Changing demographics of heart donors: The impact of donor drug intoxication on posttransplant survival

Outcomes following heart or bilateral-lung transplantation from donors who died of drug toxicity in British Columbia, Canada

INTRODUCTION

The illicit drug toxicity (overdose) crisis has worsened across Canada; between 2016 and 2021, more than 28,000 individuals have died of drug toxicity. Organ donation from persons who experience drug toxicity death (DTD) has increased in recent years. This study examines whether survival after heart or bilateral-lung transplantation differed by donor cause of death.

METHODS

We studied transplant recipients in British Columbia who received heart (N = 110) or bilateral-lung (N = 223) transplantation from deceased donors aged 12-70 years between 2013 and 2019. Transplant recipient survival was compared by donor cause of death from drug toxicity or other. Five-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival and 3-year inverse probability treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards models were conducted.

RESULTS

DTD donors made up 36% (40/110) of heart and 24% (54/223) of bilateral-lung transplantations. DTD donors were more likely to be young, white, and male. Unadjusted 5-year recipient survival was similar by donor cause of death (heart: 87% for DTD and 86% for non-DTD, p = .75; bilateral- lung: 80% for DTD and 76% for non-DTD, p = .65). Adjusted risk of mortality at 3-years post-transplant was similar between recipients of DTD and non-DTD donor heart (hazard ratio [HR]: .94, 95% confidence interval (CI): .22-4.07, p = .938) and bilateral-lung (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: .41-2.70, p = .908).

CONCLUSION

Recipient survival after heart or bilateral-lung transplantation from DTD donors and non-DTD donors was similar. Donation from DTD donors is safe and should be considered more broadly to increase organ donation.

Donor substance abuse and heart transplantation outcomes

Heart failure continues to account for millions of cases and deaths worldwide. Heart transplant is the gold standard for treatment of advanced heart failure. Unfortunately, the supply of donor hearts continues to be limited with the increase in demand for heart transplantation. In this review, we aim to explore the safety and efficacy of using hearts from donors with history of substance use. Despite the theoretical effect of cocaine and alcohol on the cardiovascular system, several studies demonstrate no difference in outcomes (overall survival, graft rejection, graft vasculopathy) when using hearts from patients with history of cocaine and alcohol use. The opioid epidemic has expanded the potential donor pool where the current studies have not shown any adverse outcomes when considering donors with history of opioid use. The currently available evidence would support the use of donor hearts from patients with history of alcohol, cocaine, opioids, and marijuana use. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety of using donor hearts from patients with history of nicotine use.

Organ Procurement From Poisoned Patients: A 14-Year Survey in 2 Academic Centers

OBJECTIVES

Organ transplant from poisoned donors is an issue that has received much attention, especially over the past decade. Unfortunately, there are still opponents to this issue who emphasize that toxins and drugs affect the body's organs and do not consider organs from poisoned donors appropriate for transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases of brain death due to poisoning were collected from 2 academic centers in Tehran, Iran during a period from 2006 to 2020. Donor information and recipient condition at 1 month and 12 months after transplant and the subsequent transplant success rates were investigated.

RESULTS

From 102 poisoned donors, most were 30 to 40 years old (33.4%) and most were men (55.9%). The most common causes of poisoning among donors were opioids (28.4%). Six candidate donors had been referred with cardiorespiratory arrest; these patients had organs that were in suitable condition, and transplant was successful. Acute kidney injury was seen in 30 donors, with emergency dialysis performed in 23 cases. For 51% of donors, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed. The most donated organs were the liver (81.4%), left kidney (81.4%), and right kidney (80.4%). Survival rate of recipients at 1 month and 12 months was 92.5% and 91.4%, respectively. Graft rejection rate at 1 month and 12 months after transplant was 0.7% and 2.21%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Organ donation from poisoning-related brain deaths is one of the best sources of organ supply for people in need. If the organ is in optimal condition before transplant, there are no exclusions for use of the graft.

Intoxicated Donors and Heart Transplant Outcomes: Long-Term Safety

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

The opioid crisis has led to an increase in available donor hearts, although questions remain about the long-term outcomes associated with the use of these organs. Prior studies have relied on historical information without examining the toxicology results at the time of organ offer. The objectives of this study were to examine the long-term survival of heart transplants in the recent era, stratified by results of toxicological testing at the time of organ offer as well as comparing the toxicology at the time of donation with variables based on reported history.

Methods:

The United Network for Organ Sharing database was requested as well as the donor toxicology field. Between 2007 and 2017, 23 748 adult heart transplants were performed. United Network for Organ Sharing historical variables formed a United Network for Organ Sharing Toxicology Score and the measured toxicology results formed a Measured Toxicology Score. Survival was examined by the United Network for Organ Sharing Toxicology Score and Measured Toxicology Score, as well as Cox proportional hazards models incorporating a variety of risk factors.

Results:

The number and percent of donors with drug use has significantly increased over the study period (P<0.0001). Cox proportional hazards modeling of survival including toxicological and historical data did not demonstrate differences in post-transplant mortality. Combinations of drugs identified by toxicology were not associated with differences in survival. Lower donor age and ischemic time were significantly positively associated with survival (P<0.0001).

Conclusions:

Among donors accepted for transplantation, neither history nor toxicological evidence of drug use was associated with significant differences in survival. Increasing use of such donors may help alleviate the chronic donor shortage.

HCV-Positive Allograft Use in Heart Transplantation Is Associated With Increased Access to Overdose Donors and Reduced Waitlist Mortality Without Compromising Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Because of ongoing shortages of donors for heart transplantation, the use of donor candidates whose availabilities are the result of drug overdoses (ODs) has become increasingly prevalent, even though these donors carry a high preponderance of the now curable hepatitis C virus (HCV). This study investigated temporal trends and regional variabilities in HVC-positive (HCV+) allograft use in heart transplantation and assessed the relationship between the use of HCV+ graft donors and the use of OD donors as well as assessing waitlist and post-transplant outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing database assessed adults listed for heart transplantation. Patients were stratified both temporally into pre-HCV and HCV eras related to HCV+ graft use trends and regionally by degree of HCV+ allograft use. Regions of high HCV+ donor use were associated with an increase in OD donor access by 7.8% across eras compared to 0.4% in low HCV+ donor-use regions. One-year waitlist mortality decreased from 4.7% to 2.5% across eras in high HCV+ donor-use regions (P= 0.001) and remained roughly the same as before in low HCV+ donor-use regions (3.0% vs 2.4%; P= 0.244.). Post-transplant survival at 1 year remained similar across eras.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV+ donor allograft use can help to optimize donor use, decreasing waitlist mortality without compromising early survival. Ongoing assessment is essential to ensure long-term safety and efficacy of using HCV+ donors.

Organ allocation and procurement in cardiac transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is a critical shortage of organs in cardiac transplantation. Recent advancements in both organ allocation and donor utilization have intended to address this shortage and optimally allocate allografts. This review evaluates several important aspects of recipient and donor management. For recipients, the focus is placed on the evolving mechanical circulatory support population and its bidirectional impact on organ allocation. From the donor standpoint, organ utilization is assessed with respect to increasing access to previously unused allografts.

RECENT FINDINGS

Implementation of the new heart allocation system in the United States has better stratified waitlist candidates by illness acuity. Compared to the prior system, those requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support are less likely to die on the waitlist, although conflicting data exists whether this has improved their posttransplant survival. The use of pretransplant intra-aortic balloon pumps has markedly increased, whereas transplantation of patients with dischargeable left ventricular assist devices has decreased. Although some studies have reported inferior short- to mid-term posttransplant survival in the new system compared to its predecessor, others report similar outcomes.Several recent advancements in donor utilization have also been noted. Coinciding with the global increase in drug overdose deaths, efforts have been made to increase use of these donors who are frequently considered 'increased risk' and are hepatitis C-positive. Grafts from these donors appear safe to use. These, alongside donation after circulatory death donors, represent potentially underutilized populations that may effectively expand the donor pool.

SUMMARY

Recent changes in organ allocation, alongside efforts to expand the donor pool, have attempted to improve cardiac allograft utilization and reduce the imbalance between organ supply and demand. Ongoing monitoring and continuous re-evaluation of these efforts will help guide future practice.

Coronary angiography utilization in the evaluation of a potential heart donor by age: a narrative review

Heart transplant is the gold standard treatment for patients with heart failure. The limitation to providing heart transplantation to patients suffering from end stage heart disease is the stable organ supply within the United States despite increasing demand. Transplant centers across the United States have begun to expand traditional cardiac donor selection metrics previously utilized. As a result, the use of extended criteria donors, such as older donors, those with longer ischemic times, and donors considered high risk has increased. Current guidelines suggest that coronary angiography be performed when evaluating a donor above the age of 45. Angiographic guidelines for evaluation of the donor heart are based specifically on age, with little evidence based guidance surrounding the use of angiography in a younger donor with comorbidities or increased risk behavior which may lead to premature coronary artery disease. Recently, we have seen an increase in younger heart donors, many of whom have succumbed due to drug overdose with ensuing high risk behaviors. Given the increased risk nature of these donors, consideration of performing coronary angiography is determined by clinical “gestalt” of the transplant center evaluating the heart for use, which may lead to underutilization of donor organs without evidence to support the practice. Here, we review the guidelines, literature, and controversy surrounding the use of coronary angiography in evaluating donor hearts for transplantation.

Effects of drug abuse, smoking and alcohol on donor hearts and lungs

Potential heart and lung donors with a history of illicit drugs and/or smoking and alcohol are frequently offered, though there is no clear guidance on when it is safe to use these organs. A review of the literature on effects of drugs, alcohol and smoking on donor outcomes, and the effects of these on the intact heart and lung was undertaken. There has been a marked increase in deaths from opioid abuse in many developed countries, though recent evidence suggests that outcomes after cardiothoracic transplantation are equivalent to nonopioid donor causes of death. For donor smoking, there is an increased risk with lung transplantation; however, that risk is less when compared to further waiting on the transplant list for a nonsmoking alternative. Heavy alcohol consumption does not adversely affect heart transplantation, and there is no clear evidence of adverse outcomes after lung transplantation. There are no overall effects of cannabis or cocaine on survival after heart or lung transplantation. In all these cases, careful donor assessment can establish if a particular organ can be used. In most cases, use of drugs requires careful assessment, but is not in of itself a contraindication to cardiothoracic transplantation.