Allograft and patient survival after sequential HSCT and kidney transplantation from the same donor-A multicenter analysis

Combining Treg Therapy With Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation: Experimental Progress and Clinical Perspective

Donor-specific tolerance remains a goal in transplantation because it could improve graft survival and reduce morbidity. Cotransplantation of donor hematopoietic cells to achieve chimerism is a promising approach for tolerance induction, which was successfully tested in clinical trials. However, current protocols are associated with side effects related to the myelosuppressive recipient conditioning, which makes it difficult to introduce them as standard therapy. More recently, adoptive cell therapy with polyclonal or donor-specific regulatory T cells (Treg) proved safe and feasible in several transplant trials, but it is unclear whether it can induce tolerance on its own. The combination of both approaches-Treg therapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation-leads to chimerism and tolerance without myelosuppressive treatment in murine models. Treg therapy promotes engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic cells, reducing conditioning requirements and enhancing regulatory mechanisms maintaining tolerance. This review discusses possible modes of action of transferred Treg in experimental chimerism models and describes translational efforts investigating the potent synergy of Treg and chimerism.

Chimerism-based Tolerance Induction in Clinical Transplantation: Its Foundations and Mechanisms

Hematopoietic chimerism remains the most promising strategy to bring transplantation tolerance into clinical routine. The concept of chimerism-based tolerance aims to extend the recipient's mechanisms of self-tolerance (ie, clonal deletion, anergy, and regulation) to include the tolerization of donor antigens that are introduced through the cotransplantation of donor hematopoietic cells. For this to be successful, donor hematopoietic cells need to engraft in the recipient at least temporarily. Three pioneering clinical trials inducing chimerism-based tolerance in kidney transplantation have been published to date. Within this review, we discuss the mechanisms of tolerance that are associated with the specific therapeutic protocols of each trial. Recent data highlight the importance of regulation as a mechanism that maintains tolerance. Insufficient regulatory mechanisms are also a likely explanation for situations of tolerance failure despite persisting donor chimerism. After decades of preclinical development of chimerism protocols, mechanistic data from clinical trials have recently become increasingly important. Better understanding of the required mechanisms for tolerance to be induced in humans will be a key to design more reliable and less invasive chimerism protocols in the future.

Achievement of operational tolerance in a pediatric liver transplant recipient following successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a different donor

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)-based approaches are increasingly investigated strategies to induce tolerance in recipients of solid allografts. However, in the majority of cases, these approaches rely on the infusion of hematopoietic stem cells recovered from the same solid organ donor. In this report, we describe the case of a boy who received liver transplantation from a deceased donor, who had successfully underwent allogeneic HSCT from an unrelated donor for hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia. In this patient, it was possible to permanently withdraw post-HSCT immune suppression without causing any sign of liver graft dysfunction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of operational tolerance documented in a patient who received combined liver transplantation and HSCT from different donors.

Sequential Stem Cell-Kidney Transplantation in Schimke Immuno-osseous Dysplasia

Lifelong immunosuppression is required for allograft survival after kidney transplantation but may not ultimately prevent allograft loss resulting from chronic rejection. We developed an approach that attempts to abrogate immune rejection and the need for post-transplantation immunosuppression in three patients with Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia who had both T-cell immunodeficiency and renal failure. Each patient received sequential transplants of αβ T-cell-depleted and CD19 B-cell-depleted haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells and a kidney from the same donor. Full donor hematopoietic chimerism and functional ex vivo T-cell tolerance was achieved, and the patients continued to have normal renal function without immunosuppression at 22 to 34 months after kidney transplantation. (Funded by the Kruzn for a Kure Foundation.).

Emerging Concepts in Managing Malignancy in Kidney Transplant Patients

Cancer remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients, due to long-term immunosuppression. Salient issues to consider in decreasing the burden of malignancy among kidney transplant recipients include pretransplant recipient evaluation, post-transplant screening and monitoring, and optimal treatment strategies for the kidney transplant recipients with cancer. In this review, we address cancer incidence and outcomes, approaches to cancer screening and monitoring pretransplant and post-transplant, as well as treatment strategies, immunosuppressive management, and multidisciplinary approaches in the kidney transplant recipients with cancer.

Kidney Transplant Outcomes of Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Introduction

Data on kidney transplantation (KTx) outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are very limited.

Methods

We investigated the outcomes of patients with MM who underwent KTx between 1994 and 2019.

Results

A total of 12 transplants from 11 patients were included. At the time of KTx, 6 were classified as having stringent complete response (CR), 2 as CR, 2 as very good partial response (VGPR), and 2 as partial response (PR). With a median follow-up of 40 (minimum–maximum, 5–92) months after KTx, hematologic progression occurred in 9 transplants (75%). There were 3 grafts (25%) that failed, and 5 patients (45.5%) experienced death with functioning allografts. Graft survival at 1 and 5 years was 82.5% and 66%, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates of the cohort at 1, 3, and 5 years were 83.3%, 55.6%, and 44.4%, respectively. The estimated median PFS of patients who received bortezomib at any time (pre-KTx and/or post-KTx) was not reached, whereas it was 24 months for those who never received bortezomib (P = 0.281). Overall survival (OS) rates of the cohort at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81.8%, 61.4%, and 61.4%, respectively. OS of patients who received bortezomib at any time was 87.5%, 72.9%, and 72.9%, and that for those who never received bortezomib was 66.7%, 33.3%, and 33.3% (P = 0.136). All deaths occurred owing to hematologic progression or treatment-related complications.

Conclusion

Kidney transplant outcomes of patients with myeloma who received bortezomib before or after KTx seem to be more favorable. Nevertheless, relapse after KTx in MM is still common. More studies are needed to better determine who benefits from a KTx.

First Successful Kidney Transplantation After Hematopoeitic Stem Cell Transplantation in Malaysia

Promising outcomes of kidney transplantation following hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation has been reported. Data from some centers have demonstrated stable graft function without long term immunosuppression. We present our experience with the first successful case in Malaysia. This is a 21-year-old man who had acute myeloid leukemia, received stem cell transplant from his younger brother 8 years prior, underwent kidney transplantation from the same donor, and had an excellent 1-year graft function post-transplant. As the post-transplant genetic analysis revealed full chimerism, his immunosuppression regimen can be tapered to minimal doses safely. The concept of immunotolerance is now widely studied and could potentially be the curative strategy for patients who develop end stage kidney disease after hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation.

Harnessing Mechanisms of Immune Tolerance to Improve Outcomes in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Review

Survival after solid organ transplantation (SOT) is limited by chronic rejection as well as the need for lifelong immunosuppression and its associated toxicities. Several preclinical and clinical studies have tested methods designed to induce transplantation tolerance without lifelong immune suppression. The limited success of these strategies has led to the development of clinical protocols that combine SOT with other approaches, such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). HSCT prior to SOT facilitates engraftment of donor cells that can drive immune tolerance. Recent innovations in graft manipulation strategies and post-HSCT immune therapy provide further advances in promoting tolerance and improving clinical outcomes. In this review, we discuss conventional and unconventional immunological mechanisms underlying the development of immune tolerance in SOT recipients and how they can inform clinical advances. Specifically, we review the most recent mechanistic studies elucidating which immune regulatory cells dampen cytotoxic immune reactivity while fostering a tolerogenic environment. We further discuss how this understanding of regulatory cells can shape graft engineering and other therapeutic strategies to improve long-term outcomes for patients receiving HSCT and SOT.

A Prospective Controlled Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of in vitro Expanded Recipient Regulatory T Cell Therapy and Tocilizumab Together With Donor Bone Marrow Infusion in HLA-Mismatched Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients (Trex001)

Background: The induction of donor-specific immunological tolerance could improve outcome after kidney transplantation. However, no tolerance protocol is available for routine clinical use. Chimerism-based regimens hold promise, but their widespread application is impeded in part by unresolved safety issues. This study tests the hypothesis that therapy with polyclonal recipient regulatory T cells (Tregs) and anti-IL6R (tocilizumab) leads to transient chimerism and achieves pro-tolerogenic immunomodulation in kidney transplant recipients also receiving donor bone marrow (BM) without myelosuppressive conditioning of the recipient.

Methods/design: A prospective, open-label, controlled, single-center, phase I/IIa academic study is performed in HLA-mismatched living donor kidney transplant recipients.

Study group: Recipients of the study group receive in vitro expanded recipient Tregs and a donor bone marrow cell infusion within 3 days after transplantation and tocilizumab for the first 3 weeks post-transplant. In addition they are treated with thymoglobulin, belatacept, sirolimus, and steroids as immunosuppression. Starting 6 months post-transplant, sirolimus and steroids are withdrawn in a step-wise manner in stable patients.

Control group: Recipients of the control group are treated with thymoglobulin, belatacept, sirolimus, and steroids as immunosuppression. Co-primary endpoints of safety (impaired graft function [eGFR <35 mL/min/1.73 m²], graft-vs.-host disease or patient death by 12 months) and efficacy (total leukocyte donor chimerism within 28 days post-transplant) are assessed. Secondary endpoints include frequency of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes and subclinical rejection episodes on surveillance biopsies, assessment of kidney graft function, and the evaluation whether the study protocol leads to detectable changes in the immune system indicative of pro-tolerogenic immune modulation.

Discussion: The results of this trial will provide evidence whether treatment with recipient Tregs and donor BM is feasible, safe and efficacious in leading to transient chimerism. If successful, this combination cell therapy has the potential to become a novel treatment option for immunomodulation in organ transplantation without the toxicities associated with myelosuppressive recipient conditioning.

Trial registration: European Clinical Trials Database EudraCT Nr 2018-003142-16 and clinicaltrials.gov NCT03867617.

Phase I trial of donor-derived modified immune cell infusion in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUNDPreclinical experiments have shown that donor blood cells, modified in vitro by an alkylating agent (modified immune cells [MICs]), induced long-term specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor.METHODSIn this phase I trial, patients received either 1.5 × 106 MICs per kg BW on day -2 (n = 3, group A), or 1.5 × 108 MICs per kg BW on day -2 (n = 3, group B) or day -7 (n = 4, group C) before living donor kidney transplantation in addition to post-transplantation immunosuppression. The primary outcome measure was the frequency of adverse events (AEs) until day 30 (study phase) with follow-up out to day 360.RESULTSMIC infusions were extremely well tolerated. During the study phase, 10 treated patients experienced a total of 69 AEs that were unlikely to be related or not related to MIC infusion. No donor-specific human leukocyte antigen Abs or rejection episodes were noted, even though the patients received up to 1.3 × 1010 donor mononuclear cells before transplantation. Group C patients with low immunosuppression during follow-up showed no in vitro reactivity against stimulatory donor blood cells on day 360, whereas reactivity against third-party cells was still preserved. Frequencies of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi transitional B lymphocytes (Bregs) increased from a median of 6% before MIC infusion to 20% on day 180, which was 19- and 68-fold higher, respectively, than in 2 independent cohorts of transplanted controls. The majority of Bregs produced the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10. MIC-treated patients showed the Immune Tolerance Network operational tolerance signature.CONCLUSIONMIC administration was safe and could be a future tool for the targeted induction of tolerogenic Bregs.TRIAL REGISTRATIONEudraCT number: 2014-002086-30; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02560220.FUNDINGFederal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Technology, Berlin, Germany, and TolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Solid Organ Recipients with Emphasis on Transplant Complications: A Nationwide Retrospective Survey on Behalf of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Transplant Complications Working Group

Little is known about stem cell transplantation in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. We conducted a nationwide retrospective survey of Japan Society for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation centers. A total of 19 patients who underwent 22 hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCTs) after SOT were identified: 5 autologous HSCTs and 17 allogeneic HSCTs were performed. Patients who underwent autologous HSCT received a liver (n = 4) or kidney (n = 1) transplant. All 5 patients achieved neutrophil engraftment, and 2 of 3 patients with hepatoblastoma were alive at 1 year after HSCT. Allogeneic HSCT was performed in 16 patients (7 liver transplant recipients and 9 kidney transplant recipients). Among these, 2 donors were identical for both transplantations. All but 1 patient achieved neutrophil engraftment. The 5-year overall survival rate was 41.7%, but that in patients with malignant disease (n = 13) was much lower than the overall rate (23.1%). Only 1 patient with malignant disease underwent allogeneic HSCT in nonremission. In allogeneic HSCT after kidney transplantation, post-transplantation (1 year) kidney function in 5 evaluable patients was significantly lower than that before allogeneic HSCT, and 3 patients experienced renal rejection. However, no severe hepatic rejection was noted. In SOT recipients, HSCT is a potentially curable treatment for hematologic disorders, but it must be performed with caution, especially in patients with malignancy.

Allograft and patient survival after sequential HSCT and kidney transplantation from the same donor-A multicenter analysis

Tolerance induction through simultaneous hematopoietic stem cell and renal transplantation has shown promising results, but it is hampered by the toxicity of preconditioning therapies and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Moreover, renal function has never been compared to conventionally transplanted patients, thus, whether donor-specific tolerance results in improved outcomes remains unanswered. We collected follow-up data of published cases of renal transplantations after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from the same donor and compared patient and transplant kidney survival as well as function with caliper-matched living-donor renal transplantations from the Austrian dialysis and transplant registry. Overall, 22 tolerant and 20 control patients were included (median observation period 10 years [range 11 months to 26 years]). In the tolerant group, no renal allograft loss was reported, whereas 3 were lost in the control group. Median creatinine levels were 85 μmol/l (interquartile range [IQR] 72-99) in the tolerant cohort and 118 μmol/l (IQR 99-143) in the control group. Mixed linear-model showed around 29% lower average creatinine levels throughout follow-up in the tolerant group (P < .01). Our data clearly show stable renal graft function without long-term immunosuppression for many years, suggesting permanent donor-specific tolerance. Thus sequential transplantation might be an alternative approach for future studies targeting tolerance induction in renal allograft recipients.