Pre-operative classification of molar pregnancy: How good is ultrasound?

Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Complete versus Partial Hydatidiform Moles

Hydatidiform moles, including both complete and partial moles, constitute a subset of gestational trophoblastic diseases characterized by abnormal fertilization resulting in villous hydrops and trophoblastic hyperplasia with or without embryonic development. This involves chromosomal abnormalities, where one or two sperms fertilize an empty oocyte (complete hydatidiform mole (CHM); mostly 46,XX) or two sperms fertilize one oocyte (partial hydatidiform mole (PHM); mostly 69,XXY). Notably, recurrent occurrences are associated with abnormal genomic imprinting of maternal effect genes such as NLRP7 (chromosome 19q13.4) and KHDC3L (chromosome 6q1). Ongoing efforts to enhance identification methods have led to the identification of growth-specific markers, including p57 (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C; CDKN1C), which shows intact nuclear expression in the villous cytotrophoblast and villous stromal cells in PHMs and loss of expression in CHMs. Treatment of hydatidiform moles includes dilation and curettage for uterine evacuation of the molar pregnancy followed by surveillance of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels to confirm disease resolution and rule out the development of any gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. In this review, we provide a synopsis of the existing literature on hydatidiform moles, their diagnosis, histopathologic features, and management.

Predicting Acute Appendicitis in Pregnant Patients Using the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio: A Meta-Analysis

Background: To determine whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can serve as a predictive indicator for acute appendicitis among pregnant females. Patients and Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science seeking to gather pertinent research on the NLR concerning pregnant individuals either suspected of or diagnosed with acute appendicitis. The NLR value and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were utilized to assess the predictive value of the NLR in predicting acute appendicitis among pregnant patients. Results: Seven studies and 410 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) for identifying acute appendicitis in pregnant patients using the NLR was found to be 0.856 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.833-0.879). Additionally, the NLR values for pregnant patients with acute appendicitis were significantly elevated, showing a mean difference (MD) of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.58-1.03; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The NLR can be considered a valuable and effective diagnostic tool for anticipating acute appendicitis in pregnant patients.

Changes in diagnostic sensitivity, incidence and presentation of complete and partial hydatidiform mole over the years

OBJECTIVE

Molar pregnancy is the most common type of gestational trophoblastic disease. Several recent reports have described changes in the clinical representation, the incidence and the diagnostic sensitivity of molar pregnancy. These changes could be due to widespread use of transvaginal ultrasound and beta-hCG testing in the management of routine first-trimester investigations.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study of 144 women diagnosed with partial or complete mole at a regional medical center during 2007-2020. Incidence, demographics, clinical features and diagnostic sensitivity were compared between 2007 and 2014 and 2015-2020, and attempts were made to understand the bases of the changes between the time periods.

RESULTS

Sixty-two moles were diagnosed during 2007-2014 and 82 during 2015-2020. The proportions of complete moles in the respective periods were 65% (40) and 18% (15). From the earlier to the later period, the incidence and proportion of complete moles decreased, and of partial moles, increased. The median gestational age at diagnosis of molar pregnancy was 9.3 weeks. In the later period, women presented less frequently with vaginal bleeding, though this remained the most common presenting symptom. The proportion of women who underwent surgical evacuation of the uterus due to suspected molar pregnancy decreased, as did the proportion of moles that was suspected in ultrasound evaluation (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of complete moles decreased between the periods examined. Gestational age at diagnosis was similar to data from 1994 to 2013. Some typical presenting symptoms of molar pregnancy decreased. However, earlier diagnosis of missed abortion can miss diagnoses of molar pregnancy.

The diagnostic value and accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing hydatidiform mole: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Hydatidiform moles are the most common type of gestational trophoblastic disease. Internationally the incidence of hydatidiform moles is 1-2:1000 pregnancies. Early detection of women with hydatidiform moles is preferential, as these women are at a higher risk of developing other gestational trophoblastic disease. Despite Ultrasound being the most common modality used to diagnose hydatidiform moles, its diagnostic value and accuracy throughout all trimesters remains uncertain. Thus, the aim of this review was to explore and evaluate the diagnostic value and accuracy of Ultrasound in diagnosing hydatidiform mole throughout all trimesters of pregnancy.

METHODS

The databases MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched between 2004 and 2021. Included studies were quality assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies were included. The narrative synthesis identified four themes: Misdiagnosis, Complete and Partial molar pregnancy, Operator dependency and Gestational age. The meta-analysis highlighted although the sensitivity of ultrasound for diagnosing hydatidiform moles is relatively low at 52.2%, the specificity was high at 92.6%.

CONCLUSION

While histological examination remains the gold standard for detecting hydatidiform moles, our review made evident that ultrasound is a beneficial diagnostic tool in the detection of Hydatidiform moles, especially alongside other diagnostic investigations. This review has highlighted and collated the main barriers and facilitators to diagnosing hydatidiform moles using ultrasound.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Findings suggest that although sonographic detection of hydatidiform moles remains a diagnostic challenge, seeking a second opinion or repeating scans before making a final diagnosis should be embedded into clinical practice.