1
|
Jonkman I, Jacobs MME, Negishi Y, Yanginlar C, Martens JHA, Baltissen M, Vermeulen M, van den Hoogen MWF, Baas M, van der Vlag J, Fayad ZA, Teunissen AJP, Madsen JC, Ochando J, Joosten LAB, Netea MG, Mulder WJM, Mhlanga MM, Hilbrands LB, Rother N, Duivenvoorden R. Trained immunity suppression determines kidney allograft survival. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00492-1. [PMID: 39147201 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 08/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
The innate immune system plays an essential role in regulating the immune responses to kidney transplantation, but the mechanisms through which innate immune cells influence long-term graft survival are unclear. The current study highlights the vital role of trained immunity in kidney allograft survival. Trained immunity describes the epigenetic and metabolic changes that innate immune cells undergo following an initial stimulus, allowing them have a stronger inflammatory response to subsequent stimuli. We stimulated healthy peripheral blood mononuclear cells with pretransplant and posttransplant serum of kidney transplant patients and immunosuppressive drugs in an in vitro trained immunity assay and measured tumor necrosis factor and interleukin 6 cytokine levels in the supernatant as a readout for trained immunity. We show that the serum of kidney transplant recipients collected 1 week after transplantation can suppress trained immunity. Importantly, we found that kidney transplant recipients whose serum most strongly suppressed trained immunity rarely experienced graft loss. This suppressive effect of posttransplant serum is likely mediated by previously unreported effects of immunosuppressive drugs. Our findings provide mechanistic insights into the role of innate immunity in kidney allograft survival, uncovering trained immunity as a potential therapeutic target for improving graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Jonkman
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike M E Jacobs
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yutaka Negishi
- Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Oncode Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cansu Yanginlar
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost H A Martens
- Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Oncode Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke Baltissen
- Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Oncode Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Vermeulen
- Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Oncode Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W F van den Hoogen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johan van der Vlag
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Zahi A Fayad
- Department of Radiology, Biomolecular Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Abraham J P Teunissen
- Department of Radiology, Biomolecular Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joren C Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jordi Ochando
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Transplant Immunology Unit, National Center of Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Leo A B Joosten
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Genetics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iuliu Haţieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Mihai G Netea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Immunology and Metabolism, Life and Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Willem J M Mulder
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Musa M Mhlanga
- Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Oncode Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nils Rother
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Raphaël Duivenvoorden
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Biomolecular Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vo A, Ammerman N, Jordan SC. New Therapies for Highly Sensitized Patients on the Waiting List. KIDNEY360 2024; 5:1207-1225. [PMID: 38995690 PMCID: PMC11371354 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000000000000509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
Exposure to HLA alloantigens through pregnancy, blood products, and previous transplantations induce powerful immunologic responses that create an immunologic barrier to successful transplantation. This is commonly detected through screening for HLA antibodies using Luminex beads coated with HLA antigens at transplant evaluation. Currently accepted approaches to desensitization include plasmapheresis/low-dose or high-dose intravenous Ig plus anti-CD20. However, these approaches are often unsuccessful because of the inability to remove high titer circulating HLA antibodies and limit rebound responses by long-lived anti-HLA antibody secreting plasma cells (PCs) and memory B cells (B MEM ). This is especially significant for patients with a calculated panel reactive antibody of 99%-100%. Newer desensitization approaches, such as imlifidase (IgG endopeptidase), rapidly inactivate IgG molecules and create an antibody-free zone by cleaving IgG into F(ab'2) and Fc fragments, thus eliminating complement and cell-mediated injury to the graft. This represents an important advancement in desensitization. However, the efficacy of imlifidase is limited by pathogenic antibody rebound, increasing the potential for antibody-mediated rejection. Controlling antibody rebound requires new strategies that address the issues of antibody depletion and inhibition of B MEM and PC responses. This will likely require a combination of agents that effectively and rapidly deplete pathogenic antibodies and prevent immune cell activation pathways responsible for antibody rebound. Here, using anti-IL-6 receptor (tocilizumab) or anti-IL-6 (clazakizumab) could offer long-term control of B MEM and PC donor-specific HLA antibody responses. Agents aimed at eliminating long-lived PCs (anti-CD38 and anti-B-cell maturation antigen×CD3) are likely to benefit highly HLA sensitized patients. Complement inhibitors and novel agents aimed at inhibiting Fc neonatal receptor IgG recycling will be important in desensitization. Administering these agents alone or in combination will advance our ability to effectively desensitize patients and maintain durable suppression post-transplant. After many years of limited options, advanced therapeutics will likely improve efficacy of desensitization and improve access to kidney transplantation for highly HLA sensitized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Vo
- Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Furian L, Bestard O, Budde K, Cozzi E, Diekmann F, Mamode N, Naesens M, Pengel LHM, Schwartz Sorensen S, Vistoli F, Thaunat O. European Consensus on the Management of Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Delphi Study. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12475. [PMID: 38665475 PMCID: PMC11043529 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
An increasing number of sensitized patients awaiting transplantation face limited options, leading to fatalities during dialysis and higher costs. The absence of established evidence highlights the need for collaborative consensus. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-triggered antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly contributes to kidney graft failure, especially in sensitized patients. The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) launched the ENGAGE initiative, categorizing sensitized candidates by AMR risk to improve patient care. A systematic review assessed induction and maintenance regimens as well as antibody removal strategies, with statements subjected to the Delphi methodology. A Likert-scale survey was distributed to 53 European experts (Nephrologists, Transplant surgeons and Immunologists) with experience in kidney transplant recipient care. A rate ≥75% with the same answer was considered consensus. Consensus was achieved in 95.3% of statements. While most recommendations aligned, two statements related to complement inhibitors for AMR prophylaxis lacked consensus. The ENGAGE consensus presents contemporary recommendations for desensitization and immunomodulation strategies, grounded in predefined risk categories. The adoption of tailored, patient-specific measures is anticipated to streamline the care of sensitized recipients undergoing renal allografts. While this approach holds the promise of enhancing transplant accessibility and fostering long-term success in transplantation outcomes, its efficacy will need to be assessed through dedicated studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Emanuele Cozzi
- Transplant Immunology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Experimental Nephrology and Transplant Laboratory, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Liset H. M. Pengel
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Soren Schwartz Sorensen
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Biothecnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vo A, Ammerman N, Jordan SC. Advances in desensitization for human leukocyte antigen incompatible kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:104-120. [PMID: 38088373 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization is a major barrier to kidney transplantation induced by exposure to alloantigens through pregnancy, blood product exposure and previous transplantations. Desensitization strategies are undertaken to improve the chances of finding compatible organ offers. Standard approaches to desensitization include the use of plasmapheresis/low dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or high dose IVIG plus anti-CD20. However, current methods to reduce HLA antibodies are not always successful, especially in those with calculated panel reactive antibody 99-100%. RECENT FINDINGS Newer desensitization strategies such as imlifidase [immunoglobulin G (IgG) endopeptidase] rapidly inactivates IgG molecules and creates an "antibody-free zone", representing an important advancement in desensitization. However, pathogenic antibodies rebound, increasing allograft injury that is not addressed by imlifidase. Here, use of anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab) or anti-interleukin-6 (clazakizumab) could offer long-term control of B-memory and plasma cell DSA responses to limit graft injury. Agents aimed at long-lived plasma cells (anti-CD38 and anti-BCMAxCD3) could reduce or eliminate HLA-producing plasma cells from marrow niches. Other agents such as complement inhibitors and novel agents inhibiting the Fc neonatal receptor (FcRn) mediated IgG recycling will likely find important roles in desensitization. SUMMARY Use of these agents alone or in combination will likely improve the efficacy and durability of desensitization therapies, improving access to kidney transplantation for immunologically disadvantaged patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Vo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu L, Ji X, Zhu P, Yang L, Shi J, Zhao Y, Lai X, Yu J, Fu H, Ye Y, Wu Y, Ying J, Huang H, Luo Y. Double filtration plasmapheresis combined with rituximab for donor-specific antibody desensitization in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2023; 203:829-839. [PMID: 37621146 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT). Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) avoids the unnecessary loss of plasma proteins and increases the efficiency of purification. To investigate the effectiveness of the desensitization protocol including DFPP and rituximab, we conducted a nested case-control study. Thirty-three patients who had positive DSA were desensitized by the protocol and 99 patients with negative DSA were randomly matched as control. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity values before and after DFPP treatment were 7505.88 ± 4424.38 versus 2013.29 ± 4067.22 (p < 0.001). All patients in DSA group achieved haematopoietic reconstitution and the median neutrophils and platelets engraftment times were 13 (10-21) and 13 (10-29) days respectively. Although the cumulative incidence of II-IV aGVHD (41.4% vs. 28.1%) and 3-year moderate to severe cGVHD (16.8% vs. 7.2%) were higher in DSA cohort than in the control, no statistical significance was observed. The 3-year non-relapse mortality and the overall survival were 6.39% and 72.0%, respectively, in the DSA cohort, which were comparable to the negative control. In conclusion, DFPP and rituximab could be effectively used for desensitization and overcome the negative effects of DSA in Haplo-HSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lizhen Liu
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xinyu Ji
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Panpan Zhu
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Luxin Yang
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jimin Shi
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yanmin Zhao
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyu Lai
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jian Yu
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Huarui Fu
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yishan Ye
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yibo Wu
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jinping Ying
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - He Huang
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Luo
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chiang CY, Chen CH, Feng JY, Chiang YJ, Huang WC, Lin YJ, Huang YW, Wu HH, Lee PH, Lee MC, Shu CC, Wang HH, Wang JY, Wu MY, Lee CY, Wu MS. Prevention and management of tuberculosis in solid organ transplantation: A consensus statement of the transplantation society of Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 2023; 122:976-985. [PMID: 37183074 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Solid organ transplant recipients have an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB). Due to the use of immunosuppressants, the incidence of TB among solid organ transplant recipients has been consistently reported to be higher than that among the general population. TB frequently develops within the first year after transplantation when a high level of immunosuppression is maintained. Extrapulmonary TB and disseminated TB account for a substantial proportion of TB among solid organ transplant recipients. Treatment of TB among recipients is complicated by the drug-drug interactions between anti-TB drugs and immunosuppressants. TB is associated with an increased risk of graft rejection, graft failure and mortality. Detection and management of latent TB infection among solid organ transplant candidates and recipients have been recommended. However, strategy to mitigate the risk of TB among solid organ transplant recipients has not yet been established in Taiwan. To address the challenges of TB among solid organ transplant recipients, a working group of the Transplantation Society of Taiwan was established. The working group searched literatures on TB among solid organ transplant recipients as well as guidelines and recommendations, and proposed interventions to strengthen TB prevention and care among solid organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Yuan Chiang
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hsu Chen
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jia-Yih Feng
- Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yang-Jen Chiang
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Organ Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chang Huang
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan; Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Mycobacteria Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Ph.D. Program in Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Medical Technology, Jen-Teh Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Miaoli, Taiwan
| | - Yih-Jyh Lin
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan; College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Wen Huang
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit, Changhua Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Hsu Wu
- Kidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Pin-Hui Lee
- Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Che Lee
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; TMU Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Chung Shu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Han Wang
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Organ Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Jann-Yuan Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Yi Wu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Yuan Lee
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mai-Szu Wu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mohamadou I, Matignon M, Malard S, Lombardi Y, Buob D, Moktefi A, Jamme M, Ouali N, Rafat C, François H, Petit-Hoang C, Rondeau E, Mesnard L, Grimbert P, Taupin JL, Luque Y. Additional Benefits of Rituximab and Plasma Exchange on Top of Standard Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients With a Negative CDC Crossmatch but High Preformed Donor Specific Antibody Titer. Transpl Int 2023; 36:10844. [PMID: 37056357 PMCID: PMC10088221 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.10844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Optimal induction strategy in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is still a matter of debate. The place of therapies, such as plasma exchange and rituximab, with potential side effects and high cost, is not clearly established. We compared two induction strategies with (intensive) or without (standard) rituximab and plasma exchange in KTRs with high levels of preformed DSA transplanted between 2012 and 2019. Sixty KTRs with a mean age of 52.2 ± 12.2 years were included, 36 receiving standard and 24 intensive induction. Mean fluorescence intensity of immunodominant DSA in the cohort was 8,903 ± 5,469 pre-transplantation and similar in both groups. DSA level decrease was similar at 3 and 12 months after transplantation in the two groups. An intensive induction strategy was not associated with better graft or patient survival, nor more infectious complications. The proportion of patients with rejection during the first year was similar (33% in each group), but rejection occurred later in the intensive group (211 ± 188 days, vs. 79 ± 158 days in the standard group, p < 0.01). Our study suggests that an intensive induction therapy including rituximab and plasma exchanges in highly sensitized kidney recipients is not associated with better graft survival but may delay biopsy-proven rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inna Mohamadou
- Service de Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- INSERM U1155 Des Maladies Rénales Rares Aux Maladies Fréquentes, Remodelage Et Réparation, Paris, France
- *Correspondence: Inna Mohamadou,
| | - Marie Matignon
- Service de Néphrologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
- INSERM U955 Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Créteil, France
| | - Stéphanie Malard
- Laboratoire d’Immunologie et d’Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Yannis Lombardi
- Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - David Buob
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- INSERM U1155 Des Maladies Rénales Rares Aux Maladies Fréquentes, Remodelage Et Réparation, Paris, France
- Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Pairs, France
| | - Anissa Moktefi
- INSERM U955 Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Créteil, France
- Département de Pathologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | - Matthieu Jamme
- Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Nacera Ouali
- Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Cedric Rafat
- Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Hélène François
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- INSERM U1155 Des Maladies Rénales Rares Aux Maladies Fréquentes, Remodelage Et Réparation, Paris, France
- Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Camille Petit-Hoang
- Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Eric Rondeau
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- INSERM U1155 Des Maladies Rénales Rares Aux Maladies Fréquentes, Remodelage Et Réparation, Paris, France
- Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Laurent Mesnard
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- INSERM U1155 Des Maladies Rénales Rares Aux Maladies Fréquentes, Remodelage Et Réparation, Paris, France
- Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Grimbert
- Service de Néphrologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
- INSERM U955 Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Créteil, France
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Laboratoire d’Immunologie et d’Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Yosu Luque
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- INSERM U1155 Des Maladies Rénales Rares Aux Maladies Fréquentes, Remodelage Et Réparation, Paris, France
- Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
OUTCOMES OF ABO-INCOMPATIBLE KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: NOVEL WAYS OF REDUCING REJECTION, COMPLICATIONS, AND COST. TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tpr.2023.100127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
|
9
|
Piñeiro GJ, Lazo-Rodriguez M, Ventura-Aguiar P, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Banon-Maneus E, Lozano M, Cid J, Hierro-Garcia N, Cucchiari D, Revuelta I, Montagud-Marrahi E, Palou E, Bayés-Genís B, Campistol JM, Diekmann F, Rovira J. Extracorporeal Photopheresis Improves Graft Survival in a Full-Mismatch Rat Model of Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2023; 36:10840. [PMID: 36713113 PMCID: PMC9876976 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.10840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory therapy based on the infusion of autologous cellular products exposed to ultraviolet light (UV) in the presence of a photosensitizer. The study evaluates the ECP efficacy as induction therapy in a full-mismatch kidney transplant rat model. Dark Agouti to Lewis (DA-L) kidney transplant model has been established. ECP product was obtained from Lewis rat recipients after DA kidney graft transplantation (LewDA). Leukocytes of those LewDA rats were exposed to 8-methoxy psoralen, and illuminated with UV-A. The ECP doses assessed were 10 × 106 and 100 × 106 cells/time point. Lewis recipients received seven ECP infusions. DA-L model was characterized by the appearance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and kidney function deterioration from day three after kidney transplant. The dysfunction progressed rapidly until graft loss (6.1 ± 0.5 days). Tacrolimus at 0.25 mg/kg prolonged rat survival until 11.4 ± 0.7 days (p = 0.0004). In this context, the application of leukocytes from LewDA sensitized rats accelerated the rejection (8.7 ± 0.45, p = 0.0012), whereas ECP product at high dose extended kidney graft survival until 26.3 ± 7.3 days, reducing class I and II DSA in surviving rats. ECP treatment increases kidney graft survival in full-mismatch rat model of acute rejection and is a suitable immunomodulatory therapy to be explored in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaston J. Piñeiro
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Lazo-Rodriguez
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria J. Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Banon-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miquel Lozano
- Apheresis Unit, Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Cid
- Apheresis Unit, Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natalia Hierro-Garcia
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Cucchiari
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahi
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Palou
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriu Bayés-Genís
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M. Campistol
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain,*Correspondence: Fritz Diekmann, ; Jordi Rovira,
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,*Correspondence: Fritz Diekmann, ; Jordi Rovira,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Velleca A, Shullo MA, Dhital K, Azeka E, Colvin M, DePasquale E, Farrero M, García-Guereta L, Jamero G, Khush K, Lavee J, Pouch S, Patel J, Michaud CJ, Shullo M, Schubert S, Angelini A, Carlos L, Mirabet S, Patel J, Pham M, Urschel S, Kim KH, Miyamoto S, Chih S, Daly K, Grossi P, Jennings D, Kim IC, Lim HS, Miller T, Potena L, Velleca A, Eisen H, Bellumkonda L, Danziger-Isakov L, Dobbels F, Harkess M, Kim D, Lyster H, Peled Y, Reinhardt Z. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Guidelines for the Care of Heart Transplant Recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2022; 42:e1-e141. [PMID: 37080658 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
11
|
Velleca A, Shullo MA, Dhital K, Azeka E, Colvin M, DePasquale E, Farrero M, García-Guereta L, Jamero G, Khush K, Lavee J, Pouch S, Patel J, Michaud CJ, Shullo M, Schubert S, Angelini A, Carlos L, Mirabet S, Patel J, Pham M, Urschel S, Kim KH, Miyamoto S, Chih S, Daly K, Grossi P, Jennings D, Kim IC, Lim HS, Miller T, Potena L, Velleca A, Eisen H, Bellumkonda L, Danziger-Isakov L, Dobbels F, Harkess M, Kim D, Lyster H, Peled Y, Reinhardt Z. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Guidelines for the Care of Heart Transplant Recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
12
|
Baradaran H, Hashem Zadeh A, Dashti-Khavidaki S, Laki B. Management of drug-induced neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia after solid organ transplantation: A comprehensive review. J Clin Pharm Ther 2022; 47:1895-1912. [PMID: 36250775 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Advances in the development of more effective immunosuppressive drugs have increased graft survival and drug induced adverse effects. Haematological complications including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia are common side effects that affect the grafts' and patients' outcomes. Several studies have stated the important role of various medications in haematological complications after transplantation. They have reported the incidence and different mechanisms of drug induced cytopenia, as well as an overview of possible treatment modalities. However, there is no comprehensive protocol for the management of these complications following transplantation. This narrative review was performed to develop a comprehensive practical approach for management of drug induced haematological complications following solid organ transplantation. METHOD PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Google scholar databases were searched without time limitations until March, 2021. In addition, some valid drug information data bases (Uptodate and Micromedex) were searched for detailed information until October, 2021. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Several immunosuppressive and antimicrobial medications may induce neutropenia, thrombocytopenia or anaemia following transplantation. Most of these agents cause dose-related cytopenia, which resolves with dose reduction or drug withdrawal. However, any change in medications may result in negative consequences such as severe infections, bleeding, cardiovascular complications, acute allograft rejection, and graft or patient loss. Thus, cautious evaluation of the patient's condition and the pharmacological properties of the culprit medication are required. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION Three algorithms are presented to guide healthcare providers in the stepwise management of drug-induced neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia after solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hananeh Baradaran
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Simin Dashti-Khavidaki
- Liver Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bahareh Laki
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Frutos MÁ, Crespo M, Valentín MDLO, Alonso-Melgar Á, Alonso J, Fernández C, García-Erauzkin G, González E, González-Rinne AM, Guirado L, Gutiérrez-Dalmau A, Huguet J, Moral JLLD, Musquera M, Paredes D, Redondo D, Revuelta I, Hofstadt CJVD, Alcaraz A, Alonso-Hernández Á, Alonso M, Bernabeu P, Bernal G, Breda A, Cabello M, Caro-Oleas JL, Cid J, Diekmann F, Espinosa L, Facundo C, García M, Gil-Vernet S, Lozano M, Mahillo B, Martínez MJ, Miranda B, Oppenheimer F, Palou E, Pérez-Saez MJ, Peri L, Rodríguez O, Santiago C, Tabernero G, Hernández D, Domínguez-Gil B, Pascual J. Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation. Nefrologia 2022; 42 Suppl 2:5-132. [PMID: 36503720 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Crespo
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Juana Alonso
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Esther González
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Guirado
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jorge Huguet
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Mireia Musquera
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Donation and Transplantation Coordination Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Alonso
- Regional Transplantation Coordination, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Gabriel Bernal
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Cabello
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Joan Cid
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Espinosa
- Paediatric Nephrology Department, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carme Facundo
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Miquel Lozano
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Eduard Palou
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Peri
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Domingo Hernández
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Julio Pascual
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The Impact of Panel Reactive Antibodies and Different Desensitization Methods on Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2022; 44:e689-e694. [PMID: 34699465 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000002357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In highly sensitized patients who have panel reactive antibodies (PRAs) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, primary graft failure risk may increase. In this study, we aimed to determine the association of PRA with engraftment, and graft versus host disease (GVHD) in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-three PRA-positive and 42 PRA-negative patients were taken into study. Both groups were compared in terms of graft failure, acute GVHD, viral infection and survival rates. PRA-positive group was also divided into 2 according to treatment modality (steroid-only group/combination therapy) and compared for the same parameters. RESULTS There was no difference in PRA-positive and negative patients in terms of graft failure, acute GVHD and viral infections. Analysis of the PRA-positive group in itself showed that there was also no difference in terms of graft failure and viral infection frequency. The only difference is that acute grade 3 to 4 GVHD was higher in the steroid-only group. The 100-day overall survival was 90.2% and 90.4% for the PRA-positive and negative groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Different treatment strategies like plasmapheresis, steroid, rituximab, or combination therapies can be used for the desensitization of PRA-positive patients before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Patient-specific treatment modality for sensitized patients before transplant can increase the success rate.
Collapse
|
15
|
Recomendaciones para el trasplante renal de donante vivo. Nefrologia 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
16
|
Nikolova A, Patel JK. Induction Therapy and Therapeutic Antibodies. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2022; 272:85-116. [PMID: 35474024 DOI: 10.1007/164_2021_570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Prevention of allograft rejection is one of the crucial goals in solid organ transplantation to ensure durability of the graft and is chiefly mediated by cellular and humoral pathways targeting cell surface alloantigens. The risk of rejection is highest in the first post-transplant year and wanes with time albeit the risk always exists and varies with the type of organ transplanted. Induction therapies refer to the use of high-intensity immunosuppression in the immediate post-operative period to mitigate the highest risk of rejection. This term encompasses chiefly the use of antibody therapies directed against one of the key pathways in T-cell activation or abrogating effects of circulating alloantibodies. These antibodies carry more potent immunomodulatory effect than maintenance immunosuppressive therapy alone and many of them lead to durable immune cell depletion. A variety of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies have been utilized for use not only for induction therapy, but also for treatment of allograft rejection when it occurs and as components of desensitization therapy before and after transplantation to modulate circulating alloantibodies.
Collapse
|
17
|
Sweet SC, Armstrong B, Blatter J, Chin H, Conrad C, Goldfarb S, Hayes D, Heeger PS, Lyou V, Melicoff-Portillo E, Mohanakumar T, Odim J, Ravichandran R, Schecter M, Storch GA, Visner G, Williams NM, Danziger-Isakov L. CTOTC-08: A multicenter randomized controlled trial of rituximab induction to reduce antibody development and improve outcomes in pediatric lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:230-244. [PMID: 34599540 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of pediatric lung transplant recipients, hypothesizing that rituximab plus rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction would reduce de novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) development and improve outcomes. We serially obtained clinical data, blood, and respiratory samples for at least one year posttransplant. We analyzed peripheral blood lymphocytes by flow cytometry, serum for antibody development, and respiratory samples for viral infections using multiplex PCR. Of 45 subjects enrolled, 34 were transplanted and 27 randomized to rituximab (n = 15) or placebo (n = 12). No rituximab-treated subjects versus five placebo-treated subjects developed de novo DSA with mean fluorescence intensity >2000. There was no difference between treatment groups in time to the primary composite outcome endpoint (death, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome [BOS] grade 0-p, obliterative bronchiolitis or listing for retransplant). A post-hoc analysis substituting more stringent chronic lung allograft dysfunction criteria for BOS 0-p showed no difference in outcome (p = .118). The incidence of adverse events including infection and rejection episodes was no different between treatment groups. Although the study was underpowered, we conclude that rituximab induction may have prevented early DSA development in pediatric lung transplant recipients without adverse effects and may improve outcomes (Clinical Trials: NCT02266888).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Carol Conrad
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital/Stanford Children's Health, Palo Alto, California
| | - Samuel Goldfarb
- Masonic Children's Hospital, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Don Hayes
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Peter S Heeger
- Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Victoria Lyou
- Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Jonah Odim
- NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Marc Schecter
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | - Gary Visner
- Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee JY, Cha SH, Kim SH, Jeong KH, Chung KY, Cho HR, Lee J, Huh KH, Yang J, Kim MS, Kim DG. Risk Due to ABO Incompatibility and Donor-Recipient Weight Mismatch in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235674. [PMID: 34884376 PMCID: PMC8658727 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The effect of donor-recipient weight mismatch is not well established in ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). A total of 2584 LDKT patients in the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry were classified into four groups according to the presence or absence of ABO incompatibility and donor-recipient weight mismatch (donor-to-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) < 0.8). In a multivariable Cox analysis, the combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility (n = 124) was an independent risk factor for graft survival (HR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.11-6.70) and patient survival (HR = 3.55, 95% CI = 1.39-9.04), whereas neither factor alone was a significant risk factor for either outcome. The combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility was not an independent risk factor for biopsy-proven graft rejection (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.88-1.82); however, it was an independent risk factor for pneumonia (HR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.64-5.57). The mortality rate due to infection was higher among patients with both ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility than among patients with neither factor or with either factor alone. The combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility was an independent risk factor for graft and patient survival after LDKT, whereas neither factor alone significantly affected graft or patient survival. Thus, donor-recipient weight matching should be cautiously considered in LDKT with ABO incompatibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Young Lee
- Transplantation Center, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju 26426, Korea;
- Department of Nephrology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, Korea
| | - Sung Hwan Cha
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, Korea;
| | - Sung Hwa Kim
- Department of Biostatistics, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, Korea;
| | - Kyung Hwan Jeong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul 02447, Korea;
| | - Ku Yong Chung
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul 07985, Korea;
| | - Hong Rae Cho
- Department of Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan 44030, Korea;
| | - Juhan Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (J.L.); (K.H.H.); (M.S.K.)
| | - Kyu Ha Huh
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (J.L.); (K.H.H.); (M.S.K.)
| | - Jaeseok Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea;
| | - Myoung Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; (J.L.); (K.H.H.); (M.S.K.)
| | - Deok Gie Kim
- Transplantation Center, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju 26426, Korea;
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, Korea;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-33-741-0510
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sethi S, Ammerman N, Vo A, Jordan SC. Approach to Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates and a Positive Crossmatch. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2021; 28:587-595. [PMID: 35367027 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible kidney transplantation offers survival benefit compared with ongoing dialysis. There have been considerable advances in the last decade to allow for increased access to transplant for the HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. These include increased priority in the kidney allocation system, kidney paired donation, and novel desensitization strategies. A better understanding of the role of B cells, plasma cells, and complement and inflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of HLA antibody-mediated allograft injury has led to the use of novel therapeutics for desensitization and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. Here we discuss current approaches to kidney transplantation in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates.
Collapse
|
20
|
de Weerd AE, van den Brand JAJG, Bouwsma H, de Vries APJ, Dooper IPMM, Sanders JSF, Christiaans MHL, van Reekum FE, van Zuilen AD, Bemelman FJ, Nurmohamed AS, van Agteren M, Betjes MGH, de Jong MFC, Baas MC. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity-matched analysis. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2706-2719. [PMID: 34687095 PMCID: PMC9299000 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Kidney transplant candidates are blood group incompatible with roughly one out of three potential living donors. We compared outcomes after ABO‐incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation with matched ABO‐compatible (ABOc) living and deceased donor transplantation and analyzed different induction regimens. We performed a retrospective study with propensity matching and compared patient and death‐censored graft survival after ABOi versus ABOc living donor and deceased donor kidney transplantation in a nationwide registry from 2006 till 2019. 296 ABOi were compared with 1184 center and propensity‐matched ABOc living donor and 1184 deceased donor recipients (matching: recipient age, sex, blood group, and PRA). Patient survival was better compared with deceased donor [hazard ratio (HR) for death of HR 0.69 (0.49–0.96)] and non‐significantly different from ABOc living donor recipients [HR 1.28 (0.90–1.81)]. Rate of graft failure was higher compared with ABOc living donor transplantation [HR 2.63 (1.72–4.01)]. Rejection occurred in 47% of 140 rituximab versus 22% of 50 rituximab/basiliximab, and 4% of 92 alemtuzumab‐treated recipients (P < 0.001). ABOi kidney transplantation is superior to deceased donor transplantation. Rejection rate and graft failure are higher compared with matched ABOc living donor transplantation, underscoring the need for further studies into risk stratification and induction therapy [NTR7587, www.trialregister.nl].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies E de Weerd
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan A J G van den Brand
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke Bouwsma
- Department of Nephrology and Leiden Transplant Center, LUMC Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Aiko P J de Vries
- Department of Nephrology and Leiden Transplant Center, LUMC Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ine Ph M M Dooper
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan F Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Franka E van Reekum
- Department of Nephrology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Azam S Nurmohamed
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Madelon van Agteren
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margriet F C de Jong
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marije C Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kim SG, Hong S, Lee H, Eum SH, Kim YS, Jin K, Han S, Yang CW, Park WY, Chung BH. Impact of delayed graft function on clinical outcomes in highly sensitized patients after deceased-donor kidney transplantation. KOREAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2021; 35:149-160. [PMID: 35769252 PMCID: PMC9235446 DOI: 10.4285/kjt.21.0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We investigated whether the development of delayed graft function (DGF) in pre-sensitized patients affects the clinical outcomes after deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Methods The study included 709 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from three transplant centers. We divided KTRs into four subgroups (highly sensitized DGF, highly sensitized non-DGF, low-sensitized DGF, and low-sensitized non-DGF) according to panel reactive antibody level of 50%, or DGF development. We compared post-transplant clinical outcomes among the four subgroups. Results Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was higher in two highly sensitized subgroups than in low-sensitized subgroups. It tended to be higher in highly sensitized DGF subgroups than in the highly sensitized non-DGF subgroups. In addition, the highly sensitized DGF subgroup showed the highest risk for BPAR (hazard ratio, 3.051; P=0.005) and independently predicted BPAR. Allograft function was lower in the two DGF subgroups than in the non-DGF subgroup until one month after transplantation, but thereafter it was similar. Death-censored graft loss rates and patient mortality tended to be low when DGF developed, but it did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions DGF development in highly sensitized patients increases the risk for BPAR in DDKT compared with patients without DGF, suggesting the need for strict monitoring and management of such cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong Gyu Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Suyeon Hong
- Transplantation Research Center, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hanbi Lee
- Transplantation Research Center, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hun Eum
- Transplantation Research Center, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Soo Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Kyubok Jin
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Seungyeop Han
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Chul Woo Yang
- Transplantation Research Center, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Yeong Park
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Byung Ha Chung
- Transplantation Research Center, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Reese SR, Wilson NA, Huang Y, Ptak L, Degner KR, Xiang D, Redfield RR, Zhong W, Panzer SE. B-cell Deficiency Attenuates Transplant Glomerulopathy in a Rat Model of Chronic Active Antibody-mediated Rejection. Transplantation 2021; 105:1516-1529. [PMID: 33273321 PMCID: PMC8106694 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is a pathological feature of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) and is associated with renal allograft failure. The specific role of B cells in the pathogenesis of TG is unclear. METHODS We used a minor mismatched rat kidney transplant model with B cell-deficient recipients, generated by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 technology, to investigate the impact of B-cell depletion on the pathogenesis of TG. We hypothesized that B-cell deficiency would prevent TG in the rat kidney transplant model of cAMR. Treatment groups included syngeneic, allogeneic, sensitized allogeneic, and B cell-deficient allogeneic transplant recipients. RESULTS B cell-deficient recipients demonstrated reduced TG lesions, decreased microvascular inflammation, reduced allograft infiltrating macrophages, and reduced interferon gamma transcripts within the allograft. Allograft transcript levels of interferon gamma, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and interleukin-1β correlated with numbers of intragraft macrophages. B cell-deficient recipients lacked circulating donor-specific antibodies and had an increased splenic regulatory T-cell population. CONCLUSIONS In this model of cAMR, B-cell depletion attenuated the development of TG with effects on T cell and innate immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon R. Reese
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Nancy A. Wilson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Yabing Huang
- Department of Pathology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, China
| | - Lucille Ptak
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Kenna R. Degner
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Ding Xiang
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China
| | - Robert R. Redfield
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Weixiong Zhong
- Department of Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Sarah E. Panzer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Walti LN, Mugglin C, Sidler D, Mombelli M, Manuel O, Hirsch HH, Khanna N, Mueller N, Berger C, Boggian K, Garzoni C, Neofytos D, van Delden C, Hirzel C. Association of antiviral prophylaxis and rituximab use with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs): A nationwide cohort study. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:2532-2542. [PMID: 33289340 PMCID: PMC8359347 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT). Most PTLD cases are associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. The role of antiviral prophylaxis or rituximab therapy for prevention of PTLD in SOT recipients is controversial. In a nationwide cohort, we assessed the incidence, presentation, and outcome of histologically proven PTLD. We included 4765 patients with a follow-up duration of 23 807 person-years (py). Fifty-seven PTLD cases were identified; 39 (68%) were EBV positive (EBV+ PTLD). Incidence rates for EBV+ PTLD at 1, 2, and 3 years posttransplant were 3.51, 2.24, and 1.75/1000 py and 0.44, 0.25, and 0.29/1000 py for EBV- PTLD. We did not find an effect of antiviral prophylaxis on early and late EBV+ PTLD occurrence (early EBV+ PTLD: SHR 0.535 [95% CI 0.199-1.436], p = .264; late EBV+ PTLD: SHR 2.213, [95% CI 0.751-6.521], p = .150). However, none of the patients (0/191) who received a rituximab-containing induction treatment experienced PTLD, but 57 of 4574 patients without rituximab induction developed PTLD. In an adjusted restricted mean survival time model, PTLD-free survival was significantly longer (0.104 years [95% CI 0.077-0.131]) in patients receiving rituximab as induction treatment. This study provides novel data on the association of rituximab induction and reduced risk for PTLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura N. Walti
- Department of Infectious DiseasesInselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Catrina Mugglin
- Department of Infectious DiseasesInselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Daniel Sidler
- Department of Nephrology and HypertensionInselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Matteo Mombelli
- Transplantation Center and Service of Infectious DiseasesLausanne University Hospital (CHUV)LausanneSwitzerland
| | - Oriol Manuel
- Transplantation Center and Service of Infectious DiseasesLausanne University Hospital (CHUV)LausanneSwitzerland
| | - Hans H. Hirsch
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital EpidemiologyUniversity and University Hospital of BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Nina Khanna
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital EpidemiologyUniversity and University Hospital of BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Nicolas Mueller
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital EpidemiologyUniversity Hospital Zurich and University ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Christoph Berger
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital EpidemiologyUniversity Children's Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Katia Boggian
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital HygieneCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| | - Christian Garzoni
- Clinic of Internal Medicine and Infectious DiseasesClinica LuganeseLuganoSwitzerland
| | - Dionysios Neofytos
- Transplant Infectious Diseases Unit, Faculty of MedicineUniversity Hospitals of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
| | - Christian van Delden
- Transplant Infectious Diseases Unit, Faculty of MedicineUniversity Hospitals of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
| | - Cédric Hirzel
- Department of Infectious DiseasesInselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schmitz R, Fitch ZW, Schroder PM, Choi AY, Jackson AM, Knechtle SJ, Kwun J. B cells in transplant tolerance and rejection: friends or foes? Transpl Int 2021; 33:30-40. [PMID: 31705678 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Our understanding of the role of B cells in organ transplantation remains incomplete and continues to grow. The majority of research has focused on the detrimental role of antibodies that drive the development of pathogenesis of the transplanted organ. However, it has been shown that not all donor-specific antibodies are harmful and in some circumstances can even promote tolerance through the mechanism of accommodation. Furthermore, B cells can have effects on transplanted organs through their interaction with T cells, namely antigen presentation, cytokine production, and costimulation. More recently, the role and importance of Bregs was introduced to the field of transplantation. Due to this functional and ontogenetic heterogeneity, targeting B cells in transplantation may bring undesired immunologic side effects including increased rejection. Therefore, the selective control of B cells that contribute to the humoral response against donor antigens will continue to be an important and challenging area of research and potentially lead to improved long-term transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zachary W Fitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul M Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ashley Y Choi
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Annette M Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kleinherenbrink W, Baas M, Nakhsbandi G, Hesselink DA, Roodnat JI, de Winter BC, Hilbrands L, van Gelder T. Delayed graft function and rejection are risk factors for cytomegalovirus breakthrough infection in kidney transplant recipients. Pharmacol Res 2021; 167:105565. [PMID: 33744428 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Breakthrough cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease during valganciclovir prophylaxis is rare but may cause significant morbidity and even mortality. In order to identify patients at increased risk the incidence of CMV disease was studied in a large population of renal transplant recipients who underwent a kidney transplantation in the Radboud University Medical Center between 2004 and 2015 (n = 1300). CMV disease occurred in 31/1300 patients. Multivariate binary linear regression analysis showed that delayed graft function (DGF) (p = 0.018) and rejection (p = 0.001) significantly and independently increased the risk of CMV disease, whereas CMV status did not. Valganciclovir prophylaxis was prescribed to 281/1300 (21.6%) high-risk patients (defined as CMV IgG-seronegative recipients receiving a kidney from a CMV IgG-seropositive donor (D+/R-)). Of these 281 patients, 51 suffered from DGF (18%). The incidence of breakthrough CMV disease in D + /R- patients with DGF was much higher than in those with immediate function (6/51 (11.8%) vs 2/230, (0.9%), p = 0.0006 Fisher's exact test), despite valganciclovir prophylaxis. This higher incidence of CMV disease could not be explained by a higher incidence of rejection (and associated anti-rejection treatment) in patients with DGF. D + /R- patients with DGF are at increased risk of developing CMV disease despite valganciclovir prophylaxis. These findings suggest that underexposure to ganciclovir occurs in patients with DGF. Prospective studies evaluating the added value of therapeutic drug monitoring to achieve target ganciclovir concentrations in patients with DGF are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wieteke Kleinherenbrink
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marije Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud university Medical center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gizal Nakhsbandi
- Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joke I Roodnat
- Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brenda C de Winter
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud university Medical center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Teun van Gelder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Regulatory T Cells for the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2021. [PMID: 33523454 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-6407-9_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Organ transplantation is the optimal treatment for terminal and irreversible organ failure. Achieving transplantation tolerance has long been the ultimate goal in the field of transplantation. Regulatory T cell (Treg)-based therapy is a promising novel approach for inducing donor organ-specific tolerance. Tregs play critical roles in the maintenance of immune homeostasis and self-tolerance, by promoting transplantation tolerance through a variety of mechanisms on different target cells, including anti-inflammatory cytokine production, induction of apoptosis, disruption of metabolic pathways, and mutual interaction with dendritic cells. The continued success of Treg-based therapy in the clinical setting is critically dependent on preclinical studies that support its translational potential. However, although some initial clinical trials of adoptive Treg therapy have successively demonstrated safety and efficacy for immunosuppressant minimization and transplantation tolerance induction, most Treg-based hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ clinical trials are still in their infancy. These clinical trials have not only focused on safety and efficacy but also included optimization and standardization protocols of good manufacturing practice regarding cell isolation, expansion, dosing, timing, specificity, quality control, concomitant immunosuppressants, and post-administration monitoring. We herein report a brief introduction of Tregs, including their phenotypic and functional characterization, and focus on the clinical translation of Treg-based therapeutic applications in the setting of transplantation.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
The majority of cells comprising the inflammatory infiltrates in kidney allografts undergoing acute and/or chronic rejection are typically T cells and monocyte/macrophages with B cells, plasma cells, and eosinophils accounting for <5%. In a significant minority of biopsies, B lineage cells (B cells and/or plasma cells) may be found more abundantly. Although plasma cell infiltrates tend to be more diffuse, B cells tend to aggregate into nodules that may mature into tertiary lymphoid organs. Given the ability to target B cells with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and plasma cells with proteasome inhibitors and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, it is increasingly important to determine the significance of such infiltrates. Both cell types are potential effectors of rejection, but both also have a tolerizing potential. B cell infiltrates have been associated with steroid resistance and reduced graft survival in some studies but not in others, and their presence should not prompt automatic depletional therapy. Plasma cell-rich infiltrates tend to occur later, may be associated with cell-mediated and/or antibody-mediated rejection, and portend an adverse outcome. Viral infection and malignancy must be ruled out. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the appropriateness of specific therapy when B cells and/or plasma cells are found. No strong therapeutic recommendations can be made at this time.
Collapse
|
28
|
Ko Y, Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim DH, Lim SJ, Shin S, Kim YH, Jung JH, Park SK, Kwon H, Han DJ. Acute Rejection and Infectious Complications in ABO- and HLA-Incompatible Kidney Transplantations. Ann Transplant 2020; 25:e927420. [PMID: 33020465 PMCID: PMC7547531 DOI: 10.12659/aot.927420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients receiving ABO-incompatible (ABOi) or human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible (HLAi) kidney transplantation (KT) require potent immunosuppression and are thus at a higher risk of infectious complications. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of KT stratified by ABO and HLA incompatibilities and identified the factors associated with the clinical outcomes. Material/Methods Recipients who underwent living-related KT between 2012 and 2017 were included and classified into 4 groups: ABO-compatible and HLA-compatible (ABOc/HLAc), HLA-incompatible (ABOc/HLAi), ABO-incompatible (ABOi/HLAc), and ABO-incompatible and HLA-incompatible (ABOi/HLAi). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were carried out to evaluate the risk factors of acute rejection. Out of the 1732 patients who underwent KT, 1190, 131, 358, and 53 were in the ABOc/HLAc, ABOi/HLAc, ABOc/HLAi, and ABOi/HLAi groups, respectively. Results The ABO/HLAi group showed the lowest 5-year graft survival rate (91.7%). Death-censored graft survival was not significantly different among the groups. The mortality rate from infections was significantly higher in the ABOi/HLAi group (7.5%) than the other groups. Antibody-mediated rejection-free graft survival was the lowest in the ABOi/HLAi group, with significant differences compared with the ABOi/HLAc group (P=0.02) and the ABOc/HLAi group (P=0.03). ABOi/HLAi (hazard ratio [HR], 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–6.65; P<0.01) and combined infection (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.45–2.51; P<0.01) were significant risk factors for acute rejection. Conclusions Patients with both ABO and HLA incompatibilities showed inferior rates of overall patient and graft survival due to infectious complications. Infection was a prominent risk factor of acute rejection following KT after adjusting for possible confounders including ABO and HLA incompatibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngmin Ko
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jee Yeon Kim
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung-Han Kim
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Kim
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seong Jun Lim
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Shin
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young Hoon Kim
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joo Hee Jung
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Su-Kil Park
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyunwook Kwon
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Duck Jong Han
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cen M, Wang R, Kong W, Deng H, Lei W, Chen J. ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14050. [PMID: 32713064 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation is nowadays a routine procedure to expand living donor pool. The past decades have seen the evolution of desensitization protocol and immunosuppression regimen. Despite increased bleeding events, infectious complications, and rejection episodes reported in some studies, favorable graft and patient survival rate are now achieved, regardless of various protocols among transplant centers. Several issues such as the usage of rituximab and standardization of blood group antibody titration remain to be settled. The deposition of C4d is no longer the histopathologic hallmark of antibody-mediated rejection, which have inspired innovative strategies of peripheral molecular screening and the improvement of histological diagnosis of AMR (antibody-mediated rejection). The better understanding of the underlying mechanism might facilitate the distinction and therapeutic schemes of AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menger Cen
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Rending Wang
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiwei Kong
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hao Deng
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenhua Lei
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianghua Chen
- Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Iwasaki K, Hamana H, Kishi H, Yamamoto T, Hiramitsu T, Okad M, Tomosugi T, Takeda A, Narumi S, Watarai Y, Miwa Y, Okumura M, Matsuoka Y, Horimi K, Muraguchi A, Kobayash T. The suppressive effect on CD4 T cell alloresponse against endothelial HLA-DR via PD-L1 induced by anti-A/B ligation. Clin Exp Immunol 2020; 202:249-261. [PMID: 32578199 DOI: 10.1111/cei.13482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
While donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies are a frequent cause for chronic antibody-mediated rejection in organ transplantation, this is not the case for antibodies targeting blood group antigens, as ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) organ transplantation has been associated with a favorable graft outcome. Here, we explored the role of CD4 T cell-mediated alloresponses against endothelial HLA-D-related (DR) in the presence of anti-HLA class I or anti-A/B antibodies. CD4 T cells, notably CD45RA-memory CD4 T cells, undergo extensive proliferation in response to endothelial HLA-DR. The CD4 T cell proliferative response was enhanced in the presence of anti-HLA class I, but attenuated in the presence of anti-A/B antibodies. Microarray analysis and molecular profiling demonstrated that the expression of CD274 programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) increased in response to anti-A/B ligation-mediated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inactivation in endothelial cells that were detected even in the presence of interferon-γ stimulation. Anti-PD-1 antibody enhanced CD4 T cell proliferation, and blocked the suppressive effect of the anti-A/B antibodies. Educated CD25+ CD127- regulatory T cells (edu.Tregs ) were more effective at preventing CD4 T cell alloresponses to endothelial cells compared with naive Treg ; anti-A/B antibodies were not involved in the Treg -mediated events. Finally, amplified expression of transcript encoding PD-L1 was observed in biopsy samples from ABO-I renal transplants when compared with those from ABO-identical/compatible transplants. Taken together, our findings identified a possible factor that might prevent graft rejection and thus contribute to a favorable outcome in ABO-I renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Iwasaki
- Department of Kidney Disease and Transplant Immunology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - H Hamana
- Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - H Kishi
- Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - T Yamamoto
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - T Hiramitsu
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - M Okad
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - T Tomosugi
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - A Takeda
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - S Narumi
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Y Watarai
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Y Miwa
- Department of Kidney Disease and Transplant Immunology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - M Okumura
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
| | - Y Matsuoka
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
| | - K Horimi
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
| | - A Muraguchi
- Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - T Kobayash
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
George J, Alex S, Thomas ETA, Gracious N, Vineetha NS, Kumar S. Clinical Response and Pattern of B cell Suppression with Single Low Dose Rituximab in Nephrology. KIDNEY360 2020; 1:359-367. [PMID: 35369364 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000072020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background There is no consensus regarding dose and frequency of rituximab in nephrology with extrapolation of doses used in treating lymphoproliferative disorders. There are no guidelines on targeting initial and subsequent doses on the basis of CD19+ B cells. Methods Initially, 100 mg rituximab was given to 42 adults with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) and frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS), idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN), and high-immunologic-risk kidney transplantation. Absolute and percentage levels of CD19 B cells and clinical status were assessed at baseline, days 30, 90, and 180, and at 1 year. Subsequent doses of rituximab were on the basis of CD19 B cell reconstitution and clinical response. Results CD19 B cell percentage decreased from 16.3 ± 7.6 to 0.3 ± 0.3 (P≤0.001), 1.9 ± 1.7 (P≤0.001), and 4.0 ± 4.5 (P=0.005) by 30, 90, and 180 days, respectively. Suppression of CD19 B cell count below 1% at days 30, 90, and 180 was seen in 40 of 42 (95.2%), 18 of 42 (42.9%), and 7 of 42 (16.7%) patients, respectively. Of 30 with SDNS and FRNS followed up for 1 year, 29 (96.7%) went into remission at day 30. Remission was sustained in 23 (76.6%) at day 180 and 21 (70%) at 1 year. There was a significant decrease (P<0.001) in the dose of steroids needed to maintain remission at 180 days after rituximab (0.27 ± 0.02 mg/kg to 0.02 ± 0.00 mg/kg). CD19 B cell percentage at 90 days correlated with relapse (P=0.001; odds ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 2.57). Eighteen (60%) required an additional dose. Of five with MN, four achieved remission by 6 months, which was sustained in three by 1 year. Of the seven kidney transplant recipients, two had antibody-mediated rejections, although CD19 B cells were suppressed even at 1 year. Conclusions Low-dose rituximab induces sustained depletion of CD19 B cells for up to 90 days. Its role in preventing relapses in SDNS, FRNS, MN, and rejection needs further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob George
- Department of Nephrology, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - Sunu Alex
- Department of Nephrology, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - E T Arun Thomas
- Department of Nephrology, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - Noble Gracious
- Department of Nephrology, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - Nalanda S Vineetha
- Department of Nephrology, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - Sajeev Kumar
- Department of Nephrology, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chang YJ, Xu LP, Wang Y, Zhang XH, Chen H, Chen YH, Wang FR, Han W, Sun YQ, Yan CH, Tang FF, Huo MR, Zhao XY, Mo XD, Liu KY, Huang XJ. Rituximab for desensitization during HLA-mismatched stem cell transplantation in patients with a positive donor-specific anti-HLA antibody. Bone Marrow Transplant 2020; 55:1326-1336. [PMID: 32385341 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-0928-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2019] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
To define the efficacy of a single dose of 375 mg/m2 rituximab for DSA-positive patients with 2000 ≤ MFI < 10,000, we enrolled a prospective clinical cohort including patients with positive DSA treated with rituximab (n = 55, cohort A), a matched-pair cohort including cases with negative DSA (n = 110, cohort B) and a historical cohort including subjects with 2000 ≤ MFI < 10,000 without receiving any treatment for DSA (n = 22, cohort C). The incidences of primary poor graft function (PGF) in cohort A and cohort B were 5% and 1% (P = 0.076), respectively, both of which were lower than that in cohort C (27%, P < 0.001, for all). Rituximab was associated with a reduced incidence of primary PGF (HR 0.200, P = 0.023). The 3-year nonrelapse mortality of patients in cohort A and cohort B were 23% and 24%, respectively, both of which were lower than that in the cohort C (37%), although no statistical significance was observed. These results led to a low 3-year overall survival in patients in the cohort C (58%) compared with those in the cohort A (71%) and the cohort B (73%). We suggest that a single dose of rituximab could be effectively used to prevent the onset of primary PGF. The prospective cohort of this study is registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn/ChiCTR-OPC-15006672.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Jun Chang
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Lan-Ping Xu
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Xiao-Hui Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Huan Chen
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Yu-Hong Chen
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Feng-Rong Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Wei Han
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Yu-Qian Sun
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Chen-Hua Yan
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Fei-Fei Tang
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Ming-Rui Huo
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Xiang-Yu Zhao
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Mo
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Kai-Yan Liu
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Xiao-Jun Huang
- Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China. .,Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, 100871, China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schachtner T, Stein M, Otto NM, Reinke P. Preformed donor‐reactive T cells that persist after ABO desensitization predict severe T cell‐mediated rejection after living donor kidney transplantation – a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2019; 33:288-297. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Revised: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Schachtner
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Charité University Medicine Berlin Berlin Germany
- Berlin‐Brandenburg Center of Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) Berlin Germany
- Department of Nephrology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Maik Stein
- Berlin‐Brandenburg Center of Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) Berlin Germany
| | - Natalie M. Otto
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Charité University Medicine Berlin Berlin Germany
- Berlin‐Brandenburg Center of Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) Berlin Germany
| | - Petra Reinke
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Charité University Medicine Berlin Berlin Germany
- Berlin‐Brandenburg Center of Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) Berlin Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Facial Transplantation for an Irreparable Central and Lower Face Injury: A Modernized Approach to a Classic Challenge. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144:264e-283e. [PMID: 31348362 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000005885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Facial transplantation introduced a paradigm shift in the reconstruction of extensive facial defects. Although the feasibility of the procedure is well established, new challenges face the field in its second decade. METHODS The authors' team has successfully treated patients with extensive thermal and ballistic facial injuries with allotransplantation. The authors further validate facial transplantation as a reconstructive solution for irreparable facial injuries. Following informed consent and institutional review board approval, a partial face and double jaw transplantation was performed in a 25-year-old man who sustained ballistic facial trauma. Extensive team preparations, thorough patient evaluation, preoperative diagnostic imaging, three-dimensional printing technology, intraoperative surgical navigation, and the use of dual induction immunosuppression contributed to the success of the procedure. RESULTS The procedure was performed on January 5 and 6, 2018, and lasted nearly 25 hours. The patient underwent hyoid and genioglossus advancement for floor-of-mouth dehiscence, and palate wound dehiscence repair on postoperative day 11. Open reduction and internal fixation of left mandibular nonunion were performed on postoperative day 108. Nearly 1 year postoperatively, the patient demonstrates excellent aesthetic outcomes, intelligible speech, and is tolerating an oral diet. He remains free from acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS The authors validate facial transplantation as the modern answer to the classic reconstructive challenge imposed by extensive facial defects resulting from ballistic injury. Relying on a multidisciplinary collaborative approach, coupled with innovative emerging technologies and immunosuppression protocols, can overcome significant challenges in facial transplantation and reinforce its position as the highest rung on the reconstructive ladder. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, V.
Collapse
|
35
|
Kim DG, Lee J, Seo WJ, Lee JG, Kim BS, Kim MS, Kim SI, Kim YS, Huh KH. Rituximab protects against development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease after kidney transplantation: a propensity-matched study. Sci Rep 2019; 9:16475. [PMID: 31712593 PMCID: PMC6848081 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52942-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have implicated B cells in atherosclerosis and have verified the atheroprotective effect of rituximab. Rituximab is widely used for desensitization in ABO-incompatible or crossmatch-positive kidney transplantation (KT). Using a single-center KT database, we performed propensity-matched analysis to investigate the association between rituximab and posttransplant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Among 1299 eligible patients, 239 given rituximab induction were matched with 401 controls in a 1:2 propensity score matching process. The cumulative rate of ASCVD during 8 years of follow-up was significantly lower in rituximab-treated patients, compared with matched controls (3.7% vs. 11.2%; P = 0.012). However, all-cause mortality did not differ by group (2.9% vs. 4%; P = 0.943). In multivariable Cox analysis, rituximab proved independently protective of ASCVD (hazard ratio = 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.14–0.83). The lower risk of ASCVD seen with rituximab induction reached significance only in patient subsets of diabetes mellitus, pretransplant dialysis, or older age (>50 years). Rituximab induction confers a lower risk of ASCVD during the posttransplant period. This atheroprotective effect appears particularly beneficial in patients whose risk of ASCVD is heightened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deok Gie Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Juhan Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Jun Seo
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Geun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Seok Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myoung Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soon Il Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yu Seun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu Ha Huh
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tomita Y, Iwadoh K, Ogawa Y, Miki K, Kato Y, Kai K, Sannomiya A, Koyama I, Kitajima K, Nakajima I, Fuchinoue S. Single fixed low-dose rituximab as induction therapy suppresses de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibody production in ABO compatible living kidney transplant recipients. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0224203. [PMID: 31644555 PMCID: PMC6808551 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (dnDSA) production leading to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) after rituximab induction in non-sensitized ABO-compatible living kidney transplantation (ABO-CLKTx). During 2008-2015, 318 ABO-CLKTx were performed at the Department of Surgery III at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital. To reduce confounding factors, we adopted a propensity score analysis, which was applied with adjustment for age, gender, duration of pretransplant dialysis, HLA mismatch count, preformed DSA, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive treatment, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on postoperative day 7. Using a propensity score matching model (1:1, 115 pairs), we analyzed the long-term outcomes of 230 ABO-CLKTx recipients retrospectively. Recipients were classified into a rituximab-treated (RTX-KTx, N = 115) group and a control group not treated with rituximab (C-KTx, N = 115). During five years, adverse events, survival rates for grafts and patients, and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and dnDSA production for the two groups were monitored and compared. All recipients in the RTX-KTx group received rituximab induction on preoperative day 4 at a single fixed low dose of 100 mg; the CD19+ B cells were eliminated completely before surgery. Of those recipients, 13 (11.3%) developed BPAR; 1 (0.8%) experienced graft loss. By contrast, of C-KTx group recipients, 25 (21.7%) developed BPAR; 3 (2.6%) experienced graft loss. The RTX-KTx group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of BPAR (P = .041) and dnDSA production (13.9% in the RTX-KTx group vs. 26.9% in the C-RTx group, P = .005). Furthermore, lower incidence of CMV infection was detected in the RTX-KTx group than in the C-KTx group (13.9% in the RTX-KTx group vs. 27.0% in the C-KTx group, P = .014). No significant difference was found between groups for several other factors: renal function (P = .384), graft and patient survival (P = .458 and P = .119, respectively), and the respective incidences of BK virus infection (P = .722) and leukopenia (P = .207). During five-year follow-up, single fixed low-dose rituximab therapy is sufficient for ensuring safety, reducing rejection, and suppressing dnDSA production for immunological low-risk non-sensitized ABO-CLKTx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Tomita
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
- * E-mail:
| | - Kazuhiro Iwadoh
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichi Ogawa
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Miki
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yojiro Kato
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kotaro Kai
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihito Sannomiya
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Koyama
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kumiko Kitajima
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Nakajima
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shohei Fuchinoue
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Uchida J, Kosoku A, Naganuma T, Tanaka T, Nakatani T. Latest insights on ABO-incompatible living-donor renal transplantation. Int J Urol 2019; 27:30-38. [PMID: 31522462 PMCID: PMC7004137 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This review summarizes the latest insights on ABO‐incompatible living‐donor renal transplantation. Desensitization protocols and clinical outcomes were investigated, and a comparison was made with kidney‐paired donation, which is not permitted in Japan for ethical reasons. Although renal transplantation is greatly beneficial for most patients with end‐stage kidney disease, many of these patients must remain on dialysis therapy for extended periods due to the scarcity of organs from deceased donors. ABO blood type incompatibility was once believed to be a contraindication to renal transplantation due to the increased risk for antibody‐mediated rejection and early graft loss attributable to isoagglutinins. Recently, pretransplant desensitization strategies, such as removal of isoagglutinins and antibody‐producing cells, have achieved successful outcomes, although it remains unclear whether graft survival and patient morbidity are equivalent to those for ABO‐compatible renal transplantation. The present review suggested that ABO‐incompatible living‐donor renal transplantation might be a favorable radical renal replacement therapy for patients with end‐stage kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junji Uchida
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kosoku
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshihide Naganuma
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Suita Municipal Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Nakatani
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Modification of pathogenic antibodies for autoimmune diseases illuminated the biologic relevance of B cells, plasma cells, and pathogenic antibodies in autoimmunity. They have also rejuvenated interest in how B cells mediate multiple effector functions that include antibody production, antigen presentation to T cells, costimulation, and the production of immune stimulating and immune modulatory cytokines. Repurposing these drugs from autoimmunity and cancer immunotherapy has yielded important advancements in the care of antibody-mediated rejection patients and novel drug development aimed at HLA desensitization have recently emerged. We now stand on an important threshold that promises many advances in the care of our allosensitized patients. We hope that these initial advances will encourage basic scientist, clinical investigators, industry, National Institutes of Health, our academic societies, and the Food and Drug Administration to continue support of these important objectives. These advances clearly have implications for sensitized patients receiving solid organ transplants and antibody-mediated rejection treatment. Modification of alloimmunity and alloantibodies will also have relevance to xenotransplantation where the xenoantibodies present a formidable obstacle to advancement of this important therapy. Working together, we can advance transplant therapeutics where biologic agents are likely to play novel and important roles. Here, we discuss novel drugs emerging in this area.
Collapse
|
39
|
Sinangil A, Ucar ZA, Koc Y, Barlas S, Abouzahir S, Ecder ST, Akin EB. Outcome of Desensitization Therapy in Immunologically High-Risk Kidney Transplantation: Single-Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:2268-2273. [PMID: 31358450 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM Sensitization to HLA antigens creates an immunologic barrier, linked to an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection and poorer graft survival, that remains a persistent and often impenetrable deterrent to transplantation. Desensitization can improve transplantation rates in broadly sensitized kidney transplant recipients. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of immunologic high-risk kidney recipients who had desensitization treatment with the outcomes of those who did not. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent desensitization protocol due to immunologic risk between 2010 and 2018. Living-donor transplantation patients with panel reactive antibody positivity, retransplantation, donor specific antibody, and/or single antigen bead positivity were included in the study. We excluded deceased-donor transplantation recipients. Demographic data (age, sex, etiology of end-stage renal disease, blood transfusions, pregnancy, etc), immunologic status (HLA-mismatch [HLA-MM], panel reactive antibody, donor specific antibody, etc), induction and maintenance of immunosuppressive medications, and complications (all-cause hospitalizations, episodes of acute rejections, etc) were noted. We compared data and clinical outcomes of patients who had desensitization (Group 1) with data and clinical outcomes of patients who had not had desensitization (Group 2). FINDINGS There were 124 living-kidney donors (49 female, mean age 43.7 ± 12.2 years, mean body mass index [BMI] 25.8 ± 5.8 kg/m2, mean follow-up time 20.9 ± 14.6 months). Thirty-four of these patients (25 female, mean age 43.7 ± 12.5 years, mean follow-up time 26.1 ± 17.7 months, mean BMI 27 ± 6.5 kg/m2) had desensitization treatment (rituximab+plasmapheresis for 19 patients, rituximab for 11 patients, rituximab+plasmapheresis+intravenous immunoglobulin for 4 patients). Ninety patients (24 female, mean age 43.7 ± 12.2 years, mean follow-up time 18.9 ± 12.9 months, mean BMI 25.3 ± 5.4 kg/m2) had not had desensitization. There was no statistical difference between groups for age, sex, hepatitis serology, history of blood transfusion, history of pregnancy, or history of dialysis (P < .05 for all parameters). While scores for HLA-MM and HLA-relative intensity scale (RIS) were 2.7 ± 1.6 and 7.86 ± 6.2, respectively, in Group 1, in Group 2 the same scores were 2.1 ± 1.1 and 3.6 ± 2.5, respectively (P: .053 and .03). Delayed graft function, acute rejection episodes, and hospitalizations were similar between groups (P: .47, .29, and .34, respectively). Follow-up time and length of hospitalization were longer in Group 1 (P: .013 and .001, respectively). Total doses of ATG were higher in Group 1 patients (P: .007). CONCLUSION Despite the higher HLA-MM and RIS scores, clinical outcomes in desensitized patients were found to be similar to those in nondesensitized patients for acute rejection episodes and hospitalizations. Desensitization with rituximab in patients with high HLA-RIS scores can prevent acute rejection and hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayse Sinangil
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zuhal Atan Ucar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yener Koc
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Soykan Barlas
- Unit of Renal Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sana Abouzahir
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Nephrology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Suleyman Tevfik Ecder
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Emin Baris Akin
- Unit of Renal Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ziemann M, Altermann W, Angert K, Arns W, Bachmann A, Bakchoul T, Banas B, von Borstel A, Budde K, Ditt V, Einecke G, Eisenberger U, Feldkamp T, Görg S, Guthoff M, Habicht A, Hallensleben M, Heinemann FM, Hessler N, Hugo C, Kaufmann M, Kauke T, Koch M, König IR, Kurschat C, Lehmann C, Marget M, Mühlfeld A, Nitschke M, Pego da Silva L, Quick C, Rahmel A, Rath T, Reinke P, Renders L, Sommer F, Spriewald B, Staeck O, Stippel D, Süsal C, Thiele B, Zecher D, Lachmann N. Preformed Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies in Living and Deceased Donor Transplantation: A Multicenter Study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 14:1056-1066. [PMID: 31213508 PMCID: PMC6625630 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.13401118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The prognostic value of preformed donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA), which are only detectable by sensitive methods, remains controversial for kidney transplantation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS The outcome of 4233 consecutive kidney transplants performed between 2012 and 2015 in 18 German transplant centers was evaluated. Most centers used a stepwise pretransplant antibody screening with bead array tests and differentiation of positive samples by single antigen assays. Using these screening results, DSA against HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 were determined. Data on clinical outcome and possible covariates were collected retrospectively. RESULTS Pretransplant DSA were associated with lower overall graft survival, with a hazard ratio of 2.53 for living donation (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.49 to 4.29; P<0.001) and 1.59 for deceased donation (95% CI, 1.21 to 2.11; P=0.001). ABO-incompatible transplantation was associated with worse graft survival (hazard ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.33 to 3.27; P=0.001) independent from DSA. There was no difference between DSA against class 1, class 2, or both. Stratification into DSA <3000 medium fluorescence intensity (MFI) and DSA ≥3000 MFI resulted in overlapping survival curves. Therefore, separate analyses were performed for 3-month and long-term graft survival. Although DSA <3000 MFI tended to be associated with both lower 3-month and long-term transplant survival in deceased donation, DSA ≥3000 MFI were only associated with worse long-term transplant survival in deceased donation. In living donation, only strong DSA were associated with reduced graft survival in the first 3 months, but both weak and strong DSA were associated with reduced long-term graft survival. A higher incidence of antibody-mediated rejection within 6 months was only associated with DSA ≥3000 MFI. CONCLUSIONS Preformed DSA were associated with an increased risk for graft loss in kidney transplantation, which was greater in living than in deceased donation. Even weak DSA <3000 MFI were associated with worse graft survival. This association was stronger in living than deceased donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wolfgang Altermann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Arns
- Clinic for Internal Medicine I, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anette Bachmann
- Medical Department III - Endocrinology, Nephrology, Rheumatology and
| | | | - Bernhard Banas
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Annette von Borstel
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Division of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vanessa Ditt
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Thorsten Feldkamp
- Transplant Center, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Martina Guthoff
- Section for Renal and Hypertensive Disorders, Clinic for Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Hallensleben
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Falko M Heinemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nicole Hessler
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christian Hugo
- Clinic for Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Matthias Kaufmann
- Regional Office North, German Organ Transplantation Foundation, Hannover, Germany
| | - Teresa Kauke
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Transplant Surgery and.,Department for Transfusion Medicine, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University München München, Germany.,Department for Transfusion Medicine, Hospital of the Ludwigs-Maximilians-University München, München, Germany
| | | | - Inke R König
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Lehmann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Matthias Marget
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anja Mühlfeld
- Clinic for Renal and Hypertensive Disorders, Rheumatological and Immunological Diseases, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Martin Nitschke
- Transplant center, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Carmen Quick
- Clinic for Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Axel Rahmel
- German Organ Transplantation Foundation, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Thomas Rath
- Department for Nephrology and Transplantation, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Petra Reinke
- Division of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lutz Renders
- Department for Nephrology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Sommer
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Spriewald
- Department of Medicine 5 - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Oliver Staeck
- Division of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Stippel
- Department of General, Visceral Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Institute of Immunology and Transplant Immunology, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Thiele
- Institut für Immunologie und Genetik Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany; and
| | - Daniel Zecher
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Nils Lachmann
- HLA Laboratory, Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Platt JL, Cascalho M. Non-canonical B cell functions in transplantation. Hum Immunol 2019; 80:363-377. [PMID: 30980861 PMCID: PMC6544480 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2019.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
B cells are differentiated to recognize antigen and respond by producing antibodies. These activities, governed by recognition of ancillary signals, defend the individual against microorganisms and the products of microorganisms and constitute the canonical function of B cells. Despite the unique differentiation (e.g. recombination and mutation of immunoglobulin gene segments) toward this canonical function, B cells can provide other, "non-canonical" functions, such as facilitating of lymphoid organogenesis and remodeling and fashioning T cell repertoires and modifying T cell responses. Some non-canonical functions are exerted by antibodies, but most are mediated by other products and/or direct actions of B cells. The diverse set of non-canonical functions makes the B cell as much as any cell a central organizer of innate and adaptive immunity. However, the diverse products and actions also confound efforts to weigh the importance of individual non-canonical B cell functions. Here we shall describe the non-canonical functions of B cells and offer our perspective on how those functions converge in the development and governance of immunity, particularly immunity to transplants, and hurdles to advancing understanding of B cell functions in transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L Platt
- Departments of Surgery and of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
| | - Marilia Cascalho
- Departments of Surgery and of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Scurt FG, Ewert L, Mertens PR, Haller H, Schmidt BMW, Chatzikyrkou C. Clinical outcomes after ABO-incompatible renal transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2019; 393:2059-2072. [PMID: 31006573 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32091-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Revised: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND ABO-incompatible renal transplantation (ABOi-rTx) is increasingly used to overcome organ shortage. Evidence about its non-inferiority in comparison with ABO-compatible renal transplantation (ABOc-rTx) needs to be analysed at early and late timepoints. We aimed to investigate differences in outcome after ABOi-rTX and ABOc-rTX. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published up until Dec 31, 2017, that reported outcome data (≥1 year of follow-up) after ABOi-rTx and included an ABO-compatible control group, by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase Ovid, MEDLINE Ovid, and PubMed. Trials on recipients of ABOi-rTx were assessed, if an ABO-compatible control group was included and if outcome data on at least graft or recipient survival with 1 year or more of follow-up were available. Exclusion criteria included case reports, editorials, reviews and letters, animal studies, meeting papers, studies unable to extract data, non-renal solid organ and bone-marrow transplant studies, and deceased donor ABOc-rTx. Data were extracted from published reports. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and graft survival at 1, 3, 5, and more than 8 years after transplantation. In the meta-analysis, we used a fixed-effects model if the I2 value was 0, and both a fixed-effects and random-effects model if I2 was more than 0. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018094550. FINDINGS 1264 studies were screened and 40 studies including 49 patient groups were identified. 65 063 patients were eligible for analysis, 7098 of whom had undergone ABOi-rTx. Compared with ABOc-rTx, ABOi-rTx was associated with significantly higher 1-year mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2·17 [95% CI 1·63-2·90], p<0·0001; I2=37%), 3 years (OR 1·89 [1·46-2·45], p<0·0001; I2=29%), and 5 years (OR 1·47 [1·08-2·00], p=0·010; I2=68%) following transplantation. Death-censored graft survival was lower with ABOi-rTx than with ABOc-rTx at 1 year (OR 2·52 [1·80-3·54], p<0·0001; I2=61%) and 3 years (OR 1·59 [1·15-2·18], p=0·0040; I2=58%) only. Graft losses were equivalent to that of ABOc-rTx after 5 years and patient survival after 8 years. No publication bias was detected and the results were robust to trial sequential analysis until 5 years after transplantation; thereafter, data became futile or inconclusive. INTERPRETATION Despite progress in desensitisation protocols and optimisation of ABOi-rTx procedures, excess mortality and loss of kidney grafts was found compared with ABOc-rTx within the first 3 years after transplantation. Only long-term outcomes after 5 years yielded equivalent survival rates and organ function. Awareness of the increased risks of infection, organ rejection, and bleeding could improve care of patients and promote efforts towards paired kidney exchange programmes. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian G Scurt
- Clinic of Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Health Campus Immunology, Infectiology and Inflammation, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Lara Ewert
- Clinic of Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Health Campus Immunology, Infectiology and Inflammation, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter R Mertens
- Clinic of Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Health Campus Immunology, Infectiology and Inflammation, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Hermann Haller
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernhard M W Schmidt
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christos Chatzikyrkou
- Clinic of Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Health Campus Immunology, Infectiology and Inflammation, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Green H, Nesher E, Aizner S, Israeli M, Klein T, Zakai H, Rahamimov R, Rozen‐Zvi B, Mor E. Long‐term results of desensitization protocol with and without rituximab in sensitized kidney transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13562. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2018] [Revised: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hefziba Green
- Department of Medicine B Rabin Medical Center Petah‐Tikva Israel
- Nephrology and Hypertension Rabin Medical Center Petah‐Tikva Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine Tel‐Aviv University Tel‐aviv Israel
| | - Eviatar Nesher
- Department of Transplantation Rabin Medical Center Petah‐Tikva Israel
| | - Sigal Aizner
- Department of Transplantation Rabin Medical Center Petah‐Tikva Israel
| | - Moshe Israeli
- Sackler School of Medicine Tel‐Aviv University Tel‐aviv Israel
- Tissue Typing Laboratory Rabin Medical Center Petah‐Tikva Israel
| | - Tirza Klein
- Sackler School of Medicine Tel‐Aviv University Tel‐aviv Israel
- Tissue Typing Laboratory Rabin Medical Center Petah‐Tikva Israel
| | - Hana Zakai
- Sackler School of Medicine Tel‐Aviv University Tel‐aviv Israel
- Tissue Typing Laboratory Rabin Medical Center Petah‐Tikva Israel
| | - Ruth Rahamimov
- Nephrology and Hypertension Rabin Medical Center Petah‐Tikva Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine Tel‐Aviv University Tel‐aviv Israel
| | - Benaya Rozen‐Zvi
- Nephrology and Hypertension Rabin Medical Center Petah‐Tikva Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine Tel‐Aviv University Tel‐aviv Israel
| | - Eytan Mor
- Sackler School of Medicine Tel‐Aviv University Tel‐aviv Israel
- Transplant Center, Department of Surgery B Sheba Medical Center Ramat‐Gan Israel
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Novel immunological and clinical insights in vascularized composite allotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019; 24:42-48. [DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
45
|
Kosoku A, Uchida J, Nishide S, Kabei K, Shimada H, Iwai T, Kuwabara N, Maeda K, Naganuma T, Kumada N, Takemoto Y, Ishihara T, Shintani A, Nakatani T. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation as a renal replacement therapy-A single low-volume center experience in Japan. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0208638. [PMID: 30596663 PMCID: PMC6312268 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Living donor kidney transplantation is preferable to deceased donor transplantation due to its superior long-term patient and graft survivals. However, ABO blood group incompatibility is a major barrier to living donor kidney transplantation. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation has been performed in Japan since the late 1980's, but it is still globally uncommon. The objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABO-IKT) with that of ABO-compatible kidney transplantation (ABO-CKT) at an institution where only about two kidney transplants are performed a month on average. DESIGN A single center propensity score-matched cohort study. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively collected and analyzed the data of 240 patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who underwent living donor kidney transplantation at Osaka City University Hospital from January 1999 to December 2016, of which 66 patients were ABO-IKT. The remaining 174 patients who underwent ABO-CKT were studied as the control group, and the clinical outcomes of ABO-IKT and ABO-CKT recipients were compared based on propensity score matching. RESULTS After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in both patient survival and death-censored graft survival rates between the ABO-IKT and ABO-CKT groups. Moreover, there were no significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate as well as frequency of acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, infectious adverse events, malignancies, and post-operative bleeding between the two groups. CONCLUSION Currently, ABO-IKT may be an acceptable treatment for patients with ESKD even at a low-volume transplant center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Kosoku
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Junji Uchida
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
- * E-mail:
| | - Shunji Nishide
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuya Kabei
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hisao Shimada
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Iwai
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Kuwabara
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keiko Maeda
- Department of Nursing, Osaka City University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshihide Naganuma
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Norihiko Kumada
- Department of Urology, Suita Municipal Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Takemoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuma Ishihara
- Innovative and Clinical Research Promotion Center, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Ayumi Shintani
- Department of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Nakatani
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Desensitisation strategies in high-risk children before kidney transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 2018; 33:2239-2251. [PMID: 29332219 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-017-3882-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Revised: 11/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transplantation is the preferred modality for renal replacement therapy in children. With increasing rates of re-transplantation within the paediatric population, there are more sensitised children on waiting lists. One issue with developing strategies to treat these children is the number of different definitions of sensitisation. and we would therefore recommend an immunological risk stratification approach. METHODS We discuss methods of sensitisation prevention, assessment and management, including paired exchange programmes and desensitisation protocols. RESULTS There are limited published evidence-based data for desensitisation in adults and none in children; thus, we present information on the available therapies currently in use. DISCUSSION Further research is required to investigate strategies which prevent sensitisation in children, including the healthcare utility of incorporating epitope-based matching into organ allocation algorithms. Controlled studies are also needed to establish the most appropriate desensitisation regimen(s).
Collapse
|
47
|
Outcomes of Pediatric ABO-incompatible Living Kidney Transplantations From 2002 to 2015: An Analysis of the Japanese Kidney Transplant Registry. Transplantation 2018; 102:1934-1942. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
48
|
Abstract
Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal protein used in various clinical scenarios in kidney transplant recipients. However, its evidence-based use there remains limited due to lack of controlled studies, limited sample size, short follow-up and poorly defined endpoints. Rituximab is indicated for CD20+ posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. It may be beneficial for treating recurrent membranous nephropathy and recurrent allograft antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis and possibly for recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Rituximab, in combination with IVIg/plasmapheresis, appears to decrease antibody level and increase the odds of transplantation in sensitized recipients. The role of Rituximab in ABOi transplant remains unclear, as similar outcomes are achieved without its use. Rituximab is not efficacious in antibody-mediated rejection/chronic antibody-mediated rejection. Strict randomized control trials are necessary to elucidate its true role in these settings.
Collapse
|
49
|
de Weerd AE, Betjes MGH. ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13:1234-1243. [PMID: 30012630 PMCID: PMC6086717 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.00540118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ABO blood group-incompatible kidney transplantation is considered a safe procedure, with noninferior outcomes in large cohort studies. Its contribution to living kidney transplantation programs is substantial and growing. Outcomes compared with center-matched ABO blood group-compatible control patients have not been ascertained. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Comprehensive searches were conducted in Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Web-of-Science, and Google Scholar. Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology study guidelines for observational studies and Newcastle Ottawa bias scale were implemented to assess studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. A subgroup analysis on antibody removal technique was performed. RESULTS After identifying 2728 studies addressing ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation, 26 studies were included, describing 1346 unique patients who were ABO-incompatible and 4943 ABO-compatible controls. Risk of bias was low (all studies ≥7 of 9 stars). Baseline patient characteristics revealed no significant differences in immunologic risk parameters. Statistical heterogeneity of studies was low (I2 0% for graft and patient survival). One-year uncensored graft survival of patients who were ABO-incompatible was 96% versus 98% in ABO-compatible controls (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 0.98; P<0.001). Forty-nine percent of reported causes of death in patients who were ABO-incompatible were of infectious origin, versus only 13% in patients who were ABO-compatible (P=0.02). Antibody-mediated rejection (3.86; 95% confidence interval, 2.05 to 7.29; P<0.001), severe nonviral infection (1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.82; P=0.003), and bleeding (1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.36 to 2.72; P<0.001) were also more common after ABO-incompatible transplantation. CONCLUSIONS ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients have good outcomes, albeit inferior to center-matched ABO-compatible control patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies E de Weerd
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Khalil MAM, Khalil MAU, Khan TFT, Tan J. Drug-Induced Hematological Cytopenia in Kidney Transplantation and the Challenges It Poses for Kidney Transplant Physicians. J Transplant 2018; 2018:9429265. [PMID: 30155279 PMCID: PMC6093016 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9429265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug-induced hematological cytopenia is common in kidney transplantation. Various cytopenia including leucopenia (neutropenia), thrombocytopenia, and anemia can occur in kidney transplant recipients. Persistent severe leucopenia or neutropenia can lead to opportunistic infections of various etiologies. On the contrary, reducing or stopping immunosuppressive medications in these events can provoke a rejection. Transplant clinicians are often faced with the delicate dilemma of balancing cytopenia and rejection from adjustments of immunosuppressive regimen. Differentials of drug-induced cytopenia are wide. Identification of culprit medication and subsequent modification is also challenging. In this review, we will discuss individual drug implicated in causing cytopenia and correlate it with corresponding literature evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Taqi F. Taufeeq Khan
- King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk King Abdul Aziz Rd., Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jackson Tan
- RIPAS Hospital, Bandar Seri Begawan BA1710, Brunei Darussalam
| |
Collapse
|