The hepatitis B birth-dose immunisation: Exploring parental refusal

Improving On-time Administration of the Initial Hepatitis B Vaccine in the NICU

Introduction

Despite the updated American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for universal administration of the hepatitis B vaccine for newborns, delays in routine prophylaxis are common in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Delayed immunization can increase perinatal acquisition risks and lead to subsequent delays in routine childhood immunization. This study aimed to increase the on-time administration of the birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine from 46% to ≥70% at a level III and level IV NICU within the same health system.

Methods

The stakeholder group developed project interventions using quality improvement methods, including implementing unit guidelines and a prompt in the progress note template. The outcome measure was the percent on-time administration of the initial hepatitis B vaccine for inborn NICU patients born to hepatitis B-negative mothers. The process measure was the percent on-time administration or a valid reason to delay immunization following the guidelines. Statistical process control P-charts graphically represented the measures to assess for change from January 2019 to May 2021.

Results

In total, 2192 patients were included. The percent on-time administration improved from 48% to 57%. The percentage of on-time administration or valid reason to delay increased from 76% to 80%.

Conclusions

Quality improvement methodology facilitated the identification of barriers to on-time hepatitis B prophylaxis in the NICU and the improvement of the timeliness of administration across 2 sites. Guidelines tailored to this population and changes to the progress note template successfully created and sustained change and may benefit other NICUs.

Hepatitis B birth dose vaccination for newborns in Uganda: A qualitative inquiry on pregnant women's perceptions, barriers and preferences

BACKGROUND

Sub-Saharan Africa continues with very low hepatitis B (HBV) birth dose vaccination coverage. To guide policy on HBV vaccine for newborns, we explored perceptions, barriers and preferences of pregnant women regarding HBV and the HBV birth dose vaccination.

METHODS

We conducted eight focus groups discussions (FGDs) among 70 pregnant women, stratified by rural-urban residence, age and education level, using a structured focus group discussion guide to explore birth dose awareness, perceptions, barriers and preferences. Data were transcribed, coded and analysed using framework analysis.

RESULTS

Perceptions related to HBV and liver cancer causes and prevention were diverse; most FGD participants did not perceive illnesses as distinctly different. Older women-groups, both urban and rural, had never heard about HBV, but were aware of liver cancer, viewing the disease as fatal. No FGD participants were aware of HBV birth dose. Concerns included vaccine safety, its availability to women who deliver outside the health system and mistrust in health-care worker (HCWs) when handling newborns. Rural-dwelling groups perceived absence of HBV services, while FGDs with young participants believed vaccine side-effects hampered birth dose planning. Most women-groups preferred (i) oral to injectable vaccines; (ii) receiving birth dose education during antenatal, to media-based education; (iii) that newborns receive the birth dose immediately after delivery in the mother's presence.

CONCLUSION

Although the birth dose is acceptable among pregnant women, planners need to continuously engage them as key stakeholders during planning to address concerns, in order to raise confidence, maximize uptake and strengthen HBV eradication efforts.

Hepatitis B birth dose vaccination patterns in the military health System, 2014-2018

BACKGROUND

Since 2005, the universal hepatitis B (HepB) birth dose has been recommended for all medically stable infants weighing ≥2,000 g at birth. The timing of the birth dose provides a critical safeguard and prevents infection among infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers not identified prenatally. We assess infant HepB vaccination in the U.S. Department of Defense's Military Health System (MHS) to identify trends in vaccination coverage and sociodemographic factors associated with non-receipt of the birth dose, receiving the first HepB vaccine >3 days of life, and not receiving any HepB vaccine in the first 18 months of life utilizing parental refusal codes. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies assessing trends in parental refusal of the HepB birth dose utilizing administrative claims parental refusal codes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of MHS live births from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2018 utilizing administrative claims data. Data were included from 44 hospitals in 24 unique states, territories, or countries. We analyzed diagnosis codes for vaccine refusal and vaccination and current procedural terminology (CPT) codes to identify vaccination patterns. Generalized linear mixed effects models with a logit link were used to assess factors associated with vaccination patterns.

RESULTS

HepB birth dose vaccination coverage increased from 79.6% in 2014 to 88.1% in 2018 (p < .0001). Refusal rates also increased from 3.7% in 2014 to 4.5% in 2018 (p < .0001). The percentage of patients with missing diagnosis codes for vaccine refusal or vaccination decreased from 16.7% in 2014 to 7.4% in 2018. Factors associated with non-receipt of the birth dose included earlier year of birth, white maternal race, higher maternal age, higher birth order, and longer infant length of stay in hospital.

CONCLUSION

Vaccination coverage for HepB birth dose is high in the MHS and increased over time; concurrently, refusal rates also increased over time. Utilizing administrative claims data has the benefit of differentiating reasons for non-receipt of the birth dose over time.