Fertility preservation in oncology patients: A literature review examining current fertility preservation techniques and access to oncofertility services in Australia

Current Status of Fertility Preservation in Pediatric Oncology Patients

Cancer poses significant emotional challenges for children and adolescents, despite improvements in survival rates due to new therapies. However, there is growing concern about the long-term effects, including fertility issues. This review examines recent advancements and future directions in fertility preservation within a pediatric population subjected to oncological therapies. Worldwide, there is variability in the availability of fertility preservation methods, influenced by factors like development status and governmental support. The decision to pursue preservation depends on the risk of gonadotoxicity, alongside factors such as diagnosis, treatment, clinical status, and prognosis. Currently, options for preserving fertility in prepubertal boys are limited compared to girls, who increasingly have access to ovarian tissue preservation. Adolescents and adults have more options available, but ethical considerations remain complex and diverse.

Evaluating Maybe Later Baby, a Fertility Information Resource for Adolescents and Young Adults Diagnosed with Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study

Purpose: Fertility is a major concern for adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15-30 years) diagnosed with cancer, yet they often report a lack of information and understanding about fertility impacts and preservation options. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of Maybe Later Baby (MLB), an oncofertility information resource for AYAs diagnosed with cancer. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 13 participants received MLB alone and 10 received an augmented intervention involving an additional consultation with a health care professional (HCP). Pre- and postintervention surveys and interviews explored participants' well-being, fertility knowledge, health literacy, and experiences using the resource. Results: Participants indicated that the resource was accessible and understandable and provided valuable information without increasing distress. When averaged across conditions, functional health literacy (p = 0.006) and oncofertility knowledge (p = 0.002) increased, although there were no significant changes in fertility-related emotions (p > 0.05), and quality of life decreased (p = 0.014). While qualitative accounts suggested that HCP consultations were useful and validated participants' experiences and concerns, participants receiving the augmented intervention became more nervous/fearful about fertility treatment (p = 0.005). There were no other differences in outcomes between conditions. Conclusions: Young people diagnosed with cancer want and value information about oncofertility and resources such as MLB are acceptable and useful means of providing this information. This could be supplemented by clinical discussion to ensure that tailored situation-specific information is provided and understood and patient distress is appropriately managed. Clinical Trial Registration number: 12615000624583.

Fertility preservation in gynaecology oncology patients: Experience from an Australian tertiary oncology centre

BACKGROUND

Management for gynaecological cancers often includes removal of the reproductive organs and/or the use of gonadotoxic therapies resulting in sub-fertility. Oncofertility and discussion of fertility preservation in these patients is critical.

AIM

To determine the rate of fertility preservation discussion among a cohort of patients with a gynaecological cancer and what determinants impact likelihood of a discussion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A seven-year quantitative retrospective study was conducted at a single oncology centre, including 15-45 year old patients with a gynaecological cancer. The primary outcome was if a fertility preservation discussion occurred during a consultation. Secondary outcomes included if a referral was made and what fertility preservation services were undertaken. Determinants that impacted the likelihood of a fertility preservation discussion were analysed.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-one patients were analysed. There were 84 (69%) patients who had a documented fertility preservation discussion, and 46% were referred to a fertility specialist for consultation. Age was a significant determinant, with patients aged 30-39 years of age more commonly having a fertility preservation discussion. Patients with a high-grade cancer compared to patients with a lower-grade cancer (grade one or two) were only a third as likely to have a discussion surrounding their fertility (odds ratio: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13-0.86; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that rates of discussion around fertility options for patients with cancer are lower than the recommended guidelines. Oncofertility is an important discipline which we believe needs to be emphasised within the gynaecology oncology community and management of patients should include a multi-disciplinary team.

The Australian Youth Cancer Service: Developing and Monitoring the Activity of Nationally Coordinated Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Care

Adolescents and young adults (aged 15-25 years) diagnosed with cancer have unique medical and psychosocial experiences and care needs, distinct from those of paediatric and older adult patients. Since 2011, the Australian Youth Cancer Services have provided developmentally appropriate, multidisciplinary and comprehensive care to these young patients, facilitated by national service coordination and activity data collection and monitoring. This paper reports on how the Youth Cancer Services have conceptualised and delivered quality youth cancer care in four priority areas: clinical trial participation, oncofertility, psychosocial care and survivorship. National activity data collected by the Youth Cancer Services between 2016-17 and 2019-20 are used to illustrate how service monitoring processes have facilitated improvements in coordination and accountability across multiple indicators of quality youth cancer care, including clinical trial participation, access to fertility information and preservation, psychosocial screening and care and the transition from active treatment to survivorship. Accounts of both service delivery and monitoring and evaluation processes within the Australian Youth Cancer Services provide an exemplar of how coordinated initiatives may be employed to deliver, monitor and improve quality cancer care for adolescents and young adults.

Oocyte Biobanks: Old Assumptions and New Challenges

The preservation of fertility is a clinical issue that has been emerging considerably in recent decades, as the number of patients of childbearing age who risk becoming infertile for many reasons is increasing. The cryopreservation technique of oocytes has been developed for many years and nowadays constitutes a method of safe storage with impressive efficacy and high rates of successful thawing. The storage and use for research of oocytes taken for medical or non-medical can be carried out by both public and private structures, through egg sharing, voluntary egg donation and so-called “social freezing” for autologous use. This paper focuses on the oocyte bank as an emerging cryopreservation facility, in which a collaboration between public and private and the creation of a network of these biobanks can be useful in enhancing both their implementation and their functions. Good oocyte biobank practice would require that they be collected, stored, and used according to appropriate bioethical and bio-law criteria, collected and stored according to procedures that guarantee the best preservation of their structural components and a high level of safety, connected with appropriate procedures to protect the rights and privacy of the parties involved and associated with the results of the bio-molecular investigations that will be carried out gradually.