Recommendations for the treatment of vulvar cancer in settings with limited resources: Report from the International Gynecological Cancer Society consensus meeting

Introduction

Due to scant literature and the absence of high-level evidence, the treatment of vulvar cancer is even more challenging in countries facing limited resources, where direct application of international guidelines is difficult. Recommendations from a panel of experts convened to address some of these challenges were developed.

Methods

The panel met in Rio de Janeiro in September 2019 during the International Gynecological Cancer Society congress and was composed of specialists from countries in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. The panel addressed 62 questions and provided recommendations for the management of early, locally advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic vulvar cancer. Consensus was defined as at least 75% of the voting members selecting a particular recommendation, whereas a majority vote was considered when one option garnered between 50.0% and 74.9% of votes. Resource limitation was defined as any issues limiting access to qualified surgeons, contemporary imaging or radiation-oncology techniques, antineoplastic drugs, or funding for the provision of contemporary medical care.

Results

Consensus was reached for nine of 62 (14.5%) questions presented to the panel, whereas a majority vote was reached for 29 (46.7%) additional questions. For the remaining questions, there was considerable heterogeneity in the recommendations.

Conclusion

The development of guidelines focusing on areas of the world facing more severe resource limitations may improve medical practice and patient care.

Recurrence patterns identify aggressive form of human papillomavirus-dependent vulvar cancer

BACKGROUND

Vulvar cancer is rare and, as a result, is understudied. Treatment is predominantly surgery, irrespective of the type of vulvar cancer, and is associated with physical, emotional and sexual complications. A cluster of human papillomavirus (HPV)-dependent vulvar cancer patients was identified in Arnhem Land Northern Territory (NT), Australia, in which young Indigenous women were diagnosed at 70 times the national incidence rate.

AIMS

To assess whether women from the Arnhem Land cluster differ from women with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) resident elsewhere in the NT in recurrence after treatment, disease progression and mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of NT-resident women diagnosed with VIN or invasive vulvar cancer (VSCC) between 1 January 1993 and 30 June 2015 was undertaken. Time to recurrence was assessed using cumulative incidence plots and Fine and Gray competing risk regression models. Mean cumulative count was used to estimate the burden of recurrent events.

RESULTS

Indigenous women from Arnhem Land experienced more recurrences after treatment than non-Indigenous women, the cancers recurred faster, and Indigenous women have worse survival at five years.

CONCLUSIONS

In characterising the epidemiological features of this cluster, we have identified a particularly aggressive form of vulvar cancer. This provides a unique opportunity for elucidating the aetiopathological pathways driving vulvar cancer development that may ultimately lead to preventive and therapeutic targets for this neglected malignancy. Further, these findings have important implications for clinical practice and HPV vaccination policy in the affected population.

Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma (VSCC) as Two Diseases: HPV Status Identifies Distinct Mutational Profiles Including Oncogenic Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3

Purpose: Patients with advanced or recurrent invasive vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) have limited treatment options and a grave prognosis. Understanding the genomic landscape may facilitate the identification of new therapies and improve clinical outcomes.Experimental Design: A retrospective chart review and molecular analysis of patients with VSCC from 2000 to 2016 was performed at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. The presence of oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) was determined by nested PCR and amplified DNA was sequenced using the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot v2 Panel. The patients were divided into two groups according to HPV status (HPV-positive versus HPV-negative) and clinical outcome correlated with mutation status using descriptive statistics.Results: In 43 VSCC patients, there was a high mutation rate in both HPV-positive (73%) and HPV-negative (90%) disease with the two subgroups expressing distinct genetic profiles. HPV-positive tumors were characterized by oncogenic mutations in PIK3CA (27%), FGFR3 (14%), and PTEN (9%), whereas HPV-negative tumors were found to have mutations in TP53 (57%), HRAS (24%), PI3KCA (19%), and CDKN2A (14%). Mutation S249C in FGFR3 occurred in 14% of HPV-positive tumors. While there were notable differences in the occurrence of TP53, HRAS, PTEN, and FGFR3 mutations according to HPV status, only the rate of TP53 mutations was statistically significant (P = 0.0004). No significant difference in prognosis was found between patients with HPV-positive and HPV-negative VSCC.Conclusions: HPV-positive VSCC is characterized by oncogenic FGFR3 mutations that helps classify this subtype as a separate disease. Inhibitors of FGFR3 merit consideration as a therapeutic strategy in this neglected cancer in women. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4501-10. ©2017 AACR.