Quality of life impact and treatment response in vulval disease: Comparison of 3 common conditions using the Vulval Quality of Life Index

The efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib compared to methotrexate, in patients with vulvar lichen planus who have failed topical therapy with potent corticosteroids: a study protocol for a single-centre double-blinded randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Vulvar lichen planus (VLP) is a chronic vulvar dermatosis that is difficult to treat and can severely impair quality of life in the absence of adequate treatment. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to direct therapy for VLP. This randomised controlled trial will be the first double-blinded study comparing systemic treatments in VLP and aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of deucravacitinib compared to methotrexate, in patients with VLP who have failed treatment with potent topical corticosteroids.

METHODS

A total of 116 women aged ≥ 18 years with moderate to severe VLP (Genital Erosive Lichen Planus (GELP) score ≥ 5) will be recruited. All participants will initially be treated with Diprosone® OV daily, and their outcome will be assessed using the GELP score. At 8 weeks' follow-up, responders (GELP < 5) will be continued on Diprosone® OV. Non-responders (GELP ≥ 5) will be randomised 1:1 in a blinded fashion to receive (i) methotrexate 10 mg weekly + placebo tablet twice daily + folic acid 5 mg weekly or (ii) deucravacitinib 6 mg twice daily + placebo tablet weekly + folic acid 5 mg weekly. The primary endpoint is the difference in the mean change of GELP scores from baseline to week 32 between deucravacitinib and methotrexate groups.

DISCUSSION

High-quality evidence guiding the management of women with VLP is lacking. Once completed, this will be the first double-blinded RCT to compare systemic treatments in VLP. The results of this study will provide valuable, high-quality data to guide second-line therapy options for VLP that is recalcitrant to potent topical corticosteroids.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12623000682640. Registered on 26 June 2023.

The impact of genital lichen sclerosus in men and women on quality of life: a prospective cohort study

Background

Genital lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that affects both sexes of all ages. The clinical characteristics include erosions, redness, and white plaques with atrophic skin, with symptoms such as pruritus, pain, dysuria, and dyspareunia.

Objective

This prospective cohort study aimed to assess quality of life (QoL) in men and women with genital LS, both before and after treatment, using the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) questionnaire.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with genital LS were enrolled continuously in the study and were asked to complete the DLQI questionnaire before treatment and again after individualized treatment 12 weeks apart.

Results

This study included 136 patients (48 females and 88 males) diagnosed with genital LS, with a median age of 62 years (range 18-86). The results showed a statistically significant decrease (P < .001) in DLQI score before treatment (median 6.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.0-11.0]) compared to after treatment (median 2.0 [IQR, 0.0-4.0)]. In males and females, the median DLQI scores before treatment were 3.0 (IQR, 0.0-10.0) and 8.0 (IQR, 4.5-11.5), respectively, and after treatment were 1.0 (IQR, 0.0-3.0) and 4.0 (IQR, 0.0-9.0), respectively. Females scored significantly higher (P < .001) than males.

Limitations

The study's limited generalizability stems from a small sample size of 136 patients, potentially restricting the application of findings to a broader population with genital lichen sclerosus. Additionally, the 12-week follow-up period may not adequately capture the long-term effects of interventions on quality of life. Reliance on self-reported data through the DLQI questionnaire introduces the possibility of bias, as participants may not accurately represent their symptoms and quality of life. The absence of a control group hinders the ability to attribute observed changes solely to the treatment, and the lack of detail on specific interventions makes it challenging to assess the effectiveness of individualized treatment approaches. The wide age range among participants (18-86 years) introduces potential confounding variables, as different age groups may respond differently to treatment.

Conclusion

The study findings confirmed that individuals with genital LS experience a small decline in QoL, as observed in both males and females. This study also highlights that effective management of genital LS can significantly improve QoL in both sexes.