Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with incremental systemic corticosteroid exposure in asthma

Adverse consequences of systemic corticosteroids use among a broad population of US adults with asthma: a real-world analysis

AIMS

Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) are used to manage asthma exacerbations. Among the broad population of patients with asthma, SCS-related risk of adverse events (AEs), health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the Optum Research Database claims to identify adults with asthma from 1/1/2017 to 6/30/2022. The index date was the earliest SCS claim for SCS users; non-SCS users were randomly selected and adjusted proportionally to SCS users by index year. SCS use was measured during the first 12 months of follow-up. Inverse probability of treatment weighting balanced the two cohorts for selected baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. SCS users were further stratified into low, medium, and high dose sub-cohorts. SCS-related AEs were assessed up to 48 months, while HCRU and costs were assessed during the first 12 months of follow-up. A generalized linear model (GLM) analyzed follow-up costs by SCS exposure.

RESULTS

The 130,739 patients included 55,363 non-SCS users (42.3%), while 75,376 were SCS users stratified into 60,319 low-, 12,235 medium-, and 2,822 high-dose users. The mean age was 49.6 years; 61.8% were female and 68.9% were non-Hispanic White. SCS users had a significantly greater risk of new-onset acute and chronic SCS-related AEs, increasing incrementally with dose exposure (all p < .001) across numerous physiological systems. Follow-up HCRU and costs also rose incrementally with dose exposure (all p < .001). Compared with non-users, SCS-related costs were 1.43, 1.97, and 3.21 times higher among low-, medium-, and high-dose users, respectively. The adjusted GLM predicted a 9.9% cost increase per 100 mg of prednisone equivalents.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective administrative claims studies cannot randomize patients and may not capture all patient events.

CONCLUSIONS

Among a broad population of adults with asthma, even low doses of SCS were associated with significantly increased risk of new-onset AEs, HCRU, and costs.

Impact of Biologics Initiation on Oral Corticosteroid Use in the International Severe Asthma Registry and the Optimum Patient Care Research Database: A Pooled Analysis of Real-World Data

BACKGROUND

For severe asthma (SA) management, real-world evidence on the effects of biologic therapies in reducing the burden of oral corticosteroid (OCS) use is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the efficacy of biologic initiation on total OCS (TOCS) exposure in patients with SA from real-world specialist and primary care settings.

METHODS

From the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR, specialist care) and the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD, primary care, United Kingdom), adult biologic initiators were identified and propensity score-matched with non-initiators (ISAR, 1:1; OPCRD, 1:2). The impact of biologic initiation on TOCS (including bursts for exacerbations) daily dose in the first- and second-year follow-up period was estimated using multivariable generalized linear models.

RESULTS

Among 5,663 patients (ISAR 48%, OPCRD 52%), the odds ratios (ORs) of biologic initiators achieving TOCS cessation in the first and second years of follow-up were 2.38 (95% CI, 1.87-3.04) and 2.11 (95% CI, 1.65-2.70), whereas the ORs of low (0- to 5-mg) TOCS intake were 1.62 (95% CI, 1.40-1.86) and 1.40 (95% CI, 1.21-1.61), respectively. Compared with non-initiators, biologic initiators had a substantially higher chance of achieving greater than 75% reduction from baseline (OR [95% CI] = 2.35 [2.06-2.68] and 1.53 [1.35-1.73] in first and second years, respectively). These findings remained persistent and robust when analyses were repeated with one country setting removed at a time.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologic initiation in patients with SA led to substantial reduction in TOCS exposure, particularly in the first year. Future analyses will explore the impact on OCS-related adverse health events.

Predicting Risk of Morbidities Associated with Oral Corticosteroid Prescription for Asthma

Background

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are commonly used to treat asthma but increase the risks for multiple morbidities; reducing OCS exposure may benefit patients. We analysed independent risk factors and longitudinal changes in OCS usage among patients with asthma to predict future risks of OCS-related adverse outcomes.

Methods

Optimum Patient Care Research Database United Kingdom primary care electronic medical records (EMR) from January 1990 to June 2021 were used to select adults (18-93 years) with asthma who had follow-up data from ≥2 years before to ≥3 years after an index visit for active symptoms; this date was defined by the largest pre-visit to post-visit change in mean annual OCS use. OCS usage during every follow-up year was categorised as none, low (mean <2 prescriptions/year), or high (mean ≥2 prescriptions/year). Pre-index to post-index changes between usage categories were calculated. Risk modelling selected cohorts without 17 morbidities (documented pre-index) reported to be associated with OCS exposure, including type 2 diabetes, osteoporosis, hypertension, and pneumonia. Cox regression analyses selected published risk factors associated with each condition and available in EMR for inclusion in proportional hazards models.

Results

The pre-index to post-index OCS usage category remained unchanged in 38.6% of patients, increased in 39.2%, and decreased in 22.2%, with 20.7% having no further OCS prescriptions. In models, the risks of all adverse outcomes increased with projected categoric OCS use; for example, hazard ratios for a one-category increment (none to low, low to high) were 1.55 (1.42-1.69) for type 2 diabetes, 1.56 (1.36-1.78) for post-menopausal osteoporosis, 1.05 (1.00-1.10) for hypertension, and 1.67 (1.52-1.83) for pneumonia (all p < 0.001).

Conclusion

OCS exposure in this primary care asthma population usually continued longitudinally. Our models predict increased risk of multiple morbidities with higher projected OCS exposure. These findings support early initiation of strategies to minimise OCS use in asthma.

The role of type 2 diabetes in the severity of adult asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes recent basic, translational, and clinical research on type 2 diabetes (T2D) and its relationship with asthma severity in the context of T2D mechanisms and asthma outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several clinical asthma outcomes, such as lung function and exacerbations, demonstrate a strong association between T2D and asthma and support that T2D contributes to worse asthma outcomes. Multiple mechanisms underlying those observed associations, and their representative biomarkers, have been proposed. However, prospective, controlled human studies in the context of both T2D and asthma are limited.

SUMMARY

T2D is associated with worse asthma outcomes and more severe asthma. Yet patients with more severe or uncontrolled asthma are also at a higher risk for systemic steroid exposure, which worsens glycemic control and metabolic dysregulation. Preclinical and translational studies point to metabolic dysregulation as a driver of airway inflammation. Addressing these metabolic pathways through T2D treatment may, in turn, directly or indirectly improve clinical asthma outcomes. While additional research is needed to identify biomarkers of risk and treatment response in metabolic asthma, this review highlights the importance of considering T2D as a clinically relevant asthma comorbidity.

Oral Corticosteroid-Related Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Costs in Patients with COPD

INTRODUCTION

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are used to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations but are associated with adverse outcomes that may increase healthcare resource utilization and costs. We compared attendance/costs associated with OCS-related adverse outcomes in patients who ever used OCS versus those who never used OCS and examined associations between cumulative OCS exposure and attendance/costs.

METHODS

This direct matched observational cohort study used the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database (data range 1987-2019). Patients with a COPD diagnosis on/after April 1, 2003, and Hospital Episode Statistics linkage were included. Emergency room, specialist or primary care outpatient, and inpatient attendance were analyzed. Costs, estimated using Health and Social Care 2019 and National Health Service Reference Costs 2019-2020 reports, were adjusted for sex, age, exacerbation number, and inhaler type used in the 12 months before index date.

RESULTS

The OCS cohort had higher annualized disease-specific (excluding respiratory) total attendance/costs versus the non-OCS cohort (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) ranging from 37% (1.37 [1.31, 1.43]) for emergency room attendances to 149% (2.49 [2.36, 2.63]) for specialist consultations. Disease-specific (excluding respiratory) attendance/costs increased in a positive dose-response relationship for most attendance categories versus the < 0.5 g reference dose. For the 0.5 to < 1.0 g cumulative dose category, the greatest increases in disease-specific (excluding respiratory) attendance/costs occurred for primary care consultations (aIRR [95% CI] 1.38 [1.32, 1.44]). For the ≥ 10 g cumulative dose category, the greatest increases were observed for primary care consultations (aIRR [95% CI] 2.83 [2.66, 3.00]), non-elective long stays (≥ 2 days; 2.54 [2.15, 2.99]), and non-elective short stays (≤ 1 day; 2.51 [2.12, 2.98]). Similar findings were observed for all-cause attendance/costs.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with COPD, OCS-related adverse outcomes were associated with higher attendance and costs, with a positive dose-response relationship. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

Systemic corticosteroid dose-response effects in asthma: an observational cohort study

This study is among the first in a large patient database over an extended period to identify a link between SCS use/overuse and mortality in asthma in a positive dose-response relationship with average daily exposure and cumulative dose categories https://bit.ly/3zzl2QN.

Maintenance OCS Were Used More Frequently Than Biologics in Patients with Uncontrolled GINA 4/5 Asthma in Germany in 2019

Purpose

Asthma is affecting 4-5% of all adults (10% of children) in Germany, ≥ half are inadequately controlled. In 2019 up to 54 thousand patients suffered from severe uncontrolled asthma, 52% were treated/co-treated by pneumonologists. 45% of them had continuous oral corticosteroid (OCS)- and short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) overuse for ≥2 years. The aim of the current study was to analyze the main treatments, escalation schemes and the adherence to the GINA recommendations.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective analysis in 2021 based on data from January to December 2019 in Germany, using the IQVIA™ LRx prescription database and the IQVIA™ Disease Analyzer database containing anonymized electronic medical records as the main data sources.

Results

In 2019 25,200 patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma treated in a pneumonologist´s practice in Germany received GINA 3 (0,4%), GINA 4 (76%) or GINA 5 therapy (24%) during the study year compared to 59% GINA 5 therapy in the 5-10% (1,500-3,000) co-treated in a specialized outpatient department. In Pneumonologists` practices the most frequent choice in GINA 5 was OCS in 69% of patients (biologicals 37%, long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) 20%) compared to 66% biologicals, 55% OCS, and 25% LAMA in the outpatient department. 54,958 of 613,000 GINA 4/5 patients were treated with OCS, 9,725 even with doses above the so called "Cushing threshold" for prednisolone of 2700 mg/year. After introduction of a biological treatment, patients reduced their SABA prescriptions by 28%, OCS by 55%, and OCS overall exposure by 40%, one-third did not need OCS anymore.

Conclusion

In 75% of patients with uncontrolled asthma for ≥2 years therapy was not escalated beyond GINA 4 or low dose OCS was used as the most frequent add-on treatment in GINA 5 contradictory to treatment recommendations. Use of biologics reduced on demand rescue medication and OCS use.

Healthcare Resource Utilization Associated with Intermittent Oral Corticosteroid Prescribing Patterns in Asthma

Purpose

Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use for asthma is associated with considerable healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. However, no study has investigated this in relation to patterns of intermittent OCS prescription.

Methods

This historical UK cohort study used primary care medical records, linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, from 2008 to 2019, of patients (≥4 years old) with asthma prescribed intermittent OCS. Patients were categorized by OCS prescribing pattern (one-off [single], less frequent [≥90-day gap] and frequent [<90-day gap]) and matched 1:1 (by sex, age and index date) with people never prescribed OCS with/without asthma. HCRU (reported as episodes, except for length of hospital stay [days] and any prescription [records]) and associated costs were compared between intermittent OCS and non-OCS cohorts, and among intermittent OCS prescribing patterns.

Results

Of 149,191 eligible patients, 50.3% had one-off, 27.4% less frequent, and 22.3% frequent intermittent OCS prescribing patterns. Annualized non-respiratory HCRU rates were greater in the intermittent OCS versus non-OCS cohorts for GP visits (5.93 vs 4.70 episodes, p < 0.0001), hospital admissions (0.24 vs 0.16 episodes, p < 0.0001), and length of stay (1.87 vs 1.58 days, p < 0.0001). In the intermittent OCS cohort, rates were highest in the frequent prescribing group for GP visits (7.49 episodes; p < 0.0001 vs one-off), length of stay (2.15 days; p < 0.0001) and any prescription including OCS (25.22 prescriptions; p < 0.0001). Mean per-patient non-respiratory related and all-cause HCRU-related costs were higher with intermittent OCS than no OCS (£3902 vs £2722 and £8623 vs £4929, respectively), as were mean annualized costs (£565 vs £313 and £1526 vs £634, respectively). A dose-response relationship existed; HCRU-related costs were highest in the frequent prescribing cohort (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Intermittent OCS use and more frequent intermittent OCS prescription patterns were associated with increased HCRU and associated costs. Improved asthma management is needed to reduce reliance on intermittent OCS in primary care.

Biologic therapies for severe asthma with persistent type 2 inflammation

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airways disease with reversible airflow obstruction, characterised in the majority by type 2 airway inflammation. Type 2 inflammation results in secretion of interleukin-4, -5 and -13 in the airways, recruitment of inflammatory cells (especially eosinophils and mast cells), and airway changes such as mucus hypersecretion and increased airway reactivity. Approximately 5 to 10% of people with asthma, despite optimal therapy and adherence to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2 agonists, are unable to obtain good symptom control and continue to experience exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids; this is known as 'severe asthma'. In many cases, this is associated with persistent type 2 inflammation, indicated by the persistent elevation of blood eosinophils or fractional exhaled nitric oxide. In people with severe asthma and persistent type 2 inflammation, biologic (monoclonal antibody) therapy is indicated. Biologic therapies currently available in Australia for asthma are benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab and omalizumab. They are administered subcutaneously and are generally well tolerated. Biologic asthma therapies are very effective in improving symptoms, and reducing the rate of exacerbations and use of oral corticosteroids, in people with severe asthma and persistent type 2 inflammation. Inhaled corticosteroid treatment should be continued in people using a biologic therapy.

Expert consensus on the use of systemic glucocorticoids for managing eosinophil-related diseases

Eosinophil-related diseases represent a group of pathologic conditions with highly heterogeneous clinical presentation and symptoms ranging from mild to critical. Both systemic and localized forms of disease are typically treated with glucocorticoids. The approval of novel biologic therapies targeting the interleukin-5 pathway can help reduce the use of systemic glucocorticoids (SGC) in eosinophilic diseases and reduce the risk of SGC-related adverse effects (AEs). In this article, a panel of experts from different medical specialties reviewed current evidence on the use of SGC in two systemic eosinophilic diseases: Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with PolyAngiitis (EGPA) and HyperEosinophilic Syndrome (HES); and in two single-organ (respiratory) eosinophilic diseases: Chronic RhinoSinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) and Severe Asthma with Eosinophil Phenotype (SA-EP), and contrasted it with their experience in clinical practice. Using nominal group technique, they reached consensus on key aspects related to the dose and tapering of SGC as well as on the initiation of biologics as SGC-sparing agents. Early treatment with biologics could help prevent AEs associated with medium and long-term use of SGC.

A Long-Term Study of Adverse Outcomes Associated With Oral Corticosteroid Use in COPD

Background

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are often prescribed for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations.

Methods

This observational, individually matched historical cohort study used electronic medical records (1987-2019) from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) to evaluate adverse outcomes in patients with COPD who used OCS (OCS cohort) and those not exposed to OCS (non-OCS cohort). Risk of 17 adverse outcomes was estimated using proportional hazard regression.

Results

Of 323,722 patients, 106,775 (33.0%) had COPD-related OCS prescriptions. Of the 106,775 patients in the overall cohort, 58,955 had HES linkage and were eligible for inclusion in the OCS cohort. The individual matching process identified 53,299 pairs of patients to form the OCS and non-OCS cohorts. Median follow-up post-index was 6.9 years (OCS cohort) and 5.4 years (non-OCS cohort). Adjusted risk of multiple adverse outcomes was higher for the OCS cohort versus the non-OCS cohort, including osteoporosis with/without fractures (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70-1.92), type 2 diabetes mellitus (aHR 1.44; 95% CI 1.37-1.51), cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease (aHR 1.26; 95% CI 1.21-1.30), and all-cause mortality (aHR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.07). In the OCS cohort, risk of most adverse outcomes increased with increasing categorized cumulative OCS dose. For example, risk of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease was 34% higher in the 1.0-<2.5 g group versus the <0.5 g group (HR 1.34; 95% CI 1.26-1.42).

Conclusion

Any OCS use was associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes in patients with COPD, with risk generally increasing with greater cumulative OCS dose.

Adult Severe Asthma Registries: A Global and Growing Inventory

Aim

The International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR; http://isaregistries.org/) uses standardised variables to enable multi-country and adequately powered research in severe asthma. This study aims to look at the data countries within ISAR and non-ISAR countries reported collecting that enable global research that support individual country interests.

Methods

Registries were identified by online searches and approaching severe asthma experts. Participating registries provided data collection specifications or confirmed variables collected. Core variables (results from ISAR's Delphi study), steroid-related comorbidity variables, biologic safety variables (serious infection, anaphylaxis, and cancer), COVID-19 variables and additional variables (not belonging to the aforementioned categories) that registries reported collecting were summarised.

Results

Of the 37 registries identified, 26 were ISAR affiliates and 11 non-ISAR affiliates. Twenty-five ISAR-registries and 4 non-ISAR registries reported collecting >90% of the 65 core variables. Twenty-three registries reported collecting all optional steroid-related comorbidity variables. Twenty-nine registries reported collecting all optional safety variables. Ten registries reported collecting COVID-19 variables. Twenty-four registries reported collecting additional variables including data from asthma questionnaires (10 Asthma Control Questionnaire, 20 Asthma Control Test, 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, and 4 EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level Questionnaire). Eight registries are linked to databases such as electronic medical records and national claims or disease databases.

Conclusion

Standardised data collection has enabled individual severe asthma registries to collect unified data and increase statistical power for severe asthma research irrespective of ISAR affiliations.

Observational UK cohort study to describe intermittent oral corticosteroid prescribing patterns and their association with adverse outcomes in asthma

INTRODUCTION

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) for asthma are associated with increased risks of developing adverse outcomes (adverse outcomes); no previous study has focused exclusively on intermittent OCS use.

METHODS

This historical (2008-2019) UK cohort study using primary care medical records from two anonymised, real-life databases (OPCRD and CPRD) included patients aged≥4 years with asthma receiving only intermittent OCS. Patients were indexed on their first recorded intermittent OCS prescription for asthma and categorised by OCS prescribing patterns: one-off (single), less frequent (≥90 day gap) and frequent (<90 day gap). Non-OCS patients matched 1:1 on gender, age and index date served as controls. The association of OCS prescribing patterns with OCS-related AO risk was studied, stratified by age, Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2020 treatment step, and pre index inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) prescriptions using a multivariable Cox-proportional hazard model.

FINDINGS

Of 476 167 eligible patients, 41.7%, 26.8% and 31.6% had one-off, less frequent and frequent intermittent OCS prescribing patterns, respectively. Risk of any AO increased with increasingly frequent patterns of intermittent OCS versus non-OCS (HR; 95% CI: one-off 1.19 (1.18 to 1.20), less frequent 1.35 (1.34 to 1.36), frequent 1.42 (1.42 to 1.43)), and was consistent across age, GINA treatment step and ICS and SABA subgroups. The highest risks of individual OCS-related adverse outcomes with increasingly frequent OCS were for pneumonia and sleep apnoea.

CONCLUSION

A considerable proportion of patients with asthma receiving intermittent OCS experienced a frequent prescribing pattern. Increasingly frequent OCS prescribing patterns were associated with higher risk of OCS-related adverse outcomes. Mitigation strategies are needed to minimise intermittent OCS prescription in primary care.

Long-Term Efficacy of Mepolizumab at 3 Years in Patients with Severe Asthma: Comparison with Clinical Trials and Super Responders

The efficacy mepolizumab in severe asthmatic patients is proven in the literature. Primarily to study the effect of mepolizumab on exacerbations, steroid dependence, and the continuation of efficacy in the long term. Secondarily to evaluate the effect of the drug on nasal polyps. Analyzing data from SANI (Severe Asthma Network Italy) clinics, we observed severe asthmatic patients treated with mepolizumab 100 mg/4 weeks, for a period of 3 years. 157 patients were observed. Exacerbations were reduced from the first year (-84.6%) and progressively to 90 and 95% in the second and third ones. Steroid-dependent patients decreased from 54% to 21% and subsequently to 11% in the second year and 6% in the third year. Patients with concomitant nasal polyps, assessed by SNOT-22, showed a 49% reduction in value from baseline to the third year. The study demonstrated the long-term efficacy of mepolizumab in a real-life setting.

COVID-19 and chronic rhinosinusitis: management and comorbidity - what have we learned?

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 5%-12% of the population worldwide suffer from chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). CRS is defined as a chronic respiratory disease and is considered to be a risk factor for COVID-19 patients.

AREAS COVERED

A non-systematic literature research was conducted on COVID-19 and treatment options for CRSwNP. The latest international publications in medical databases, international guidelines, and the internet were reviewed. Since there were no publications on all aspects of this topic during the pandemic, we included our own experience in this report. Based on the conducted literature research in addition to our previously reported experience, we discuss the treatment of CRSwNP during the COVID-19 pandemic and what can be taken for future pandemics.

EXPERT OPINION

Intranasal corticosteroids remain the standard treatment for CRS in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Indications for surgical treatment of CRS should be critically evaluated and reserved for patients with complications and those with no other treatment options. For this purpose, COVID-19 status should be known if possible and, in case of unclear status (emergency), using appropriate personal protective equipment. Systemic corticosteroids should be avoided were possible. Biological treatment should be continued under careful monitoring in uninfected patients and should be temporarily interrupted during COVID-19 infection.

The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index-Metabolic Domains, an abridged version of the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: post-hoc analysis of data from the ADVOCATE trial

BACKGROUND

Quantifying glucocorticoid toxicity is crucial to efforts to reduce it. The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) measures toxicity effectively in clinical trials by calculating two scores: the cumulative worsening score (CWS) and the aggregate improvement score (AIS). However, in clinical practice, high patient volumes limit the time available for standardised assessments. We aimed to compare the GTI with an abbreviated version of the GTI, the GTI-Metabolic Domains (GTI-MD), which could help to address this issue by using data that are collected easily at routine visits and do not require additional effort from clinicians.

METHODS

We did a post-hoc analysis of data from ADVOCATE, a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial in which avacopan replaced a standard prednisone taper in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. We calculated the cumulative worsening score (CWS) and aggregate improvement score (AIS) for each domain of the GTI-MD-comprising the BMI, glucose tolerance, blood pressure, and lipid metabolism domains of the GTI-to test its ability to differentiate the avacopan and prednisone groups by glucocorticoid toxicity. Data from two additional disease cohorts, one comprising patients with asthma and the other comprising patients with autoimmune blistering disease, constituted the validation set.

FINDINGS

Complete data were available for 321 (97%) of the 330 participants comprising the intention-to-treat population in the ADVOCATE trial at week 13, and 307 (93%) at week 26; data from these individuals were included in our post-hoc analysis. In ADVOCATE, 98 (59%) of 166 participants in the avacopan group were men and 68 (41%) were women, 88 (54%) of 164 in the prednisone group were men and 76 (46%) were women; the mean age of participants was 61·2 years [SD 14·6] in the avacopan group and 60·5 years [14·5] in the prednisone group. The validation cohort included 159 patients (89 with glucocorticoid-dependent asthma, of whom 40 [45%] were men and 49 [55%] were women, and 70 with autoimmune blistering disease of the skin, of whom 30 [43%] were men and 40 [57%] were women). The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient in ADVOCATE for the GTI-MD CWS with the GTI CWS for the treatment groups combined was 0·78 (95% CI 0·75-0·81; p<0·0001). The corresponding correlation for the AIS was 0·73 (0·69-0·77, p<0·0001). The GTI-MD distinguished the groups by glucocorticoid toxicity at both 13 weeks and 26 weeks. The mean GTI-MD CWS was lower in the avacopan group than in the prednisone group, consistent with less toxicity (15·9 vs 23·0 at 13 weeks [p=0·0010]; 26·7 vs 31·7 at 26 weeks [p=0·0092]). The GTI-MD AIS values were also consistent with less toxicity in the avacopan group (2·5 vs 13·0 at 13 weeks [p=0·0003], 4·4 vs 10·1 at 26 weeks [p=0·027]). A GTI-MD score of 0 corresponded to a low likelihood of toxicity in the other GTI domains. In the validation set, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the GTI-MD CWS with the GTI CWS was 0·61 (95% CI 0·50-0·70; p<0·0001) and the corresponding correlation for the AIS was 0·58 (0·47-0·68; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

The GTI-MD correlates well with the full GTI and could be incorporated readily into routine clinic workflows without additional input from the clinician. Using the GTI-MD on the background of electronic medical records systems could help clinicians to monitor glucocorticoid toxicity longitudinally, with the goals of preventing the burden of chronic, treatment-related harms and reducing long-term costs to health systems.

FUNDING

ChemoCentryx.

A Charter to Fundamentally Change the Role of Oral Corticosteroids in the Management of Asthma

Asthma affects 339 million people worldwide, with an estimated 5-10% experiencing severe asthma. In emergency settings, oral corticosteroids (OCS) can be lifesaving, but acute and long-term treatment can produce clinically important adverse outcomes and increase the risk of mortality. Therefore, global guidelines recommend limiting the use of OCS. Despite the risks, research indicates that 40-60% of people with severe asthma are receiving or have received long-term OCS treatment. Although often perceived as a low-cost option, long-term OCS use can result in significant health impairments and costs owing to adverse outcomes and increased utilization of healthcare resources. Alternative treatment methods, such as biologics, may produce cost-saving benefits with a better safety profile. A comprehensive and concerted effort is necessary to tackle the continued reliance on OCS. Accordingly, a threshold for OCS use should be established to help identify patients at risk of OCS-related adverse outcomes. Receiving a total dose of more than 500 mg per year should trigger a review and specialist referral. Changes to national and local policies, following examples from other chronic diseases, will be crucial to achieving this goal. Globally, multiple barriers to change still exist, but specific steps have been identified to help clinicians reduce reliance on OCS. Implementing these changes will result in positive health outcomes for patients and social and economic benefits for societies.

The use of systemic corticosteroids in asthma management in Latin American countries

The stepwise treatment approach recommended by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) includes systemic corticosteroids (SCS) suggested as a final step if asthma is severe and/or difficult to treat. Yet, despite the effectiveness of SCS, they are also associated with potentially irreversible adverse outcomes such as type 2 diabetes, adrenal suppression, and cardiovascular disease. Based on recent data indicating that the risk of developing these conditions can increase after as few as 4 short-term (burst) courses of SCS, even patients with mild asthma who receive SCS occasionally for exacerbations are also at risk of these events. As a result, recent updates by GINA and the Latin American Thoracic Society recommend decreasing SCS use by optimizing administration of non-SCS therapies and/or increasing the use of alternatives, such as biologic agents. Recent and ongoing studies characterizing treatment patterns among patients with asthma have revealed alarming trends suggesting the widespread overuse of SCS around the world. In Latin America, asthma prevalence is approximately 17%, and data suggest that the majority of patients have uncontrolled disease. In this review, we summarize currently available data on asthma treatment patterns in Latin America, which indicate that SCS are prescribed to 20-40% of patients with asthma considered to be well controlled and over 50% of patients with uncontrolled disease. We also offer potential strategies to help reduce SCS use for asthma in everyday clinical practice.

Corticosteroid exposure and cumulative effects in patients with eczema: Results from a patient survey

BACKGROUND

Individuals with eczema may have substantial lifetime corticosteroid exposure, increasing the risk of corticosteroid-related side effects.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a patient survey evaluating corticosteroid exposure and its cumulative effects in individuals with eczema.

METHODS

The multinational online survey was conducted between November 5, 2020, and January 11, 2021. Participants were aged 18 years or older and a patient (n = 1889) or a caregiver of a child (n = 271) diagnosed with having eczema by a medical professional.

RESULTS

All participants reported using corticosteroids. Average duration of topical corticosteroid (TCS) use was 15.3 years in adults and 3.6 years in children; 75% used TCS 1 to 2 times a day and 50% applied TCS 15 to 30 days/mo. Frequency and duration could not be determined by varying prescription TCS potencies. Oral corticosteroid use was reported by 36% of the participants (23% for eczema), with a lifetime average of 8.4 courses in adults and 8.1 courses in children. Corticosteroids for non-eczema atopic conditions were reported by 49% of the participants. In participants using TCS, 83% of adults and 64% of children experienced worsening symptoms over time. Development of new symptoms and conditions increased with a greater number of corticosteroid treatments and longer duration of TCS use but may have been owing to eczema progression. Symptoms consistent with topical steroid withdrawal syndrome after TCS discontinuation were reported by many participants.

CONCLUSION

Reported substantial corticosteroid exposure throughout their lifetime eczema experience placed participants at risk of negative outcomes. Corticosteroids are a critical component of eczema treatment for many patients. However, careful corticosteroid prescribing practices and monitoring are needed to avoid side effects. When possible, corticosteroid-sparing strategies should be explored.

Systemic corticosteroids in asthma: A call to action from World Allergy Organization and Respiratory Effectiveness Group

Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) are a highly effective treatment for acute exacerbations and long-term symptom control in asthma. Long-term SCS use is highly prevalent across all asthma severities, occurring in over 20% of patients with severe or uncontrolled disease globally. It is now well known that exposure to both long-term and repeated acute courses of SCS is associated with a high risk of serious adverse effects (AEs), such as osteoporosis, and metabolic and cardiovascular complications, especially when prescribed onto a background of other corticosteroids. The aim of this call-to-action article, endorsed by the World Allergy Organization and the Respiratory Effectiveness Group, is to review the accumulating evidence on the burden of SCS on patients with asthma and provide an overview of potential strategies for implementing SCS Stewardship. Primary prevention of exacerbations and improvement of asthma control is a key first step in achieving SCS Stewardship, by optimizing maintenance asthma medications and addressing modifiable risk factors, such as adherence and inhaler technique. Other key elements of SCS Stewardship include increasing appropriate specialist referrals for multidisciplinary review, assessment of biomarkers, and consideration of oral corticosteroid-sparing add-on therapies (eg, biologics). In cases where SCS use is deemed clinically justified, it should be tapered to the lowest possible dose. In addition, patients receiving long-term SCS or frequent acute courses should be closely monitored for emergence of SCS-related AEs. Because of the extensive data available on the costly and burdensome AEs associated with SCS use, as well as the range of treatment options now available, there is a need for healthcare providers (HCPs) to carefully evaluate whether the benefits of SCS outweigh the potential harms, to adopt SCS-sparing and Stewardship strategies, and to consider alternative therapies where possible. Development of a structured and collaborative SCS Stewardship approach is urgently required to protect patients from the potential harm of SCS use.

Adrenal function recovery after durable oral corticosteroid sparing with benralizumab in the PONENTE study

BACKGROUND

Oral corticosteroid (OCS) dependence among patients with severe eosinophilic asthma can cause adverse outcomes, including adrenal insufficiency. PONENTE's OCS reduction phase showed that, following benralizumab initiation, 91.5% of patients eliminated corticosteroids or achieved a final dosage ≤5 mg·day-1 (median (range) 0.0 (0.0-40.0) mg).

METHODS

The maintenance phase assessed the durability of corticosteroid reduction and further adrenal function recovery. For ∼6 months, patients continued benralizumab 30 mg every 8 weeks without corticosteroids or with the final dosage achieved during the reduction phase. Investigators could prescribe corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations or increase daily dosages for asthma control deteriorations. Outcomes included changes in daily OCS dosage, Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-6 and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), as well as adrenal status, asthma exacerbations and adverse events.

RESULTS

598 patients entered PONENTE; 563 (94.1%) completed the reduction phase and entered the maintenance phase. From the end of reduction to the end of maintenance, the median (range) OCS dosage was unchanged (0.0 (0.0-40.0) mg), 3.2% (n=18/563) of patients experienced daily dosage increases, the mean ACQ-6 score decreased from 1.26 to 1.18 and 84.5% (n=476/563) of patients were exacerbation free. The mean SGRQ improvement (-19.65 points) from baseline to the end of maintenance indicated substantial quality-of-life improvements. Of patients entering the maintenance phase with adrenal insufficiency, 32.4% (n=104/321) demonstrated an improvement in adrenal function. Adverse events were consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients successfully maintained maximal OCS reduction while achieving improved asthma control with few exacerbations and maintaining or recovering adrenal function.

Paroxysmal dyspnoea in asthma: Wheeze, ILO or dysfunctional breathing?

Paroxysms of dyspnoea in the general population are commonly reported and are frequently assumed to be asthma-related, especially if this diagnostic label has been previously applied. Often, this is not the case. Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction (ILO) and Dysfunctional Breathing (DB) are common comorbid conditions that go unrecognised in many difficult-to-treat asthmatics. On average, these patients have a delay in diagnosis of almost 5 years. This delay, along with ineffective, inappropriate escalation of asthma therapy, frequent hospital presentations for uncontrolled symptoms, and even intensive care admissions, magnifies patient morbidity and poor quality of life. ILO and DB have similar presentations and triggers to asthma. Differentiating between them can be challenging, especially in centres that do not have access to multidisciplinary subspecialty asthma services. Objectively confirming the diagnosis can likewise be challenging as symptoms fluctuate, and gold-standard investigations require extensive experience. This mini-review will summarise the clinical features of ILO and DB, with particular focus in the context of individuals treated for asthma. This narrative review will define each condition, highlight poignant aspects of the history and describe elements of the diagnostic pathway to gain objective confirmation.

Epidemiology, Treatment and Health Care Resource Use of Patients with severe Asthma in Germany – a retrospective Claims Data Analysis

BACKGROUND

Asthma causes various clinical symptoms, including unpredictable severe exacerbations, and even though most patients can achieve a reasonable disease control due to adequate treatment, some patients do not. This study seeks to describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and treatment of asthma and severe asthma patients in Germany.

METHOD

A retrospective claims data analysis has been conducted on adult asthma patients and a subset of patients with severe asthma, identified during July 2017 - June 2018. A proxy was used to identify severe asthma patients based on therapy options recommended within the German treatment guideline for treating these patients. These include (i) biologics, (ii) medium/high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in conjunction with LABA/montelukast and antibiotics/oral corticosteroids (OCS), and (iii) long-term OCS therapy. HCRU and treatment of patients were observed during a 1-year follow-up period (July 2018 - June 2019).

RESULTS

The study included 388 932 adult asthma patients (prevalence: 7.90%), with 2.51%-12.88% affected by severe asthma (depending on the definition). 22.60% of all asthma patients experienced hospitalizations (severe asthma: 36.11%). Furthermore, 13.59% received OCS (severe asthma: 39.91%), but only 0.18% (severe asthma: 1.25%) received biologics. Only 23.95% (severe asthma: 41.17%) visited a pulmonologist.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of severe asthma patients receive long-term OCS therapy. However, less than 50% have seen a pulmonologist who would typically seek a change in treatment to avoid the long-term consequences of OCS. To optimize the treatment of severe asthma in Germany, better referral of these patients to specialists is needed and considering potential treatment alternatives.

Characteristics of Oral Corticosteroid Users Among Persons with Asthma on GINA Step 3 Therapy and Above: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portuguese Community Pharmacies

PURPOSE

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are frequently used in asthma management but have an important risk-profile. The aim of the study is to characterize and compare the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, treatment regimen and asthma control between OCS users and non-users among the population of asthma patients (≥18 years) at GINA step 3 and above treated with a fixed combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA).

METHODS

Cross-sectional study in Portuguese community pharmacies. Data was collected via paper-based interview delivered at the pharmacy (sociodemographic characteristics and asthma treatment regimen, namely ICS/LABA and OCS utilization), followed by a telephonic interview collecting smoking history, comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), history of exacerbations and asthma-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in the previous 12 months, as well as asthma control using the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT®).

RESULTS

A total of 347 patients recruited in 98 pharmacies were included in the analysis. Of those, 328 had completed both questionnaires. A quarter of the individuals reported OCS use in the previous 12 months (OCS users), either as add-on therapy (6%) or exacerbation treatment (19%). Patients were mostly females (72%), with an average age of 59.5 years (SD=15.4). OCS users were significantly older and reported more frequently having conjunctivitis (25.9% vs 15.0%), osteoporosis (25.9% vs 13.4%), arthritis (14.6% vs 6.9%), and gastrointestinal disease (16.1% vs 8.1%). OCS users also reported greater urgent HCRU: unscheduled consultations (33.3% vs 9.3%) and emergency department (ED) visits (32.1% vs 12.1%). Both groups presented poor disease control (85.2% of OCS users vs 72.9% of non-OCS users).

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the burden of OCS therapy to asthma patients and the need to improve asthma management, by adopting OCS sparing strategies in this subgroup of patients.

Characterization of Patients in the International Severe Asthma Registry with High Steroid Exposure Who Did or Did Not Initiate Biologic Therapy

Background

Many severe asthma patients with high oral corticosteroid exposure (HOCS) often do not initiate biologics despite being eligible. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of severe asthma patients with HOCS who did and did not initiate biologics.

Methods

Baseline characteristics of patients with HOCS (long-term maintenance OCS therapy for at least 1 year, or ≥4 courses of steroid bursts in a year) from the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR; https://isaregistries.org/), who initiated or did not initiate biologics (anti-lgE, anti-IL5/5R or anti-IL4R), were described at the time of biologic initiation or registry enrolment. Statistical relationships were tested using Pearson’s chi-squared tests for categorical variables, and t-tests for continuous variables, adjusting for potential errors in multiple comparisons.

Results

Between January 2015 and February 2021, we identified 1412 adult patients with severe asthma from 19 countries that met our inclusion criteria of HOCS, of whom 996 (70.5%) initiated a biologic and 416 (29.5%) did not. The frequency of biologic initiation varied across geographical regions. Those who initiated a biologic were more likely to have higher blood eosinophil count (483 vs 399 cells/µL, p=0.003), serious infections (49.0% vs 13.3%, p<0.001), nasal polyps (35.2% vs 23.6%, p<0.001), airflow limitation (56.8% vs 51.8%, p=0.013), and uncontrolled asthma (80.8% vs 73.2%, p=0.004) despite greater conventional treatment adherence than those who did not start a biologic. Both groups had similar annual asthma exacerbation rates in the previous 12 months (5.7 vs 5.3, p=0.147).

Conclusion

Around one third of severe HOCS asthma patients did not receive biologics despite a similar high burden of asthma exacerbations as those who initiated a biologic therapy. Other disease characteristics such as eosinophilic phenotype, serious infectious events, nasal polyps, airflow limitation and lack of asthma control appear to dictate biologic use.

Schlenter W, Welkoborsky HJ, Wollenberg B, Bergmann C, Cuevas M, Beutner C, Gröger M, Becker S. Dokumentation von Biologika-Therapien bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Polyposis nasi (CRSwNP): Dupilumab, Omalizumab und Mepolizumab

Hintergrund: Die chronische Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen (CRSwNP) ist eine multifaktorielle entzündliche Erkrankung der paranasalen Schleimhäute, der als Endotyp meistens eine Typ-2-Inflammation zugrunde liegt. Mittlerweile sind drei Antikörper (Dupilumab, Omalizumab und Mepolizumab) für die Therapie der schweren CRSwNP zugelassen. Eine Dokumentation der Erkrankungsschwere im Behandlungsverlauf ist unverzichtbar.

Methoden: In einer Literaturrecherche in Medline, Pubmed sowie den nationalen und internationalen Studien- und Leitlinienregistern und der Cochrane Library wurde die Immunologie der CRSwNP analysiert und die Evidenz zur Wirkung von Dupilumab, Omalizumab und Mepolizumab bei dieser Erkrankung ermittelt. Hieraus wurden drei Positionspapiere durch unsere Autorengruppe erstellt, die Grundlage dieser zusammenfassenden Übersichtsarbeit sind.

Ergebnisse: Basierend auf den Angaben aus der internationalen Literatur werden von einem Expertengremium Empfehlungen für die Anwendung von Dupilumab, Omalizumab und Mepolizumab bei CRSwNP im deutschen Gesundheitssystem gegeben.

Schlussfolgerung: Dupilumab, Omalizumab und Mepolizumab sind zugelassen für Patienten ab 18 Jahren mit schwerer CRSwNP als Zusatztherapie zu intranasalen Glukokortikosteroiden (INCS), wenn, bei Dupilumab und Mepolizumab, durch eine Therapie mit systemischen Glukokortikosteroiden und/oder chirurgischem Eingriff keine ausreichende Krankheitskontrolle erzielt werden kann. Eine Therapie mit Omalizumab ist angezeigt, wenn eine Therapie mit INCS keine suffiziente Kontrolle der Erkrankung ergibt. Es werden dezidierte Empfehlungen zur Dokumentation der Anwendung im Deutschen Gesundheitssystem gegeben, die auf den hierzu bereits publizierten Positionspapieren unserer Autorengruppe basieren.

Zitierweise: Klimek L, Förster-Ruhrmann U, Beule AG, Chaker AM, Hagemann J, Klimek F, Casper I, Huppertz T, Hoffmann TK, Dazert S, Deitmer T, Olze H, Strieth S, Wrede H, Schlenter W, Welkoborsky H-J, Wollenberg B, Bergmann C, Cuevas M, Beutner C, Gröger M, Becker S. Indicating biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP): Recommendations by German Allergy and ORL-societies AeDA and DGHNO for Dupilumab, Omalizumab and Mepolizumab. Allergo J Int 2022;31:149-60

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-022-00220-x

Healthcare utilisation and health-related quality of life of severe asthma patients in Singapore

BackgroundNotwithstanding unequivocal consensus on the disproportionate effect of severe asthma (SA) on asthma morbidity, healthcare utilisation, quality of life, work impairment and socioeconomic burden, the burden of SA patients in Singapore has not been appraised.ObjectivesTo determine the burden of disease and extent of quality of life impairment in SA patients in Singapore.MethodsA cross-sectional analysis of SA patients seen in Singapore General Hospital (2020-2021) to investigate emergency healthcare utilization, oral corticosteroid (OCS) burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with primary endpoint EuroQoL-5 Dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) scores. The empirical measurement properties of the EQ-5D utility index in SA were comprehensively assessed through multivariate regression analyses.ResultsA total of 336 SA patients were recruited, 51.2% of SA patients had at least one acute healthcare resource utilization during the previous year, with 25.6% of patients having an emergency healthcare visit to the hospital. Overall mean (SD) EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L utility scores in SA patients were 6.22 (1.51) and 0.77 (0.30), respectively. EQ-5D utility scores were 0.14 lower in uncontrolled vs controlled asthma and 0.09 lower in the presence of severe exacerbation, whereas barely changed by maintenance OCS dose and airflow limitation.ConclusionSA patients were found to have high disease burden, high healthcare resource utilization and OCS use, low biologics usage, poor HRQoL and utility in comparison with other chronic diseases.

Overuse of Oral Corticosteroids in Asthma Is Often Underdiagnosed and Inadequately Addressed

BACKGROUND

Overuse of oral corticosteroids (OCS) is associated with serious adverse effects. It is currently unknown what proportion of patients with asthma regularly use these drugs, or whether they are optimally treated by specialists to minimize the use of these drugs.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate (1) the prevalence of patients requiring ≥2 courses or maintenance use of OCS (ie, frequent users), (2) their use of inhaled corticosteroids, and (3) who prescribed their asthma medications.

METHODS

We analyzed OCS prescription data (Dutch IQVIA Prescription Database) focusing on adult patients receiving asthma medication between March 2017 and March 2018 (focus year). An OCS course was defined as ≥20 mg prednisolone equivalent for 3 to 28 days; maintenance OCS as 2.5 to 17.5 mg/day for >28 days. Prescribers were classified as specialist or general practitioners.

RESULTS

Of 182,849 adults taking asthma medications, 77.8% had not received a prescription for OCS and 7.2% of patients were frequent OCS users: 2.6% received ≥2 OCS courses and 4.6% were on maintenance OCS. Of the frequent OCS users, 45.8% received only low or medium doses (<500 μg/day) of inhaled corticosteroids. Within the preceding 3 years (2014-2017), 51.1% and 34.3% of patients prescribed ≥2 OCS courses or maintenance OCS, respectively, had received prescriptions from a general practitioner without medication adjustments by a specialist.

CONCLUSION

This prescription-fill study shows that 7.2% of Dutch patients with asthma were overexposed to OCS, of whom only about half used adequate doses of inhaled corticosteroids, and 40.3% had not received specialist intervention within the previous 3 years. This suggests that OCS overuse is often underdiagnosed and inadequately addressed.

Clinical burden related to oral corticosteroid treatment of severe asthma in Spain: LEVANTE study

Background: Severe asthma treatment with oral corticosteroids (OCS) added to inhaled corticosteroids and a long-acting β2-agonist (ICS-LABA) may result in more treatment burden and increased adverse effects.Objective and Methods: This ambispective multicenter observational study aimed at describing the clinical burden in patients with severe asthma on stable high-dose ICS-LABA who received OCS during ≥6 months (maintenance group) or ≥2 cycles in the previous 12 months (bursts group). Data collection comprised a retrospective 12-month baseline period and 2 follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months. Results: Eighty-nine patients were evaluable (30 on maintenance, 59 on bursts). At baseline, mean (SD) daily prednisone equivalent exposure in the total population was 24.6 (14.7) mg: 13.8 (9.4) mg on maintenance and 29.9 (14.3) mg on bursts. During the 6-month follow-up period, mean (SD) daily dose in the total cohort was 22.5 (18.8) mg: 17.2 (18.6) mg on maintenance and 28.4 (20.6) mg on bursts. The overall annual severe exacerbations rate during the 12-month baseline period was 2.05 per patient-year and 1.5 per patient-year over the 6-month follow-up, and frequency of hospitalizations and emergency department visits were similar on both maintenance and bursts use. Conclusions: Results show a suboptimal control of severe asthma despite such high doses of OCS and persistence of disease burden regardless of the prescribing pattern in maintenance or bursts. There is therapeutic inertia to continue using OCS despite the increased risk of adverse effects and the availability of biologics.

Dupilumab Efficacy in Steroid-Dependent Severe Asthma by Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Dose

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4/-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation in multiple diseases. In the phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA VENTURE (VENTURE) study (NCT02528214), dupilumab versus placebo reduced oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose and improved clinical outcomes in patients with OCS-dependent severe asthma. Dupilumab efficacy in patients with varying disease burden (defined by baseline OCS dose) has not been assessed.

OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis of VENTURE evaluated dupilumab efficacy across subgroups defined by baseline OCS dose.

METHODS

The OCS dose, proportion no longer needing OCS at week 24, annualized severe exacerbation rate, and least squares mean change from baseline in pre- and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second at week 24 were evaluated in VENTURE patients with OCS-dependent severe asthma receiving dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks versus placebo, categorized by a baseline OCS dose of less than 10 mg/d or 10 or more mg/d.

RESULTS

Dupilumab reduced daily OCS dose from baseline at week 24 in both dose groups. In dupilumab-/placebo-treated patients with a baseline OCS dose of less than 10 mg/d and 10 or more mg/d, 72%/42% and 37%/23% stopped OCS by week 24 (P < .01/P < .05), respectively. Dupilumab significantly reduced the annualized severe exacerbation rate by 71% and 48% (P < .01/P < .05). At week 24, dupilumab improved pre- and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second in patients in both dose groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with OCS-dependent severe asthma receiving lower or higher baseline OCS doses, dupilumab significantly reduced the OCS dose and improved the likelihood of no longer requiring OCS while also reducing exacerbations and improving lung function.

Improving Care in Eosinophil-Associated Diseases: A Charter

Eosinophil-associated diseases (EADs) are a range of heterogeneous conditions in which eosinophils are believed to play a critical pathological role. EADs include common illnesses such as eosinophilic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis and rare conditions such as hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs). EADs are associated with substantial burdens for the patient, including chronic, debilitating symptoms, increased financial burden, decreased health-related quality of life, and the need for repeated visits to multiple different healthcare professionals (HCPs), emergency departments, and/or hospitals. Poor EAD recognition by HCPs often contributes to delayed diagnoses, which further delays patient access to appropriate care and effective treatments, contributing to poor health outcomes. The objective of this charter is to outline key patient rights and expectations with respect to the management of their condition(s) and to set forth an ambitious action plan to improve health outcomes for patients with EADs: (1) people with EADs, their caretakers, HCPs, and the public must have greater awareness and education about EADs; (2) people with EADs must receive a timely, accurate diagnosis; (3) all people with EADs must have access to an appropriate multidisciplinary team, when necessary; and (4) people with EADs must have access to safe and effective treatment options without unnecessary regulatory delays. The principles described in this charter demonstrate the core elements of quality care that people with EADs must receive, and they represent clear steps by which to reduce patient and caregiver burden and improve patient outcomes. We urge HCPs, healthcare systems, and policymakers worldwide to swiftly adopt these principles to ensure patients with EADs have an accurate diagnosis in a timely manner and access to high-level care and treatment in an appropriate setting.

Electronic Inhaler Monitoring for Chronic Airway Disease: Development and Application of a Multidimensional Efficacy Framework

Inhaled therapy is the cornerstone of chronic airway disease therapy, but poor adherence to controller inhalers worsens clinical outcomes and increases cost. Monitoring of controller use is needed to improve adherence, and monitoring of reliever use can predict impending exacerbations. Both can be accurately achieved by electronic inhaler monitoring (EIM). However, evidence for EIM use in clinical practice is limited and varied, and knowledge gaps remain across different outcomes and health settings. We aimed to develop a framework to assess EIM systematically across all aspects of efficacy, apply this framework to the current literature, and identify gaps in efficacy to inform future development in the field. We adapted an existing framework for diagnostic tests, consisting of six levels of efficacy with ascending clinical relevance: technical, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic thinking, therapeutic, patient outcome, and societal efficacy. Tailoring this framework to EIM, we incorporated expert feedback and applied it to the EIM efficacy literature. We found that EIM has good diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic thinking, and therapeutic efficacies, but evidence is lacking for specific aspects of technical, patient outcome, and societal efficacies. Further development of EIM requires improved reliability, usability, and data security for patients, and optimal integration with electronic medical records and overall patient care. Defining appropriate target patient groups and pairing EIM data with effective interventions, in conjunction with reducing costs through technological innovation and economies of scale, will enhance patient and societal outcome efficacies.

Positionspapier: Empfehlungen zur Anwendung von Mepolizumab bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Polyposis nasi (CRSwNP) im deutschen Gesundheitssystem – Empfehlungen des Ärzteverbandes Deutscher Allergologen (AeDA) und der AGs Klinische Immunologie, Allergologie und Umweltmedizin und Rhinologie und Rhinochirurgie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie (DGHNO-KHC)

BACKGROUND

 Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinus mucosa with eosinophilic inflammation as the most common endotype. The anti-IL5 antibody mepolizumab was approved for the treatment of severe CRSwNP in the EU in November 2021.

METHODS

 A literature search was performed to analyze the immunology of CRSwNP and determine the available evidence by searching Medline, Pubmed, and the German national and international trial and guideline registries and the Cochrane Library. Human studies published in the period up to and including 12/2021 that investigated the effect of mepolizumab in CRSwNP were considered.

RESULTS

 Based on the international literature and previous experience, recommendations for the use of mepolizumab in CRSwNP in the German health care system are given by an expert panel on the basis of a documentation form.

CONCLUSIONS

 Understanding about the immunological basis of CRSwNP opens new non-surgical therapeutic approaches with biologics for patients with severe courses. Mepolizumab is approved since November 2021 for add-on therapy with intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of adult patients with severe CRSwNP who cannot be adequately controlled with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgical intervention.

The Korean Severe Asthma Registry (KoSAR): real world research in severe asthma

Severe asthma constitutes a serious health burden with significant morbidity and socioeconomic costs. The development and introduction of new biologics targeting type 2 inflammation changed the paradigm for management of severe asthma and initiated a biological era. These changes impose a challenge to clinicians in managing difficult-to-treat and severe asthma. To understand the characteristics and heterogeneity of severe asthma and to develop a better strategy to manage it, the Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Working Group on Severe Asthma, has organized the Korean Severe Asthma Registry (KoSAR). In this review, we describe the challenges of severe asthma management regarding diagnosis, disease burden, heterogeneity, guidelines, and organization of severe asthma clinics. This review also examines the current global activities of national and regional registries and study groups. In addition, we present the KoSAR vision and organization and describe the findings of KoSAR in comparison with those of other countries.

Burden of Pertussis in Individuals with a Diagnosis of Asthma: A Retrospective Database Study in England

Purpose

The impact of pertussis in individuals with asthma is not fully understood. We estimated the incidence, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and direct medical costs (DMC) of pertussis in patients with asthma.

Patients and Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, the incidence rate of pertussis (identified using diagnostic codes) among individuals aged ≥50 years with an asthma diagnosis was assessed during 2009–2018 using Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics databases. HCRU and DMC were compared – between patients with diagnoses of asthma and pertussis (asthma+/pertussis+) and propensity score-matched patients with a diagnosis of asthma without pertussis (asthma+/pertussis–) – in the months around the pertussis diagnosis (–6 to +11).

Results

Among 687,105 individuals, 346 had a reported pertussis event (incidence rate: 9.6/100,000 person-years of follow-up; 95% confidence interval: 8.6–10.7). HCRU and DMC were assessed among 314 asthma+/pertussis+ patients and 1256 matched asthma+/pertussis– controls. Baseline HCRU was similar in both cohorts, but increases were observed in the asthma+/pertussis+ cohort from –6 to –1 month before to 2–5 months after diagnosis. Rates of accident and emergency visits, general practitioner (GP)/nurse visits, and GP prescriptions were 4.3-, 3.1-, and 1.3-fold, respectively, in the asthma+/pertussis+ vs asthma+/pertussis– cohorts during the month before diagnosis; GP/nurse visit rates were 2.0- and 1.2-fold during 0–2 and 2–5 months after diagnosis, respectively (all p<0.001). DMC was 1.9- and 1.6-fold during the month before and 2 months from diagnosis, respectively, in the asthma+/pertussis+ vs asthma+/pertussis– cohorts (both p<0.001). During months –1 to +11, DMC in the asthma+/pertussis+ cohort was £370 higher than in the asthma+/pertussis– controls.

Conclusion

A pertussis diagnosis among adults aged ≥50 years with asthma resulted in significant increases in HCRU and DMC across several months around diagnosis, suggesting lengthy diagnosis times and highlighting the need for prevention strategies.

Oral corticosteroid-sparing effects of mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma: evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) have long been a mainstay of treatment for asthma exacerbations and chronic severe asthma. However, it is increasingly recognized that both long-term and short-term OCS use are directly associated with a wide range of serious adverse effects, and as such OCS-sparing treatment alternatives are now widely recommended for patients with severe asthma. While several international guidelines recommend these treatments, guidance on OCS tapering, and which patients are most likely to tolerate OCS reduction and/or discontinuation, is still lacking. Several biologics have demonstrated efficacy in patients with OCS-dependent asthma. One OCS-sparing treatment is the anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody mepolizumab, which is approved for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. In addition to improved exacerbation rates, asthma control, quality of life, and lung function among patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, mepolizumab also has an OCS-sparing effect, which has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials and real-world studies. Both physicians and patients express concerns about the adverse effects of OCS, and additional data from the randomized, controlled SIRIUS trial (NCT01691508) highlight the high level of concern among patients regarding OCS-related burden. In this article, we discuss current guidance on OCS-sparing strategies for patients with severe asthma, provide a summary of the available evidence of the OCS-sparing effect of mepolizumab, and highlight patient and physician perspectives on the use of OCS and OCS-sparing treatments in severe asthma.

Real-world impact of mepolizumab in patients with life-threatening asthma: US insurance claims database analysis

PURPOSE

Patients with life-threatening asthma typically experience recurrent exacerbations, are dependent on oral corticosteroids (OCSs), and have considerable asthma-related health care costs. Data on the impact of mepolizumab on exacerbations and OCS use in patients with life-threatening asthma in real-world clinical practice are limited. This study assessed the impact of mepolizumab on exacerbation rates and OCS use in patients with life-threatening asthma in a real-word setting.

METHODS

This retrospective study utilized data from US administrative claims from patients with life-threatening asthma. Eligible patients were treated between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017; were ≥12 years of age upon mepolizumab initiation (index date); and had undergone at least two mepolizumab administrations during the 6 months postindex. Data from the 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) index were collected, with each patient serving as his or her own control. Life-threatening asthma was defined as at least three exacerbations and/or at least one asthma-related hospitalization during baseline, and/or a history of endotracheal intubation. Asthma exacerbation frequency and OCS use were assessed.

FINDINGS

The analysis included 327 patients who received a mean (SD) of 10.6 (4.3) mepolizumab doses during follow-up. The percentage of patients experiencing at least one exacerbation and the mean exacerbation rate were significantly reduced from baseline to follow-up with mepolizumab, from 94.5% to 67.9% (P < 0.001), and from 3.2 to 1.5 events per patient per year, corresponding to a 53.1% relative reduction (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients with OCS claims was reduced by 12.6%, from 99.1% to 86.5% (P < 0.001). Of the patients who had a reduction in mean daily OCS use, most (57.9%, 140/242) had a reduction in mean daily OCS use of at least 50%.

IMPLICATIONS

These data from patients with life-threatening asthma in clinical practice demonstrated that asthma exacerbation and OCS use were significantly reduced with mepolizumab treatment.

Management of patients with severe asthma: results from a survey among allergists and clinical immunologists of the Central Italy Inter-Regional Section of SIAAIC

Background

Asthma, and severe asthma in particular, is often managed within a specialized field with allergists and clinical immunologists playing a leading role. In this respect, the National Scientific Society SIAAIC (Società Italiana di Allergologia, Asma ed Immunologia Clinica), structured in Regional and Inter-Regional sections, interviewed a large number of specialists involved in the management of this respiratory disease.

Methods

A survey entitled “Management of patients with asthma and severe asthma” based on 17 questions was conducted through the SIAAIC newsletter in 2019 thanks to the collaboration between GlaxoSmithKline S.p.A. and the Inter-Regional Section of SIAAIC of Central Italy.

Results

Fifty-nine allergists and clinical immunologists participated to the survey, and 40 of them completed the entire questionnaire. Almost all of the specialists (88%) reported that asthma control was achieved in above 50% of their patients, even if only one third (32%) actually used validated clinical tools such as asthma control test (ACT). Poor adherence to inhaled therapy was recognized as the main cause of asthma control failure by 60% of respondents, and 2–5 min on average is dedicated to the patient inhaler technique training by two-thirds of the experts (65%). Maintenance and as-needed therapy (SMART/MART) is considered an appropriate approach in only a minority of the patients (25%) by one half of the respondents (52%). A high number of exacerbations despite the maximum inhalation therapy were recognized as highly suspicious of severe asthma. Patients eligible for biological therapies are 3–5% of the patients, and almost all the responders (95%) agreed that patients affected by severe asthma need to be managed in specialized centers with dedicated settings. Biological drugs are generally prescribed after 3–6 months from the initial access to the center, and once started, the follow-up is initially programmed monthly, and then every 3–6 months after the first year of treatment (96% of responders). After phenotyping and severity assessment, comorbidities (urticaria, chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps, vasculitis, etc.) are the drivers of choice among the different biological drugs. In the management of severe asthma, general practitioners (GPs) should play a central role in selecting patients and referring them to specialized centers while Scientific Societies should train GPs to appropriately recognize difficult asthma and promote public disease awareness campaigns.

Conclusions

This survey which collects the point of view of allergists and clinical immunologists from Central Italy highlights that asthma control is still not measured with validated instruments. There is a general consensus that severe asthma should be managed only in dedicated centers and to this aim it is essential to encourage patient selection from a primary care setting and develop disease awareness campaigns for patients.

Anti-Interleukin-5 in the Management of Eosinophilic Asthma: A Review of Effectiveness, Safety, and Budgetary Impact From the Perspective of the Brazilian Health System

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin-5 class therapy agents in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma and the financial impact of these drugs on the Brazilian and Mato Grosso public health systems.

METHODS

The literature review in important databases was guided by a structured research question including patient or population, intervention, comparator, outcome and type of study. The retrieved studies went through a screening, selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment process. A model with two scenarios, one with mepolizumab and the other with benralizumab, was created for budget impact analysis.

RESULTS

Evidence indicated that anti-interleukins-5 have an acceptable safety profile and can reduce exacerbation rates by up to 50% in the population with eosinophilic asthma; however, they showed no significant difference in quality of life. The adoption of these drugs in the Brazilian health system can impact the budget from R$ 40,379,731.50 to R$ 140,301,211.34 depending on the drug incorporated, considering a time horizon of 5 years. From the perspective of the state of Mato Grosso, the budget impact may reach, in the fifth year, an amount of R$ 1,301,210.58 and R$ 2,050.687.62 for the scenarios with mepolizumab and benralizumab, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Anti-interleukins-5 are promising treatments for eosinophilic asthma because they minimise exacerbations and are well tolerated and safe. The financial impact is large, implying that technology costs may be a barrier to accessing this treatment class.

[Dupilumab has an additional benefit in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps]

BACKGROUND

For patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) which cannot be controlled by continuous therapy with intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) and systemic corticosteroids and/or surgical treatment, there were no approved curative options for a long time. For CRSwNP treatment with T2-addressing biologics is possible. On October 24, 2019, the European Commission granted extended approval for dupilumab as the first biological agent for treatment of insufficiently controlled severe CRSwNP. The Federal Joint Committee (G‑BA) evaluates the benefits of reimbursable drugs with new active ingredients. This includes assessment of the additional benefit and its therapeutic relevance.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed using individual patient data based on two phase III studies. Both studies examined the safety and efficacy of dupilumab as an add-on therapy to INCS for treatment of CRSwNP in adults inadequately controlled with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgery compared to INCS alone.

RESULTS

Based on the present data, the G‑BA decided that there is an indication of a considerable additional benefit of dupilumab compared to mometasone furoate.

CONCLUSION

For patients with severe CRSwNP inadequately controlled with INCS and systemic corticosteroids and/or surgery, there is an indication of a considerable additional benefit for the administration of dupilumab as an add-on therapy to INCS compared to mometasone furoate alone.

Oral corticosteroid elimination via a personalised reduction algorithm in adults with severe, eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab (PONENTE): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm study

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists on how to reduce oral corticosteroids after the initiation of biologics in severe asthma. The PONENTE trial evaluated the effectiveness and safety of a rapid, individualised steroid-reduction algorithm, including adrenal insufficiency monitoring, after benralizumab initiation.

METHODS

This multicentre, open-label, single-arm study was done at 138 clinical asthma treatment centres across 17 countries. We enrolled adult patients (age ≥18 years) with severe, eosinophilic asthma (blood eosinophil count ≥150 cells per μL at enrolment or ≥300 cells per μL in the previous year) requiring maintenance oral corticosteroids for at least 3 months preceding enrolment. Patients received benralizumab 30 mg (subcutaneous injection) every 4 weeks for three doses, then every 8 weeks thereafter. The oral corticosteroid reduction phase began at week 4 with daily oral corticosteroid dosages reduced by 1-5 mg every 1-4 weeks depending on the starting dosage, asthma control, and adrenal function status. Adrenal function was assessed with an early morning serum cortisol measurement, followed by adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation when required, once patients achieved a daily oral corticosteroid dosage of 5 mg/day for 4 weeks. Repeat cortisol measurements were taken for patients with evidence of adrenal insufficiency at first testing. Asthma control was assessed with the Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) weekly throughout the induction and oral corticosteroid reduction phases. The primary endpoints were the percentage of patients eliminating daily oral corticosteroids, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and the percentage achieving elimination or a daily prednisone or prednisolone dosage of 5 mg or less, for at least 4 weeks, if the reason for no further reduction was adrenal insufficiency. Safety and efficacy analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of benralizumab and were descriptive. We present results after the oral corticosteroid reduction phase; a maintenance phase is ongoing. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03557307.

FINDINGS

Between April 1, 2018, and Sept 5, 2020, of 705 patients assessed for eligibility, 598 were recruited and all received at least one dose of benralizumab. Overall, 376 (62·88%, 95% CI 58·86-66·76) of 598 patients eliminated oral corticosteroids and 490 (81·94%, 78·62-84·94) of 598 eliminated use or achieved a dosage of 5 mg or less if the reason for stopping the reduction was adrenal insufficiency. Subgroup analysis showed that dosage reductions were achieved irrespective of baseline eosinophil count, baseline oral corticosteroid dosage, or oral corticosteroid treatment duration. Adrenal insufficiency was detected in 321 (60%) of 533 patients at first assessment and in 205 (38%) of 533 patients 2-3 months later. The safety profile was consistent with previous experience. Most patients (448 [75%] of 598) had no asthma exacerbations during the oral corticosteroid reduction phase with an annualised exacerbation rate of 0·63. Of 598 patients, 38 (6%) experienced a total of 46 exacerbations resulting in emergency department or urgent care visits or hospitalisations.

INTERPRETATION

Despite a high prevalence of adrenal insufficiency, most patients with eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab achieved elimination of oral corticosteroids or maximal possible reduction using a personalised dosage-reduction algorithm.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

Positionspapier: Empfehlungen zur Anwendung von Omalizumab bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Polyposis nasi (CRSwNP) im deutschen Gesundheitssystem – Empfehlungen des Ärzteverbandes Deutscher Allergologen (AeDA) und der AGs Klinische Immunologie, Allergologie und Umweltmedizin und Rhinologie und Rhinochirurgie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie (DGHNOKHC)

Hintergrund Die chronische Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen (CRSwNP) ist eine multifaktorielle entzündliche Erkrankung der paranasalen Schleimhäute, der als Endotyp meistens eine TH2-Inflammation zugrunde liegt. IgE-Antikörper spielen dabei eine wichtige Rolle. Der anti-IgE-Antikörper Omalizumab wurde im August 2020 für die Therapie der schweren CRSwNP zugelassen.

Methoden In einer Literatursuche wurde die Immunologie der CRSwNP analysiert und die Evidenz zur Wirkung von Omalizumab bei dieser Erkrankung ermittelt durch Recherchen in Medline, Pubmed sowie den nationalen und internationalen Studien- und Leitlinien-Registern und der Cochrane Library.

Ergebnisse Basierend auf diesen Angaben aus der internationalen Literatur werden von einem Expertengremium Empfehlungen für die Anwendung von Omalizumab bei CRSwNP im deutschen Gesundheitssystem gegeben.

Schlussfolgerung Omalizumab ist zugelassen für Patienten ab 18 Jahren mit schwerer chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen als Zusatztherapie zu intranasalen Kortikosteroiden (INCS), wenn durch eine Therapie mit INCS keine ausreichende Krankheitskontrolle erzielt werden kann.

Oral corticosteroids stewardship for asthma in adults and adolescents: A position paper from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are frequently used for asthma treatment. This medication is highly effective for both acute and chronic diseases, but evidence indicates that indiscriminate OCS use is common, posing a risk of serious side effects and irreversible harm. There is now an urgent need to introduce OCS stewardship approaches, akin to successful initiatives that optimized appropriate antibiotic usage. The aim of this TSANZ (Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand) position paper is to review current knowledge pertaining to OCS use in asthma and then delineate principles of OCS stewardship. Recent evidence indicates overuse and over-reliance on OCS for asthma and that doses >1000 mg prednisolone-equivalent cumulatively are likely to have serious side effects and adverse outcomes. Patient perspectives emphasize the detrimental impacts of OCS-related side effects such as weight gain, insomnia, mood disturbances and skin changes. Improvements in asthma control and prevention of exacerbations can be achieved by improved inhaler technique, adherence to therapy, asthma education, smoking cessation, multidisciplinary review, optimized medications and other strategies. Recently, add-on therapies including novel biological agents and macrolide antibiotics have demonstrated reductions in OCS requirements. Harm reduction may also be achieved through identification and mitigation of predictable adverse effects. OCS stewardship should entail greater awareness of appropriate indications for OCS prescription, risk-benefits of OCS medications, side effects, effective add-on therapies and multidisciplinary review. If implemented, OCS stewardship can ensure that clinicians and patients with asthma are aware that OCS should not be used lightly, while providing reassurance that asthma can be controlled in most people without frequent use of OCS.

Integrated Safety and Efficacy Among Patients Receiving Benralizumab for Up to 5 Years

BACKGROUND

Benralizumab is an IL-5Rα-directed monoclonal antibody indicated for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of benralizumab among adults treated for up to 5 years.

METHODS

This analysis included adults treated with placebo or subcutaneous benralizumab 30 mg every 4 or 8 weeks in the 48-week SIROCCO, 56-week CALIMA, and 28-week ZONDA pivotal trials, who were subsequently enrolled in the 56-week double-blind BORA extension and continued assigned regimens or initiated benralizumab (if previously on placebo) for 16 to 40 weeks, before entering the open-label MELTEMI extension. Safety was measured by adverse and serious adverse event rates. Exacerbations were evaluated in patients with blood eosinophils greater than or equal to 300 cells/μL receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids at baseline.

RESULTS

Overall, 446 received treatment and 384 (86.1%) completed the study; 157 (35.2%) received benralizumab for 4 or more years. Adverse and serious adverse event rates (28.5-32.4 and 6.3-8.4 per 100 patient-years, respectively) were low, stable over time, and did not increase with exposure; few (n = 8) discontinued because of adverse events. Serious infections and hypersensitivity event rates were consistent with those in previous studies. Among patients with blood eosinophils greater than or equal to 300 cells/μL-high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids receiving benralizumab every 8 weeks, at least 75% had zero exacerbations annually during the integrated analysis period.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma, long-term benralizumab was safe and well tolerated for up to 5 years. There were no new safety signals, and exacerbations were eliminated in similar percentages of patients as in predecessor studies.

Asthma Phenotyping in Primary Care: Applying the International Severe Asthma Registry Eosinophil Phenotype Algorithm Across All Asthma Severities

BACKGROUND

We developed an eosinophil phenotype gradient algorithm and applied it to a large severe asthma cohort (International Severe Asthma Registry).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to reapply this algorithm in a UK primary care asthma cohort, quantify the eosinophilic phenotype, and assess the relationship between the likelihood of an eosinophilic phenotype and asthma severity/health care resource use (HCRU).

METHODS

Patients age 13 years and older with active asthma and blood eosinophil count or 1 or greater, who were included from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database and the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, were categorized according to the likelihood of eosinophilic phenotype using the International Severe Asthma Registry gradient eosinophilic algorithm. Patient demographic, clinical and HCRU characteristics were described for each phenotype.

RESULTS

Of 241,006 patients, 50.3%, 22.2%, and 21.9% most likely (grade 3), likely (grade 2), and least likely (grade 1), respectively, had an eosinophilic phenotype, and 5.6% had a noneosinophilic phenotype (grade 0). Compared with patients with noneosinophilic asthma, those most likely to have an eosinophilic phenotype tended to have more comorbidities (percentage with Charlson comorbidity index of ≥2: 28.2% vs 6.9%) and experienced more asthma attacks (percentage with one or more attack: 24.8% vs 15.3%). These patients were also more likely to have asthma that was difficult to treat (31.1% vs 18.3%), to receive more intensive treatment (percentage on Global Initiative for Asthma 2020 step 4 or 5: 44.2% vs 27.5%), and greater HCRU (eg, 10.8 vs 7.9 general practitioner all-cause consultations per year).

CONCLUSIONS

The eosinophilic asthma phenotype predominates in primary care and is associated with greater asthma severity and HCRU. These patients may benefit from earlier and targeted asthma therapy.

Long-term corticosteroid use, adrenal insufficiency and the need for steroid-sparing treatment in adult severe asthma

Secondary adrenal insufficiency (AI) occurs as the result of any process that disrupts normal hypothalamic and/or anterior pituitary function and causes a decrease in the secretion of steroid hormones from the adrenal cortex. The most common cause of secondary AI is exogenous corticosteroid therapy administered at supraphysiologic dosages for ≥ 1 month. AI caused by oral corticosteroids (OCS) is not well-recognized or commonly diagnosed but is often associated with reduced well-being and can be life-threatening in the event of an adrenal crisis. Corticosteroid use is common in respiratory diseases, and asthma is a representative condition that illustrates the potential challenges and opportunities related to corticosteroid-sparing therapies. For individuals with severe asthma (approximately 5%-10% of all cases), reduction or elimination of maintenance OCS without loss of control can now be accomplished with biologic therapies targeting inflammatory mediators. However, the optimal strategy to ensure early identification and treatment of AI and safe OCS withdrawal in routine clinical practice remains to be defined. Many studies with biologics have involved short evaluation periods and small sample sizes; in addition, cautious approaches to OCS tapering in studies with a placebo arm, coupled with inconsistent monitoring for AI, have contributed to the lack of clarity. If the goal is to greatly reduce and, where possible, eliminate long-term OCS use in severe asthma through the increasing adoption of biologic treatments, there is an urgent need for clinical trials that address both the speed of OCS withdrawal and how to monitor for AI.