Intrapartum Ultrasound Guidance to Make Safer Any Obstetric Intervention: Fetal Head Rotation, Assisted Vaginal Birth, Breech Delivery of the Second Twin

Intrapartum ultrasound (US) is more reliable than clinical assessment in determining parameters of crucial importance to optimize the management of labor including the position and station of the presenting part. Evidence from the literature supports the role of intrapartum US in predicting the outcome of labor in women diagnosed with slow progress during the first and second stage of labor, and randomized data have demonstrated that transabdominal US is far more accurate than digital examination in assessing fetal position before performing an instrumental delivery. Intrapartum US has also been shown to outperform the clinical skills in predicting the outcome and improving the technique of instrumental vaginal delivery. On this basis, some guidelines recommend intrapartum US to ascertain occiput position before performing an instrumental delivery. Manual rotation of occiput posterior position (MROP) and assisted breech delivery of the second twin are other obstetric interventions that can be performed during the second stage of labor with the support of intrapartum US. In this review article we summarize the existing evidence on the role of intrapartum US in assisting different types of obstetric intervention with the aim to improve their safety.

Do Birth Outcomes Predicted by Occipital Position Inform Definitions of Occiput Posterior and Occiput Transverse?

Fetal head position significantly influences birth outcomes, with higher rates of complications observed when the fetal head is in the Occiput Posterior (OP) position compared to Occiput Transverse (OT) or Occiput Anterior (OA) positions. There is no consensus in the current literature on the precise rotational point at which the fetal occiput shifts from posterior to transverse, reducing clarity in both scientific and clinical communication. Different studies employ varying definitions of these positions, which affects management decisions. This study aims to determine if a definable threshold exists between the directly posterior and directly transverse positions that correlates with different birth outcomes, thereby proposing a consistent and clinically useful definition for OP versus OT. We analyzed ultrasound data from 570 patients at full dilatation from five previous studies, correlating the angle of the fetal occiput (noted on a clock-face) with birth outcomes. Adverse outcomes were defined as cesarean delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery, significant postpartum hemorrhage (500 ml or more), obstetric anal sphincter injury, five-minute Apgar scores <7, arterial cord pH <7, base excess less than -12, or neonatal intensive care unit admission. The analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4. The study found a continuous relationship between the fetal occipital angle and adverse birth outcomes without a distinct threshold separating OP from OT positions. No clear inflection point was demonstrated in pregnancy outcomes between OT and OP. The relationship between the angle of occiput position and pregnancy outcomes was continuous: the closer the fetal head was to directly OP, the higher the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Given the lack of a clear cut-off and to improve consistency in future research, we recommend dividing the occiput position into four quadrants of 90 degrees each. This classification could standardize reporting and potentially improve clinical decision-making regarding fetal position during labor.

Manual rotation of occiput posterior or transverse positions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess the association between spontaneous vaginal delivery and manual rotation during labor for occiput posterior or transverse positions. Our secondary objective was to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

An electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials covered the period from January 2000 to September 2021, without language restrictions.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

The eligibility criteria included all randomized trials with singleton pregnancies at ≥37 weeks of gestation comparing the manual rotation groups with the control groups. The primary outcome was the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. Additional secondary outcomes were rate of occiput posterior position at delivery, operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, obstetrical anal sphincter injury, prolonged second stage of labor, shoulder dystocia, neonatal acidosis, and phototherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed according to types of position (occiput posterior or occiput transverse), techniques used (whole-hand or digital rotation), and parity (nulliparous or parous).

METHODS

The quality of each study was evaluated with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, known as RoB 2. The meta-analysis used random-effects models depending on their heterogeneity, and risks ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes.

RESULTS

Here, 7 of 384 studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected. They included 1402 women: 704 in the manual rotation groups and 698 in the control groups. Manual rotation was associated with a higher rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery: 64.9% vs 59.5% (risk ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.16; P=.005; 95% prediction interval, 0.90-1.32). This association was no longer significant after stratification by parity or technique used. Manual rotation was associated with spontaneous vaginal delivery only for the occiput posterior position (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.15). Furthermore, it was associated with a reduction in occiput posterior or transverse positions at delivery (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.87) and episiotomies (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.98). The groups did not differ significantly for cesarean deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries, or neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Manual rotation increased the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery.

The role of the angle of progression in the prediction of the outcome of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor

BACKGROUND

Occiput posterior position is the most frequent cephalic malposition, and its persistence at delivery is associated with a higher risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity. Diagnosis and management of occiput posterior position remain a clinical challenge. This is partly caused by our inability to predict fetuses who will spontaneously rotate into occiput anterior from those who will have persistent occiput posterior position. The angle of progression, measured with transperineal ultrasound, represents a reliable tool for the evaluation of fetal head station during labor. The relationship between the persistence of occiput posterior position and fetal head station in the second stage of labor has not been previously assessed.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the role of fetal head station, as measured by the angle of progression, in the prediction of persistent occiput posterior position and the mode of delivery in the second stage of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

We recruited a nonconsecutive series of women with posterior occiput position diagnosed by transabdominal ultrasound in the second stage of labor. For each woman, a transperineal ultrasound was performed to measure the angle of progression at rest. We compared the angle of progression between women who delivered fetuses in occiput anterior position and those with persistent occiput posterior position at delivery. Receiver operating characteristics curves were performed to evaluate the accuracy of the angle of progression in the prediction of persistent occiput posterior position. Finally, we performed a multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors of persistent occiput posterior position.

RESULTS

Overall, 63 women were included in the analysis. Among these, 39 women (62%) delivered in occiput anterior position, whereas 24 (38%) delivered in occiput posterior position (persistent occiput posterior position). The angle of progression was significantly narrower in the persistent occiput posterior position group than in women who delivered fetuses in occiput anterior position (118.3°±12.2° vs 127.5°±10.5°; P=.003). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.731 (95% confidence interval, 0.594-0.869) with an estimated best cutoff range of 121.5° (sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 67%). On logistic regression analysis, the angle of progression was found to be independently associated with persistence of occiput posterior position (odds ratio, 0.942; 95% confidence interval, 0.889-0.998; P=.04). Finally, women who underwent cesarean delivery had significantly narrower angle of progression than women who had a vaginal delivery (113.5°±8.1 vs 128.0°±10.7; P<.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the prediction of cesarean delivery was 0.866 (95% confidence interval, 0.761-0.972). At multivariable logistic regression analysis including the angle of progression, parity, and gestational age at delivery, the angle of progression was found to be the only independent predictor associated with cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.849; 95% confidence interval, 0.775-0.0930; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

In fetuses with occiput posterior at the beginning of the second stage of labor, narrower values of the angle of progression are associated with higher rates of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery and a higher risk of cesarean delivery.

A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic early manual rotation of the occiput posterior fetus at the beginning of the second stage vs expectant management

BACKGROUND

Women whose fetuses are in the occiput posterior head position at the time of delivery are known to have longer second stages of labor and more complicated deliveries including more operative deliveries (cesarean, forceps, or vacuum-assisted delivery) and more third- and fourth-degree lacerations than those whose fetuses are in the occiput anterior position.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that rotating the fetus at the start of the second stage might decrease these complications.

STUDY DESIGN

At Utah Valley Regional Medical Center, we randomized term (37 weeks or beyond), nulliparous patients with epidurals and a singleton fetus in the occiput posterior position to either attempted early manual rotation to occiput anterior or to a control group managed expectantly. The control group could later be rotated if indicated by the clinical setting. The primary outcome was the length of the second stage of labor. Dichotomous outcomes were compared utilizing the chi-square test, and continuous outcomes were compared utilizing the Student t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. The sample size estimate was for 64 patients to be randomized (32 in each group) to show a difference of 36 minutes of pushing time between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

We randomized 65 patients (33 to early manual rotation and 32 to control). When we examined a variety of baseline obstetrical characteristics, we found no statistically different values for the 2 groups. The early manual rotation group had a shorter median second stage of labor (65 minutes vs 82 minutes; P=.04).

CONCLUSION

Early manual rotation of the occiput posterior fetus led to a shorter second stage of labor in this small randomized trial. Future larger randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.

Persistent occiput posterior position outcomes following manual rotation: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Persistent occiput posterior position in labor is associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Prophylactic manual rotation from the occiput posterior position to the occiput anterior position in the second stage of labor is considered a safe and easy to perform procedure that in observational studies has shown promise as a method for preventing operative deliveries.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of prophylactic manual rotation in the management of occiput posterior position for preventing operative delivery. The hypothesis was that among women who are at least 37 weeks pregnant and whose baby is in the occiput posterior position early in the second stage of labor, manual rotation will reduce the rate of operative delivery compared with the "sham" rotation.

STUDY DESIGN

A double-blinded, parallel, superiority, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial in 4 tertiary hospitals was conducted in Australia. A total of 254 nulliparous and parous women with a term pregnancy and a baby in the occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor were randomly assigned to receive either a prophylactic manual rotation (n=127) or a sham rotation (n=127). The primary outcome was operative delivery (cesarean, forceps, or vacuum delivery). Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery, combined maternal mortality and serious morbidity, and combined perinatal mortality and serious morbidity. Analysis was by intention to treat. Proportions were compared using chi-square tests adjusted for stratification variables using the Mantel-Haenszel method or the Fisher exact test. Planned subgroup analyses by operator experience and by manual rotation technique (digital or whole-hand rotation) were performed.

RESULTS

Operative delivery occurred in 79 of 127 women (62%) assigned to prophylactic manual rotation and 90 of 127 women (71%) assigned to sham rotation (common risk difference, 12; 95% confidence interval, -1.7 to 26; P=.09). Among more experienced operators or investigators, operative delivery occurred in 46 of 74 women (62%) assigned to manual rotation and 52 of 71 women (73%) assigned to a sham rotation (common risk difference, 18; 95% confidence interval, -0.5 to 36; P=.07). Cesarean delivery occurred in 22 of 127 women (17%) in both groups. Instrumental delivery (forceps or vacuum) occurred in 57 of 127 women (45%) assigned to prophylactic manual rotation and 68 of 127 women (54%) assigned to sham rotation (common risk difference, 10; 95% confidence interval, -3.1 to 22; P=.14). There was no significant difference in the combined maternal and perinatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic manual rotation did not result in a reduction in the rate of operative delivery. Given manual rotation was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in operative delivery, more randomized trials are needed, as our trial might have been underpowered. In addition, further research is required to further explore the potential impact of operator or investigator experience.

Structured clinical examinations in labor: rekindling the craft of obstetrics

OBJECTIVES

Exact knowledge of fetal station and position is of paramount importance for reliable surveillance of labor progress and a prerequisite for safe operative vaginal procedures. Detailed clinical assessments are thoroughly described in old textbooks, but almost forgotten in contemporary obstetrics. Ultrasound is suggested as an objective diagnostic tool in active labor. Several publications have demonstrated a low correlation between ultrasound and clinical assessment of fetal head station and position, but the methods of clinical assessment in these studies are poorly described. We wanted to explore if a quality clinical assessment could perform better than clinical assessment in previous publications, by analyzing the correlation between a structured method of clinical assessment and intrapartum ultrasound.

METHODS

In all, 100 laboring women with cervical dilatation ≥7 cm were included in a prospective cohort study at Oslo University Hospital-Ullevål from October to December 2016. The study design was cross-sectional. Clinical examinations were performed by one special educated consultant (JKI), and transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound clips were recorded and examined by a blinded expert in intrapartum ultrasound (TME). Fetal position was classified as a clock face with 12 units (hourly divisions) and thereafter categorized as occiput anterior (OA), left occiput transverse (LOT), occiput posterior (OP), and right occiput transverse (ROT) positions. Fetal station was categorized clinically from -5 to +5 and measured with ultrasound as angle of progression (AoP) and head-perineum distance (HPD). AoP is the angle between a longitudinal line through the symphysis and a tangent to the head contour. HPD is the shortest distance between the fetal skull and the perineum.

RESULTS

Eight women were excluded due to strong contractions between clinical assessments and ultrasound measurements, fetal distress, or incomplete examinations. Fetal position assessed with ultrasound and clinical examination agreed exactly in 48/92 (52%) of cases, within one unit (hour) in 87/92 (95%) of cases and within two units in 90/92 (98%) of cases. It differed by three units in one case and by five units in one case. The agreement categorized into OA, LOT, OP, and ROT was good (Cohen's kappa 0.72; 95% CI 0.61-0.84). For station, the agreement was very good for both HPD (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.91) and AoP (r = 0.77; 95% CI to 0.67-0.84). The correlation between HPD and AoP was good (r = 0.76; 95% CI 0.65-0.84).

CONCLUSION

We found very good correlations between structured clinical assessments and ultrasound examinations, suggesting that an objective quality in clinical examinations is possible to achieve. More focus on clinical skills training may improve accuracy for clinicians.

[Manual rotation in occiput posterior position: A systematic review in 2019]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and the benefits of manual rotation in the management of Occiput-posterior positions in 2019.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was performed using the MEDLINE and COCHRANE LIBRARY databases, in order to identify articles concerning maternal and neonatal outcomes after a manual rotation, through January 2019. Information on study characteristics (review, author, year of publication), population, objectives and main neonatal and maternal outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 51 articles were identified and 12 articles were selected for the systematic review. The rate of successful manual rotation were about 47 to 90%. There were more success if systematic manual rotation, multiparity, engagement, spontaneous labour and maternal age<35. The 2nd stage of labour was shorter after an attempt of manual rotation. The randomised controlled trials did not find any statistical difference concerning operative deliveries or neonatal and maternal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The manual rotation is an obstetrical manoeuvre which must be regulated and only practiced by trained operators. Currently, the state of science is not sufficient to recommend the manual rotation as a systematic practice in 2019.

How well do women understand and remember information in labour versus in late pregnancy? A pilot randomised study

Medical informed consent is the process by which a 'competent', non-coerced individual receives sufficient information including risks of a medical procedure and gives permission for it to occur. The capacity to give an informed consent might be impaired during labour. This study aimed to examine women's abilities to understand and remember during labour. Women were prospectively recruited at 36 weeks of gestation and randomised to undertake questionnaires which assessed their ability to understand and remember information. They were randomised to: (1) information given in labour only, written format (2) information in labour, verbal (3) information at 36 weeks plus labour, written (4) information at 36 weeks plus labour, verbal. Immediate comprehension and retention was assessed at 36 weeks, in labour, and 24-72 hours after birth. Forty-nine women completed the questionnaires regarding understanding and retention of information at 36 weeks, six intrapartum, and five postpartum (90% attrition). Women receiving information at 36 weeks and in labour versus in labour had a higher comprehension of pregnancy-related information, its retention, and total score. Women receiving information in late pregnancy and labour may comprehend and retain it better than women only receiving information during labour. Given small sample size, further research is needed to support these preliminary findings. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? The evidence regarding the capacity of labouring women to give informed consent is largely based on women's self-reported experiences or expert opinions and has mixed findings. Existing guidelines recommend that an informed consent should be given antenatally for both clinical practice and research. Studies show that obtaining an informed consent antenatally is neither feasible nor widely implemented. What do the results of this study add? A novel approach to providing empirical evidence regarding women's capacity to comprehend and retain information during labour. Our study confirms the difficulty with antenatal recruitment for intrapartum research. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/further research? This raises ethical concerns regarding the current intrapartum research in which consent is largely sought at the time of the study. Emphasises the need to explore the question 'Do labouring women have the capacity to consent to research?' in order to ensure that women are protected during labour.

The role of manual rotation in avoiding and managing OVD

Manual rotation (MR) is the most common technique used by accoucheurs who wish to correct malposition of the foetal head to either avoid or facilitate an operative vaginal delivery (OVD). MR can be performed using either a whole-hand or a digital approach. MR should be formally taught and trainees should be assessed for competence, and later, performance should ideally be tracked with statistical control charts. There is paucity of robust evidence evaluating MR relative to the other methods of rotational OVD: rotational forceps (RF) and rotational ventouse (RV). Furthermore, there is little evidence concerning long-term maternal outcomes of rotational OVD. A prospective randomised trial of MR versus either RF or RV is clearly needed, along with a core outcome set for OVD to facilitate comprehensive evaluation programmes that focus on aspects pertaining to women.

[Which interventions during labour to decrease the risk of perineal tears? CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines]

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to evaluate whether interventions performed during labour could influence the risk of perineal tears.

METHODS

A separate keyword search for each medical intervention during labor was performed by selecting only studies evaluating perineal consequences, particularly the risk of obstetrical anal sphincter injury (LOSA). Interventions during pregnancy and during fetal expulsion have been specifically addressed in other chapters of the recommendations.

RESULTS

Maternal mobilisation and postures during the first stage of labour have not been shown to reduce the risk of OASIS (LE3). No particular posture has demonstrated its superiority over any other during the second stage of labour for preventing obstetric perineal lesions including OASIS and postnatal incontinence (urinary or faecal) (LE2). There is no reason to recommend one maternal posture rather than another during the first and the second stages of labour for the purpose of reducing the risk of OASIS (Grade C). Women should be allowed to choose the position most comfortable for them during the first and second stages of labour (Professional consensus). Posterior cephalic positions present the greatest risks of perineal injury (LE2). Manual rotation of cephalic posterior positions to the anterior during the second stage of labour may make it possible to reduce the risk of operative vaginal delivery, although no reduction in the risk of perineal injuries or OASIS has been clearly demonstrated (LE3). For fetuses in posterior cephalic positions, no data justifies a preference for manual rotation at full dilation to diminish the risk of perineal injury (Professional consensus). Urinary catheterisation is recommended for women with epidural analgesia during labour when spontaneous micturition is not possible (Professional consensus). Although current data does not justify a preference for continuous or intermittent urinary catheterisation (LE2), intermittent catheterisation nonetheless appears preferable in this situation (Professional consensus). During the second stage phase, delayed pushing does not modify the risk of OASIS (LE1). It does, however, increase the chances of spontaneous delivery (LE1). It is thus recommended that, when maternal and fetal status allow it, the start of pushing should be delayed (Grade A). There is no evidence to support preferring one pushing technique rather than another to diminish the risk of OASIS (grade B). Performing an operative vaginal delivery for the sole purpose of reducing the duration of the second stage of labour may increase the risk of OASIS (LE3). Perineal massage or the application of warm compresses during the second stage of labour appear to reduce the risk of OASIS (LE2). However, we have not made a determination about their use in clinical practice.

Sonographic evaluation of the fetal spine position and success rate of manual rotation of the fetus in occiput posterior position: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To evaluate whether sonographic (US) diagnosis of the fetal spine position could increase the success rate of manual rotation of the fetal occiput (MRFO) in second-stage arrest in persistent occiput posterior position (OPP).

METHODS

In this randomized controlled parallel single-center trial, 58 nulliparous in second-stage arrest of labor with fetus in cephalic presentation and OPP diagnosed by US were randomly assigned to group A where the fetal spine position was not known by the operator or to group B where the operator knew it. The main outcome was the success of MRFO in the two groups. Secondary outcomes were perineal injuries, blood loss, duration of expulsive period, and neonatal APGAR at 5 minutes.

RESULTS

A priori knowledge of the spine position improves the success of the MRFO (41.4% group A versus 82.8% group B, p value < 0.001), the percentage of spontaneous deliveries (27.6% group A versus 69% group B, p value = 0.01), and maternal outcome (intact perineum and blood loss). No differences were detected on the neonatal side.

CONCLUSIONS

MRFO is a safe and useful procedure that should be performed in second-stage arrest in OPP. A better performance was observed when supported by the US knowledge of the spine position. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 45:472-476, 2017.

Lateral asymmetric decubitus position for the rotation of occipito-posterior positions: multicenter randomized controlled trial EVADELA

BACKGROUND

Fetal occiput posterior positions are associated with poorer maternal outcomes than occiput anterior positions. Although methods that include instrumental and manual rotation can be used at the end of labor to promote the rotation of the fetal head, various maternal postures may also be performed from the beginning of labor in occiput posterior position. Such postures might facilitate flexion of the fetal head and favor its rotation into an occiput anterior position.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a lateral asymmetric decubitus posture facilitates the rotation of fetal occiput posterior into occiput anterior positions.

STUDY DESIGN

Evaluation of Decubitus Lateral Asymmetric posture was a multicenter randomized controlled trial that included 322 women from May 2013 through December 2014. Study participants were women who labored with ruptured membranes and a term fetus that was confirmed by ultrasound imaging to be in cephalic posterior position. Women who were assigned to the intervention group were asked to lie in a lateral asymmetric decubitus posture on the side opposite that of the fetal spine during the first hour and encouraged to maintain this position for as long as possible during the first stage of labor. In the control group, women adopted a dorsal recumbent posture during the first hour after random assignment. The primary outcome was occiput anterior position at 1 hour after random assignment. Secondary outcomes were occiput anterior position at complete dilation, mode of delivery, speed of dilation during the active first stage, maternal pain, and women's satisfaction.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty women were assigned to the intervention group, and 162 women were assigned to the control group. One hour after random assignment, the rates of occiput anterior position did not differ between the intervention and control groups (21.9% vs 21.6%, respectively; P=.887). Occiput anterior rates did not differ between groups at complete dilation (43.7% vs 43.2%, respectively; P=.565) or at birth (83.1% vs 86.4%, respectively; P=.436). Finally, the groups did not differ significantly for cesarean delivery rates (18.1% among women in lateral asymmetric decubitus and 14.2% among control subjects (P=0.608) or for speed of cervical dilation during the active first stage of labor (P=.684), pain assessment (P=.705), or women's satisfaction (P=.326). No maternal or neonatal adverse effect that was associated with either posture was observed.

CONCLUSION

Lateral asymmetric decubitus position on the side opposite that of the fetal spine did not facilitate rotation of fetal head. Nevertheless, other maternal positions may be effective in promoting fetal head rotation. Further research is needed; posturing during labor, nonetheless, should remain a woman's active choice.

Learning From Experience: Qualitative Analysis to Develop a Cognitive Task List for Kielland Forceps Deliveries

OBJECTIVE

Fetal malposition is a common indication for Caesarean section in the second stage of labour. Rotational (Kielland) forceps are a valuable tool in select situations for successful vaginal delivery; however, learning opportunities are scarce. Our aim was to identify the verbal and non-verbal components of performing a safe Kielland forceps delivery through filmed demonstrations by expert practitioners on models to develop a task list for training purposes.

METHODS

Labour and delivery nurses at three university-affiliated hospitals identified clinicians whom they considered skilled in Kielland forceps deliveries. These physicians gave consent and were filmed performing Kielland forceps deliveries on a model, describing their assessment and technique and sharing clinical pearls based on their experience. Two clinicians reviewed the videos independently and recorded verbal and non-verbal components of the assessment; thematic analysis was performed and a core task list was developed. The algorithm was circulated to participants to ensure consensus.

RESULTS

Eleven clinicians were identified; eight participated. Common themes were prevention of persistent malposition where possible, a thorough assessment to determine suitability for forceps delivery, roles of the multidisciplinary team, description of the Kielland forceps and technical aspects related to their use, the importance of communication with the parents and the team (including consent, debriefing, and documentation), and "red flags" that indicate the need to stop when safety criteria cannot be met.

CONCLUSION

Development of a cognitive task list, derived from years of experience with Kielland forceps deliveries by expert clinicians, provides an inclusive algorithm that may facilitate standardized resident training to enhance education in rotational forceps deliveries.

Prophylactic manual rotation for fetal malposition to reduce operative delivery

BACKGROUND

Manual rotation is commonly performed to increase the chances of normal vaginal delivery and is perceived to be safe. Manual rotation has the potential to prevent operative delivery and caesarean section, and reduce obstetric and neonatal complications.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of prophylactic manual rotation for women with malposition in labour on mode of delivery, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 October 2014), the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (all searched 23 February 2014), previous reviews and, references of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, quasi-randomised or cluster-randomised clinical trials comparing prophylactic manual rotation in labour for fetal malposition versus expectant management, augmentation of labour or operative delivery. We defined prophylactic manual rotation as rotation performed without immediate assisted delivery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility and quality, and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included only one small pilot study (involving 30 women). The study, which we considered to be at low risk of bias, was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital in Australia, and involved women with cephalic, singleton pregnancies. The primary outcome was operative delivery (instrumental delivery or caesarean section).In the manual rotation group, 13/15 women went on to have an instrumental delivery or caesarean section, whereas in the control group, 12/15 women had an operative delivery. The estimated risk ratio was 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.49). There were no maternal or fetal mortalities in either groupThere were no clear differences for any of the secondary maternal or neonatal outcomes reported (e.g. perineal trauma, analgesia use duration of labour).In terms of adverse events, there were no reported cases of umbilical cord prolapse or cervical laceration and a single case of a non-reassuring or pathological cardiotocograph during the procedure.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is insufficient evidence to determine the efficacy of prophylactic manual rotation early in the second stage of labour for prevention of operative delivery. One additional study is ongoing. Further appropriately designed trials are required to determine the efficacy of manual rotation.