Treatment of allergic disease with nanoemulsion adjuvant vaccines

Engineering nanoparticle therapeutics for food allergy

Food allergy is a growing public health issue among children and adults that can lead to life-threatening anaphylaxis following allergen exposure. The criterion standard for disease management includes food avoidance and emergency epinephrine administration because current allergen-specific immunotherapy treatments are limited by adverse events and unsustained desensitization. A promising approach to remedy these shortcomings is the use of nanoparticle-based therapies that disrupt disease-driving immune mechanisms and induce more sustained tolerogenic immune pathways. The pathophysiology of food allergy includes multifaceted interactions between effector immune cells, including lymphocytes, antigen-presenting cells, mast cells, and basophils, mainly characterized by a TH2 cell response. Regulatory T cells, TH1 cell responses, and suppression of other major allergic effector cells have been found to be major drivers of beneficial outcomes in these nanoparticle therapies. Engineered nanoparticle formulations that have shown efficacy at reducing allergic responses and revealed new mechanisms of tolerance include polymeric-, lipid-, and emulsion-based nanotherapeutics. This review highlights the recent engineering design of these nanoparticles, the mechanisms induced by them, and their future potential therapeutic targets.

Novel adjuvants in allergen-specific immunotherapy: where do we stand?

Type I hypersensitivity, or so-called type I allergy, is caused by Th2-mediated immune responses directed against otherwise harmless environmental antigens. Currently, allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment with the potential to re-establish clinical tolerance towards the corresponding allergen(s). However, conventional AIT has certain drawbacks, including long treatment durations, the risk of inducing allergic side effects, and the fact that allergens by themselves have a rather low immunogenicity. To improve AIT, adjuvants can be a powerful tool not only to increase the immunogenicity of co-applied allergens but also to induce the desired immune activation, such as promoting allergen-specific Th1- or regulatory responses. This review summarizes the knowledge on adjuvants currently approved for use in human AIT: aluminum hydroxide, calcium phosphate, microcrystalline tyrosine, and MPLA, as well as novel adjuvants that have been studied in recent years: oil-in-water emulsions, virus-like particles, viral components, carbohydrate-based adjuvants (QS-21, glucans, and mannan) and TLR-ligands (flagellin and CpG-ODN). The investigated adjuvants show distinct properties, such as prolonging allergen release at the injection site, inducing allergen-specific IgG production while also reducing IgE levels, as well as promoting differentiation and activation of different immune cells. In the future, better understanding of the immunological mechanisms underlying the effects of these adjuvants in clinical settings may help us to improve AIT.

Intranasal delivery of allergen in a nanoemulsion adjuvant inhibits allergen-specific reactions in mouse models of allergic airway disease

BACKGROUND

Atopic diseases are an increasing problem that involve both immediate hypersensitivity reactions mediated by IgE and unique cellular inflammation. Many forms of specific immunotherapy involve the administration of allergen to suppress allergic immune responses but are focused on IgE-mediated reactions. In contrast, the effect of allergen-specific immunotherapy on allergic inflammation is complex, not entirely consistent and not well understood. We have previously demonstrated the ability of allergen administered in a nanoemulsion (NE) mucosal adjuvant to suppress IgE-mediated allergic responses and protect from allergen challenge in murine food allergy models. This activity was associated with decreases in allergen-specific IL-10 and reductions in allergic cytokines and increases in regulatory T cells.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we extend these studies to using 2 distinct models, the ovalbumin (OVA) and cockroach (CRA) models of allergic airway disease, which are based predominantly on allergic inflammation.

METHODS

Acute or chronic allergic airway disease was induced in mice using ovalbumin and cockroach allergen models. Mice received three therapeutic immunizations with allergen in NE, and reactivity to airway challenge was determined.

RESULTS

Therapeutic immunization with cockroach or OVA allergen in NE markedly reduced pathology after airway challenge. The 2 models demonstrated protection from allergen challenge-induced pathology that was associated with suppression of Th2-polarized immune responses in the lung. In addition, the reduction in ILC2 numbers in the lungs of allergic mice along with reduction in epithelial cell alarmins, IL-25 and IL-33, suggests an overall change in the lung immune environment induced by the NE immunization protocol.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These results demonstrate that suppression of allergic airway inflammation and bronchial hyper-reactivity can be achieved using allergen-specific immunotherapy without significant reductions in allergen-specific IgE and suggest that ILC2 cells may be critical targets for this activity.

Mucosal Nanoemulsion Allergy Vaccine Suppresses Alarmin Expression and Induces Bystander Suppression of Reactivity to Multiple Food Allergens

We have demonstrated that intranasal immunotherapy with allergens formulated in a nanoemulsion (NE) mucosal adjuvant suppresses Th2/IgE-mediated allergic responses and protects from allergen challenge in murine food allergy models. Protection conferred by this therapy is associated with strong suppression of allergen specific Th2 cellular immunity and increased Th1 cytokines. Here we extend these studies to examine the effect of NE-allergen immunization in mice sensitized to multiple foods. Mice were sensitized to both egg and peanut and then received NE vaccine formulated with either one or both of these allergens. The animals were then subjected to oral challenges with either egg or peanut to assess reactivity. Immunization with NE formulations containing both egg and peanut markedly reduced reactivity after oral allergen challenge with either allergen. Interestingly, mice that received the vaccine containing only peanut also had reduced reactivity to challenge with egg. Protection from oral allergen challenge was achieved despite the persistence of allergen-specific IgE and was associated with strong suppression of both Th2-polarized immune responses, alarmins and type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2). NE-induced bystander suppression of reactivity required IFN-γ and the presence of an allergen in the NE vaccine. These results demonstrate that anaphylactic reactions to food allergens can be suppressed using allergen-specific immunotherapy without having to eliminate allergen-specific IgE and suggests that modulation of Th2 immunity towards one allergen may induce bystander effects that suppress reactivity to other allergens through the induction of IFN-γ and suppression of alarmins in the intestine. In addition, these data suggest that a NE vaccine for a single food allergen may lead to a global suppression of allergic responses to multiple foods.