%) of 26 patients (30.8%). The median mSWAT score decreased statistically significantly from 7.1 to 2.0 after treatment (p < .001). Histopathological complete response was observed in 2 (9.5%) of 21 patients. A statistically significant decrease in dermal interstitial infiltrate was observed on histopathological examination after treatment (p = .039). Epidermal CD4/CD8 levels decreased statistically significantly higher from a median of 2.5-1.2 in the complete clinical response group after treatment (p = .043).

CONCLUSION

According to our results, UVA1 treatment has an effect on early-stage MF in terms of clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemistry.

Efficacy of ultraviolet A1 phototherapy for inflammatory, sclerotic and neoplastic dermatological diseases: A 10-year tertiary referral center experience

BACKGROUND

Ultraviolet (UV) A1 phototherapy is considered a beneficial treatment for various inflammatory, sclerotic, malignant, and other skin conditions. However, the available data regarding its efficacy for different indications, the potential side effects, and the recommended treatment protocols are sparse.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of UVA1 phototherapy and identify correlation between different indications and treatment protocols to response rates.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of a cohort of 335 patients treated with UVA1 phototherapy at the Department of Dermatology at Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel, between 2008 and 2018.

RESULTS

The study population included 163 patients with inflammatory diseases (mainly atopic dermatitis and other types of eczema), 67 patients with sclerotic diseases (morphea and graft versus host disease), nine patients with neoplastic diseases (cutaneous T cell lymphoma), and 188 patients with other cutaneous disorders. Response rates ranged between 85% and 89% across indications, without differences in response rates among the indication groups (p = .941). In a multivariant logistic regression model, increased number of treatments and higher maximal dosages were associated with response to treatment (p < .001). Using ROC analysis, a cut-off of 8 UVA1 phototherapy treatments was chosen as predictive for beneficial response (86.4% sensitivity, 78% specificity). A cut-off of 40 J/cm² was chosen as an optimal maximal dosage for differentiating between responders and non-responders (51.1% sensitivity, 83.1% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

UVA1 phototherapy is an effective treatment for a variety of skin conditions. In most patients, at least eight treatments of a medium-high dosage are required for clinical response.

Efficacy and Satisfaction of Low Doses UVA1 Phototherapy: A Spanish Experience from a Single Centre

Background: UVA1 phototherapy is a treatment used for multiple dermatological conditions. The optimal therapeutic regimens and dosing of UVA1 are a matter of debate. The dosages used vary widely between published studies and there are no evidence-based protocols that provide data on dosage, duration, or the role of maintenance therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the experience in our medical center regarding treatment with UVA1, as well as the degree of patient satisfaction with the treatment according to their pathology. Methods: We present a retrospective evaluation of outcomes, treatment tolerability, and satisfaction in adult patients using a low dose of UVA1 phototherapy, administered in our dermatologic service between 2019 and 2022. Results: A total of 78 patients were treated with UVA1, of whom 46 patients (59%) were over 18 years old, completed treatment, and gave their consent. The overall objective clinical response rate was 91.30% (42/46), achieving a complete response in 17 (36.96%) patients, partial response in 25 (54.34%), and no response in 4 (8.70%). The complete response rates recorded were high in morphea, scleredema, or chronic hand eczema. In terms of the level of satisfaction objectively measured by TSQM-9 version 1.4, highlighting high scores obtained in mastocytosis, systemic sclerosis, morphea, scleredema, chronic hand eczema, or prurigo nodularis (over 65 points). Conclusions: We present a review of treatment with UVA1 phototherapy at low doses with good response in a wide variety of dermatological pathologies.

Light- and laser-based treatments for granuloma annulare: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Granuloma annulare (GA) is challenging to treat, especially when generalized. A systematic review to support the use of light- and laser-based treatments for GA is lacking.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review by searching Cochrane, MEDLINE, and Embase. Title, abstract, full-text screening, and data extraction were done in duplicate. Quality appraisal was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for case series.

RESULTS

Thirty-one case series met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 336 patients. Overall, psoralen ultraviolet light A (PUVA) showed the greatest frequency of cases with complete response (59%, n = 77/131), followed by photodynamic therapy (PDT) (52%, n = 13/25), ultraviolet light B (UVB)/narrowband UVB (nbUVB)/excimer laser (40%, n = 19/47), UVA1 (31%, n = 27/86), and lasers (29%, n = 8/28). Overall across treatment modalities, higher response rates were seen in localized GA compared to generalized GA.

CONCLUSIONS

The body of evidence for light- and laser-based treatment of GA is sparse. Our results suggest that PUVA has a high clearance rate for GA but its use may be limited by concerns of carcinogenesis. Although PDT has the second highest clearance rate, adverse effects, small sample sizes, impractical treatment delivery (especially with generalized disease), and long-term concerns of carcinogenesis may limit its use. Although UVB/nbUVB/excimer laser appeared slightly less effective than other light therapies, we recommend UVB/nbUVB/excimer laser therapy as a first-line treatment for patients with generalized GA given wider availability and a favorable long-term safety profile.

Utility of phototherapy in patients with systemic sclerosis: systematic review

Phototherapy is a recommended treatment regimen for different scleroderma spectrum disorders, but so far it has been included neither by European nor by worldwide experts committee in recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of the study was to revisit the utility of dermatological phototherapy in patients with SSc. PubMed using medical subject headings was searched to identify studies evaluating response to dermatological phototherapy in SSc patients. Both UVA1 (340-400 nm) and PUVA (psoralen plus UVA) treatments were found to reduce skin thickening and increase skin elasticity, therefore allowing for the improvement of joint tension mobility, especially in hands. At least several papers showed efficacy of phototherapy in patients who remained non-responsive to previous immunosuppressive therapies. The most probable mechanisms of action of phototherapy in SSc include inhibition of T-cells and prevention from dermal fibrosis. Although most data on the efficacy of phototherapy come from small experimental studies and case reports, phototherapy based on UVA of wavelength manifests relatively mild spectrum of side effects and this should be considered as a treatment option for SSc with dominant cutaneous involvement. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Granuloma Annulare: An Updated Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Treatment Options

Granuloma annulare (GA) is an inflammatory granulomatous skin disease that can be localized (localized GA) or disseminated (generalized GA), with patch, perforating, and subcutaneous subtypes being less common variants of this benign condition. Recently, new research has emerged that further elucidates GA epidemiology and etiopathogenesis; importantly, new therapeutic options for GA have also been described, although there remains a paucity of randomized controlled studies. In this review, we summarize recent updates on GA epidemiology and etiopathogenesis and offer an updated review of the therapeutic options for GA currently reported in the literature. We hope that the current review galvanizes randomized controlled studies that will in turn help lead to the recommendation of evidence-based treatments for GA.