1
|
Hwang WJ, Koo JM, Yang AR, Park YH, Chae MS. Comparison of analgesic effectiveness between nefopam and propacetamol in living kidney donors following rectus sheath block after hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:219. [PMID: 38956473 PMCID: PMC11218207 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02607-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nefopam and propacetamol are the most commonly used analgesics in postoperative multimodal analgesic regimens. Distinct mechanisms are involved in each drug's anti-nociceptive effects. No studies have compared pain relief efficacy between the two drugs in patients undergoing transplantation surgery. Here, we investigated whether the administration of nefopam or propacetamol to healthy living kidney donors who underwent rectus sheath block (RSB) for parietal pain could reduce the subsequent opioid dose necessary to produce adequate analgesia. METHODS This prospective, randomized controlled trial included 72 donors undergoing elective hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy into two groups: propacetamol (n = 36) and nefopam (n = 36). Intraoperative RSB was performed in all enrolled donors. The primary outcome was the total volume of intravenous opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) used on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). Additionally, the Numeric Rating Scale scores for flank (visceral) and umbilicus (parietal) pain at rest and during coughing were compared, and the Korean adaptation of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire (QoR-15 K) was evaluated on POD 1. RESULTS Both groups had similar preoperative and intraoperative characteristics. On POD 1, the total amount of PCA infusion was significantly lower in the nefopam group than in the propacetamol group (44.5 ± 19.3 mL vs. 70.2 ± 29.0 mL; p < 0.001). This group also reported lower pain scores at the flank and umbilical sites and required fewer rescue doses of fentanyl in the post-anesthesia care unit. However, pain scores and fentanyl consumption in the ward were comparable between groups. The QoR-15 K scores were similar between groups; there were substantial improvements in breathing, pain severity, and anxiety/depression levels in the nefopam group. The incidences of postoperative complications, including sweating and tachycardia, were similar between groups. CONCLUSION Compared with propacetamol, nefopam provides a greater analgesic effect for visceral pain and enhances the effects of blocks that reduce the opioid requirement in living kidney donors with parietal pain managed by RSB. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment in the clinical trial database using the Clinical Research Information Service (registration no. KCT0007351 , Date of registration 03/06/2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won-Jung Hwang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Min Koo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - A Rim Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Hyun Park
- Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Suk Chae
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Massey EK, Rule AD, Matas AJ. Living Kidney Donation: A Narrative Review of Mid- and Long-term Psychosocial Outcomes. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00794. [PMID: 38886889 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
Living kidney donors make a significant contribution to alleviating the organ shortage. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of mid- and long-term (≥12 mo) living donor psychosocial outcomes and highlight areas that have been understudied and should be immediately addressed in both research and clinical practice. We conducted a narrative review by searching 3 databases. A total of 206 articles were included. Living donors can be divided into those who donate to an emotionally or genetically related person, the so-called directed donors, or to an emotionally or genetically unrelated recipient, the so-called nondirected donors. The most commonly investigated (bio)psychosocial outcome after living donation was health-related quality of life. Other generic (bio)psychological outcomes include specific aspects of mental health such as depression, and fatigue and pain. Social outcomes include financial and employment burdens and problems with insurance. Donation-specific psychosocial outcomes include regret, satisfaction, feelings of abandonment and unmet needs, and benefits of living kidney donation. The experience of living donation is complex and multifaceted, reflected in the co-occurrence of both benefits and burden after donation. Noticeably, no interventions have been developed to improve mid- or long-term psychosocial outcomes among living donors. We highlight areas for methodological improvement and identified 3 areas requiring immediate attention from the transplant community in both research and clinical care: (1) recognizing and providing care for the minority of donors who have poorer long-term psychosocial outcomes after donation, (2) minimizing donation-related financial burden, and (3) studying interventions to minimize long-term psychosocial problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma K Massey
- Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Internal Medicine, Rotterdam, Zuid Holland, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew D Rule
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clifton E, Winder GS, Lentine KL, Zimbrean PC, Yadav A, Rubman S, Kalil R, Kumar V, Prashar R, Gan G, Deng Y, Joyce M, Holmes R, Laflen J, Bakhai D, Liapakis A, Doshi MD. Psychosocial Evaluation of Living Kidney Donors: A Survey of Current Practices in the United States. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00788. [PMID: 38867351 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Best practices in psychosocial evaluation and care of living donor candidates and donors are not well established. METHODS We surveyed 195 living kidney donor (LKD) transplant centers in United States from October 2021 to April 2022 querying (1) composition of psychosocial teams, (2) evaluation processes including clinical tools and domains assessed, (3) selection criteria, and (4) psychosocial follow-up post-donation. RESULTS We received 161 responses from 104 programs, representing 53% of active LKD programs and 67% of LKD transplant volume in 2019. Most respondents (63%) were social workers/independent living donor advocates. Over 90% of respondents indicated donor candidates with known mental health or substance use disorders were initially evaluated by the psychosocial team. Validated psychometric or transplant-specific tools were rarely utilized but domains assessed were consistent. Active suicidality, self-harm, and psychosis were considered absolute contraindications in >90% of programs. Active depression was absolute contraindication in 50% of programs; active anxiety disorder was excluded 27%. Conditions not contraindicated to donation include those in remission: anxiety (56%), depression (53%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (41%). There was acceptance of donor candidates using alcohol, tobacco, or cannabis recreationally, but not if pattern met criteria for active use disorder. Seventy-one percent of programs conducted post-donation psychosocial assessment and use local resources to support donors. CONCLUSIONS There was variation in acceptance of donor candidates with mental health or substance use disorders. Although most programs conducted psychosocial screening post-donation, support is not standardized and unclear if adequate. Future studies are needed for consensus building among transplant centers to form guidelines for donor evaluation, acceptance, and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Clifton
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Krista L Lentine
- Department of Internal Medicine, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Paula C Zimbrean
- Departments of Psychiatry and Surgery (Transplant), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Anju Yadav
- Division of Nephrology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Susan Rubman
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Roberto Kalil
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Geliang Gan
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, CT
| | - Yanhong Deng
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, CT
| | - Michael Joyce
- Department of Social Work, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Rachel Holmes
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Jennie Laflen
- Department of Surgery, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Darsh Bakhai
- Department of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Mona D Doshi
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Levea SL, Prasadh JG, Wang BK, Salcedo-Betancourt JD, Matevish L, Sanchez Vivaldi J, Lieber SR, Shah JA, Hwang CS, Wojciechowski D, Vagefi PA, Patel MS. A Contemporary Analysis of Mental Well-being Among Living Donor Kidney Applicants. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1631. [PMID: 38757049 PMCID: PMC11098232 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Living donation is paramount for expanding the donor pool. The aim of this study was to assess changes over time in self-reported mental health of living donor kidney applicants in efforts to inform patient-centered discussions with potential donors. Methods Kidney donor applications from 2017 through 2021 were compiled. Data included age, gender, race, ethnicity, applicant-recipient relationship, medical history, and medications. Trends over time were analyzed and post hoc analyses were performed. Results During the study period, 2479 applicants to the living donor kidney program were evaluated; 73% of applicants were female individuals. More than half of applicants were not related to their intended recipient; this fraction increased from 46% in 2017 to 58% in 2021 (P < 0.01). A similar decline in family relations was not present among Black and Latino applicants. Of all applicants, 18% reported depression and 18% reported anxiety; 20% reported taking antidepressants or anxiolytics. Depression and anxiety increased 170% (P < 0.001) and 136% (P < 0.001) from 2018 to 2019, respectively; antidepressant and anxiolytic use rose 138% (P < 0.001) between 2018 and 2020. Conclusions The profile of living donor applicants has changed in recent years, with approximately 1 in 5 requiring antidepressants or anxiolytics. Predonation counseling and postdonation monitoring are imperative to decrease adverse psychological outcomes for living donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swee-Ling Levea
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jai G. Prasadh
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Benjamin K. Wang
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Lauren Matevish
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jorge Sanchez Vivaldi
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Sarah R. Lieber
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jigesh A. Shah
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Christine S. Hwang
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David Wojciechowski
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Parsia A. Vagefi
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Madhukar S. Patel
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Min K, Hwang Y. Factors associated with the quality of life of living kidney donors in Korea: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e38068. [PMID: 38728517 PMCID: PMC11081590 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000038068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between self-determination, physical health status, and Health related Quality of Life (=HRQoL) among living kidney donors. A descriptive survey was conducted between 2019 and 2020 and included 111 kidney donors. Data were collected using a self-report questionnaire on general and donation-related characteristics, self-determination, and HRQoL. The data also included medical records reflecting the physical health status at the time of the survey. Data were analyzed using a multiple regression model. Factors associated with HRQoL were perceived health recovery after donation (β = 0.42, P < .001), up to 1 year since donation (β = 0.33, P = .008), more than 1 up to 5 years since donation (β = 0.52, P < .001), more than 5 up to 10 years since donation (β = 0.53, P < .001), and competence of self-determination (β = 0.23, P = .033). The explanatory power of these variables was 43.3%. HRQoL of living kidney donors can be affected by subjective and psychological factors. Therefore, health care providers should help living kidney donors have high self-determination during pre and post donation and concentrate on the subjective and psychological factors as well as objective health status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyungok Min
- Transplantation Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Younghui Hwang
- Department of Nursing Science, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Loban K, Fadel E, Nugus P, Przybylak-Brouillard A, Badenoch H, Robert JT, Bugeja A, Gill J, Fortin MC, Rodriguez C, Sandal S. Living kidney donors' health care needs, experiences, and perspectives across their entire donation trajectory: a semistructured, in-depth interview study. Kidney Int 2024; 105:251-258. [PMID: 38008162 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Katya Loban
- Metabolic Disorders and Complications Program (MEDIC), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Elie Fadel
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter Nugus
- Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Antoine Przybylak-Brouillard
- Metabolic Disorders and Complications Program (MEDIC), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Heather Badenoch
- Patient Partner, Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jorane-Tiana Robert
- Metabolic Disorders and Complications Program (MEDIC), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ann Bugeja
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Justin Gill
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Marie-Chantal Fortin
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Charo Rodriguez
- Patient Partner, Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shaifali Sandal
- Metabolic Disorders and Complications Program (MEDIC), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shi Y, Zhang H, Nie Z, Fu Y. Quality of life, anxiety and depression symptoms in living related kidney donors: a cross‑sectional study. Int Urol Nephrol 2023; 55:2335-2343. [PMID: 36881268 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03542-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Few studies have examined the quality of life of living kidney donors in mainland China. The data on anxiety and depression of living kidney donors was also scant. This study aimed to investigate quality of life, anxiety, and depression and identify their influencing factors among living kidney donors in mainland China. METHODS A cross-sectional study included 122 living kidney donors from a kidney transplantation center in China. The abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item and Patient Health Questionnaire 2-item were used to assess the quality of life, anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively. RESULTS Our study found that the physical related quality of life of our donors was poorer than that of the domestic general population. Among 122 donors, 43.4% and 29.5% of them were found to have anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively. Poor health condition of recipient was identified as not only negative factors affecting all domains of quality of life, but also closely related to anxiety and depression of kidney donors. Donors with proteinuria were more likely to have a poor psychological, social related quality of life, as well as anxiety and depression symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Living kidney donation has an impact on the physical and mental health of donors. Both the physical and mental health of living kidney donors should not be ignored. More attention and support should be given to donors with proteinuria and donors whose relative recipient suffering poor health condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuexian Shi
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Haiming Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Beijing Key Laboratory of Tolerance Induction and Organ Protection in Transplantation, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100050, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhaoling Nie
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, China
| | - Yingxin Fu
- Kidney Transplant department (Liver transplant department), Transplant Center, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park JY, Yang WJ, Doo SW, Park JJ, Gwon YN, Kim KM, Kim JH, Kim DK. Long-term end-stage renal disease risks after living kidney donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol 2023; 24:152. [PMID: 37254087 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03208-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies have shown that donor nephrectomy can induce renal function impairment. However, few meta-analysis studies about this have proceeded. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis including all data of recent research studies was to determine whether living donor nephrectomy (LDN) could induce renal function impairment. METHODS By November 2020, comprehensive literature searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Inclusion criteria were: (1) observational studies with data about overall end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) of living kidney donors, (2) control group consisted of people without donor nephrectomy, and (3) outcomes of studies included long-term end-stage renal disease risks after living kidney donation. Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool was used to evaluate our methodological quality. RESULTS The qualitative review included 11 studies and the meta-analysis included 5 studies. In the meta-analysis, the integrated overall ESRD risk was 5.57 (95% CI: 2.03-15.30). Regarding the overall risk of bias using ROBINS-I assessment tool, 0 studies was rated as "Low", 7 studies were rated as "moderate", 2 studies were rated as "Serious", and two studies were rated as "Critical". CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that LDN increased ESRD risk in LDN patients. However, in our meta-analysis, variables in included studies were not uniform and the number of included studies was small. To have a definite conclusion, meta-analyses of well-planned and detailed studies need to be conducted in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Young Park
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-Ro, Yongsan-Gu, Seoul, 04401, Korea
| | - Won Jae Yang
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-Ro, Yongsan-Gu, Seoul, 04401, Korea
| | - Seung Whan Doo
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-Ro, Yongsan-Gu, Seoul, 04401, Korea
| | - Jae Joon Park
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-Ro, Yongsan-Gu, Seoul, 04401, Korea
| | - Yong Nam Gwon
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-Ro, Yongsan-Gu, Seoul, 04401, Korea
| | - Ki Min Kim
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-Ro, Yongsan-Gu, Seoul, 04401, Korea
| | - Jae Heon Kim
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-Ro, Yongsan-Gu, Seoul, 04401, Korea.
| | - Do Kyung Kim
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-Ro, Yongsan-Gu, Seoul, 04401, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kaul A, Bhaduaria D, Behera MR, Kushwaha R, Prasad N, Yachha M, Patel M, Kalitha J. Psycho-social health and quality of life among kidney donors following transplantation. Transpl Immunol 2022; 74:101649. [PMID: 35777614 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Living kidney donation is a complex psychological experience for donors. The present study examined the psychosocial impact of kidney donation on donors. METHODS The retrospective study included 506 donors who donated a kidney between 2010 and 2018 at a transplant centre in India. These donors responded via a donor insight questionnaire about their hospital anxiety, and their possible level of depression. The information included socio-demographic form with multiple information. The health survey was used periodically evaluate the psychosocial impact among donors following donation, including the transplant outcomes. RESULTS The majority of donors were females (79.4%). There was a significant improvement in the quality of life among donors (SF-36) following the donation of a kidney, especially among those donors who maintained good graft functions themselves as well as those who were informed about good kidney function in transplanted recipients. These donors showed a lesser degree of depressive and anxiety scores (HAD score 3.5 and BDI II 4.8) than donors who had problems themselves and/or whose donated kidneys did not function well. Most living donors (89.1%) felt that the act of donation had a positive impact on their lives and those donors would encourage others to donate a kidney. Overall, the graft outcomes impacted the donor's state of mind. CONCLUSION The study showed a very positive impact of the acknowledgment of the donor by the recipient, especially those donors whose kidney transplants were well functioning. The state of depression, anxiety, and psycho-social outcomes correlated with the graft outcomes. Donors showed positive insight towards donation, with inner conscience still conclusively willing to donate and encourage others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kaul
- Department of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India.
| | - D Bhaduaria
- Department of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India
| | - M Ranjan Behera
- Department of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India
| | - Ravi Kushwaha
- Department of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India
| | - N Prasad
- Department of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India
| | - M Yachha
- Department of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India
| | - M Patel
- Department of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India
| | - J Kalitha
- Department of Neurology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bansal D, Krishna A, Prajapati O, Kumar S, Sagar R, Subramaniam R, Misra MC, Bansal VK. A Prospective Study Comparing Quality of Life after Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy versus Open Donor Nephrectomy. SAUDI JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES AND TRANSPLANTATION 2022; 33:345-352. [PMID: 37843135 DOI: 10.4103/1319-2442.385957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has advantages over open donor nephrectomy (ODN), with less bleeding and pain, and earlier discharge. However, the quality of life (QOL) has not been compared between these techniques. All consecutive donors undergoing left LDN or ODN from 2013 to 2015 at our center were included. The donors' QOL was measured with the brief World Health Organization QOL (WHOQOL-BREF) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaires preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Cosmesis was measured by the body image questionnaire, and patient satisfaction was scored on a verbal rating scale at 3 and 6 months. Of the 264 donors, 228 met the inclusion criteria (100 - LDN and 128 - ODN). The LDN group showed no difference in WHOQOL-BREF scores at 3 months, and significant improvements in the psychological and social domains at 6 months versus the baseline. The ODN group showed a significant decrease in the physical, psychological, and environmental domains at 3 and 6 months versus the baseline. Compared with the ODN group, the LDN group had better QOL scores at 3 and 6 months in all domains. The responses to the HADS questionnaire were similar between the groups at all time points. The mean body image, cosmesis, and satisfaction scores were significantly better in the LDN group. LDN minimized the negative effects of surgery on the donors' QOL, with improvements in the long-term psychological and social aspects versus the baseline. LDN was more cosmetic and was associated with higher satisfaction than ODN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devanshu Bansal
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Asuri Krishna
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Omprakash Prajapati
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Subodh Kumar
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajesh Sagar
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajeshwari Subramaniam
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Mahesh C Misra
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Virinder Kumar Bansal
- Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wirken L, van Middendorp H, Hooghof CW, Sanders JS, Dam R, van der Pant KAMI, Wierdsma J, Wellink H, Ulrichts P, Hoitsma AJ, Hilbrands LB, Evers AW. Combining transplant professional's psychosocial donor evaluation and donor self-report measures to optimise the prediction of HRQoL after kidney donation: an observational prospective multicentre study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e045249. [PMID: 35236728 PMCID: PMC8895930 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Living donor kidney transplantation is currently the preferred treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. The psychosocial evaluation of kidney donor candidates relies mostly on the clinical viewpoint of transplant professionals because evidence-based guidelines for psychosocial donor eligibility are currently lacking. However, the accuracy of these clinical risk judgements and the potential added value of a systematic self-reported screening procedure are as yet unknown. The current study examined the effectiveness of the psychosocial evaluation by transplant professionals and the potential value of donor self-report measures in optimising the donor evaluation. Based on the stress-vulnerability model, the predictive value of predonation, intradonation and postdonation factors to impaired longer term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of kidney donors was studied. DESIGN An observational prospective multicentre study. SETTING Seven Dutch transplantation centres. PARTICIPANTS 588 potential donors participated, of whom 361 donated. Complete prospective data of 230 donors were available. Also, 1048 risk estimation questionnaires were completed by healthcare professionals. METHODS Transplant professionals (nephrologists, coordinating nurses, social workers and psychologists) filled in risk estimation questionnaires on kidney donor candidates. Furthermore, 230 kidney donors completed questionnaires (eg, on HRQoL) before and 6 and 12 months after donation. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES HRQoL, demographic and preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative health characteristics, perceived support, donor cognitions, recipient functioning and professionals risk estimation questionnaires. RESULTS On top of other predictors, such as the transplant professionals' risk assessments, donor self-report measures significantly predicted impaired longer term HRQoL after donation, particularly by poorer predonation physical (17%-28% explained variance) and psychological functioning (23%). CONCLUSIONS The current study endorses the effectiveness of the psychosocial donor evaluation by professionals and the additional value of donor self-report measures in optimising the psychosocial evaluation. Consequently, systematic screening of donors based on the most prominent risk factors provide ground for tailored interventions for donors at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke Wirken
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Henriët van Middendorp
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan-Stephan Sanders
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ruth Dam
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A M I van der Pant
- Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, Renal Transplant Unit, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith Wierdsma
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hiske Wellink
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam UMC VUMC Site, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Ulrichts
- Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Andrea W Evers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oudmaijer CAJ, Minnee RC, Pol RA, van den Boogaard WMC, Komninos DSJ, van de Wetering J, van Heugten MH, Hoorn EJ, Sanders JSF, Hoeijmakers JHJ, Vermeij WP, IJzermans JNM. Fasting before living-kidney donation: effect on donor well-being and postoperative recovery: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:18. [PMID: 34991694 PMCID: PMC8733810 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05950-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the main effectors on the quality of life of living-kidney donors is postoperative fatigue. Caloric restriction (CR) and short-term fasting (STF) are associated with improved fitness and increased resistance to acute stress. CR/STF increases the expression of cytoprotective genes, increases immunomodulation via increased anti-inflammatory cytokine production, and decreases the expression of pro-inflammatory markers. As such, nutritional preconditioning by CR or STF represents a non-invasive and cost-effective method that could mitigate the effects of acute surgery-induced stress and postoperative fatigue. To investigate whether preoperative STF contributes to a reduction in fatigue after living-kidney donation, a randomized clinical trial is indicated. METHODS We aim to determine whether 2.5 days of fasting reduces postoperative fatigue score in subjects undergoing living-kidney donation. In this randomized study, the intervention group will follow a preoperative fasting regime for 2.5 days with a low-dose laxative, while the control group will receive standard care. The main study endpoint is postoperative fatigue, 4 weeks after living-kidney donation. Secondary endpoints include the effect of preoperative fasting on postoperative hospital admission time, the feasibility of STF, and the postoperative recovery of donor and recipient kidney function. This study will provide us with knowledge of the feasibility of STF and confirm its effect on postoperative recovery. DISCUSSION Our study will provide clinically relevant information on the merits of caloric restriction for living-kidney donors and recipients. We expect to reduce the postoperative fatigue in living-kidney donors and improve the postoperative recovery of living-kidney recipients. It will provide evidence on the clinical merits and potential caveats of preoperative dietary interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register NL9262 . EudraCT 2020-005445-16 . MEC Erasmus MC MEC-2020-0778. CCMO NL74623.078.21.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. A. J. Oudmaijer
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, RG-220, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R. C. Minnee
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, RG-220, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R. A. Pol
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - W. M. C. van den Boogaard
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D. S. J. Komninos
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J. van de Wetering
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M. H. van Heugten
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E. J. Hoorn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J. S. F. Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J. H. J. Hoeijmakers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Institute for Genome Stability in Ageing and Disease, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Excellence Cluster for Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Centre for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - W. P. Vermeij
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J. N. M. IJzermans
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, RG-220, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Agarwal N, Rana AS, Jain A. A prospective comparative study from India between living genetically related and unrelated donor renal transplants. INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/ijot.ijot_51_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
14
|
Suwelack B, Dugas M, Koch M, Sommerer C, Urban M, Gerß J, Wegner J, Burgmer M. [Safety of the Living Kidney Donor - The German National Register - Development and Structure of a National Register in the Health Service Research]. DAS GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2021; 83:S33-S38. [PMID: 34731891 DOI: 10.1055/a-1547-7114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The German living donor register Safety of the Living Kidney Donor - The German National Register (SOLKID-GNR) collects data of the medical and psychosocial outcome of living kidney donors. For the first time in Germany, a prospective data collection allows a scientifically based long-term analysis of how a living kidney donation influences the psychological and physical health of living kidney donors. This will contribute directly to improve the information and care of living kidney donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Suwelack
- Medizinische Klinik D - Transplantationsnephrologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Martin Dugas
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Martina Koch
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Claudia Sommerer
- Nephrologie am Zentrum für Innere Medizin, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Marc Urban
- Zentrum für Klinische Studien, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Joachim Gerß
- Institut für Biometrie und Klinische Forschung, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Jeannine Wegner
- Medizinische Klinik D - Transplantationsnephrologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Markus Burgmer
- Abteilung für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LWL-Klinik Münster, Münster, Deutschland.,Klinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Garcia-Ochoa C, Feldman LS, Nguan C, Monroy-Caudros M, Arnold JB, Barnieh L, Boudville N, Cuerden MS, Dipchand C, Gill JS, Karpinski M, Klarenbach S, Knoll G, Lok CE, Miller M, Prasad GVR, Sontrop JM, Storsley L, Garg AX. Impact of Perioperative Complications on Living Kidney Donor Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Health: Results From a Prospective Cohort Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2021; 8:20543581211037429. [PMID: 34394947 PMCID: PMC8361543 DOI: 10.1177/20543581211037429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Although living kidney donation is safe, some donors experience perioperative complications. Objective: This study explored how perioperative complications affected donor-reported health-related quality of life, depression, and anxiety. Design: This research was a conducted as a prospective cohort study. Setting: Twelve transplant centers across Canada. Patients: A total of 912 living kidney donors were included in this study. Measurements: Short Form 36 health survey, Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Methods: Living kidney donors were prospectively enrolled predonation between 2009 to 2014. Donor perioperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Mental and physical health-related quality of life was assessed with the 3 measurements; measurements were taken predonation and at 3- and 12-months postdonation. Results: Seventy-four donors (8%) experienced a perioperative complication; most were minor (n = 67 [91%]), and all minor complications resolved before hospital discharge. The presence (versus absence) of a perioperative complication was associated with lower mental health-related quality of life and higher depression symptoms 3-month postdonation; neither of these differences persisted at 12-month. Perioperative complications were not associated with any changes in physical health-related quality of life or anxiety 3-month postdonation. Limitations: Minor complications may have been missed and information on complications postdischarge were not collected. No minimal clinically significant change has been defined for kidney donors across the 3 measurements. Conclusions: These findings highlight a potential opportunity to better support the psychosocial needs of donors who experience perioperative complications in the months following donation. Trial registration: NCT00319579 and NCT00936078.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Chris Nguan
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Neil Boudville
- Medical School, Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | | | | | - John S Gill
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | - Greg Knoll
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Matthew Miller
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jessica M Sontrop
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - Amit X Garg
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living kidney donors incur donation-related expenses, but how these expenses impact postdonation mental health is unknown. METHODS In this prospective cohort study, the association between mental health and donor-incurred expenses (both out-of-pocket costs and lost wages) was examined in 821 people who donated a kidney at one of the 12 transplant centers in Canada between 2009 and 2014. Mental health was measured by the RAND Short Form-36 Health Survey along with Beck Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory. RESULTS A total of 209 donors (25%) reported expenses of >5500 Canadian dollars. Compared with donors who incurred lower expenses, those who incurred higher expenses demonstrated significantly worse mental health-related quality of life 3 months after donation, with a trend towards worse anxiety and depression, after controlling for predonation mental health-related quality of life and other risk factors for psychological distress. Between-group differences for donors with lower and higher expenses on these measures were no longer significant 12 months after donation. CONCLUSIONS Living kidney donor transplant programs should ensure that adequate psychosocial support is available to all donors who need it, based on known and unknown risk factors. Efforts to minimize donor-incurred expenses and to better support the mental well-being of donors need to continue. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of donor reimbursement programs, which mitigate donor expenses, on postdonation mental health.
Collapse
|
17
|
Massey EK, Pronk MC, Zuidema WC, Weimar W, van de Wetering J, Ismail SY. Positive and negative aspects of mental health after unspecified living kidney donation: A cohort study. Br J Health Psychol 2021; 27:374-389. [PMID: 34296497 PMCID: PMC9291094 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Unspecified donors give a kidney to a stranger with end‐stage kidney failure. There has been little research on the long‐term impact of unspecified donation on mental health outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the positive and negative aspects of mental health among unspecified donors. Design We invited all unspecified donors who donated a kidney between 2000 and 2016 at our centre to participate in an interview and to complete validated questionnaires. Methods We measured positive mental health using the Dutch Mental Health Continuum‐Short Form (MHC‐SF), psychological complaints using the Symptoms Checklist‐90 (SCL‐90) and psychiatric diagnoses using the Mini‐International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) Screen for all donors and the M.I.N.I. Plus on indication. Results Of the 134 eligible donors, 114 participated (54% female; median age 66 years), a median of 6 years post‐donation. Scores on emotional and social well‐being subscales of the MHC‐SF were significantly higher than in the general population. Psychological symptoms were comparable to the general population. Thirty‐two per cent of donors had a current or lifetime psychiatric diagnosis. Psychological symptoms did not significantly change between the pre‐donation screening and the post‐donation study. Conclusions We concluded that, with the appropriate screening, unspecified donation is a safe procedure from a psychological perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma K Massey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathilde C Pronk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willij C Zuidema
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Weimar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline van de Wetering
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sohal Y Ismail
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fox KR, Gulin SL, Bruschwein HM, Rose T, Burker EJ, Kozlowski T, Loiselle MM. The Effect of Psychiatric History on Pain and Related Outcomes Among Living Kidney Donors. Prog Transplant 2021; 31:108-116. [PMID: 34080486 DOI: 10.1177/15269248211002809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Living donor transplantation of kidneys accounts for one quarter of transplants performed in the United States. Careful screening of psychiatric history is a standard part of the donor evaluation. Little is known about the impact of psychiatric history on post-donation course and pain experience. RESEARCH QUESTION This study investigated whether psychiatric history was associated with pain and related outcomes among living kidney donors. DESIGN A retrospective medical record review was conducted of 75 living kidney donors who underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. All donor candidates completed a psychological evaluation and were approved for donation by a multidisciplinary committee. History of psychiatric diagnosis and psychiatric medication use were obtained from donors' psychological evaluation reports. Data on pain and related outcomes (ie, history of prescribed pain medication, post-donation pain, opioid use, length of hospital stay, post-donation emergency department visits), as well as demographic and donation-related characteristics were also abstracted from medical records. RESULTS Psychiatric history, including current or historical psychiatric diagnosis or psychiatric medication use, in living kidney donors who were evaluated and approved for donation by a transplant psychologist was not associated with greater perceived pain, greater use of opioid pain medication in the post-operative period, longer hospital stays, or more frequent post-donation emergency department visits. DISCUSSION The findings demonstrate that carefully screened donors with a psychiatric history have comparable pain-related outcomes as donors without a psychiatric history. This study highlights the importance of the pre-donation psychological evaluation in promoting positive postdonation outcomes through careful selection of donor candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen R Fox
- Center for Biobehavioral Health, 2650Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Shaina L Gulin
- 2331University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Heather M Bruschwein
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, 12349University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Terra Rose
- Division of Clinical Rehabilitation & Mental Health Counseling, Department of Allied Health Sciences, 2331University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, 2331University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Eileen J Burker
- Division of Clinical Rehabilitation & Mental Health Counseling, Department of Allied Health Sciences, 2331University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, 2331University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tomasz Kozlowski
- Department of Surgery, 12233College of Medicine, University of Florida, University of Oklahoma, Gainesville, FL Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Marci M Loiselle
- Division of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 22957Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Experiencing one's own body and body image in living kidney donors-A sociological and psychological study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0249397. [PMID: 33857150 PMCID: PMC8049271 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to perform an in-depth exploratory analysis of the experience and image of one's body among living kidney donors. METHOD The research was carried out using mixed methodology. The study on experiencing one's own body was carried out using the sociological methodology of the grounded theory (qualitative research). This method was supplemented with psychometric measurement-the Body Esteem Scale (quantitative research). The basic research method was the in-depth interview. Using this method, a group of 25 living kidney donors who had not experienced any serious health or psychological problems after donation was examined. The participants of the study came from three transplant centers in Poland. RESULTS The data from the sociological interviews indicate that the donors: 1. do not experience radical changes in the functioning of their body; 2. maintain full control over it and do not feel the absence of a kidney in the body; 3. consciously and reflectively take care of their body after donation. In addition, the sociological research indicates that caring for one's own body also includes the transferred organ. The kidney donors experience a kind of bodily identity extension, including the recipient's body. However, the personal and social identity of the studied kidney donors is not disturbed in any way. The psychometric data correspond to the sociological results and indicate: 1. a lack of extreme emotional assessments about one's body; 2. awareness of one's own body and consistency of its image; 3. reduced emotional assessment of body zones directly related to the surgery; 4. differences in body image between the sexes. CONCLUSIONS The research results presented in the text indicate not only the possibility, but also the need for triangulation of research methods in the study of the experience and image of one's own body in living kidney donors. The proposed research approach employing mixed methodology within the fields of sociology and psychology for researching the phenomenon of living kidney donation is not very common.
Collapse
|
20
|
The Spanish Version of the Fear of Kidney Failure Questionnaire: Validity, Reliability, and Characterization of Living Donors With the Highest Fear of Kidney Failure. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e655. [PMID: 33490380 PMCID: PMC7817340 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Measures of fear of progression or recurrence of illnesses have been criticized for neglecting cross-cultural validity. Therefore, we assessed the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Fear of Kidney Failure Questionnaire (FKFQ), to determine whether postdonation fear of kidney failure (FKF) influenced the donors’ psychosocial status, and define variables that characterized donors with high FKFQ scores. Methods. We included 492 participants (211 donors) in a multicenter, 11-year, retrospective, cross-sectional study. Donors were classified with a Latent Class Analysis of the FKFQ-item scores and characterized with a multivariable logistic regression analysis. We calculated the risk ratio based on predicted marginal probabilities. Results. The Spanish version of the FKFQ showed acceptable psychometric properties. FKF was uncommon among donors, but we detected a small subgroup (n = 21, 9.9%) with high FKF (mean FKFQ score = 14.5, 3.1 SD). Compared with other donors, these donors reported higher anxiety and depression (38% and 29% of potential anxiety and depressive disorders), worse quality of life, and less satisfaction with the donation. Donors with high FKFQ scores were characterized by higher neuroticism combined with postdonation physical symptoms that interfered with daily activities. Conclusions. The FKFQ was cross-culturally valid, and thus, it may be used to assess the FKF in Spanish-speaking donors. New interventions that promote positive affectivity and evidence-based treatments for worry could be adapted for treating FKF.
Collapse
|
21
|
One size does not fit all: understanding individual living kidney donor risk. Pediatr Nephrol 2021; 36:259-269. [PMID: 31897715 PMCID: PMC7815560 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-019-04456-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Living donor kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) but confers a risk upon the donor, both in the short term and many years after donation. While perioperative mortality is low and longevity does not appear to be adversely affected, there are small increases in the risk of other important morbidities. The overall risk of ESKD among donors is low but appears to be three- to five-fold higher than among healthy non-donors, and this relative risk is even higher among donors of African ancestry. For these individuals, apolipoprotein L1 genotyping may be helpful. Kidney donors also have an increased risk of developing hypertension post-donation and a modestly increased risk of developing gout. Living kidney donation also increases the risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia while not affecting other important pregnancy outcomes. As our understanding of donor risk grows, it is important to counsel prospective donors according to their individual risk and so obtain better informed donor consent. As knowledge advances, it is also important that all clinicians who manage kidney transplant candidates have an up to date understanding of donor risk to inform shared decision making.
Collapse
|
22
|
Menjivar A, Torres X, Manyalich M, Fehrman-Ekholm I, Papachristou C, de Sousa-Amorim E, Paredes D, Hiesse C, Yucetin L, Oppenheimer F, Kondi E, Peri JM, Kvarnström N, Ballesté C, Dias L, Frade IC, Lopes A, Diekmann F, Revuelta I. Psychosocial risk factors for impaired health-related quality of life in living kidney donors: results from the ELIPSY prospective study. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21343. [PMID: 33288792 PMCID: PMC7721886 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78032-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Living kidney donors' follow-up is usually focused on the assessment of the surgical and medical outcomes. Whilst the psychosocial follow-up is advocated in literature. It is still not entirely clear which exact psychosocial factors are related to a poor psychosocial outcome of donors. The aim of our study is to prospectively assess the donors' psychosocial risks factors to impaired health-related quality of life at 1-year post-donation and link their psychosocial profile before donation with their respective outcomes. The influence of the recipient's medical outcomes on their donor's psychosocial outcome was also examined. Sixty donors completed a battery of standardized psychometric instruments (quality of life, mental health, coping strategies, personality, socio-economic status), and ad hoc items regarding the donation process (e.g., motivations for donation, decision-making, risk assessment, and donor-recipient relationship). Donors' 1-year psychosocial follow-up was favorable and comparable with the general population. So far, cluster-analysis identified a subgroup of donors (28%) with a post-donation reduction of their health-related quality of life. This subgroup expressed comparatively to the rest, the need for more pre-donation information regarding surgery risks, and elevated fear of losing the recipient and commitment to stop their suffering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Menjivar
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Torres
- Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Service, Institut Clinic de Neurociencies, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marti Manyalich
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Transplant Assessorial Unit, Medical Direction, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ingela Fehrman-Ekholm
- Karolinska Institutet, Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christina Papachristou
- Department for Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Charité, University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloníki, Greece
| | - Erika de Sousa-Amorim
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Donation and Transplant Coordination Section, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian Hiesse
- Service de Néphrologie et de Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes Cedex, France
| | - Levent Yucetin
- Organ Transplant Coordination, Antalya Medical Park Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Federico Oppenheimer
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Entela Kondi
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Transplant Assessorial Unit, Medical Direction, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Maria Peri
- Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Service, Institut Clinic de Neurociencies, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Niclas Kvarnström
- Department of Transplantation, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Chloë Ballesté
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leonidio Dias
- Nephrology and Transplant Departments, Hospital Geral de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Inês C Frade
- Liaison-Psychiatry and Health Psychology Unit, Hospital Geral de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Alice Lopes
- Liaison-Psychiatry and Health Psychology Unit, Hospital Geral de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. .,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain. .,Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wahba R, Vitinius F, Walczuch B, Dieplinger G, Buchner D, Datta R, Lürssen N, Schlößer HA, Thomas M, Müller R, Kann M, Hellmich M, Kurschat C, Stippel DL. Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Compared to Anterior Approach Open Donor Nephrectomy: Improved Long-Term Physical Component Score in Health-Related Quality of Life in Living Kidney Donors. Transplant Proc 2020; 53:786-792. [PMID: 32981693 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health-related quality of life (HRQL), fatigue, anxiety, and depression are crucial for the living kidney donor (LKD). Follow-up data for HRQL of LKDs comparing surgical techniques, especially regarding hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (HARP), are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of abdominal wall trauma minimized by HARP in comparison to open anterior approach donor nephrectomy (AA) on HRQL and additional psychosocial aspects of LKDs during the long-term follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a cross-sectional study comparing psychosocial aspects of LKD between HARP and AA. RESULTS This study included 100 LKDs (68 HARP, 28 AA, and 4 were excluded secondary to incomplete data). The time to follow-up was 22.6 ± 11.7 (HARP) vs 58.7 ± 13.9 (AA) months (P < .005). Complications ≥3a° due to Clavien-Dindo classification was 0% in both groups. There were higher scores in all physical aspects for HARP donors vs AA donors at that time (physical function: 89.8 ± 14.6 vs 80.0 ± 19.9, P = .008, and the physical component score: 53.9 ± 7.6 vs 48.6 ± 8.5, P = .006). One year later (follow-up time + 12 months), HRQL for HARP donors was still higher. Mental items showed no significant differences. HARP donors showed better physical scores compared to the age-matched nondonor population (AA donors had lower scores). Neither the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20) or the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) showed any differences between the 2 groups. Fatigue scores were higher for HARP and for AA compared to the age-matched population. CONCLUSIONS LKDs undergoing HARP showed better physical performance as part of HRQL in the long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Wahba
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Frank Vitinius
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Transplant Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bianca Walczuch
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Georg Dieplinger
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Denise Buchner
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rabi Datta
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nadine Lürssen
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans Anton Schlößer
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roman Müller
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Kann
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christine Kurschat
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk L Stippel
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kim JY, Kim DH, Kim YJ, Choi JY, Kwon H, Ko Y, Jung JH, Baek CH, Kim H, Park SK, Kim SB, Lee SK, Lee Y, Kim YH, Han DJ, Shin S. Long-Term Outcome of Live Kidney Donation in South Korea. Ann Transplant 2020; 25:e923065. [PMID: 32792472 PMCID: PMC7448690 DOI: 10.12659/aot.923065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney donors may be at increased risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as well as cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. In particular, data on long-term safety after kidney donation in Asian populations are lacking. We aimed to assess the safety of live kidney donation in Korean donors by using a matched control group. Material/Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a hospital-based database (Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea) and a control group from the national health insurance claims database in South Korea. We analyzed the health status of 1608 kidney donors who underwent donation between September 1990 and December 2015, and we compared their characteristics with those of matched 6426 non-donors (1: 4 ratio). We also measured the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with 51Cr EDTA and urinary albumin excretion and assessed the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and general health status in 200 volunteer donors. Results Mortality was significantly lower in kidney donors compared with the matched controls (130.2 vs. 185.4 per 100,000 person-years, P=0.02). There was no significant difference in mortality if a donor had hypertension or was a current smoker at the time of donation. There was also no significant difference in ESRD (43.1 vs. 35.2 per 100,000 person-years, P=0.07) between the 2 groups regardless of hypertension and smoking status. Among the 200 donors with measured GFR, 11.5% had GFR values <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 9.4±5.3 years after donation. Older age (P=0.001) and female sex (P=0.021) were significantly associated with GFR values <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conclusions Mortality and ESRD were uncommon in carefully selected kidney donors. However, donors with pre-existing risk factors should be followed up more closely to ensure long-term safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jee Yeon Kim
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Kim
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ye-Jee Kim
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Yoon Choi
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyunwook Kwon
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Youngmin Ko
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joo Hee Jung
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chung Hee Baek
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyosang Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Su-Kil Park
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Soon Bae Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sang Koo Lee
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yura Lee
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young Hoon Kim
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Duck Jong Han
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Shin
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ibrahim IA, Hassan EA, Ali TZ, Brockmann JG, Aleid HA. Severe hyponatremia after donor nephrectomy. SAUDI JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES AND TRANSPLANTATION 2020; 31:515-520. [PMID: 32394926 DOI: 10.4103/1319-2442.284028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Living kidney donation is safe and established but can lead to short- and long-term complications. Hyponatremia is the most common disorder of body fluid and electrolyte balance in clinical practice, associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and the length of hospital stay. A correct diagnosis of the etiology of hyponatremia is critical, both to determine correct management and prognosis. Here, we present a case of a severe hyponatremia following left- sided donor nephrectomy with a physical examination suggestive of mild hypovolemia. Laboratory tests revealed high urine osmolality and sodium concentration mimicking syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), in the setting of abnormally blunted response to Synacthen. The patient responded well to hydrocortisone replacement. Differentiating between primary adrenal insufficiency and SIADH as a cause of severe hyponatremia was the key to successfully treating this patient. Hyponatremia following donor nephrectomy is unusual and could be explained in this case by hypocortisolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ihab A Ibrahim
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ehab A Hassan
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tariq Z Ali
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jens G Brockmann
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan A Aleid
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shi Y, Liu C, Zhang H, Huang Y, Sun M, Wang W, Shang S. Changes in the quality of life of living liver donors: A meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 109:103586. [PMID: 32531567 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comprehending the physical, psychological, social benefits, and harm associated with liver donation is critical in promoting practices to maintain donors' long-term health. However, changes in quality of life among living liver donors pre- and post-donation have not been established. OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies examined the quality of life changes among living liver donors pre- and post-donation. METHODS PubMed, Embase, CINHAL with full text, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses were mainly searched for full-text articles from inception till December 2018 to identify studies assessing the quality of life of living liver donors. The methodological quality of the included studies was examined. The quality of life post-donation at five assessment points, ≤1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and ≥ 24 months were compared with the pre-donation, respectively. RESULTS The search yielded 2215 records, and a total of 15 articles (13 studies) with 715 donors were included in this meta-analysis. Physical functioning scores at ≤1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and ≥24 months post-donation were significantly lower than pre-donation [overall standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.67, 95% CI: -0.86, -0.49; p ≤]. Significantly higher level of pain was found at 3-month post-donation (SMD, -1.05; 95% CI: -1.26, -0.85; p < 0.00001). Also, a significantly higher level of anxiety was found at 3-month post-donation (SMD, -0.29; 95%CI: -0.51, -0.07; p = 0.01), but there were no significant changes in general psychological state and depression. A significant reduction in donors' social quality of life (SMD, -2.61; 95%CI: -4.75, 0.48; p = 0.02) was found at ≤1-month post-donation, and recovery to pre-donation levels occurred at 3 months post-donation. CONCLUSIONS Living liver donation was associated with a decline in physical functioning, which was sustained for longer than 2 years post-donation. Impaired social and psychological quality of life affected donors for 1-3 months after their donation. The quality of life of living liver donors has become a pressing issue requiring more attention from doctors and nurses within the transplant team. However, multicenter, prospective, and longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the long-term safety of living liver donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuexian Shi
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Chunxia Liu
- Department of urinary surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, 100161, Beijing, China
| | - Haiming Zhang
- Liver Transplantation Center; Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
| | - Yaqi Huang
- School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Meng Sun
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenru Wang
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Shaomei Shang
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wirken L, van Middendorp H, Hooghof CW, Sanders JSF, Dam RE, van der Pant KAMI, Wierdsma JM, Wellink H, van Duijnhoven EM, Hoitsma AJ, Hilbrands LB, Evers AWM. Psychosocial consequences of living kidney donation: a prospective multicentre study on health-related quality of life, donor-recipient relationships and regret. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 34:1045-1055. [PMID: 30544241 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have indicated decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL) shortly after kidney donation, returning to baseline in the longer term. However, a subgroup of donors experiences persistent HRQoL problems. To identify which HRQoL aspects are impacted most by the donation and to identify at-risk donors, more specific insight into psychosocial donation consequences is needed. METHODS The current study examined the HRQoL course, donor-perceived consequences of donation for donors, recipients and donor-recipient relationships, and regret up to 12 months post-donation in donors from seven Dutch transplantation centres. Kidney donor candidates (n = 588) completed self-report questionnaires early in the screening procedure, of which 361 (61%) donated their kidney. RESULTS Data for 230 donors (64%) with complete assessments before donation and 6 and 12 months post-donation were analysed. Results indicated that donor physical HRQoL was comparable at all time points, except for an increase in fatigue that lasted up to 12 months post-donation. Mental HRQoL decreased at 6 months post-donation, but returned to baseline at 12 months. Donors reported large improvements in recipient's functioning and a smaller influence of the recipient's kidney disease or transplantation on the donor's life over time. A subgroup experienced negative donation consequences with 14% experiencing regret 12 months post-donation. Predictors of regret were more negative health perceptions and worse social functioning 6 months post-donation. The strongest baseline predictors of higher fatigue levels after donation were more pre-donation fatigue, worse general physical functioning and a younger age. CONCLUSIONS Future research should examine predictors of HRQoL after donation to improve screening and to provide potential interventions in at-risk donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke Wirken
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Henriët van Middendorp
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Christina W Hooghof
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan F Sanders
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ruth E Dam
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A M I van der Pant
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Transplant Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith M Wierdsma
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hiske Wellink
- Department of Nephrology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elly M van Duijnhoven
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andries J Hoitsma
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea W M Evers
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Liu KL, Wang HH, Hsieh CY, Huang XY, Lin CT, Lin KJ, Chiang YJ, Chien CH. Kidney Donation Withdrawal and Related Factors Among the Potential Donors of Living Kidney Transplant. Transplant Proc 2020; 52:73-77. [PMID: 31901327 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to discuss the reasons for kidney donation withdrawal and related factors among the potential donors of living kidney transplant. METHODS This study was conducted in outpatient departments with purposive sampling. Potential donors received relevant examinations and completed questionnaires when they would donate their kidneys for living related kidney transplant. Researchers tracked the final decision of potential donors. The structured questionnaire included basic data, psychosocial adjustment to illness scale, and decisional conflict scale. RESULTS A total of 53 potential donors participated in this study, 46 of whom completed the kidney donation surgery (86.6%). The factors related to the final decision of kidney donation or kidney donation withdrawal included self-ranking health condition, value clarity, feeling supported in decision making, and overall decisional conflict. CONCLUSION Organ transplant teams should conduct a complete physical and psychological assessment of potential donors, provide information and support, and assist potential donors to clarify their true values and willingness to undergo kidney donation. Thus, each potential donor can decide to donate in true accordance with their willingness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuan-Lin Liu
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Han Wang
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; Organ Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Yi Hsieh
- Department of Nursing, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Xuan-Yi Huang
- College of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Te Lin
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Jen Lin
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; Organ Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Yang-Jen Chiang
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; Organ Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Hui Chien
- College of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zorgdrager M, van Londen M, Westenberg LB, Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke GJ, Lange JFM, de Borst MH, Bakker SJL, Leuvenink HGD, Pol RA. Chronic pain after hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 2019; 106:711-719. [PMID: 30919435 PMCID: PMC6593841 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on chronic pain after kidney donation are sparse. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of chronic pain after hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. METHODS Living kidney donors who donated between 2011 and 2017 at the University Medical Centre Groningen were included. All patients underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Postdonation pain and movement disabilities were assessed using the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The prevalence, severity of pain and the need for analgesics were reported. RESULTS Some 333 living kidney donors with a mean age of 56 years were included. At a median of 19 (i.q.r. 10-33) months after donation, 82 donors (24·6 per cent) had a CCS score above 0, of which 58 (71 per cent) had a CCS score of at least 2 and 57 (70 per cent) reported movement limitations. Some 110 donors (33·0 per cent) had a VAS score of more than 0. Complaints mainly occurred during bending over (12·3 per cent) and exercising (12·4 per cent). Thirty-two donors (9·7 per cent) required analgesics during follow-up between donation and the time of measurement, and six of 82 (7 per cent) reported chronic inguinal pain. In multivariable analysis, donor age (odds ratio (OR) 0·97, 95 per cent c.i. 0·95 to 0·99; P = 0·020) and length of hospital stay (OR 1·21, 1·01 to 1·51; P = 0·041) were independently associated with chronic pain. CONCLUSION One-quarter of donors experienced chronic postdonation pain or discomfort, most of which was bothersome. Younger donors and those with a longer postoperative hospital stay had more symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Zorgdrager
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M van Londen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - L B Westenberg
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G J Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J F M Lange
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M H de Borst
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - S J L Bakker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H G D Leuvenink
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - R A Pol
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lentine KL, Lam NN, Segev DL. Risks of Living Kidney Donation: Current State of Knowledge on Outcomes Important to Donors. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 14:597-608. [PMID: 30858158 PMCID: PMC6450354 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.11220918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
In the past decade, there have been increasing efforts to better define and quantify the short- and long-term risks of living kidney donation. Recent studies have expanded upon the previous literature by focusing on outcomes that are important to potential and previous donors, applying unique databases and/or registries to follow large cohorts of donors for longer periods of time, and comparing outcomes with healthy nondonor controls to estimate attributable risks of donation. Leading outcomes important to living kidney donors include kidney health, surgical risks, and psychosocial effects of donation. Recent data support that living donors may experience a small increased risk of severe CKD and ESKD compared with healthy nondonors. For most donors, the 15-year risk of kidney failure is <1%, but for certain populations, such as young, black men, this risk may be higher. New risk prediction tools that combine the effects of demographic and health factors, and innovations in genetic risk markers are improving kidney risk stratification. Minor perioperative complications occur in 10%-20% of donor nephrectomy cases, but major complications occur in <3%, and the risk of perioperative death is <0.03%. Generally, living kidney donors have similar or improved psychosocial outcomes, such as quality of life, after donation compared with before donation and compared with nondonors. Although the donation process should be financially neutral, living kidney donors may experience out-of-pocket expenses and lost wages that may or may not be completely covered through regional or national reimbursement programs, and may face difficulties arranging subsequent life and health insurance. Living kidney donors should be fully informed of the perioperative and long-term risks before making their decision to donate. Follow-up care allows for preventative care measures to mitigate risk and ongoing surveillance and reporting of donor outcomes to inform prior and future living kidney donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, Missouri; .,Department of Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ngan N Lam
- Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; and
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery and .,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Informative for Decision Making? The Spectrum and Consistency of Outcomes After Living Kidney Donation Reported in Trials and Observational Studies. Transplantation 2019; 103:284-290. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
32
|
Kroencke S. The relevance of donor satisfaction after living kidney donation-a plea for a routine psychosocial follow-up. Transpl Int 2018; 31:1330-1331. [PMID: 30244519 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Kroencke
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Liu KL, Chien CH, Hsieh CY, Huang XY, Wang HH, Lin KJ, Chiang YJ. Effective Decision-Making and Decisional Regret in Living Kidney Donors of Taiwan. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:3059-3064. [PMID: 30577166 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.08.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Revised: 08/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While most living kidney donors are satisfied with their decision and do not regret donating, few studies have been conducted on the determinants related to the effectiveness and regret of the decision. This study aims to explore the relationship between basic attributes, quality of life, positive affect, negative affect, effectiveness of decision-making, and regret in living kidney donors. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, living kidney donors were recruited from urology and kidney transplant outpatient services. The structured questionnaire used to collect the data included the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Decision Conflict Scale, and Decision Regret Scale. RESULTS The findings indicate that living donors with better health status, 24-hour creatinine clearance, physical health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and positive affect experienced greater feelings of effective decision-making. Moreover, women and donors with better physical HRQOL, positive affect, and decision effectiveness were less regretful about the decision of kidney donation. CONCLUSION Health status, physical HRQOL, and positive affect are related to decision validity and regret of living donors. Therefore, clinical care providers should regularly assess the mood and health of living kidney donors. Furthermore, activities promoting their health should be encouraged, especially for men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K-L Liu
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; Organ Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - C-H Chien
- College of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - C-Y Hsieh
- Department of Nursing, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - X-Y Huang
- College of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - H-H Wang
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; Organ Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - K-J Lin
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; Organ Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Y-J Chiang
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; Organ Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wirken L, van Middendorp H, Hooghof CW, Bremer TE, Hopman SPF, van der Pant KAMI, Hoitsma AJ, Hilbrands LB, Evers AWM. Development and feasibility of a guided and tailored internet-based cognitive-behavioural intervention for kidney donors and kidney donor candidates. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020906. [PMID: 29961018 PMCID: PMC6042571 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Living donor kidney transplantation is currently the preferred treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. A subgroup of the kidney donor population experiences adjustment problems during or after the donation procedure (eg, anxiety or fatigue). There is a need for evidence-based interventions that decrease donation-related difficulties before or after donation. In the current study, a guided and tailored internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy (ICBT) intervention for donors and donor candidates was developed and the feasibility and perceived effectiveness were evaluated. DESIGN Pilot study including qualitative and quantitative research methods for intervention development and evaluation. SETTING Living kidney donor population of two Dutch transplantation centres. PARTICIPANTS Donors and healthcare professionals participated in focus group interviews conducted to identify intervention themes and to map attitudes towards internet-based interventions. In a pilot feasibility study, 99 donors and donor candidates participated, of whom 38 completed the screening. Eight donors or donor candidates with a risk profile (ie, impaired mental health-related quality of life (HRQoL)) received and evaluated the intervention. INTERVENTIONS A guided and tailored ICBT intervention for donors and donor candidates was developed. Donation-related treatment modules, assignments and psychoeducation were integrated within an existing disease-generic ICBT intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES HRQoL, anxiety and depression were assessed before and after the ICBT intervention. Additional questionnaires were included to identify specific problem areas of donor functioning to tailor the ICBT intervention to the donor's needs. RESULTS Different intervention themes were derived from the focus group interviews (eg, physical limitations, and donation-specific emotional and social-relational problems). Participants were satisfied about the intervention content (7.7±0.8 on a 0-10 scale) and the therapeutic relationship (4.4±0.6 on a 1-5 scale), and indicated an improvement on domains of their treatment goals (3.2±0.7 on a 1-4 scale). CONCLUSION This study showed positive evaluations concerning both feasibility and perceived effectiveness of the tailored ICBT intervention in kidney donors and donor candidates, in line with previous studies using comparable ICBT treatment protocols in other populations. Future research should examine the possibilities of integrating the intervention into psychosocial care for kidney donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke Wirken
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Henriët van Middendorp
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Christina W Hooghof
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tamara E Bremer
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine P F Hopman
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A M I van der Pant
- Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, Renal Transplant Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries J Hoitsma
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea W M Evers
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Positive and Negative Affects in Living Kidney Donors. Transplant Proc 2018; 49:2036-2039. [PMID: 29149957 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 09/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify the factors influencing the positive and negative affects and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of living kidney donors. METHODS With the use of a cross-sectional study design and a structured questionnaire, information on the basic characteristics, positive affect, negative affect, and HRQOL of 41 living kidney donors were compared. RESULTS The negative affect in living kidney donors was similar to that of the general population, but the positive affect was slightly lower. The physical HRQOL of living kidney donors was slightly higher than that of the general population, and the mental HRQOL was similar. Female donors showed a greater positive affect than male donors. The donors who were siblings of the recipients showed a more negative affect. Donors without chronic disease and with good perceived physical health showed improved positive affect, negative affect, and mental HRQOL. Furthermore, living kidney donors with better positive and negative affects showed improved physical and mental HRQOLs. CONCLUSIONS Clinical health providers should evaluate and determine the positive affect, negative affect, and quality of life of living kidney donors, especially in men, siblings of the recipients, those with chronic disease, and those with poorer perceived physical health. Moreover, psychosocial interventions should be provided to improve these factors.
Collapse
|
36
|
Rodrigue JR, Schold JD, Morrissey P, Whiting J, Vella J, Kayler LK, Katz D, Jones J, Kaplan B, Fleishman A, Pavlakis M, Mandelbrot DA. Mood, body image, fear of kidney failure, life satisfaction, and decisional stability following living kidney donation: Findings from the KDOC study. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:1397-1407. [PMID: 29206349 PMCID: PMC5988866 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Prior studies demonstrate that most living kidney donors (LKDs) report no adverse psychosocial outcomes; however, changes in psychosocial functioning at the individual donor level have not been routinely captured. We studied psychosocial outcomes predonation and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postdonation in 193 LKDs and 20 healthy controls (HCs). There was minimal to no mood disturbance, body image concerns, fear of kidney failure, or life dissatisfaction, indicating no incremental changes in these outcomes over time and no significant differences between LKDs and HCs. The incidence of any new-onset adverse outcomes postdonation was as follows: mood disturbance (16%), fear of kidney failure (21%), body image concerns (13%), and life dissatisfaction (10%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that LKDs with more mood disturbance symptoms, higher anxiety about future kidney health, low body image, and low life satisfaction prior to surgery were at highest risk of these same outcomes postdonation. It is important to note that some LKDs showed improvement in psychosocial functioning from pre- to postdonation. Findings support the balanced presentation of psychosocial risks to potential donors as well as the development of a donor registry to capture psychosocial outcomes beyond the mandatory 2-year follow-up period in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JR Rodrigue
- The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - JD Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - P Morrissey
- Transplant Center, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - J Whiting
- Maine Transplant Center, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | - J Vella
- Maine Transplant Center, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | - LK Kayler
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Transplantation, Bronx, NY,Regional Center of Excellence for Transplantation & Kidney Care, Erie County Medical Center, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | - D Katz
- Organ Transplantation Program, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - J Jones
- Organ Transplantation Program, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - B Kaplan
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ,School for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ
| | - A Fleishman
- The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - M Pavlakis
- The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - DA Mandelbrot
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gritsch HA. Adrenal Function After Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: The Zurich Clinical Trial. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4:144-145. [PMID: 29779841 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
This manuscript reviews the outcomes of a European clinical trial to evaluate the effects of living kidney donation on adrenal function. The study shows that left-sided donor nephrectomy is associated with transiently reduced adrenocortical responsiveness, which returns to baseline after 28 d.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Albin Gritsch
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nöhre M, Pollmann I, Mikuteit M, Weissenborn K, Gueler F, de Zwaan M. Partnership Satisfaction in Living Kidney Donors. Front Psychiatry 2018; 9:353. [PMID: 30123146 PMCID: PMC6085414 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to organ shortage, living kidney donation is gaining increasing importance. Medical progress enables a successful transplantation between unrelated individuals, even individuals with AB0-incompatibilities. Spouses are the largest group of living kidney donors. The aim of this study was to assess partnership status and partnership satisfaction in living kidney donors. In the cross-sectional study we investigated 361 living kidney donors. The time since donation ranged between 1 and 38 years. The partnership satisfaction was assessed with the German version of the Quality of Marriage Index. We compared the donor sample with a representative German population sample (n = 1995). In addition, we compared donors who have donated to their partner (spouse donors) to those who have donated to someone else (non-spouse donors). In comparison to the population sample significantly more kidney donors were living in a relationship (82 vs. 60%). Most donors reported an unchanged (76.6%) or improved (20.5%) relationship to the recipient since transplantation. A significantly higher partnership satisfaction could be found in the donor sample compared to the population sample which was mainly due to a higher partnership satisfaction of the spouse donors compared to the non-spouse donors. High partnership satisfaction in living kidney donors might be an indicator for a successful selection process before transplantation. Alternatively, kidney donation might have a stabilizing or even positive impact on the partnership. Due to the design of our study causative interpretations cannot be made. Therefore, prospective studies are required to assess partnership satisfaction before and after living kidney donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariel Nöhre
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Iris Pollmann
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Marie Mikuteit
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Faikah Gueler
- Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martina de Zwaan
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Massey EK, Timmerman L, Ismail SY, Duerinckx N, Lopes A, Maple H, Mega I, Papachristou C, Dobbels F. The ELPAT living organ donor Psychosocial Assessment Tool (EPAT): from 'what' to 'how' of psychosocial screening - a pilot study. Transpl Int 2017; 31:56-70. [PMID: 28850737 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Revised: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Thorough psychosocial screening of donor candidates is required in order to minimize potential negative consequences and to strive for optimal safety within living donation programmes. We aimed to develop an evidence-based tool to standardize the psychosocial screening process. Key concepts of psychosocial screening were used to structure our tool: motivation and decision-making, personal resources, psychopathology, social resources, ethical and legal factors and information and risk processing. We (i) discussed how each item per concept could be measured, (ii) reviewed and rated available validated tools, (iii) where necessary developed new items, (iv) assessed content validity and (v) pilot-tested the new items. The resulting ELPAT living organ donor Psychosocial Assessment Tool (EPAT) consists of a selection of validated questionnaires (28 items in total), a semi-structured interview (43 questions) and a Red Flag Checklist. We outline optimal procedures and conditions for implementing this tool. The EPAT and user manual are available from the authors. Use of this tool will standardize the psychosocial screening procedure ensuring that no psychosocial issues are overlooked and ensure that comparable selection criteria are used and facilitate generation of comparable psychosocial data on living donor candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma K Massey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Timmerman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sohal Y Ismail
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nathalie Duerinckx
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Heart Transplant Program, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alice Lopes
- Psychiatry and Health Psychology Unit, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Hannah Maple
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Inês Mega
- Hepato-Biliar-Pancreatic and Transplantation Center, Hospital Curry Cabral, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Christina Papachristou
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabienne Dobbels
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lentine KL, Kasiske BL, Levey AS, Adams PL, Alberú J, Bakr MA, Gallon L, Garvey CA, Guleria S, Li PKT, Segev DL, Taler SJ, Tanabe K, Wright L, Zeier MG, Cheung M, Garg AX. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors. Transplantation 2017; 101:S1-S109. [PMID: 28742762 PMCID: PMC5540357 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The 2017 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors is intended to assist medical professionals who evaluate living kidney donor candidates and provide care before, during and after donation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies that included critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations. However, many recommendations, for which there was no evidence or no systematic search for evidence was undertaken by the Evidence Review Team, were issued as ungraded expert opinion recommendations. The guideline work group concluded that a comprehensive approach to risk assessment should replace decisions based on assessments of single risk factors in isolation. Original data analyses were undertaken to produce a "proof-in-concept" risk-prediction model for kidney failure to support a framework for quantitative risk assessment in the donor candidate evaluation and defensible shared decision making. This framework is grounded in the simultaneous consideration of each candidate's profile of demographic and health characteristics. The processes and framework for the donor candidate evaluation are presented, along with recommendations for optimal care before, during, and after donation. Limitations of the evidence are discussed, especially regarding the lack of definitive prospective studies and clinical outcome trials. Suggestions for future research, including the need for continued refinement of long-term risk prediction and novel approaches to estimating donation-attributable risks, are also provided.In citing this document, the following format should be used: Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Living Kidney Donor Work Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors. Transplantation. 2017;101(Suppl 8S):S1-S109.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Josefina Alberú
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dorry L. Segev
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Scandling JD. All's well following living kidney donation? Transpl Int 2017; 30:972-974. [PMID: 28608627 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
42
|
Maple H, Chilcot J, Weinman J, Mamode N. Psychosocial wellbeing after living kidney donation - a longitudinal, prospective study. Transpl Int 2017; 30:987-1001. [PMID: 28445627 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2016] [Revised: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 04/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Living kidney donation (LKD) has become routine practice across the world as the gold standard treatment of end-stage renal failure. Whilst the physical risks and harms of LKD surgery are well documented, relatively little is known about psychosocial outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine whether it was possible to quantify the psychosocial impact of LKD. A prospective longitudinal study of 93 living kidney donors was performed. Data were collected preoperatively, and 3 and 12 months after donation. Questionnaires included 11 validated psychosocial outcome measures and questions specific to LKD. Over time, there was no significant change in wellbeing, life satisfaction, self-esteem, social comparison, distress, depression, stress, anxiety or social support at 3 or 12 months. Despite this, questions specific to LKD indicated that donors felt positively about donation, with low levels of regret. This study provides a thorough assessment of psychosocial outcomes after LKD over the first year. Donors felt positive about LKD although there was no evidence of any significant change in psychosocial outcomes. Despite no measurable psychosocial benefit after living kidney donation, there was also no evidence of harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Maple
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph Chilcot
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - John Weinman
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pérez-San-Gregorio MÁ, Martín-Rodríguez A, Luque-Budia A, Conrad R. Concerns, Mental Health, and Quality of Life in Living Kidney Donation-Parent Donor Candidates Worry Less about Themselves. Front Psychol 2017; 8:564. [PMID: 28443056 PMCID: PMC5387064 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Even though the majority of living kidney donor candidates appear in good mental health and show few concerns little is known concerning the influence of the type of donor-recipient relationship on donor candidates' specific concerns with regard to kidney donation. 136 donor candidates at Virgen del Rocío University Hospital of Seville filled in the Scale of Concerns Regarding Living Kidney Donation of whom 105 donor candidates and their corresponding recipients (105 patients with End-Stage Renal Disease) were further evaluated with regard to mental health (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory-II) and quality of life (SF-36 Health Survey). As hypothesized recipients scored higher on depression and lower on quality of life. Donor candidates intending to donate to their children were significantly less concerned about risks of donation for themselves compared to donor candidates donating to siblings. Our findings highlight the importance of the type of donor-recipient relationship to understand specific concerns of donor candidates and optimize psychosocial assessment and support. From an evolutionary perspective parents lack of concern about their own well-being can be seen as an altruistic behavior to increase children's fitness at the (potential) expense of their own fitness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Agustín Martín-Rodríguez
- Department of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatment, University of SevilleSeville, Spain
| | - Asunción Luque-Budia
- Liaison Mental Health Services, University Hospital Virgen del RocíoSeville, Spain
| | - Rupert Conrad
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of BonnBonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Matas AJ, Hays RE, Ibrahim HN. Long-Term Non-End-Stage Renal Disease Risks After Living Kidney Donation. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:893-900. [PMID: 27529688 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Revised: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Despite generally positive outcomes and high rates of satisfaction, living kidney donors are at risk for both medical and psychosocial problems. In this review, the authors summarize non-end-stage renal disease (ESRD) risks for donors and describe limitations to the data. We review the evidence of medical risks (e.g. increased cardiovascular disease and mortality, preeclampsia) and psychosocial risks (e.g. mood disturbance, financial burden). We then discuss the evidence of differential risks among subsets and the impact of postdonation events (e.g. development of diabetes). Collectively, available evidence indicates the following. (1) Recognizing the importance of non-ESRD risks has been overshadowed by analyses of the reported risk of ESRD. This imbalance should be remedied. (2) There is little quantification of the true contribution of donation to medical and psychosocial outcomes. (3) Most studies, to date, have been retrospective, with limited sample sizes and diversity and with less-than-ideal controls for comparison of outcomes. (4) Many postdonation events (diabetes and hypertension) can now be reasonably predicted, and their association with adverse outcomes can be quantified. (5) Mechanisms and systems need to be implemented to evaluate and care for donors who develop medical and/or psychosocial problems. (6) Costs to donors are a significant burden, and making donation financially neutral should be a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - R E Hays
- Transplant Clinic, Division of Transplantation, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - H N Ibrahim
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Live Donors of the Initial Observational Study of Uterus Transplantation—Psychological and Medical Follow-Up Until 1 Year After Surgery in the 9 Cases. Transplantation 2017; 101:664-670. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
46
|
|
47
|
Han X, Lim JYM, Raman L, Tai BC, Kaur H, Goh ATH, Vathsala A, Tiong HY. Nephrectomy-induced reduced renal function and the health-related quality of life of living kidney donors. Clin Transplant 2017; 31. [PMID: 28083977 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the health impact of nephrectomy on living kidney donors (LKDs) by comparing the health-related quality of life (HrQOL) scores measured by Short Form-36 (SF36) between those with and without postdonation renal function impairment (PRFI). METHODS Eighty-two LKDs (47 females, mean age=50.2±11.2 years) were prospectively recruited to participate in a SF-36 HrQOL survey. Chart review, individual baseline, and postoperative renal function (eGFR) was determined using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. PRFI was defined as eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or proteinuria. Mean SF-36 domain scores were compared between those with and without PRFI. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 5.7 years, the prevalence of postdonation comorbidities was 29.3% (n=24) PRFI, 25.6% (n=21) hypertension, 6.1% (n=5) diabetes, and 3.7% (n=3) heart disease, and no LKDs developed end-stage renal disease. Mean eGFR before and after donor nephrectomy was 95.5±23.4 and 71.0±17.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P<.01). Mean SF-36 scores of LKDs were not significantly different between those with and without PRFI in all the domains (all P>.05). Similarly, the proportion of LKDs with PRFI did not differ significantly between the patients with SF-36 domain scores above and below the published reference values. CONCLUSION Nephrectomy-induced PRFI may not have a significant impact on the HrQOL of the LKD population with a low proportion of other major comorbidities such as diabetes and ischemic heart disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Han
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joel Yu Ming Lim
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lata Raman
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bee Choo Tai
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hersharan Kaur
- Department of Nephrology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Angeline Ting Hui Goh
- Department of Nephrology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Anantharaman Vathsala
- Department of Nephrology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ho Yee Tiong
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Pollmann I, Gueler F, Mikuteit M, Nöhre M, Richter N, Weissenborn K, de Zwaan M. Adaptive Personality Traits and Psychosocial Correlates among Living Kidney Donors. Front Psychiatry 2017; 8:210. [PMID: 29109691 PMCID: PMC5660284 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Since living kidney donors have repeatedly been shown to be mentally more healthy compared to the general population, they might also exhibit more adaptive personality characteristics. We investigated the personality traits of 315 living kidney donors (202 female and 113 male donors) on average 7.1 years after donation using the NEO-Five Factor Inventory, a frequently used personality inventory measuring the "big five" dimensions of personality (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness). In addition, levels of depression, anxiety, and fatigue were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression Scale, GAD-7, and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. Kidney donors showed more adaptive personality traits with higher agreeableness and lower neuroticism scores compared to the German general population. This was even more pronounced in living kidney donors with a high motivation to donate again (non-regreters). Scores for depression, anxiety, and fatigue did not differ from general population values and were significantly correlated with most personality dimensions. The more adaptive personality characteristics of living kidney donors might either be a selection effect or the consequence of the experience of donation and improved health of the close relative. Regardless of the causal relationship, adaptive personality traits might positively influence both physical and psychosocial well-being of the donor. Longitudinal studies should investigate if living donation might lead to persistent adaptive changes in personality traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Pollmann
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Faikah Gueler
- Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Marie Mikuteit
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Mariel Nöhre
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nicolas Richter
- Department of Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Martina de Zwaan
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|