Dual JAK2/Aurora kinase A inhibition prevents human skin graft rejection by allo-inactivation and ILC2-mediated tissue repair

Potential Role of Innate Lymphoid Cells in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Skin Diseases

Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) are lymphoid cells that are resident in mucosal tissues, especially the skin, which, once stimulated by epithelial cell-derived cytokines, release IL-5, IL-13, and IL-4, as the effectors of type 2 immune responses. This research aims to evaluate the role of ILC2s in the pathogenesis of skin diseases, with a particular focus on inflammatory cutaneous disorders, in order to also elucidate potential therapeutic perspectives. The research has been conducted in articles, excluding reviews and meta-analyses, on both animals and humans. The results showed that ILC2s play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of systemic skin manifestations, prognosis, and severity, while a potential antimelanoma role is emerging from the new research. Future perspectives could include the development of new antibodies targeting or stimulating ILC2 release. This evidence could add a new therapeutic approach to inflammatory cutaneous conditions, including allergic ones.

Potential correlation of allograft infiltrating group 2 innate lymphoid cells with acute rejection after liver transplantation

Accumulating evidence indicates the critical roles of group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) in immunoregulation. However, the role of ILC2s in acute rejection after liver transplantation (LT) remains elusive. In this study, we analyzed the frequency, counts, and signature cytokines of ILC2s in liver transplant recipients by flow cytometric analysis and multiplex immunofluorescence assay. We also assessed the spatial distribution and correlation between hepatic ILC2s and Treg cells. The changes of ILC2s were dynamically monitored in the mouse LT model. We found that the frequencies of circulating ILC2s were comparable in liver transplant recipients with either rejection or non-rejection compared with the control group. The hepatic ILC2s counts were significantly increased in the rejection group than in the non-rejection and control groups, and a similar trend was observed for Treg cells. In the mouse LT model, allograft infiltrating ILC2s dramatically increased within 14 days post-transplant. The frequency of ILC2s in bone marrow significantly increased at 7 days post-transplant and rapidly decreased at 14 days after LT. Similarly, there was a significant increase in the frequency of splenic ILC2s within two weeks post-transplant. Multiplex immunofluorescence assay showed a close correlation between hepatic ILC2s and Treg cells by analyzing their spatial distribution and distance. In conclusion, the number of allograft infiltrating ILC2s was closely related to rejection after LT. Allograft infiltrating ILC2s may play inhibitory roles in posttransplant immune homeostasis, favoring resolution of liver allograft rejection by interacting with Treg cells or promoting the migration of Tregs cells into the liver allograft.

Microvascular Inflammation of the Renal Allograft: A Reappraisal of the Underlying Mechanisms

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is associated with poor transplant outcomes and was identified as a leading cause of graft failure after kidney transplantation. Although the hallmark histological features of ABMR (ABMRh), i.e., microvascular inflammation (MVI), usually correlate with the presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSAs), it is increasingly recognized that kidney transplant recipients can develop ABMRh in the absence of HLA-DSAs. In fact, 40-60% of patients with overt MVI have no circulating HLA-DSAs, suggesting that other mechanisms could be involved. In this review, we provide an update on the current understanding of the different pathogenic processes underpinning MVI. These processes include both antibody-independent and antibody-dependent mechanisms of endothelial injury and ensuing MVI. Specific emphasis is placed on non-HLA antibodies, for which we discuss the ontogeny, putative targets, and mechanisms underlying endothelial toxicity in connection with their clinical impact. A better understanding of these emerging mechanisms of allograft injury and all the effector cells involved in these processes may provide important insights that pave the way for innovative diagnostic tools and highly tailored therapeutic strategies.