Clinical utility of complement-dependent C3d assay in kidney recipients presenting with late allograft dysfunction

Complement and Non-Complement Binding Anti-HLA Antibodies Are Differentially Detected with Different Antigen Bead Assays in Renal Transplant Recipients

Two semi-quantitative, Luminex-based, single-antigen bead (SAB) assays are available to detect anti-HLA antibodies and evaluate their reactivity with complement binding. Sera from 97 patients with positive panel reactive antibody tests (>5%) were analyzed with two SAB tests, Immucor (IC) and One-Lambda (OL), for anti-HLA antibody detection and the evaluation of their complement-binding capacity. IC detected 1608/8148 (mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) 4195 (1995-11,272)) and 1136/7275 (MFI 6706 (2647-13,184)) positive anti-HLA class I and II specificities, respectively. Accordingly, OL detected 1942/8148 (MFI 6185 (2855-12,099)) and 1247/7275 (MFI 9498 (3630-17,702)) positive anti-HLA class I and II specificities, respectively. For the IC assay, 428/1608 (MFI 13,900 (9540-17,999)) and 409/1136 (MFI 11,832 (7128-16,531)) positive class I and II specificities bound C3d, respectively. Similarly, OL detected 485/1942 (MFI 15,452 (9369-23,095)) and 298/1247 (MFI18,852 (14,415-24,707)) C1q-binding class I and II specificities. OL was more sensitive in detecting class I and II anti-HLA antibodies than IC was, although there was no significant difference in the number of class II specificities per case. MFI was higher for complement vs. non-complement-binding anti-HLA antibodies in both assays. Both methods were equal in detecting complement-binding anti-HLA class I antibodies, whereas the C3d assay was more sensitive in detecting complement-binding anti-HLA class II antibodies.

Complement-activating donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical appraisal

Introduction

Several studies have investigated the impact of circulating complement-activating anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (anti-HLA DSAs) on organ transplant outcomes. However, a critical appraisal of these studies and a demonstration of the prognostic value of complement-activating status over anti-HLA DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) level are lacking.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal evaluating the role of complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs on allograft outcomes in different solid organ transplants. We included studies through Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase since inception of databases till May 05, 2023. We evaluated allograft loss as the primary outcome, and allograft rejection as the secondary outcome. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and funnel plots to assess risk of bias and used bias adjustment methods when appropriate. We performed multiple subgroup analyses to account for sources of heterogeneity and studied the added value of complement assays over anti-HLA DSA MFI level.

Results

In total, 52 studies were included in the final meta-analysis (11,035 patients). Complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs were associated with an increased risk of allograft loss (HR 2.77; 95% CI 2.33-3.29, p<0.001; I²=46.2%), and allograft rejection (HR 4.98; 95% CI 2.96-8.36, p<0.01; I²=70.9%). These results remained significant after adjustment for potential sources of bias and across multiple subgroup analyses. After adjusting on pan-IgG anti-HLA DSA defined by the MFI levels, complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs were significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of allograft loss.

Discussion

We demonstrated in this systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal the significant deleterious impact and the independent prognostic value of circulating complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs on solid organ transplant risk of allograft loss and rejection.

Seeking Standardized Definitions for HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplants: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

There is no standard definition for "HLA incompatible" transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility.

RESULTS

Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.

Approaching the sensitized lung patient: risk assessment for donor acceptance

The presence of HLA antibodies is widely recognized as a barrier to solid organ transplantation, and for lung transplant candidates, it has a significant negative impact on both waiting time and waiting list mortality. Although HLA antibodies have been associated with a broad spectrum of allograft damage, precise characterization of these antibodies in allosensitized candidates may enhance their accessibility to transplant. The introduction of Luminex-based single antigen bead (SAB) assays has significantly improved antibody detection sensitivity and specificity, but SAB alone is not sufficient for risk-stratification. Functional characterization of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is paramount to increase donor accessibility for allosensitized lung candidates. We describe here our approach to evaluate sensitized lung transplant candidates. By employing state-of-the-art technologies to assess histocompatibility and determine physiological properties of circulating HLA antibodies, we can provide our Clinical Team a better risk assessment for lung transplant candidates and facilitate a "road map" to transplant. The cases presented in this paper illustrate the "individualized steps" taken to determine calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA), titer and complement-fixing properties of each HLA antibody present in circulation. When a donor is considered, we can better predict the risk associated with potentially crossing HLA antibodies, thereby allowing the Clinical Team to approach allosensitized lung patients with an individualized medicine approach. To facilitate safe access of sensitized lung transplant candidates to potential donors, a synergy between the histocompatibility laboratory and the Clinical Team is essential. Ultimately, donor acceptance is a decision based on several parameters, leading to a risk-stratification unique for each patient.

C3d-positive donor-specific antibodies have a role in pretransplant risk stratification of cross-match-positive HLA-incompatible renal transplantation: United Kingdom multicentre study

Anti-HLA-antibody characteristics aid to risk-stratify patients and improve long-term renal graft outcomes. Complement activation by donor-specific antibody (DSA) is an important characteristic that may determine renal allograft outcome. There is heterogeneity in graft outcomes within the moderate to high immunological risk cases (cross-match-positive). We explored the role of C3d-positive DSAs in sub-stratification of cross-match-positive cases and relate to the graft outcomes. We investigated 139 cross-match-positive living-donor renal transplant recipients from four transplant centres in the United Kingdom. C3d assay was performed on serum samples obtained at pretreatment (predesensitization) and Day 14 post-transplant. C3d-positive DSAs were found in 52 (37%) patients at pretreatment and in 37 (27%) patients at Day 14 post-transplant. Median follow-up of patients was 48 months (IQR 20.47-77.57). In the multivariable analysis, pretreatment C3d-positive DSA was independently associated with reduced overall graft survival, the hazard ratio of 3.29 (95% CI 1.37-7.86). The relative risk of death-censored five-year graft failure was 2.83 (95% CI 1.56-5.13). Patients with both pretreatment and Day 14 C3d-positive DSAs had the worst five-year graft survival at 45.5% compared with 87.2% in both pretreatment and Day 14 C3d-negative DSA patients with the relative risk of death-censored five-year graft failure was 4.26 (95% CI 1.79, 10.09). In this multicentre study, we have demonstrated for the first time the utility of C3d analysis as a distinctive biomarker to sub-stratify the risk of poor graft outcome in cross-match-positive living-donor renal transplantation.

Impact of persistent preformed and de novo donor-specific antibodies detected at 1 year after kidney transplantation on long-term graft survival in Japan: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the impact of persistent preformed donor-specific antibody (DSA) and de novo DSA (dnDSA) detected at 1 year posttransplantation on long-term death-censored graft survival.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty adult patients who received living kidney allograft with pretransplant-negative T-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM), and without periodic screening for DSA, were eligible for this study. All enrolled patients were retrospectively tested for DSA using the Luminex assay. The presence of DSA was analyzed in stored serum samples collected at 1 year posttransplantation. If the recipients had DSA, it was analyzed in the pretransplant serum sample. The detection of DSA solely in the 1 year posttransplant sample was defined as dnDSA, and DSA detection in both pretransplant and 1 year posttransplant samples was defined as persistent preformed DSA.

RESULTS

DSAs were identified in 14 (8.8%) of the 160 patients. Seven patients had persistent preformed DSA, 6 had dnDSA, and 1 had both persistent preformed and dnDSA at 1 year posttransplantation. Death-censored allograft survival rates of patients with DSA versus those without DSA at 7 and 11 years were 77.9 vs. 97.8% and 60.6 vs. 89.2%, respectively. The graft survival rate was lower in patients with persistent preformed DSA and/or dnDSA. Each case of preformed DSA and dnDSA was associated with long-term graft survival.

CONCLUSION

The presence of persistent preformed DSA or dnDSA at 1 year posttransplantation may be a predictor of long-term graft survival. Further study is needed to evaluate whether periodic screening for DSA improves long-term graft survival.

Clinical impact of complement (C1q, C3d) binding De Novo donor-specific HLA antibody in kidney transplant recipients

Introduction

Complement binding activity of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) has been suggested as a new tool to stratify immunologic risk in kidney transplantation (KT). The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical implication of C1q/C3d binding activity of de novo DSA (dnDSA) in KT recipients.

Material and methods

A total of 161 pretransplant DSA-negative recipients were monitored for dnDSA at the time of biopsy. C1q/C3d binding activities of dnDSA were assessed using C1qScreen assay (One lambda, USA) and Lifecodes C3d detection assay (Immucor, USA), respectively. Clinical outcomes including biopsy-proven antibody mediated rejection (AMR), C4d detection and post-biopsy graft survival were investigated.

Results

De-novo DSAs were detected in fifty-four (33.5%) patients (HLA class I only, n = 19; class II only, n = 29; both class I and II, n = 6). Of them, complement binding activities were detected in 26 (48.1%) patients, including 17 C1q+ and 24 C3d+ patients. Both C1q and C3d positivity were associated with increased mean fluorescence intensity values of dnDSA. Complement binding activity of dnDSA enhanced the incidence of AMR (25.0% in C1q-C3d-, 36.4% in C1q+/C3d- or C1q-/C3d+, and 60.0% in C1q+/C3d+ patients) (P <0.001). The incidence of AMR was not different between patients with C1q+ and those with C3d+ dnDSA (64.7%, 11/17 versus 45.8%, 11/24, P = 0.238). In comparison between C1q and C3d assay according to HLA specificity, C1q+ HLA class I ± II dnDSA was the best predictor for AMR (odds ratio: 27.2). C1q+/C3d+ dnDSA was associated with more C4d deposition in allograft tissue and inferior post-biopsy graft survival. Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between C1q+ and C3d+ dnDSA-positive patients.

Conclusion

Detection of complement binding activity using both C1q and C3d assays can be a further prognostic marker for predicting AMR and allograft outcome in dnDSA+ kidney transplant patients.