The Antibody Response to HLA Mismatch: Putting Together the Pieces of a Puzzle

Epitope-based human leukocyte antigen matching for transplantation: a personal perspective of its future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study reflects my personal experience with the characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) epitopes and their significance in HLA matching for transplantation. It offers a subjective assessment what further studies are needed to have this concept be applied in the clinical setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

This study addresses the structural characteristics of antibody-reactive HLA epitopes determined by different methods, eplet-associated antibody analysis and acceptable mismatching for sensitized patients and eplet immunogenicity and determination of mismatch permissibility. BASIC IMPLICATIONS: for clinical practice and research consider the need for further studies of the structural basis of antibody-verified HLA epitopes determined in different techniques and their clinical relevance, the biological basis of epitope immunogenicity and determinations of permissible mismatches and a computerized clinical transplant database with an Artificial Intelligence component that can generate evidence-based information for the practical application of epitope-based HLA matching.

Inaccuracies in epitope repertoire estimations when using Multi-Locus Allele-Level hla genotype imputation tools

BACKGROUND

Limited availability of allele-level HLA genotypes prompts their imputation from allele-group genotypes to estimate epitope mismatches. We evaluated the accuracy of epitope load and repertoire assignment when imputing allele-level HLA genotypes.

METHODS

Analyses were conducted on 175 hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors from the Héma-Québec registry (HQR) and 57 HSC donor-recipient pairs from McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Québec, Canada, genotyped for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1. Multi-locus allele-level imputation was performed using HaploStats. Disagreement in B- and T-cell epitope assignment and epitope mismatches were ascertained for imputed vs. measured allele-level HLA genotypes in HSC donors and donor-recipient pairs, respectively.

RESULTS

Imputation resulted in no differences in overall eplet mismatches and PIRCHE-II for HLA-A, -B, and -C in 83.4% and 93.7% of HQR donors and 87.7% and 87.7% of MUHC donors, respectively. HLA-DRB1- and -DQB1-derived eplet mismatches and PIRCHE-II were correctly assigned in 72.0% and 85.1% of HQR donors and 70.2% and 71.9% of MUHC donors, respectively. No discrepancies in eplet load or PIRCHE-II were observed in 96.5% and 86.0% of HSC donor-recipient pairs and in 70.2% and 70.1% of pairs for HLA-A, -B and -C and -DRB1 and -DQB1, respectively. Kappa statistics of 0.9708 and 0.9725, 0.8724 and 0.8177, 0.9827 and 0.9022, 0.5644 and 0.4939, 0.5085 and 0.6361 were demonstrated when assessing agreement between eplet mismatches and PIRCHE-II of imputed vs. measured HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 types, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid inaccuracies in epitope compatibility estimation, mainly for class II HLA, multi-locus allele-level genotype measurement is recommended. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Refill-Based Medication Use Quality Measures in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Examination of Proportion of Days Covered and Medication Possession Ratio

BACKGROUND

The Pharmacy Quality Alliance's definition of proportion of days covered (PDC) and medication possession ratio (MPR) have not been examined as potential quality measures in the kidney transplant recipient population.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) describe the frequency distribution of MPR and PDC using mycophenolic acid products in a real-world kidney transplant recipient population and (b) evaluate associations between MPR and PDC with late (> 90 days after transplantation) biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study combining data from the Wisconsin Allograft Recipient Database with University of Wisconsin (UW) Health Specialty Pharmacy prescription claims and dispensing data from March 10, 2006, to June 30, 2012. Patients who met criteria for persistence filling mycophenolic acid prescriptions at UW Health Specialty Pharmacy in the first year following discharge from kidney transplantation surgery hospitalization were included. Patients were excluded if they were enrolled in a clinical trial, if they had BPAR within 90 days of transplantation, or if they did not have panel reactive antibody data available. PDC and MPR were calculated over 360 days after discharge, and multivariable analyses were performed to determine if there were associations between PDC or MPR with late BPAR within 3 years.

RESULTS

This study included 388 patients. The incidence of 3-year late BPAR was 5.1% (n = 20). Characteristics of patients who experienced late BPAR were largely consistent with those who did not experience late BPAR, with the exception of number of hospital readmissions, which was higher among patients who experienced late BPAR. The frequency distribution of PDC and MPR exhibited a skewed left distribution, with a median PDC of 0.972 and a median MPR of 1.000. Higher PDC was associated with lower odds of late BPAR (OR = 0.041, 95% CI = 0.004-0.417) in multivariable analysis, as was a higher MPR (OR = 0.041, 95% CI = 0.004-0.419).

CONCLUSIONS

MPR and PDC may be calculated from data available to pharmacies and health plans, and each was associated with 3-year late BPAR among patients who did not experience early BPAR. However, the construct validity of these medication adherence measures requires further study.

DISCLOSURES

This study was not funded. The authors report no conflicts of interest and no relevant financial interests related to the products or services discussed in this article. Study concept and design were contributed by Hofmeyer, along with Look and Hager. Hager took the lead in data collection, along with the other authors. Data interpretation was performed by Look, along with the other authors. The manuscript was primarily written by Hofmeyer, assisted by Look and Hager, and revised by all of the authors.

Are We Ready for Epitope-Based HLA Matching in Clinical Organ Transplantation?

This overview describes recent developments demonstrating the significance of epitopes in HLA antibody responses and matching for organ transplantation. HLA epitopes are defined by molecular modeling and amino acid comparisons between HLA alleles and the HLAMatchmaker algorithm considers eplets as essential components. Each allele represents a distinct string of eplets and matching is done by aligning donor and recipient strings. Evidence is summarized how mismatched eplet loads affect antibody responses and transplant outcomes. Epitope-based matching has been applied not only to identify acceptable mismatches for sensitized transplant candidates but also to identify more suitably mismatched donors for nonsensitized patients. Three recently proposed theories will further our understanding of the immunogenicity of individual HLA eplets.It has become apparent that epitope-based matching is superior to antigen matching; we should be ready soon to apply this principle in the clinical transplant setting very soon.

The Immunogenicity of HLA Class II Mismatches: The Predicted Presentation of Nonself Allo-HLA-Derived Peptide by the HLA-DR Phenotype of the Recipient Is Associated with the Formation of DSA

The identification of permissible HLA class II mismatches can prevent DSA in mismatched transplantation. The HLA-DR phenotype of recipients contributes to DSA formation by presenting allo-HLA-derived peptides to T-helper cells, which induces the differentiation of B cells into plasma cells. Comparing the binding affinity of self and nonself allo-HLA-derived peptides for recipients' HLA class II antigens may distinguish immunogenic HLA mismatches from nonimmunogenic ones. The binding affinities of allo-HLA-derived peptides to recipients' HLA-DR and HLA-DQ antigens were predicted using the NetMHCIIpan 3.1 server. HLA class II mismatches were classified based on whether they induced DSA and whether self or nonself peptide was predicted to bind with highest affinity to recipients' HLA-DR and HLA-DQ. Other mismatch characteristics (eplet, hydrophobic, electrostatic, and amino acid mismatch scores and PIRCHE-II) were evaluated. A significant association occurred between DSA formation and the predicted HLA-DR presentation of nonself peptides (P = 0.0169; accuracy = 80%; sensitivity = 88%; specificity = 63%). In contrast, mismatch characteristics did not differ significantly between mismatches that induced DSA and the ones that did not, except for PIRCHE-II (P = 0.0094). This methodology predicts DSA formation based on HLA mismatches and recipients' HLA-DR phenotype and may identify permissible HLA mismatches to help optimize HLA matching and guide donor selection.

Reflections on HLA Epitope-Based Matching for Transplantation

HLA antibodies are primary causes of transplant rejection; they recognize epitopes that can be structurally defined by eplets. There are many reviews about HLA epitope-based matching in transplantation. This article describes some personal reflections about epitopes including a historical perspective of HLA typing at the antigen and allele levels, the repertoires of antibody-verified HLA epitopes, the use of HLAMatchmaker in determining the specificities of antibodies tested in different assays, and, finally, possible strategies to control HLA antibody responses.

Should epitope-based HLA compatibility be used in the kidney allocation system?

The new kidney allocation system (KAS) still applies donor-recipient HLA compatibility mostly at the antigen level and although some four-digit alleles have been included. This system is used to record unacceptable mismatches for sensitized transplant candidates with serum HLA antibodies. Since the reactivities of such antibodies are specifically associated with epitopes rather than HLA antigens, a more scientifically accurate assessment of mismatch acceptability could be based on epitopes. HLA class I and class II epitope specificity analyses can now be readily performed with serum antibody assays with single allele panels. This report describes an epitope-based HLA compatibility system for KAS and involves recipient and donor HLA typing at the four-digit allele level. It focuses on sensitized patients who have serum antibodies specific for HLA epitopes that can be entered as unacceptable mismatches in the transplant candidate database. Newly developed software programs could readily identify compatible HLA types.