1
|
Budhiraja P, Schold JD, Heilman RL, Malamon J, Kaplan B. Integrating Epidemiological Data and Conditional Probabilistic Approaches in Clinical Decision-making: A Focus on Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00822. [PMID: 39044330 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | - John Malamon
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Bruce Kaplan
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eerola V, Sallinen V, Lyden G, Snyder J, Lempinen M, Helanterä I. Preoperative Risk Assessment of Early Kidney Graft Loss. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1636. [PMID: 38769983 PMCID: PMC11104730 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background A large proportion of potential organ donors are not utilized for kidney transplantation out of risk of early allograft loss because of donor-related characteristics. These can be summarized using kidney donor profile index (KDPI). Because KDPI affects the choice of the recipient, the predictive ability of KDPI is tied to recipient attributes. These have been questioned to explain most of the predictive ability of KDPI. This study aims to quantify the effect of the donor on early graft loss (EGL) by accounting for nonrandom allocation. Methods This study included patients undergoing kidney transplantation from deceased donors between 2014 and 2020 from the Scientific Registry of Transplantation Recipients. EGL, defined as a return to dialysis or retransplantation during the first posttransplant year, was the primary endpoint. Nonrandom allocation and donor-recipient matching by KDPI necessitated the use of inverse probability treatment weighting, which served to assess the effect of KDPI and mitigate selection bias in a weighted Cox regression model. Results The study comprised 89 290 transplantations in 88 720 individual patients. Inverse probability treatment weighting resulted in a good balance of recipient covariates across values of continuous KDPI. Weighted analysis showed KDPI to be a significant predictor for short-term outcomes. A comparable (in terms of age, time on dialysis, previous transplants, gender, diabetes status, computed panel-reactive antibodies, and HLA mismatches) average recipient, receiving a kidney from a donor with KDPI 40-60 had a 3.5% risk of EGL increased to a risk of 7.5% if received a kidney from a KDPI >95 donor (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.7). However, for all-cause survival KDPI was less influential. Conclusions The predictive ability of KDPI does not stem from recipient confounding alone. In this large sample-sized study, modeling methods accounting for nonindependence of recipient selection verify graft quality to effectively predict short-term transplantation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verner Eerola
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ville Sallinen
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Grace Lyden
- Department of Health Services and Organ Transplantation, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Jon Snyder
- Department of Health Services and Organ Transplantation, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Marko Lempinen
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ilkka Helanterä
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hippen BE, Hart GM, Maddux FW. A Transplant-Inclusive Value-Based Kidney Care Payment Model. Kidney Int Rep 2024; 9:1590-1600. [PMID: 38899170 PMCID: PMC11184397 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
In the United States, kidney care payment models are migrating toward value-based care (VBC) models incentivizing quality of care at lower cost. Current kidney VBC models will continue through 2026. We propose a future transplant-inclusive VBC (TIVBC) model designed to supplement current models focusing on patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The proposed TIVBC is structured as an episode-of-care model with risk-based reimbursement for "referral/evaluation/waitlisting" (REW, referencing kidney transplantation), "primary hospitalization to 180 days posttransplant," and "long-term graft survival." Challenges around organ acquisition costs, adjustments to quality metrics, and potential criticisms of the proposed model are discussed. We propose next steps in risk-adjustment and cost-prediction to develop as an end-to-end, TIVBC model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin E. Hippen
- Global Medical Office, Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Franklin W. Maddux
- Global Medical Office, Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patel SS, Kim JI, Stewart DE, Segev DL, Massie AB. Organ Nonutilization Following Revision to the Public Health Service Donor Risk Criteria for HIV, HCV, or HBV Transmission. Transplantation 2024; 108:1440-1447. [PMID: 38361232 PMCID: PMC11136601 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organs from Public Health Service criteria (PHSC) donors, previously referred to as PHS infectious-risk donors, have historically been recovered but not used, traditionally referred to as "discard," at higher rates despite negligible risk to recipients. On March 1, 2021, the definition of PHSC donors narrowed to include only the subset of donors deemed to have meaningfully elevated risk in the current era of improved infectious disease testing. METHODS Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from May 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022, we compared rates of PHSC classification and nonutilization of PHSC organs before versus after the March 1, 2021, policy change among recovered decedents using the χ 2 tests. We performed an adjusted interrupted time series analysis to examine kidney and liver recovery/nonuse (traditionally termed "discard") and kidney, liver, lung, and heart nonutilization (nonrecovery or recovery/nonuse) prepolicy versus postpolicy. RESULTS PHSC classification dropped sharply from 24.5% prepolicy to 15.4% postpolicy ( P < 0.001). Before the policy change, PHSC kidney recovery/nonuse, liver nonuse, lung nonuse, and heart nonuse were comparable to non-PHSC estimates (adjusted odds ratio: kidney = 0.98 1.06 1.14 , P = 0.14; liver = 0.85 0.92 1.01 , P = 0.07; lung = 0.91 0.99 1.08 , P = 0.83; heart = 0.89 0.97 1.05 , P = 0.47); following the policy change, PHSC kidney recovery/nonuse, liver nonuse, lung nonuse, and heart nonuse were lower than non-PHSC estimates (adjusted odds ratio: kidney = 0.77 0.84 0.91 , P < 0.001; liver = 0.77 0.84 0.92 , P < 0.001; lung = 0.74 0.81 0.90 , P < 0.001; heart = 0.61 0.67 0.73 , P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Even though PHSC donors under the new definition are a narrower and theoretically riskier subpopulation than under the previous classification, PHSC status appears to be associated with a reduced risk of kidney and liver recovery/nonuse and nonutilization of all organs. Although historically PHSC organs have been underused, our findings demonstrate a notable shift toward increased PHSC organ utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suhani S. Patel
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jacqueline I. Kim
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Darren E. Stewart
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dorry L. Segev
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Allan B. Massie
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bamforth RJ, Trachtenberg A, Ho J, Wiebe C, Ferguson TW, Rigatto C, Forget E, Dodd N, Tangri N. Expanding Access to High KDPI Kidney Transplant for Recipients Aged 60 y and Older: Cost Utility and Survival. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1629. [PMID: 38757046 PMCID: PMC11098249 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Modern organ allocation systems are tasked with equitably maximizing the utility of transplanted organs. Increasing the use of deceased donor organs at risk of discard may be a cost-effective strategy to improve overall transplant benefit. We determined the survival implications and cost utility of increasing the use of marginal kidneys in an older adult Canadian population of patients with end-stage kidney disease. Methods We constructed a cost-utility model with microsimulation from the perspective of the Canadian single-payer health system for incident transplant waitlisted patients aged 60 y and older. A kidney donor profile index score of ≥86 was considered a marginal kidney. Donor- and recipient-level characteristics encompassed in the kidney donor profile index and estimated posttransplant survival scores were used to derive survival posttransplant. Patients were followed up for 10 y from the date of waitlist initiation. Our analysis compared the routine use of marginal kidneys (marginal kidney scenario) with the current practice of limited use (status quo scenario). Results The 10-y mean cost and quality-adjusted life-years per patient in the marginal kidney scenario were estimated at $379 485.33 (SD: $156 872.49) and 4.77 (SD: 1.87). In the status quo scenario, the mean cost and quality-adjusted life-years per patient were $402 937.68 (SD: $168 508.85) and 4.37 (SD: 1.87); thus, the intervention was considered dominant. At 10 y, 62.8% and 57.0% of the respective cohorts in the marginal kidney and status quo scenarios remained alive. Conclusions Increasing the use of marginal kidneys in patients with end-stage kidney disease aged 60 y and older may offer cost savings, improved quality of life, and greater patient survival in comparison with usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J. Bamforth
- Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Aaron Trachtenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Julie Ho
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Thomas W. Ferguson
- Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Claudio Rigatto
- Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Evelyn Forget
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Nancy Dodd
- Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Navdeep Tangri
- Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cashion WT, Zhang X, Puttarajappa C, Sharma A, Mehta R, Ganoza A, Gunabushanam V, Sood P, Wu C, Cherukuri A, Shah N, Kaltenmeier C, Liu H, Dharmayan S, Hariharan S, Molinari M. Interaction between cold ischemia time and Kidney Donor Profile Index on postrenal transplant outcomes. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:781-794. [PMID: 38307416 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
We analyzed whether there is an interaction between the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and cold ischemia time (CIT) in recipients of deceased donor kidney transplant (KTs). Adults who underwent KTs in the United States between 2014 and 2020 were included and divided into 3 KDPI groups (≤20%, 21%-85%, >85%) and 4 CIT strata (<12, 12-17.9, 18-23.9, ≥24 hours). Multivariate analyses were used to test the interaction between KDPI and CIT for the following outcomes: primary graft nonfunction (PGNF), delayed graft function (DGF), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 6 and 12 months, patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival (DCGS). A total of 69,490 recipients were analyzed: 18,241 (26.3%) received a graft with KDPI ≤20%, 46,953 (67.6%) with KDPI 21%-85%, and 4,296 (6.2%) with KDPI >85%. Increasing KDPI and CIT were associated with worse post-KT outcomes. Contrary to our hypothesis, howerver, the interaction between KDPI and CIT was statistically significant only for PGNF and DGF and eGFR at 6 months. Paradoxically, the negative coefficient of the interaction suggested that increasing duration of CIT was more detrimental for low and intermediate-KDPI organs relative to high-KDPI grafts. Conversely, for mortality, graft survival, and DCGS, we found that the interaction between CIT and KDPI was not statistically significant. We conclude that, high KDPI and prolonged CIT are independent risk factors for inferior outcomes after KT. Their interaction, however, is statistically significant only for the short-term outcomes and more pronounced on low and intermediate-KDPI grafts than high-KDPI kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winn T Cashion
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maine Health, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Xingyu Zhang
- Department of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chethan Puttarajappa
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Akhil Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rajil Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Armando Ganoza
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Vikraman Gunabushanam
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Puneet Sood
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christine Wu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Pittsburgh VA Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aravind Cherukuri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nirav Shah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christof Kaltenmeier
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Stalin Dharmayan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University Hospital of Lester, Lester, UK
| | - Sundaram Hariharan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michele Molinari
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McCracken EK, Jay CL, Garner M, Webb C, Farney AC, Orlando G, Reeves-Daniel A, Mena-Gutierrez A, Sakhovskaya N, Stratta RJ. The Kidney Not Taken: Single-Kidney Use in Deceased Donors. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:492-504. [PMID: 38224100 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The nonuse rate for kidneys recovered from deceased donors is increasing, rising to 27% in 2023. In 10% of these cases, 1 kidney is transplanted but the mate kidney is not. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study from December 2001 to May 2023 comparing single kidneys transplanted at our center (where the contralateral kidney was not used) to kidneys where both were transplanted separately, at least 1 of which was at our center. RESULTS We performed 395 single deceased-donor kidney transplants in which the mate kidney was not transplanted. Primary reasons for mate kidney nonuse were as follows: no recipient located or list exhausted (33.4%), kidney trauma or injury or anatomic abnormalities (18.7%), biopsy findings (16.7%), and poor renal function (13.7%). Mean donor and recipient ages were 51.5 ± 14.2 and 60 ± 12.6 years, respectively. Mean kidney donor profile index was 73% ± 22%, and 104 donors (26.3%) had kidney donor profile index >85%. Mean cold ischemia was 25.6 ± 7.4 hours, and 280 kidneys (70.7%) were imported. Compared with 2,303 concurrent control transplants performed at our center, primary nonfunction or thrombosis (5.1% single vs 2.8% control) and delayed graft function (35.4% single vs 30.1% control) were greater with single-kidney use (both p < 0.05). Median patient and death-censored graft survival were shorter in the single group (11.6 vs 13.5 years, p = 0.03 and 11.6 vs 19 years, p = 0.003), although the former was at least double median survival on the waiting list. In patients with functioning grafts in the single-kidney group, 1-year mean serum creatinine was 1.77 ± 0.8 mg/dL and estimated glomerular filtration rate was 44.8 ± 20 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that many mate kidneys are being inappropriately rejected, given the acceptable outcomes that can be achieved by transplanting the single kidney in appropriately selected recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Ke McCracken
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Colleen L Jay
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Matthew Garner
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Christopher Webb
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Alan C Farney
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Giuseppe Orlando
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Amber Reeves-Daniel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology (Reeves-Daniel, Mena-Gutierrez, Sakhovskaya), Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Alejandra Mena-Gutierrez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology (Reeves-Daniel, Mena-Gutierrez, Sakhovskaya), Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Natalia Sakhovskaya
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology (Reeves-Daniel, Mena-Gutierrez, Sakhovskaya), Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Robert J Stratta
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Milders J, Ramspek CL, Janse RJ, Bos WJW, Rotmans JI, Dekker FW, van Diepen M. Prognostic Models in Nephrology: Where Do We Stand and Where Do We Go from Here? Mapping Out the Evidence in a Scoping Review. J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 35:367-380. [PMID: 38082484 PMCID: PMC10914213 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Prognostic models can strongly support individualized care provision and well-informed shared decision making. There has been an upsurge of prognostic research in the field of nephrology, but the uptake of prognostic models in clinical practice remains limited. Therefore, we map out the research field of prognostic models for kidney patients and provide directions on how to proceed from here. We performed a scoping review of studies developing, validating, or updating a prognostic model for patients with CKD. We searched all published models in PubMed and Embase and report predicted outcomes, methodological quality, and validation and/or updating efforts. We found 602 studies, of which 30.1% concerned CKD populations, 31.6% dialysis populations, and 38.4% kidney transplantation populations. The most frequently predicted outcomes were mortality ( n =129), kidney disease progression ( n =75), and kidney graft survival ( n =54). Most studies provided discrimination measures (80.4%), but much less showed calibration results (43.4%). Of the 415 development studies, 28.0% did not perform any validation and 57.6% performed only internal validation. Moreover, only 111 models (26.7%) were externally validated either in the development study itself or in an independent external validation study. Finally, in 45.8% of development studies no useable version of the model was reported. To conclude, many prognostic models have been developed for patients with CKD, mainly for outcomes related to kidney disease progression and patient/graft survival. To bridge the gap between prediction research and kidney patient care, patient-reported outcomes, methodological rigor, complete reporting of prognostic models, external validation, updating, and impact assessment urgently need more attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jet Milders
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Chava L. Ramspek
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Roemer J. Janse
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Jan W. Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Santeon, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Joris I. Rotmans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Friedo W. Dekker
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Merel van Diepen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yu B, Liu Y, Wang T, Zhang Y, Guo J, Kong C, Chen Z, Ma X, Zhou J, Qiu T. Validation of the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) for deceased donor kidney transplants in China. Transpl Immunol 2024; 82:101961. [PMID: 38184216 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The kidney donor profile index (KDPI) evaluates kidney donor's age, height, weight, ethnicity, cause of death, high blood pressure, diabetes, exposure to hepatitis C and estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR). Kidneys with lower KDPI scores are expected to function longer that those with higher KPDI values. The applicability of KDPI score in Chinese kidney transplant donation has not yet been validated. This study evaluated the prognostic value of KDPI score in Chinese kidney transplant patients. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 184 deceased donors and 353 corresponding kidney transplant patients at the Organ Transplantation Department of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University between 2018 and 2021. The donors and recipients were stratified into four groups based on their KDPI score: KDPI 85-100, KDPI 60-84, KDPI 21-59, and KDPI 0-20. RESULTS As expected, the KDPI 85-100 group was associated with a poor short-term renal function (both postoperative creatinine and eGFR with P > 0.05), a higher incidence of delayed graft function (DGF; 25.5% for KDPI 85-100 group vs. 10.2% for KDPI 60-84 group vs. 5.4% for KDPI 21-59 group vs. 0 for KDPI 0-20 group, all P > 0.05). Furthermore, the same groups showed worse 3-year patient survival rate: 86.3% for KDPI 85-100 group vs. 97.01% for KDPI 60-84 group vs. 97.83% for KDPI 21-59 group vs. 100% for KDPI 0-20 group, all P > 0.05); and renal survival rate: 82.6% for KDPI 85-100 group vs. 92.99% KDPI 60-84 group vs.97.83% for KDPI 21-59 group vs. 100% for KDPI 0-20 group, all P > 0.05). Our analysis showed that the KDPI score had a good predictive value for the survival of kidney transplants and patients in our center (area under the curve: 0.728 and 0.76, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION We recommend that the KDPI scoring system can be employed as an effective tool to predict kidney transplantation outcomes in deceased donation in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Yu
- The Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China; Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China
| | - Yiting Liu
- The Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China; Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China
| | - Tianyu Wang
- The Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China; Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China
| | - Yalong Zhang
- The Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China; Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China
| | - Jiayu Guo
- The Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China; Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China
| | - Chenyang Kong
- The Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China; Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China
| | - Zhongbao Chen
- The Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China; Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China
| | - Xiaoxiong Ma
- The Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China; Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China
| | - Jiangqiao Zhou
- The Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China; Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China.
| | - Tao Qiu
- The Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China; Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Webb CJ, McCracken E, Jay CL, Sharda B, Garner M, Farney AC, Orlando G, Reeves-Daniel A, Mena-Gutierrez A, Sakhovskaya N, Stratta B, Stratta RJ. Single center experience and literature review of kidney transplantation from non-ideal donors with acute kidney injury: Risk and reward. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15115. [PMID: 37646473 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is limited experience transplanting kidneys from either expanded criteria donors (ECD) or donation after circulatory death (DCD) deceased donors with terminal acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS AKI kidneys were defined by a donor terminal serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dL whereas non-ideal deceased donor (NIDD) kidneys were defined as AKI/DCD or AKI/ECDs. RESULTS From February 2007 to March 2023, we transplanted 266 single AKI donor kidneys including 29 from ECDs, 29 from DCDs (n = 58 NIDDs), and 208 from brain-dead standard criteria donors (SCDs). Mean donor age (43.7 NIDD vs. 33.5 years SCD), KDPI (66% NIDD vs. 45% SCD), and recipient age (57 NIDD vs. 51 years SCD) were higher in the NIDD group (all p < .01). Mean waiting times (17.8 NIDD vs. 24.2 months SCD) and dialysis duration (34 NIDD vs. 47 months SCD) were shorter in the NIDD group (p < .05). Delayed graft function (DGF, 48%) and 1-year graft survival (92.7% NIDD vs. 95.9% SCD) was similar in both groups. Five-year patient and kidney graft survival rates were 82.1% versus 89.9% and 82.1% versus 75.2% (both p = NS) in the NIDD versus SCD groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The use of kidneys from AKI donors can be safely liberalized to include selected ECD and DCD donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Webb
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation and the Section of Nephrology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily McCracken
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation and the Section of Nephrology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Colleen L Jay
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation and the Section of Nephrology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation and the Section of Nephrology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew Garner
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation and the Section of Nephrology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alan C Farney
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation and the Section of Nephrology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Giuseppe Orlando
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation and the Section of Nephrology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amber Reeves-Daniel
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alejandra Mena-Gutierrez
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Natalia Sakhovskaya
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bobby Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation and the Section of Nephrology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation and the Section of Nephrology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
He W, Xu Y, Gong C, Liu X, Wu Y, Xie X, Chen J, Yu Y, Guo Z, Sun Q. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography-based renal blood perfusion in brain-dead donors predicts early graft function. Ultrasonography 2023; 42:532-543. [PMID: 37722724 PMCID: PMC10555683 DOI: 10.14366/usg.23006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to quantify renal microcirculatory perfusion in braindead donors using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), and to establish an accurate, noninvasive, and convenient index for predicting delayed graft function (DGF) post-transplantation. METHODS In total, 90 brain-dead donor kidneys (training group, n=60; validation group, n=30) examined between August 2020 and November 2022 were recruited in this prospective study. CEUS was performed on the kidneys of brain-dead donors 24 hours before organ procurement and time-intensity curves were constructed. The main measures were arrival time, time to peak, and peak intensity of the kidney segmental arteries, cortex, and medulla. Recipients were divided into DGF and non-DGF groups according to early post-transplant graft function. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess diagnostic performance. RESULTS The arrival time of the kidney segmental artery and cortex and the time interval between the time to peak of the segmental artery and cortex were identified as independent factors associated with DGF by multivariate stepwise regression analysis. A new index for the joint prediction model of three variables, the contrast-enhanced ultrasonography/Kidney Donor Profile index (CEUS-KDPI), was developed. CEUS-KDPI showed high accuracy for predicting DGF (training group: AUC, 0.91; sensitivity, 90.5%; specificity, 92.3%; validation group: AUC, 0.84; sensitivity, 75.0%; specificity, 92.3%). CONCLUSION CEUS-KDPI accurately predicted DGF after kidney transplantation. CEUS may be a potential noninvasive tool for bedside examinations before organ procurement and may be used to predict early renal function after kidney transplants kidneys from donors after brain death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiming He
- Organ Transplant Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - Yuguang Xu
- Ultrasound Imaging Department, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - Chaoyang Gong
- Organ Transplant Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - Xiaozhen Liu
- Ultrasound Imaging Department, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - Yuqiang Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - Xi Xie
- Organ Transplant Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - Jiazhen Chen
- Organ Transplant Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - Yi Yu
- Organ Transplant Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - Zhiyong Guo
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Sun
- Organ Transplant Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schutter R, Sanders JSF, Ramspek CL, Crop MJ, Bemelman FJ, Christiaans MH, Hilbrands LB, de Vries AP, van de Wetering J, van Zuilen AD, van Diepen M, Leuvenink HG, Dekker FW, Moers C. Considerable Variability Among Transplant Nephrologists in Judging Deceased Donor Kidney Offers. Kidney Int Rep 2023; 8:2008-2016. [PMID: 37850026 PMCID: PMC10577326 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Transplant clinicians may disagree on whether or not to accept a deceased donor kidney offer. We investigated the interobserver variability between transplant nephrologists regarding organ acceptance and whether the use of a prediction model impacted their decisions. Methods We developed an observational online survey with 6 real-life cases of deceased donor kidneys offered to a waitlisted recipient. Per case, nephrologists were asked to estimate the risk of adverse outcome and whether they would accept the offer for this patient, or for a patient of their own choice, and how certain they felt. These questions were repeated after revealing the risk of adverse outcome, calculated by a validated prediction model. Results Sixty Dutch nephrologists completed the survey. The intraclass correlation coefficient of their estimated risk of adverse outcome was poor (0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.62). Interobserver agreement of the decision on whether or not to accept the kidney offer was also poor (Fleiss kappa 0.13, 95% CI 0.129-0.130). The acceptance rate before and after providing the outcome of the prediction model was significantly influenced in 2 of 6 cases. Acceptance rates varied considerably among transplant centers. Conclusion In this study, the estimated risk of adverse outcome and subsequent decision to accept a suboptimal donor kidney varied greatly among transplant nephrologists. The use of a prediction model could influence this decision and may enhance nephrologists' certainty about their decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rianne Schutter
- Department of Surgery–Organ Donation and Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan F. Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Chava L. Ramspek
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Meindert J. Crop
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Frederike J. Bemelman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten H.L. Christiaans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Luuk B. Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Aiko P.J. de Vries
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, and Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | | | - Arjan D. van Zuilen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Merel van Diepen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Henri G.D. Leuvenink
- Department of Surgery–Organ Donation and Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Friedo W. Dekker
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Cyril Moers
- Department of Surgery–Organ Donation and Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jalbert J, Weller JN, Boivin PL, Lavigne S, Taobane M, Pieper M, Lodi A, Cardinal H. Predicting Time to and Average Quality of Future Offers for Kidney Transplant Candidates Declining a Current Deceased Donor Kidney Offer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2023; 10:20543581231177844. [PMID: 37313365 PMCID: PMC10259098 DOI: 10.1177/20543581231177844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background At the time a kidney offer is made by an organ donation organization (ODO), transplant physicians must inform candidates on the pros and cons of accepting or declining the offer. Although physicians have a general idea of expected wait time to kidney transplantation by blood group in their ODO, there are no tools that provide quantitative estimates based on the allocation score used and donor/candidate characteristics. This limits the shared decision-making process at the time of kidney offer as (1) the consequences of declining an offer in terms of wait-time prolongation cannot be provided and (2) the quality of the current offer cannot be compared with that of offers that could be made to the specific candidate in the future. This is especially relevant to older transplant candidates as many ODOs use some form of utility matching in their allocation score. Objective We aimed to develop a novel method to provide personalized estimates of wait time to next offer and quality of future offers for kidney transplant candidates if they refused a current deceased donor offer from an ODO. Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Administrative data from Transplant Quebec. Patients All patients who were actively registered on the kidney transplant wait list at any point between March 29, 2012 and December 13, 2017. Measurements The time to next offer was defined as the number of days between the time of the current offer and the next offer if the current one were declined. The quality of the offers was measured with the 10-variable Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) equation. Methods Candidate-specific kidney offer arrival was modeled with a marked Poisson process. To derive the lambda parameter for the marked Poisson process for each candidate, the arrival of donors was examined in the 2 years prior to the time of the current offer. The Transplant Quebec allocation score was calculated for each ABO-compatible offer with the characteristics that the candidate presented at the time of the current offer. Offers where the candidate's score was lower than the scores of actual recipients of the second kidneys transplanted were filtered out from the candidate-specific kidney offer arrival. The KDRIs of offers that remained were averaged to provide an estimate of the quality of future offers, to be compared with that of the current offer. Results During the study period, there were 848 unique donors and 1696 transplant candidates actively registered. The models provide the following information: average time to next offer, time to which there is a 95% probability of receiving a next offer, average KDRI of future offers. The C-index of the model was 0.72. When compared with providing average group estimates of wait time and KDRI of future offers, the model reduced the root-mean-square error in the predicted time to next offer from 137 to 84 days and that of predicted KDRI of future offers from 0.64 to 0.55. The precision of the model's predictions was higher when observed times to next offer were 5 months or less. Limitations The models assume that patients declining an offer remain wait-listed until the next one. The model only updates wait time every year after the time of an offer and not in a continuous fashion. Conclusion By providing personalized quantitative estimates of time to and quality of future offers, our new approach can inform the shared decision-making process between transplant candidates and physicians when a kidney offer from a deceased donor is made by an ODO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Jalbert
- Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Noel Weller
- Canada Excellence Research Chair, Polytechnique Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Pierre-Luc Boivin
- Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Mehdi Taobane
- Canada Excellence Research Chair, Polytechnique Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Mike Pieper
- Canada Excellence Research Chair, Polytechnique Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Andrea Lodi
- Canada Excellence Research Chair, Polytechnique Montréal, QC, Canada
- Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute, Cornell Tech, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Héloise Cardinal
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
- Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
- The Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Miller J, Lyden GR, McKinney WT, Snyder JJ, Israni AK. Impacts of removing race from the calculation of the kidney donor profile index. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:636-641. [PMID: 36695678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The kidney donor risk index (KDRI), standardized as the kidney donor profile index (KDPI), estimates graft failure risk for organ allocation and includes a coefficient for the Black donor race that could create disparities. This study used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data to recalculate KDRI coefficients with and without the Black race variable for deceased donor kidney transplants from 1995 to 2005 (n = 69 244). The recalculated coefficients were applied to deceased kidney donors from 2015 to 2021 (n = 72 926) to calculate KDPI. Removing the Black race variable had a negligible impact on the model's predictive ability. When the Black race variable was removed, the proportion of Black donors above KDPI 85%, a category with a higher risk of organ nonuse, declined from 31.09% to 17.75%, closer to the 15.68% above KDPI 85% among non-Black donors. KDPI represents percentiles relative to all other donors, so the number of Black donors moving below KDPI 86% was roughly equal to the number of non-Black donors moving above KDPI 85%. Removing the Black donor indicator from KDRI/KDPI may improve equity without substantial overall impact on the transplantation system, though further improvement may require the use of absolute measures of donor risk KDRI rather than relative measures of risk KDPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Miller
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Grace R Lyden
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Warren T McKinney
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jon J Snyder
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ajay K Israni
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
McCulloh I, Stewart D, Kiernan K, Yazicioglu F, Patsolic H, Zinner C, Mohan S, Cartwright L. An experiment on the impact of predictive analytics on kidney offer acceptance decisions. Am J Transplant 2023:S1600-6135(23)00353-2. [PMID: 36958629 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
Due to the breadth of factors that might affect kidney transplant decisions to accept an organ or wait for another, presumably "better" offer, a high degree of heterogeneity in decision-making exists among transplant surgeons and hospitals. These decisions do not typically include objective predictions regarding the future availability of equivalent or better-quality organs, nor the likelihood of patient death while waiting for another organ. To investigate the impact of displaying such predictions on organ donation decision making, we conducted a statistically designed experiment involving 53 kidney transplant professionals, where kidney organ offers were presented via an online application and systematically altered to observe effects on decision making. We found that providing predictive analytics for time-to-better offer and patient mortality improves decision consensus and decision maker confidence in their decision. Providing a visual display of the patient's mortality slope under accept/reject conditions shortened the time to decide, but did not have an impact on the decision itself. Presenting risk of death in a loss frame as opposed to a gain frame improved decision consensus and decision confidence. Patient-specific predictions surrounding future organ offers and mortality may improve decision quality, confidence, and expediency while improving organ utilization and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian McCulloh
- Discovery Lab, Applied Intelligence, Accenture, Washington, DC, USA; Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | | | - Kevin Kiernan
- Discovery Lab, Applied Intelligence, Accenture, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Heather Patsolic
- Discovery Lab, Applied Intelligence, Accenture, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Garner M, Jay CL, Sharda B, Webb C, Farney AC, Orlando G, Rogers J, Reeves-Daniel A, Mena-Gutierrez A, Sakhovskaya N, Stratta B, Stratta RJ. Long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation from deceased donors with terminal acute kidney injury: Single center experience and literature review. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14886. [PMID: 36524320 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation from deceased donors (DDKTs) with terminal acute kidney injury (AKI) are not well defined. METHODS Single center retrospective review of DDKTs from 1/31/07-12/31/19. AKI kidneys were defined by a doubling of the donor's admission serum creatinine (SCr) level AND a terminal SCr ≥2.0 mg/dl. RESULTS A total of 188 AKI DDKTs were performed, including 154 from brain-dead standard criteria donors (SCD). Mean donor age was 36 years and mean Kidney Donor Profile Index was 50%; mean admission and terminal SCr levels were 1.3 and 3.1 mg/dl, respectively. With a mean follow-up of 94 months (median 89 months), overall patient (both 71.3%) and graft survival (54% AKI vs. 57% non-AKI) rates were comparable to concurrent DDKTs from brain-dead non-AKI SCDs (n = 769). Delayed graft function (DGF) was higher in AKI kidney recipients (47% vs. 20% non-AKI DDKTs, p < .0001). DGF was associated with lower graft survival in recipients of both AKI and non-AKI SCD kidneys but the impact was earlier and more pronounced in non-AKI recipients. CONCLUSIONS Despite having more than twice the incidence of DGF, kidneys from deceased donors with terminal AKI have long-term outcomes comparable to non-AKI SCD kidneys and represent a safe and effective method to expand the donor pool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Garner
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Colleen L Jay
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher Webb
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alan C Farney
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Giuseppe Orlando
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jeffrey Rogers
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amber Reeves-Daniel
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alejandra Mena-Gutierrez
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Natalia Sakhovskaya
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bobby Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Miller G, Ankerst DP, Kattan MW, Hüser N, Vogelaar S, Tieken I, Heemann U, Assfalg V. Kidney Transplantation Outcome Predictions (KTOP): A Risk Prediction Tool for Kidney Transplants from Brain-dead Deceased Donors Based on a Large European Cohort. Eur Urol 2023; 83:173-179. [PMID: 35000822 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND European kidney donation shortages mandate efficient organ allocation by optimizing the prediction of success for individual recipients. OBJECTIVE To develop the first European online risk tool for kidney transplant outcomes on the basis of recipient-only and recipient plus donor characteristics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We used individual recipient and donor risk factors and three outcomes (death, death with functioning graft [DWFG], and graft loss) for 32 958 transplants within the Eurotransplant kidney allocation system and the Eurotransplant senior program between January 2006 and May 2018 in eight European countries to develop and validate a risk tool. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Cox proportional-hazards models were used to analyze the association of risk factors with overall patient mortality, and proportional subdistribution hazard regression models for their association with graft loss and DWFG. Prediction models were developed with recipient-only and recipient-donor risk factors. Sensitivity analyses based on time-specific area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with leave-one-country-out validation were performed and calibration plots were generated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The 10-yr cumulative incidence rate was 37% for mortality, 12% for DWFG, and 41% for graft loss. In recipient-donor models the leading risk factors for mortality were recipient diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 10.73), retransplantation (HR 3.08 per transplant), and recipient age (HR 1.08). Effects were similar for DWFG. For graft loss, diabetes (subdistributional HR [SHR] 1.32), increased donor age (SHR 1.02), and prolonged cold ischemia time (SHR 1.02) had increased SHRs. All p values were <0.001. CONCLUSIONS Previously identified risk factors for outcomes following kidney transplants allow for outcome prediction with 10-yr AUC values of up to 0.81. PATIENT SUMMARY Using European data, we estimated individual risks to predict the success of kidney transplants and support physicians in decision-making. An online tool is now available (https://riskcalc.org/ktop/) for predicting kidney transplant outcomes both before and after a donor has been identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Miller
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
| | - Donna P Ankerst
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany; Department of Life Science Systems, Munich Data Science Institute, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Michael W Kattan
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Norbert Hüser
- TransplanTUM - Munich Transplant Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Serge Vogelaar
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke Tieken
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Uwe Heemann
- TransplanTUM - Munich Transplant Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Assfalg
- TransplanTUM - Munich Transplant Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Crannell WC, Perkins JD, Leca N, Kling CE. Deceased donor kidneys are discarded at higher rates when labeled as high kidney donor profile index. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:3087-3092. [PMID: 36088649 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The kidney donor risk index (KDRI) and percentile conversion, kidney donor profile index (KDPI), provide a continuous measure of donor quality. Kidneys with a KDPI >85% (KDPI85 ) are referred to as "high KDPI." The KDPI85 cutoff changes every year, impacting which kidneys are labeled as KDPIHIGH . We examine kidney utilization around the KDPI85 cutoff and explore the "high KDPI" labeling effect. KDRI to KDPI Mapping Tables from 2012 to 2020 were used to determine the yearly KDRI85 value. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data was used to calculate discard rates and model organ use. KDRI85 varied between 1.768 and 1.888. In a multivariable analysis, kidney utilization was lower for KDPI 86% compared with KDPI 85% kidneys (p = .046). Kidneys with a KDRI between 1.785-1.849 were classified as KDPIHIGH in the years 2015-2017 and KDPILOW in the years 2018-2020. The discard rate was 44.9% when labeled as KDPIHIGH and 39.1% when labeled as KDPILOW (p < .01). For kidneys with the same KDRI, the high KDPI label is associated with increased discard. We should reconsider the appropriateness of the "high KDPI" label.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Christian Crannell
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - James D Perkins
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory (CBATL), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nicolae Leca
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Catherine E Kling
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory (CBATL), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schutter R, Vrijlandt WAL, Weima GM, Pol RA, Sanders JSF, Crop MJ, Leuvenink HGD, Moers C. Kidney utilization in the Netherlands - do we optimally use our donor organs? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 38:787-796. [PMID: 36318454 PMCID: PMC9976738 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To ensure optimal utilization of deceased donor kidneys, it is important to understand the precise reasons why kidneys are discarded. In this study we aimed to obtain a comprehensive overview of kidney utilization and discard during the entire donation process in the Netherlands. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study we analysed kidney utilization of 3856 kidneys in the Netherlands between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020. For every kidney that was not transplanted, we determined the moment of and reason for discard through a unique case-by-case assessment. RESULTS Kidney discard according to the traditional definition (procured but not transplanted) was 7.8%. However, when kidneys that seemed medically suitable at the beginning of the donation process were also included, many more potential donor kidneys were lost and the total non-utilization was 24.4%. Subjectively presumed impaired organ quality was responsible for 34.2% of all discarded kidneys. Two-thirds of kidneys discarded due to acute kidney injury (AKI) had only AKI stage 1 or 2. CONCLUSION The classical definition of organ discard underestimates the non-utilization of deceased donor kidneys. Strategies to improve kidney utilization could be a revision of the maximum allowed agonal time in donation after circulatory death, careful consideration in reporting and accepting kidneys from donors with AKI and a prospectively filled registry of detailed organ discard reasons, including the 'silent' non-utilization before procurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Robert A Pol
- Department of Surgery – Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan F Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Meindert J Crop
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Henri G D Leuvenink
- Department of Surgery – Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Cyril Moers
- Department of Surgery – Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Helanterä I, Divard G. Gene expression profiling using deceased donor kidney biopsies to predict graft outcomes-We are not there yet. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2497-2498. [PMID: 35900865 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ilkka Helanterä
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Gillian Divard
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Patel A, Shertel T, Wynd M, Wadhera V, Serur D, Schleich B, Yushkov Y, Goldstein M. Outcomes of de novo belatacept-based immunosuppression regimen and avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors in recipients of kidney allografts at higher risk for underutilization. Nephrology (Carlton) 2022; 27:901-905. [PMID: 36047901 DOI: 10.1111/nep.14106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
To describe an experience using a protocol using de novo belatacept (DNB) based maintenance immunosuppression in the setting of lymphocyte depletion. A retrospective, observational study was performed on 37 kidney transplant recipients treated with the DNB protocol, which was defined as belatacept initiated within 7 days after a kidney transplant with steroids and mycophenolate with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction without concomitant calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Patients who received a deceased donor kidney meeting one or more of the following criteria: anticipated cold ischemia time (CIT) greater than 24 h, donation after cardiac death, donor acute kidney injury, and a Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) >85% during the study period were included. Patient survival at 1 year was 97.3% and graft survival was 94.6%. Delayed graft function (DGF) occurred in 40.54% of the patients. Two patients experienced a Banff 1B acute cellular rejection. BK viremia was detected in 32.4% of patients. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated with the use of modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation at 1 year in the study group was 54.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 . We believe that utilization of the DNB protocol, which allows early CNI avoidance, may decrease organ discard rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankita Patel
- Nephrology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| | - Tara Shertel
- Pharmacy, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| | - Michael Wynd
- Pharmacy, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| | - Vikram Wadhera
- Surgery, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| | - David Serur
- Nephrology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| | - Benjamin Schleich
- Quality, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| | - Yuriy Yushkov
- Surgery, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| | - Michael Goldstein
- Surgery, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Molinari M, Kaltenmeier C, Liu H, Ashwat E, Jorgensen D, Puttarajappa C, Wu CM, Mehta R, Sood P, Shah N, Sharma A, Thompson A, Reddy D, Hariharan S. Function and longevity of renal grafts from high-KDPI donors. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14759. [PMID: 35778369 PMCID: PMC9786736 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High kidney-donor profile index (KDPI) kidneys have a shorter survival than grafts with lower KDPI values. It is still unclear, however, whether their shorter longevity depends on an inferior baseline function, faster functional decline, or the combination of both. METHODS We analyzed the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 605 consecutive recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants (KT) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Comparisons were performed among four groups based on KDPI quartile: Group I-KDPI ≤ 25% (n = 151), Group II-KDPI 26-50% (n = 182), Group III-KDPI 51-75% (n = 176), and Group IV-KDPI 〉 75% (n = 96). Linear mixed model analysis was subsequently used to assess whether KDPI was independently associated with the decline in eGFR during the first 5-years after KT. We also analyzed the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), rejection within the first year after KT, patient survival, graft survival, and death censored graft survival based on KDPI group. FINDINGS High-KDPI grafts had lower eGFR immediately after KT, had a higher incidence of DGF and rejection. However, there were no signifcant differences in the adjusted rate (slope) of decline in eGFR among the four KDPI groups (P = .06). Although patient survival was signigicantly lower for recipients of high-KDPI grafts, death-censored graft survival was similar among the four KDPI groups (P = .33). CONCLUSIONS The shorter functional survival of high-KDPI grafts seems to be due to their lower baseline eGFR rather than a more rapid functional decline after KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Molinari
- Department of SurgeryDivision of TransplantationUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Christof Kaltenmeier
- Department of SurgeryDivision of TransplantationUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Eishan Ashwat
- Department of SurgeryDivision of TransplantationUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Dana Jorgensen
- Department of SurgeryDivision of TransplantationUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA,Biostatistics, Division of TransplantationUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Chethan Puttarajappa
- Department of MedicineDivision of NephrologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Christine M. Wu
- Department of MedicineDivision of NephrologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Rajil Mehta
- Department of MedicineDivision of NephrologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Puneet Sood
- Department of MedicineDivision of NephrologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Nirav Shah
- Department of MedicineDivision of NephrologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Akhil Sharma
- Department of MedicineDivision of NephrologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Ann Thompson
- Department of SurgeryDivision of TransplantationUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Dheera Reddy
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Sundaram Hariharan
- Department of MedicineDivision of NephrologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Transplantation is a life-saving medical intervention that unfortunately is constrained by scarcity of available organs. An ideal system for allocating organs should seek to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people. It also must be fair and not disadvantage certain populations. However, policies aimed at reducing disparities also must be balanced with considerations of utility (graft outcomes), cost, efficiency, and any adverse effects on organ utilization. Here, we discuss the ethical challenges of creating a fair and equitable organ allocation system, focusing on the principles governing deceased donor kidney transplant waitlists around the world. The kidney organ allocation systems in the United States, Australia, and Hong Kong are used as illustrations.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Aim of our study was to test a noninvasive HSI technique as an intraoperative real time assessment tool for deceased donor kidney quality and function in human kidney allotransplantation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA HSI is capable to deliver quantitative diagnostic information about tissue pathology, morphology, and composition, based on the spectral characteristics of the investigated tissue. Because tools for objective intraoperative graft viability and performance assessment are lacking, we applied this novel technique to human kidney transplantation. METHODS Hyperspectral images of distinct components of kidney allografts (parenchyma, ureter) were acquired 15 and 45 minutes after reperfusion and subsequently analyzed using specialized HSI acquisition software capable to compute oxygen saturation levels (StO2), near infrared perfusion indices (NIR), organ hemoglobin indices, and tissue water indices of explored tissues. RESULTS Seventeen kidney transplants were analyzed. Median recipient and donor age were 55 years. Cold ischemia time was 10.8 ± 4.1 hours and anastomosis time was 35 ± 7 minutes (mean ± standard deviation). Two patients (11.8%) developed delayed graft function (DGF). cold ischemia time was significantly longer (18.6 ± 1.6) in patients with DGF (P < 0.01). Kidneys with DGF furthermore displayed significant lower StO2 (P = 0.02) and NIR perfusion indices, 15 minutes after reperfusion (P < 0.01). Transplant ureters displayed a significant decrease of NIR perfusion with increased distance to the renal pelvis, identifying well and poor perfused segments. CONCLUSION Intraoperative HSI is feasible and meaningful to predict DGF in renal allografts. Furthermore, it can be utilized for image guided surgery, providing information about tissue oxygenation, perfusion, hemoglobin concentration, and water concentration, hence allowing intraoperative viability assessment of the kidney parenchyma and the ureter.
Collapse
|
25
|
Mour GK, Chang YH, Calderon E, Chang JM, Velazco CS, Jadlowiec CC, Reddy KS, Heilman RL, Mathur AK. Kidney donor profile index and post-transplant health care utilization: Implications for value of transplant care delivery. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14618. [PMID: 35182437 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Centers discard high kidney donor profile index (KDPI) allografts, potentially related to delayed graft function and prolonged hospital use by kidney transplant recipients (KTR). We sought to determine whether high KDPI KTRs have excess health care utilization. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study from a high-volume center analyzing KTRs from January 3, 2011 to April 12, 2015 (n = 652). We measured differences in hospital use, emergency visits, and outpatient visits within the first 90 days between low (≤85%) versus high KDPI (>85%) KTRs, as well as long-term graft function and patient survival. RESULTS High (n = 107) and low KDPI (n = 545) KTRs had similar length of stay (median = 3 days, P = .66), and readmission rates at 7, 30, and 90 days after surgery (all, P > .05). High KDPI kidneys were not associated with excess utilization of the hospital, emergency services, outpatient transplant clinics, or ambulatory infusion visits on univariate or multivariate analysis (all, P > .05). Low KDPI KTRs had significantly better eGFR at 2 years (Low vs. High KDPI: 60.35 vs. 41.54 ml/min, P < .001), but similar 3-year patient and graft survival (both, P > .09). CONCLUSIONS High and low KDPI KTRs demonstrated similar 90-day risk-adjusted health care utilization, which should encourage use of high KDPI kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Girish K Mour
- Division of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Yu-Hui Chang
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Esteban Calderon
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - James M Chang
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | - Kunam S Reddy
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Amit K Mathur
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.,Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nonutilization of Kidneys From Donors After Circulatory Determinant of Death. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1331. [PMID: 35721459 PMCID: PMC9197368 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The expansion of donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) programs and unmet demands for kidney transplantation indicate that there is a need to improve the efficiency and utilization of these organs. Methods. We studied all DCDD donors retrieved for kidney transplantation in Australia between 2014 and 2019 and determined the factors associated with nonutilization using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and random forest models. Self-organizing maps were used to group these donors into clusters with similar characteristics and features associated with nonutilization were defined. Results. Of the 762 DCDD donors, 116 (15%) were not utilized for kidney transplantation. Of the 9 clusters derived from self-organizing map, 2 had the highest proportions of nonutilized kidneys. Factors for nonutilization (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval], per SD increase) were duration from withdrawal of cardiorespiratory support till death (1.38 [1.16-1.64]), admission and terminal serum creatinine (1.43 [1.13-1.85]) and (1.41 [1.16-1.73]). Donor kidney function and duration of warm ischemia were the main factors for clinical decisions taken not to use kidneys from DCDD donors. Conclusions. Donor terminal kidney function and the duration of warm ischemia are the key factors for nonutilization of DCDD kidneys. Strategies to reduce the duration of warm ischemia and improve post-transplant recipient kidney function may reduce rates of nonutilization.
Collapse
|
27
|
Stewart DE, Foutz J, Kamal L, Weiss S, McGehee HS, Cooper M, Gupta G. The Independent Effects of Procurement Biopsy Findings on Ten-Year Outcomes of Extended Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:1850-1865. [PMID: 35967103 PMCID: PMC9366372 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
|
28
|
Bachmann Q, Haberfellner F, Büttner-Herold M, Torrez C, Haller B, Assfalg V, Renders L, Amann K, Heemann U, Schmaderer C, Kemmner S. The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) Correlates With Histopathologic Findings in Post-reperfusion Baseline Biopsies and Predicts Kidney Transplant Outcome. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:875206. [PMID: 35573025 PMCID: PMC9100560 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.875206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing organ shortage in kidney transplantation leads to the necessity to use kidneys previously considered unsuitable for transplantation. Numerous studies illustrate the need for a better decision guidance rather than only the classification into kidneys from standard or expanded criteria donors referred to as SCD/ECD-classification. The kidney donor profile index (KDPI) exhibits a score utilizing a much higher number of donor characteristics. Moreover, graft biopsies provide an opportunity to assess organ quality. Methods In a single center analysis 383 kidney transplantations (277 after deceased and 106 after living donation) performed between January 1st, 2006, and December 31st, 2016, retrospectively underwent SCD/ECD and KDPI scoring. Thereby, the quality of deceased donor kidneys was assessed by using the KDPI and the living donor kidneys by using the living KDPI, in the further analysis merged as (L)KDPI. Baseline biopsies taken 10 min after the onset of reperfusion were reviewed for chronic and acute lesions. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis within a 5-year follow-up. Results The (L)KDPI correlated with glomerulosclerosis (r = 0.30, p < 0.001), arteriosclerosis (r = 0.33, p < 0.001), interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy (r = 0.28, p < 0.001) as well as the extent of acute tubular injury (r = 0.20, p < 0.001). The C-statistic of the (L)KDPI concerning 5-year death censored graft survival was 0.692. Around 48% of ECD-kidneys were classified as (L)KDPI<85%. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis including (preformed) panel reactive antibodies, cold ischemia time, (L)KDPI, and SCD/ECD-classification, the (L)KDPI was significantly associated with risk of graft loss (hazard ratio per 10% increase in (L)KDPI: 1.185, 95% confidence interval: 1.033–1.360, p = 0.025). Survival analysis revealed decreased death censored (p < 0.001) and non-death censored (p < 0.001) graft survival in kidneys with an increasing (L)KDPI divided into groups of <35, 35–85, and >85%, respectively. Conclusion With a higher granularity compared to the SCD/ECD-classification the (L)KDPI is a promising tool to judge graft quality. The correlation with chronic and acute histological lesions in post-reperfusion kidney biopsies underlines the descriptive value of the (L)KDPI. However, its prognostic value is limited and underlines the urgent need for a more precise prognostic tool adopted to European kidney transplant conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quirin Bachmann
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Flora Haberfellner
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maike Büttner-Herold
- Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carlos Torrez
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- School of Medicine, Institute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Assfalg
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lutz Renders
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin Amann
- Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Schmaderer
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Kemmner
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- *Correspondence: Stephan Kemmner
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Beyond Graft Survivl: A National Cohort Study Quantifying the Impact of Increasing Kidney Donor Profile Index on Recipient Outcomes 1 Year Post-transplantation. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1308. [PMID: 35474655 PMCID: PMC9029898 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The reporting of a locally validated kidney donor profile index (KDPI) began in Australia in 2016. Across diverse populations, KDPI has demonstrated utility in predicting allograft survival and function. A metric that incorporates both elements may provide a more comprehensive picture of suboptimal recipient outcomes. Methods. A retrospective cohort study of adult kidney transplant recipients in Australia (January 2009 to December 2014) was conducted. Conventional recipient outcomes and a composite measure of suboptimal outcome (1-y allograft failure or estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min) were evaluated across KDPI intervals (KDPI quintiles and 5-point increments in the KDPI 81–100 cohort). The impact of increasing KDPI on allograft function (1-y eGFR) and a suboptimal outcome was explored using multivariable regression models, adjusting for potential confounding factors. Results. In 2923 donor kidneys eligible for analysis, median KDPI was 54 (interquartile range [IQR], 31–77), and Kidney Donor Risk Index was 1.39 (IQR, 1.03–1.67). The median 1-y eGFR was 52.74 mL/min (IQR, 40.79–66.41 mL/min). Compared with the first quintile reference group, progressive reductions in eGFR were observed with increasing KDPI and were maximal in the fifth quintile (adjusted β-coefficient: −27.43 mL/min; 95% confidence interval, –29.44 to –25.42; P < 0.001). A suboptimal outcome was observed in 359 recipients (12.3%). The adjusted odds for this outcome increased across quintiles from a baseline of odds ratio of 1.00 (first quintile) to odds ratio of 11.68 (95% confidence interval, 6.33-21.54, P < 0.001) in the fifth quintile cohort. Conclusions. Increases in donor KDPI were associated with higher probabilities of a suboptimal outcome and poorer baseline allograft function, particularly in the KDPI > 80 cohort. These findings may inform pretransplant discussions with potential recipients of high-KDPI allografts.
Collapse
|
30
|
Harriman DI, Kazokov H, Rogers J, Farney AC, Orlando G, Jay C, Reeves-Daniel A, Stratta RJ. Does prolonged cold ischemia affect outcomes in donation after cardiac death donor kidney transplants? Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14628. [PMID: 35239992 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
: The purpose of this study was to analyze the combined effect of cold ischemia time (CIT) and donation after cardiac death (DCD, with requisite warm ischemia time, WIT) on kidney transplant (KT) outcomes. METHODS Single center retrospective review of DCD KT recipients stratified by CIT. RESULTS From 6/08 to 10/20, we performed 446 DCD KTs (115 CIT ≤20, 205 CIT 20-30, 88 CIT 30-40, 38 CIT ≥40 hours). Mean WITs (26/25/27/23 minutes) and KDPI values (59%/55%/55%/59%) were similar while mean CITs (16.4/23.6/33.4/42.5 hours) and pump times (10.3/13.6/16.1/20.4 hours) differed across groups (p < 0.05). With a mean 6-year follow-up, patient survival (84%/84%/74%/84%) was similar. Kidney graft survival (GS) (72%/72%/56%/58%) and death censored GS (DCGS) (82%/80%/63%/67%) rates decreased whereas rates of primary nonfunction (PNF, 0.9%/2.4%/9.1%/7.9%) and delayed graft function (DGF) (36%/48%/50%/69%) increased with longer CIT (≥30 hours, p<0.05). Meaningful years free of dialysis, which we refer to as Allograft Life Years, were achieved in all cohorts (4.5/4.3/3.9/4.3 years per patient transplanted). CONCLUSION DCD donor kidneys with prolonged CIT (≥30 hours) are associated with increased rates of DGF and PNF, along with decreased GS and DCGS. Despite this, Allograft Life Years were gained even with longer CITs, demonstrating the utility of using these allografts. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Herman Kazokov
- Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Rogers
- Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Alan C Farney
- Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Giuseppe Orlando
- Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Collen Jay
- Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Amber Reeves-Daniel
- Internal Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Robert J Stratta
- Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liu C, Alasfar S, Reese PP, Mohan S, Doshi MD, Hall IE, Thiessen Philbrook H, Jia Y, Stewart D, Parikh CR. Trends in the procurement and discard of kidneys from deceased donors with acute kidney injury. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:898-908. [PMID: 34897982 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Kidney allocation trends from deceased donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) have not been characterized since initial Kidney Donor Profile Index reporting in 2012 and its use under the revised Kidney Allocation System (KAS) in 2014. We conducted a retrospective analysis of US registry data to characterize kidney procurement and discard trends in deceased donors with AKI, defined by ≥50% or ≥0.3 mg/dl (≥4.0 mg/dl or ≥200% for stage 3) increase in terminal serum creatinine from admission. From 2010 to 2020, 172 410 kidneys were procured from 93 341 deceased donors 16 years or older; 34 984 kidneys were discarded (17 559 from AKI donors). The proportion of stage 3 AKI donors doubled from 6% (412/6841) in 2010 to 12% (1365/11493) in 2020. Procurement of stage 3 AKI kidneys increased from 51% (423/824) to 80% (2183/2730). While discard of stage 3 AKI kidneys increased from 41% (175/423) in 2010 to 44% (960/2183) in 2020, this increase was not statistically significant in interrupted time-series analysis following KAS implementation (slope difference -0.41 [-3.22, 2.4], and level change 3.09 [-6.4, 12.6]). In conclusion, the absolute number of stage 3 AKI kidneys transplanted has increased. Ongoing high discard rates of these kidneys suggest opportunities for improved utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Liu
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Sami Alasfar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Peter P Reese
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Mona D Doshi
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Isaac E Hall
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Heather Thiessen Philbrook
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yaqi Jia
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Darren Stewart
- Research Department, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Chirag R Parikh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Stratta RJ, Harriman D, Gurram V, Gurung K, Sharda B. The use of marginal kidneys in dual kidney transplantation to expand kidney graft utilization. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2022; 27:75-85. [PMID: 34939967 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) and identify opportunities to improve utilization of marginal deceased donor (MDD) kidneys through DKT. RECENT FINDINGS The practice of DKT from adult MDDs dates back to the mid-1990s, at which time the primary indication was projected insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short- and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects: Identifying appropriate selection criteria/scoring systems based on pre- and postdonation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing longer-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. MDDs with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or nonrecovery. SUMMARY DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. New and innovative technologies targeting ex vivo organ assessment, repair, and regeneration may have a major impact on the decision whether or not to use recovered kidneys for single or DKT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David Harriman
- The Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Venkat Gurram
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Komal Gurung
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Patient and Clinician Perceptions of Informed Consent and Decision Making About Accepting KDPI > 85 Kidneys. Transplant Direct 2021; 8:e1254. [PMID: 34934806 PMCID: PMC8683202 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background. Although the impact of the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) on kidney discard is well researched, less is known about how patients make decisions about whether to give consent for KDPI > 85 kidney offers. Methods. We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with 16 transplant recipients, 15 transplant candidates, and 23 clinicians (transplant surgeons, nephrologists, and nurse coordinators) to assess and compare perceptions of transplant education, informed consent for KDPI > 85 kidneys‚ and the decision-making process for accepting kidney offers. Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. Results. Four themes emerged: (1) patients reported uncertainty about the meaning of KDPI or could not recall information about KDPI; (2) patients reported uncertainty about their KDPI > 85 consent status and a limited role in KDPI > 85 consent decision making; (3) patients’ reported willingness to consider KDPI > 85 kidneys depended on their age, health status, and experiences with dialysis, and thus it changed over time; (4) patients’ underestimated the survival benefit of transplantation compared with dialysis, which could affect their KDPI > 85 consent decision making. Conclusions. To better support patients’ informed decision making about accepting KDPI > 85 kidneys, centers must ensure that all patients receive education about the trade-offs between accepting a KDPI > 85 kidney and remaining on dialysis. Additionally, education about KDPI and discussions about informed consent for KDPI > 85 kidneys must be repeated at multiple time points while patients are on the waiting list.
Collapse
|
34
|
Stratta RJ, Harriman D, Gurram V, Gurung K, Sharda B. Dual kidney transplants from adult marginal donors: Review and perspective. Clin Transplant 2021; 36:e14566. [PMID: 34936135 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The practice of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from adult marginal deceased donors (MDDs) dates back to the mid-1990s with initial pioneering experiences reported by the Stanford and Maryland groups, at which time the primary indication was estimated insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects of DKT: Identifying appropriate selection criteria and developing scoring systems based on pre- and post-donation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing mid-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. Deceased donors with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or non-recovery. However, DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. In an attempt to promote utilization of MDD kidneys, the United Network for Organ Sharing introduced new allocation guidelines pursuant to DKT in 2019. The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of DKT and identify opportunities to improve utilization of MDD kidneys through DKT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - David Harriman
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada
| | - Venkat Gurram
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Komal Gurung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Smyrli M, Tsouka G, Apostolou T, Vougas V. Body Mass Index and Kidney Donor Profile Index as Prognostic Markers of the Outcome of Renal Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:2756-2759. [PMID: 34565581 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine the effects of Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and body mass index (BMI) of the deceased donor on the kidney allograft outcome 1 year after transplantation. METHODS We retrospectively studied 98 deceased kidney allograft donors with a mean age of 56 ± 12 years. The donors were divided into 5 groups according to their BMI: Normal ΒΜΙ = 25 (n = 25); ΒΜΙ 25 to 29 = Overweight (n = 33); ΒΜΙ 30 to 34.9 = Obese class I (n = 19); ΒΜΙ 35 to 39 = Obese class ΙΙ (n = 11); and ΒΜΙ >40 = Obese class III (n = 10). We examined the impact of the deceased donor's BMI and KDPI on delayed graft function (DGF) and estimated renal glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (measured by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) 1 year after transplantation. RESULTS Donor BMI significantly increased the prevalence of DGF (P = .031), and it was associated with higher cold ischemia time (P = .021). However, there was no significant association between the aforementioned BMI groups and 1-year eGFR (P = 0.57), as deceased grafts from donors with increased BMI (BMI > 40) gained sufficient renal function during the first year of transplantation. Moreover, high KDPI was associated not only with DGF (P = .015), but also with decreased values of eGFR (P = .033). CONCLUSION In this population, we identified no significant association between donor BMI and long-term clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplants. KDPI, and not ΒΜΙ, of the deceased donor seems to be a good prognostic factor of renal function at the end of the first year after kidney transplant, whereas high BMI and high KDPI markedly induce DGF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Smyrli
- Nephrology Department, Antonios. B. Billis, General Hospital of Evangelismos, Athens, Greece.
| | - Glykeria Tsouka
- Nephrology Department, Antonios. B. Billis, General Hospital of Evangelismos, Athens, Greece
| | - Theofanis Apostolou
- Nephrology Department, Antonios. B. Billis, General Hospital of Evangelismos, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasileios Vougas
- Surgical Unit - Transplantation Unit, General Hospital of Evangelismos, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Disparities in Deceased Organ Donor Research Authorization: Experience at One Organ Procurement Organization and Call for National Conversations. Kidney Int Rep 2021; 6:2331-2337. [PMID: 34514194 PMCID: PMC8419128 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Research with deceased donor organs can provide an important platform for studying interventions to improve organ use and outcomes after authorization from the next-of-kin (NOK) or before death by the decedent (i.e., first-person authorization [FPA]). To date, information on authorization rates across donor subgroups is lacking. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of all 690 deceased organ donors from January 2017 to December 2019 at a midsized Midwestern organ procurement organization (OPO). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between donor factors and research decline (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 95% confidence interval [CI]). Results Electronic records for all 690 deceased donors were reviewed. Of these, 659 (95.5%) yielded at least one transplanted organ. Overall, research was declined in 10.8% of donations. Compared to White donors, research decline was higher for Black (16.0% vs. 8.9%; aOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.03-3.40; P = 0.04) and other non-White donors (24.0% vs. 8.9%; aOR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.02-17.39; P = 0.05). Unadjusted research decline trended higher for Hispanic donors versus non-Hispanic donors (23.1% vs. 10.5%; P = 0.14). Compared to donors age <40 years, research decline trended higher for donors age ≥65 years (16.7% vs. 11.8%; aOR, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.12-21.05; P = 0.03), whereas research decline was 55% lower when donors provided FPA (7.3% vs 15.0%; aOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.27-0.76; P = 0.003). Conclusions Deceased donor research authorization decline is higher for Black, other non-White, and older donors, but lower when the descendent provides FPA. Identification of disparities in research authorization may stimulate educational strategies to reduce barriers to scientific investigations directed at optimizing the outcomes of organ donation.
Collapse
|
37
|
Dolgner SJ, Nguyen VP, Cowger J, Dardas TF. Accuracy of risk models used for public reporting of heart transplant center performance. J Heart Lung Transplant 2021; 40:1571-1578. [PMID: 34465530 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart transplant programs and regulatory entities require highly accurate performance metrics to support internal quality improvement activities and national oversight of transplant programs, respectively. We assessed the accuracy of publicly reported performance measures. METHODS We used the United Network for Organ Sharing registry to study patients who underwent heart transplantation between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2018. We used tests of calibration to compare the observed rate of 1-year graft failure to the expected risk of 1-year graft failure, which was calculated for each recipient using the July 2019 method published by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). The primary study outcome was the joint test of calibration, which accounts for both the total number of events predicted (calibration-in-the-large) and dispersion of risk predictions (calibration slope). RESULTS 6,528 heart transplants were analyzed. The primary test of calibration failed (p <0.0001), indicating poor accuracy of the SRTR model. The calibration-in-the-large statistic (0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.68, p < 0.0001) demonstrated overestimation of event rates while the calibration slope statistic (0.56, 95% CI 0.49-0.62, p <0.0001) indicated over-dispersion of event rates. Pre-specified subgroup analyses demonstrated poor calibration for all subgroups (each p <0.01). After recalibration, program-level observed/expected ratios increased by a median of 0.14 (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Risk models employed for publicly-reported graft survival at U.S. heart transplant centers lack accuracy in general and in all subgroups tested. The use of disease-specific models may improve the accuracy of program performance metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Dolgner
- Adult Congenital Heart Program, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vidang P Nguyen
- Providence Heart Institute, Providence St. Vincent's Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jennifer Cowger
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospitals, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Todd F Dardas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jung CW, Jorgensen D, Sood P, Mehta R, Molinari M, Hariharan S, Ganoza A, Van Der Windt D, Wijkstrom MN, Puttarajappa CM, Tevar AD. Outcomes and factors leading to graft failure in kidney transplants from deceased donors with acute kidney injury-A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254115. [PMID: 34437548 PMCID: PMC8389362 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to shortage of donor, kidney transplants (KTs) from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) are expanding. Although previous studies comparing clinical outcomes between AKI and non-AKI donors in KTs have shown comparable results, data on high-volume analysis of KTs outcomes with AKI donors are limited. This study aimed to analyze the selection trends of AKI donors and investigate the impact of AKI on graft failure using the United states cohort data. We analyzed a total 52,757 KTs collected in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient (SRTR) from 2010 to 2015. The sample included 4,962 (9.4%) cases of KTs with AKI donors (creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL). Clinical characteristics of AKI and non-AKI donors were analyzed and outcomes of both groups were compared. We also analyzed risk factors for graft failure in AKI donor KTs. Although the incidence of delayed graft function was higher in recipients of AKI donors compared to non-AKI donors, graft and patient survival were not significantly different between the two groups. We found donor hypertension, cold ischemic time, the proportion of African American donors, and high KDPI were risk factors for graft failure in AKI donor KTs. KTs from deceased donor with AKI showed comparable outcomes. Thus, donors with AKI need to be considered more actively to expand donor pool. Caution is still needed when donors have additional risk factors of graft failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheol Woong Jung
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dana Jorgensen
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Puneet Sood
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Rajil Mehta
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Michele Molinari
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Sundaram Hariharan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Armando Ganoza
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Dirk Van Der Windt
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Martin N. Wijkstrom
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Chethan M. Puttarajappa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Amit D. Tevar
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Schwantes IR, Axelrod DA. Technology-Enabled Care and Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Transplantation. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021; 8:235-240. [PMID: 34341714 PMCID: PMC8317681 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-021-00336-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and technology-enabled remote patient care have evolved rapidly and have now been incorporated into many aspects of medical care. Transplantation is fortunate to have large data sets upon which machine learning algorithms can be constructed. AI are now available to improve pretransplant management, donor selection, and post-operative management of transplant patients. Recent Findings Changes in patient and donor characteristics warrant new approaches to listing and organ acceptance practices. Machine learning has been employed to optimize donor selection to identify patients likely to benefit from transplantation of higher risk organs, increasing organ discard and reducing waitlist mortality. These models have greater precisions and predictive ability than currently employed metrics including the Kidney Donor Profile Index and the expected posttransplant survival models. After transplant, AI tools have been developed to optimize immunosuppression management, track patients adherence, and assess graft survival. Summary AI and technology-enabled management tools are now available throughout the transplant journey. Unfortunately, those are frequently not available at the point of decision (patient listing, organ acceptance, posttransplant clinic), limiting utilization. Incorporation of these tools into the EMR, the Donor Net® organ offer system, and mobile devices is vital to ensure widespread adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Issac R Schwantes
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA
| | - David A Axelrod
- Organ Transplant Center, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, LA 52240 USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lentine KL, Pastan S, Mohan S, Reese PP, Leichtman A, Delmonico FL, Danovitch GM, Larsen CP, Harshman L, Wiseman A, Kramer HJ, Vassalotti J, Joseph J, Longino K, Cooper M, Axelrod DA. A Roadmap for Innovation to Advance Transplant Access and Outcomes: A Position Statement From the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 78:319-332. [PMID: 34330526 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 65 years, kidney transplantation has evolved into the optimal treatment for patients with kidney failure, dramatically reducing suffering through improved survival and quality of life. However, access to transplant is still limited by organ supply, opportunities for transplant are inequitably distributed, and lifelong transplant survival remains elusive. To address these persistent needs, the National Kidney Foundation convened an expert panel to define an agenda for future research. The key priorities identified by the panel center on the needs to develop and evaluate strategies to expand living donation, improve waitlist management and transplant readiness, maximize use of available deceased donor organs, and extend allograft longevity. Strategies targeting the critical goal of decreasing organ discard that warrant research investment include educating patients and clinicians about potential benefits of accepting nonstandard organs, use of novel organ assessment technologies and real-time decision support, and approaches to preserve and resuscitate allografts before implantation. The development of personalized strategies to reduce the burden of lifelong immunosuppression and support "one transplant for life" was also identified as a vital priority. The panel noted the specific goal of improving transplant access and graft survival for children with kidney failure. This ambitious agenda will focus research investment to promote greater equity and efficiency in access to transplantation, and help sustain long-term benefits of the gift of life for more patients in need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St Louis, MO.
| | - Stephen Pastan
- Department of Medicine, Emory Transplant Center, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alan Leichtman
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | | | - Lyndsay Harshman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Transplant Institute, Iowa City, IA
| | - Alexander Wiseman
- Department of Medicine, Centura Health-Porter Adventist Hospital, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Joseph Vassalotti
- National Kidney Foundation, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Matthew Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC
| | - David A Axelrod
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Transplant Institute, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Vincenzi P, Gaynor JJ, Chen LJ, Figueiro J, Morsi M, Selvaggi G, Tekin A, Vianna R, Ciancio G. No Benefit of Prophylactic Surgical Drainage in Combined Liver and Kidney Transplantation: Our Experience and Review of the Literature. Front Surg 2021; 8:690436. [PMID: 34322515 PMCID: PMC8311022 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.690436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Contrasting results have emerged from limited studies investigating the role of prophylactic surgical drainage in preventing wound morbidity after liver and kidney transplantation. This retrospective study analyzes the use of surgical drain and the incidence of wound complications in combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKTx). Methods: A total of 55 patients aged ≥18 years were divided into two groups: the drain group (D) (n = 35) and the drain-free group (DF) (n = 20). Discretion to place a drain was based exclusively on surgeon preference. All deceased donor kidneys were connected to the LifePort Renal Preservation Machine® prior to transplantation, in both simultaneous and delayed technique of implantation of the renal allograft. The primary outcome was the development of superficial/deep wound complications during the study follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the development of delayed graft function (DGF) of the transplanted kidney, primary non-function (PNF) and early allograft dysfunction (EAD) of the transplanted liver, graft failure, graft and patient survival, overall post-operative morbidity rate and length of hospital stay. Results: With a median follow-up of 14.4 months after transplant, no difference in the incidence of superficial/deep wound complications, except for hematomas, in collections size, intervention rate, PNF, EAD, graft failure and patient survival, was observed between the 2 groups. Significantly lower level of platelets, higher INR values, DGF, morbidity rates and length of hospital stay were reported post-operatively in the D group. Pre-operative hypoalbuminemia and longer CIT were included in the propensity score for receiving a drain and were associated with a significantly higher rate of developing a hematoma post-transplant. Conclusions: Absence of the surgical drain did not appear to adversely affect wound morbidity compared to the prophylactic use of drains in renal transplant patients during CLKTx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Vincenzi
- Division of Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.,Division of Liver and Intestinal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Jeffrey J Gaynor
- Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Linda J Chen
- Division of Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Jose Figueiro
- Division of Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Mahmoud Morsi
- Division of Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.,Division of Liver and Intestinal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Gennaro Selvaggi
- Division of Liver and Intestinal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Akin Tekin
- Division of Liver and Intestinal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Rodrigo Vianna
- Division of Liver and Intestinal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Gaetano Ciancio
- Division of Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.,Department of Urology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Luque Y, Jamme M, Aubert O, Roux A, Martinez F, Amrouche L, Tinel C, Galmiche L, Duong Van Huyen JP, Audenet F, Legendre C, Anglicheau D, Rabant M. A kidney discard decision strategy based on zero-time histology analysis could lead to an unjustified increase in the organ turndown rate among ECD. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1506-1516. [PMID: 34097778 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The utility of zero-time kidney biopsies (KB) in deciding to accept expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys remains controversial. However, zero-time histology is one of the main causes for discarding kidneys in the United States. In a single-centre study, we examined the utility and impact on outcome of the use of frozen section zero-time KB among ECD. Ninety-two zero-time KB were analysed for accept/discard decision between 2005 and 2015 among ECD. 53% of kidneys were rejected after zero-time KB analysis; there was no difference in individual clinical and biological data between accepted/rejected groups. However, histology of rejected kidneys showed more sclerotic glomeruli (20% vs. 8%; P < 0.001), increased interstitial fibrosis (1.25 ± 0.12 vs. 0.47 ± 0.09; P < 0.0001), more arteriosclerosis (2.14 ± 0.17 vs. 1.71 ± 0.11; P = 0.0032) and arteriolar hyalinosis (2.15 ± 0.12 vs. 1.55 ± 0.11; P = 0.0006). Using propensity score matching, we generated a group of 42 kidney allograft recipients who received a transplant matched for donor zero-time histology and clinical characteristics with donors whose kidneys were rejected. Interestingly, their 1- and 5-year graft survival and function were similar to the global cohort of ECD recipients. In conclusion, when performed, zero-time KB was a decisive element for kidney discard decision. However, adverse zero-time histology was not associated with poorer graft survival and kidney function among ECD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosu Luque
- Department of Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Renal Emergencies and Kidney Transplantation Department, Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Inserm, UMR_S1155, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Jamme
- Intensive care Unit, Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye hospital, Poissy, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- UMR_S970, Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Inserm, Paris, France.,Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Arthur Roux
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Frank Martinez
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Lucile Amrouche
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Claire Tinel
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Louise Galmiche
- Department of Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - François Audenet
- Urology Department, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Paris Cite and Kidney Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University Sorbonne, Paris, France.,Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research U1151, Paris, France
| | - Marion Rabant
- Department of Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research U1151, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ninan J, Smith ML, Mathur AK, Harbell JW, Jadlowiec CC, Nair SS, Moss A, Reddy KS, Heilman RL. Correlation of Chronic Histologic Changes on Preimplantation Frozen Section Biopsy With Transplant Outcomes After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 146:205-212. [PMID: 34086859 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0675-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— It is unclear if preimplantation frozen section biopsy correlates with outcomes after deceased donor kidney transplantation. OBJECTIVE.— To assess if chronic histologic changes on the preimplant frozen section correlates with graft loss and estimated glomerular filtration rate independently of kidney donor profile index (KDPI). DESIGN.— Seven hundred three preimplantation biopsies were reviewed and a Banff sum score was calculated using glomerular sclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, vascular intimal thickening, and arteriolar hyalinosis. The posttransplant outcomes were compared for preimplantation biopsy Banff sum 0-1, 2-3, and 4-9. The cohort was also stratified by KDPI 85 or less versus more than 85. RESULTS.— For the entire biopsy cohort, graft survival, estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year and chronic changes on a 1-year posttransplant biopsy were superior in the group with preimplantation Banff sum 0-1. After stratifying by KDPI, the Banff sum no longer correlated with graft survival. In a univariate mode, using the Banff sum score as a continuous variable, a higher Banff sum score was significantly associated with graft failure (P = .03); however, after adjusting the KDPI, the Banff sum score no longer correlated with graft failure (P = .45). The 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate and 1 year biopsy changes were superior in the group with Banff sum 0-1 only in the cohort with KDPI 85 or less. CONCLUSIONS.— In donor kidneys used for transplant, preimplantation biopsy chronic changes correlate with estimated glomerular filtration rate and biopsy findings at 1 year, but biopsies with mostly mild chronicity and sum scores less than or equal to 5 did not impact graft survival beyond KDPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Ninan
- From the Department of Medicine (Ninan, Nair, Heilman), Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Maxwell L Smith
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (Smith), Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Amit K Mathur
- the Department of Surgery (Mathur, Harbell, Jadlowiec, Moss, Reddy), Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Jack W Harbell
- the Department of Surgery (Mathur, Harbell, Jadlowiec, Moss, Reddy), Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Caroline C Jadlowiec
- the Department of Surgery (Mathur, Harbell, Jadlowiec, Moss, Reddy), Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sumi Sukumaran Nair
- From the Department of Medicine (Ninan, Nair, Heilman), Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Adyr Moss
- the Department of Surgery (Mathur, Harbell, Jadlowiec, Moss, Reddy), Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Kunam S Reddy
- the Department of Surgery (Mathur, Harbell, Jadlowiec, Moss, Reddy), Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Raymond L Heilman
- From the Department of Medicine (Ninan, Nair, Heilman), Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lia D, Singer P, Nair V, Yang J, Teperman L, Grodstein E. DCD Renal Transplantation From Donors With Acute Kidney Injury. Transplantation 2021; 105:886-890. [PMID: 32433240 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deceased donor kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys are viable sources of organs. The outcomes of renal transplantation from DCD donors with AKI are not known. METHODS A retrospective review of deceased donor renal transplants performed from 2006 to 2016 was conducted using the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset. Donors were stratified by DCD or brain dead status and by AKI stage. Recipients were followed until graft failure or the end of study. Cox regression was used to adjust for donor, recipient, and transplant covariates known to affect the incidence of delayed graft function and graft survival. RESULTS A total of 135 644 patients were included in the study. The odds of delayed graft function among DCD recipients were significantly higher across all donor AKI stages. The unadjusted risk of overall and death-censored graft failure were similar between the 2 groups. After adjusting for covariates, there was a significant increase in the risk of overall graft failure in recipients of DCD allografts from donors with stage 2 AKI. There was also a higher risk of death-censored graft failure among stage 1 and 2 AKI DCD recipients. CONCLUSIONS DCD renal allografts from donors experiencing stage 1 and 2 AKI have a higher adjusted risk of death-censored graft failure than AKI stage-matched donation after brain death renal allografts. Their use, however, is still associated with improved outcomes compared with waitlist mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lia
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Park WY, Chang YK, Kim YS, Jin K, Yang CW, Han S, Chung BH. Impact of acute kidney injury in deceased donors with high Kidney Donor Profile Index on posttransplant clinical outcomes: a multicenter cohort study. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2021; 40:162-174. [PMID: 33663035 PMCID: PMC8041636 DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.20.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the impact of acute kidney injury (AKI) on posttransplant clinical outcomes for deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantation (KT) using the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) system. METHODS Overall, 657 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) receiving kidneys from 526 DDs from four transplant centers were included. We divided them into the high and low KDPI donor groups by 65%, the KDPI score, and both groups were subdivided into the AKI-DDKT and non-AKI-DDKT subgroups according to AKI in DDs. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) between the high and low KDPI-KTR groups; however, the AKI-DDKT subgroup showed significantly higher incidence of DGF than the non-AKI-DDKT subgroup in both groups (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The death-censored graft survival rate was significantly lower in the high KDPI-KTR group than in the low KDPI-KTR group (p = 0.005). Only in the high KDPI-KTR group, the death-censored graft survival rate was significantly lower in the KT from DDs with AKI stage 3 than KT from DDs with non-AKI or AKI stage 1 or 2 (p = 0.040). The interaction between AKI stage 3 in DDs and high KDPI on the allograft outcome was significant (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION KTs from DDs with AKI stage 3 showed an adverse impact on the allograft outcome in the high KDPI-KTR group. Therefore, DDs with a high KDPI score should be managed carefully so that severe AKI does not occur prior to KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Yeong Park
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Kyung Chang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Soo Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubok Jin
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul Woo Yang
- Transplant Research Center, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungyeup Han
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Ha Chung
- Transplant Research Center, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kizilbash SJ, Evans MD, Chinnakotla S, Chavers BM. Use of expanded-criteria donors and > 85 KDPI kidneys for pediatric kidney transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1160-1170. [PMID: 32594613 PMCID: PMC7767891 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Pediatric kidney transplant outcomes associated with expanded-criteria donors (ECD) and high Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) kidneys are unknown. We reviewed the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 1987-2017 to identify 96 ECD and 92 > 85 KDPI kidney recipients (<18 years). Using propensity scores, we created comparison groups of 375 non-ECD and 357 ≤ 85 KDPI recipients for comparisons with ECD and > 85 KDPI transplants, respectively. We used Cox regression for patient/graft survival and sequential Cox approach for survival benefit of ECD and > 85 KDPI transplantationvs remaining on the waitlist. After adjustment, ECD recipients were at significantly increased risk of graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.6; P = .001) but not of mortality (aHR = 1.33; P = .15) compared with non-ECD recipients. We observed no survival benefit of ECD transplants vs remaining on the waitlist (aHR = 1.05; P = .83). We found no significant difference in graft failure (aHR = 1.27; P = .12) and mortality (aHR = 1.41; P = .13) risks between > 85 KDPI and ≤ 85 KDPI recipients. However, > 85 KDPI transplants were associated with a survival benefit vs remaining on the waitlist (aHR = 0.41; P = .01). ECD transplantation in children is associated with a high graft loss risk and no survival benefit, whereas > 85 KDPI transplantation is associated with a survival benefit for children vs remaining on the waitlist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J. Kizilbash
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Michael D. Evans
- Clinical and Translational Science institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Blanche M. Chavers
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Price MB, Yan G, Joshi M, Zhang T, Hickner BT, O'Mahony C, Goss J, Galván TN, Cotton RT, Rana A. Prediction of Kidney Allograft Discard Before Procurement: The Kidney Discard Risk Index. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2021; 19:204-211. [PMID: 33605206 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2020.0340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is an 18.9% discard rate among kidney allografts. Here, we aimed to determine predictors of kidney discard and construct an index to identify high-probability discard kidney allografts prior to procurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 102 246 potential kidney allograft donors from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database were used in this analysis. The cohort was randomized into 2 groups. The training set included 67% of the cohort and was used to derive a predictive index for discard that comprised 21 factors identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The validation set included 33% and was used to internally validate the kidney discard risk index. RESULTS In 77.3% of donors, at least 1 kidney was used for transplant, whereas in 22.7% of donors, both kidneys were discarded. The kidney discard risk index was highly predictive of discard with a C statistic of 0.89 (0.88-0.89). The bottom 10th percentile had a discard rate of 0.73%, whereas the top 10th percentile had a discard rate of 83.65%. The 3 most predictive factors for discard were age, creatinine level, and hepatitis C antibody status. CONCLUSIONS We identified 21 factors predictive of discard prior to donor procurement and used these to develop a kidney discard risk index with a C statistic of 0.89.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Brent Price
- From the Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Carrara C, Cravedi P, Perna A, Peraro F, Villa A, Carrara F, Cortinovis M, Gotti E, Plati AR, Amaduzzi A, Rota G, Lacanna F, Rossini G, Abelli M, Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P. Preimplantation Histological Score Associates with 6-Month GFR in Recipients of Perfused, Older Kidney Grafts: Results from a Pilot Study. Nephron Clin Pract 2021; 145:137-149. [PMID: 33486477 DOI: 10.1159/000512341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biopsy-guided selection of older kidneys safely expands the organ pool, and pretransplant perfusion improves the preservation of these fragile organs. Herein, we studied morphofunctional variables associated with graft outcomes in perfused, histologically evaluated older kidneys. METHODS This single-center prospective cohort pilot study evaluated the relationships between preimplantation histologic scores and renal perfusion parameters during hypothermic, pulsatile, machine perfusion (MP) and assessed whether these morphofunctional parameters associated with GFR (iohexol plasma clearance) at 6 months after transplantation in 20 consecutive consenting recipients of a biopsy-guided single or dual kidney transplant from >60-year-old deceased donors. RESULTS The donor and recipient age was 70.4 ± 6.5 and 63.6 ± 7.9 years (p = 0.005), respectively. The kidney donor profile index (KDPI) was 93.3 ± 8.4% (>80% in 19 cases), histologic score 4.4 ± 1.4, and median (IQR) cold ischemia time 19.8 (17.8-22.8 h; >24 h in 5 cases). The 6-month GFR was 41.2 (34.9-55.7) mL/min. Vascular resistances positively correlated with global histologic score (p = 0.018) at MP start and then decreased from 0.88 ± 0.43 to 0.36 ± 0.13 mm Hg/mL/min (p < 0.001) in parallel with a three-fold renal flow increase from 24.0 ± 14.7 to 74.7 ± 31.8 mL/min (p < 0.001). Consistently, vascular resistance reductions positively correlated with global histologic score (p = 0.009, r = -0.429). Unlike KDPI or vascular resistances, histologic score was independently associated with 6-month GFR (beta standardized coefficient: -0.894, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS MP safely improves graft perfusion, particularly in kidneys with severe histologic changes that would not be considered for transplantation because of high KDPI. The preimplantation histologic score associates with the functional recovery of older kidneys even in the context of a standardized program of pulsatile perfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camillo Carrara
- Department of Renal Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele Daccò": Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy.,Unit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Translational Transplant Research Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Annalisa Perna
- Department of Renal Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele Daccò": Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Francesco Peraro
- Department of Renal Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele Daccò": Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Alessandro Villa
- Department of Renal Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele Daccò": Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Fabiola Carrara
- Department of Renal Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele Daccò": Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Monica Cortinovis
- Department of Renal Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele Daccò": Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Eliana Gotti
- Unit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Plati
- Unit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Annalisa Amaduzzi
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Rota
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Francesco Lacanna
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rossini
- Organ and Tissue Transplant Immunology Unit, Foundation IRCCS "Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico", Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Abelli
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Remuzzi
- Department of Renal Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele Daccò": Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy,
| | - Piero Ruggenenti
- Department of Renal Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele Daccò": Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy.,Unit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gharibi Z, Hahsler M. A Simulation-Based Optimization Model to Study the Impact of Multiple-Region Listing and Information Sharing on Kidney Transplant Outcomes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18030873. [PMID: 33498396 PMCID: PMC7908113 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
More than 8000 patients on the waiting list for kidney transplantation die or become ineligible to receive transplants due to health deterioration. At the same time, more than 4000 recovered kidneys from deceased donors are discarded each year in the United States. This paper develops a simulation-based optimization model that considers several crucial factors for a kidney transplantation to improve kidney utilization. Unlike most proposed models, the presented optimization model incorporates details of the offering process, the deterioration of patient health and kidney quality over time, the correlation between patients’ health and acceptance decisions, and the probability of kidney acceptance. We estimate model parameters using data obtained from the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). Using these parameters, we illustrate the power of the simulation-based optimization model using two related applications. The former explores the effects of encouraging patients to pursue multiple-region waitlisting on post-transplant outcomes. Here, a simulation-based optimization model lets the patient select the best regions to be waitlisted in, given their demand-to-supply ratios. The second application focuses on a system-level aspect of transplantation, namely the contribution of information sharing on improving kidney discard rates and social welfare. We investigate the effects of using modern information technology to accelerate finding a matching patient to an available donor organ on waitlist mortality, kidney discard, and transplant rates. We show that modern information technology support currently developed by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) is essential and can significantly improve kidney utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Gharibi
- Department of Management, Information Systems and Analytics, State University of New York at Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY 12901, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Michael Hahsler
- Department of Engineering Management, Information, and Systems and Department of Computer Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75205, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Donor-Recipient Matching to Optimize the Utility of High Kidney Donor Profile Index Kidneys. Transplant Proc 2020; 53:865-871. [PMID: 33358526 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In December 2014, the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) was developed to give more precise information on donor kidney quality. Kidneys with KDPI scores ≥ 85 (K ≥ 85) have been reported to have inferior outcomes to kidneys with KDPI scores < 85. METHODS After the implementation of the new Kidney Allocation System, we developed a protocol to evaluate K ≥ 85 use. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of our institutional criteria and evaluated post-transplant outcomes. K ≥ 85 recipients were stratified based on their 1-year creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rates to elucidate characteristics associated with serum creatinine < 1.7 mg/dL or estimated glomerular filtration rates ≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS From December 2014 to December 2019, 304 deceased donor kidney transplants were performed at Hartford Hospital; 58 (19%) were K ≥ 85 with an average KDPI of 91%. There were 4 graft losses; 2 were death censored. Prolonged cold ischemia time and black recipient race were associated with inferior recipient graft function at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS High KDPI kidney use requires a multifaceted evaluation that takes into account donor and recipient characteristics for an ideal match. We have identified several characteristics that may predict optimal post-transplant kidney function.
Collapse
|