Evidence-based update on Australasian pharmaceutical prescribing approaches for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis

Interplay of the microbiome and antifungal therapy in recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC): A narrative review

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) is a microbial, immune and sexual health disorder impacting up to 10 % of the adult female population. Fluconazole is a well-established antifungal drug commonly utilized for acute and long-term RVVC treatment. This insight review provides an overview of known vaginal and gastrointestinal microbiota characteristics in RVVC, presents the potential impacts of fluconazole therapy on multi-microbiome relationships and discusses implications for future research and clinical practice. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and molecular methods to accurately define vaginal microbiota trends in RVVC are not comprehensively available, limiting understanding of microbiota roles in RVVC. Inconsistencies and variances in Lactobacillus profiles in RVVC women suggest poorly understood disease implications on the bacterial and fungal microbiomes. Investigations of environmental conditions like vaginal pH, drug therapy's impact, especially fluconazole maintenance therapy, and the elucidation of multi-microbiome relationships in RVVC are required to further investigate disease pathogenesis and responsible antimicrobial prescribing.

Intravaginal Combination Therapy of Acetic and Lactic Acid in premenopausal women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled feasibility trial

BACKGROUND

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis management primarily entails azole therapy used as required or as an extended daily or weekly maintenance therapy for 6 months or more. Unfortunately, relapse within 3-6 months of ceasing maintenance therapy is experienced for more than half the patients, for whom indefinite treatment is required.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the feasibility of trial design examining a prophylaxis treatment to prevent recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis symptomatic episodes and reduce adverse effects.

STUDY DESIGN

A double-blinded randomized controlled feasibility trial was conducted in Australia. Women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis were enrolled.

METHODS

An intravaginal prophylaxis application of lactic acid and acetic acid (Intravaginal Combination Therapy of Acetic and Lactic Acid) was compared with placebo. Primary outcomes comprised recruitment and retention, compliance to study medications and study assessments. Secondary outcomes included the reduction of symptomatic recurrence over the trial period and the acceptability, satisfaction, safety and tolerability of the intervention. The feasibility of quality-of-life measures was also explored.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants were enrolled and randomized (active = 9, placebo = 6). Consent rate was 23.4%. Eight participants were lost to follow-up (active = 5, placebo = 3). Forty-seven per cent of participants (n = 7) were 100% compliant with the intervention, six of which completed the trial with good assessment compliance. The blinding process was effective. The study demonstrated a reduction in relapse in both active and placebo groups with only four participants across both groups reporting symptomatic episodes while enrolled. The intervention demonstrated good tolerability. Quality-of-life data showed minimal variance with a high quality-of-life measure.

CONCLUSION

This trial assesses the feasibility of conducting a large-scale study exploring the efficacy of the Intravaginal Combination Therapy of Acetic and Lactic Acid intravaginal intervention and hints on the importance of psychological support through appropriate disease-specific communication and clinical attention. Consideration of the reported recruitment challenges, the inclusion of suitable quality-of-life measures and digital data collection is warranted for adaptation to a fully powered trial.

Lived experience of medical management in recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a qualitative study of an uncertain journey

Background

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) is experienced by up to 10% of pre-menopausal women globally, yet there is limited research exploring the perspective of women living with this challenging condition.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with Australian women experiencing RVVC were conducted between April–July 2021. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and qualitative interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was conducted.

Results

Ten RVVC patients were interviewed. IPA revealed an uncertain journey living with RVVC for all participants ranging from initial symptoms and difficulties in obtaining a diagnosis, the trial and error of symptom management, to the overall debilitating impact of living with a personal and intimate health condition. Four key themes were identified: Theme 1 outlined challenges and delays in diagnosis and clinically appropriate management. Theme 2 found that health care professional (HCP) knowledge limitations impacted RVVC management. Theme 3 illustrated the consequences of a lack of HCP support leading to self-referral and self-education. Theme 4 details the significant emotional and psycho-social repercussions of RVVC.

Conclusions

This debilitating, life-long disease has a prolonged effect on women both physically and psychologically. Living with RVVC seems an uncertain journey that, to a large degree, women feel they must navigate alone. While resilience and self-empowerment were noted, better support through evidence-based treatment options, educated and evidence-informed HCPs and a sympathetic social support network is needed to decrease the disease burden. Future clinical management guidelines and patient support need to consider the findings of this study.

Management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis: Narrative review of the literature and European expert panel opinion

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis (RVVC) is a chronic, difficult to treat vaginal infection, caused by Candida species, which affects women of all ages and ethnic and social background. A long-term prophylactic maintenance regimen with antifungals is often necessary. In most clinical practice guidelines, oral fluconazole is recommended as the first-line treatment. Although clinical resistance to antifungal agents remains rare, overexposure to azoles may increase the development of fluconazole-resistant C. albicans strains. In addition, non-albicans Candida species are frequently dose-dependent susceptible or resistant to fluconazole and other azoles, and their prevalence is rising. Available therapeutic options to treat such fluconazole-resistant C. albicans and low susceptibility non-albicans strains are limited. Ten experts from different European countries discussed problematic issues of current RVVC diagnosis and treatment in two audiotaped online sessions and two electronic follow-up rounds. A total of 340 statements were transcribed, summarized, and compared with published evidence. The profile of patients with RVVC, their care pathways, current therapeutic needs, and potential value of novel drugs were addressed. Correct diagnosis, right treatment choice, and patient education to obtain adherence to therapy regimens are crucial for successful RVVC treatment. As therapeutic options are limited, innovative strategies are required. Well- tolerated and effective new drugs with an optimized mechanism of action are desirable and are discussed. Research into the impact of RVVC and treatments on health-related quality of life and sex life is also needed.