Updates in biologic therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease

Inflammatory Cytokines in Middle Ear Effusion of Patients With Asthma, Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps With or Without NSAID Intolerance

OBJECTIVE

To measure the inflammatory cytokines of middle ear effusion (MEE) in otitis media (OM) associated with asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) with or without nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) sensitivity to strengthen our assumption that OM is part of the same inflammatory entity. The potential individual differences between MEE inflammatory cytokines could be used in clinical practice for more individual characterization of the inflammation.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Convenience sample of 24 case patients with otitis media with effusion (OME) or chronic otitis media (COM), asthma, and CRSwNP, 14 of whom had NSAID intolerance, and 8 controls with OME but no history of asthma, CRSwNP, or NSAID intolerance.

INTERVENTION

Diagnostic.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

Inflammatory cytokines including interleukins (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-13, and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) in middle ear effusion.

RESULTS

The MEE mass fractions of IL-5 ( p = 0.003) and IFN-γ ( p = 0.048) were higher among our case patients with OME/COM than among the controls. For IL-4 and IL-13, the mass fractions were also higher among the case patients than the controls, but this difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.199 and p = 0.617, respectively). We found no difference between the IL-6 mass fractions of the groups. We found notable heterogeneity in individual patients' cytokine levels.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, OM, when present, should be considered part of the respiratory inflammatory process associated with asthma and CRSwNP. The individual differences in MEE cytokine levels could be useful as biomarkers.

[Biologic therapy in patients with severe NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease and previous aspirin desensitization : Results of a multicentric study]

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a type‑2 inflammatory disease of the upper airways, with severe impairment of quality of life. Persons affected by NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) usually present with highly dynamic recurrence of polyps and disease despite prior treatment with sinus surgeries, oral corticosteroids, and aspirin desensitization (ATAD). Biologic therapy has fundamentally changed the choice of therapeutic concept; however, limited data exist on subgroups such as NERD patients. The aim of the current article is to report on a multicenter retrospective study on add-on therapy with dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab in patients with NERD.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients (NERD+, status after ATAD) in three reference centers in Germany (Munich, Mainz, Berlin). Subjective and objective parameters were collected at 4, 8, and 12 months after biologic therapy initiation in accordance with current EPOS/EUFOREA (European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps/European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases) guidelines. Biologic agents were chosen depending on availability and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Treatment was commenced in 122 patients meeting the criteria for CRSwNP and NERD. The endoscopic polyp score, SNOT-22 questionnaire score, visual analogue scoring of total symptoms/severity of disease, and sense of smell (psychophysical testing with Sniffin'Sticks/Brief Smell Identification Test, B‑SIT; Sensonics, Inc., Haddon Heights, NJ, USA) improved significantly after 4 and 12 months of add-on therapy (p < 0.0001). All three biologic agents significantly improved one or more disease parameter. Adverse events were not life threatening but led to change of biologic agent in 4 cases. Patients rated biologic therapy significantly better than ATAD, with improved long-term disease control.

CONCLUSION

Add-on biologic therapy is effective, safe, and widely accepted among CRSwNP + NERD patients. Future studies might allow for personalized algorithms with sequential surgery, ATAD, and/or biologic therapy.

Tezepelumab improved chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in a Patient with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease

Introduction

Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) have more severe sinus disease than those without AERD. CRSwNP associated with type 2 inflammation and AERD can be difficult to control with standard medical therapy and sinus surgery.

Case study

74-year-old Japanese woman with chronic sinusitis since age 50 and asthma since age 60. At age 64, she began to experience asthma exacerbations and was started on short-term corticosteroid therapy with prednisolone. At age 70, she experienced urticaria, nasal congestion, and wheezing after taking an NSAID; based on an NSAID provocation test, we diagnosed the patient with AERD and CRSwNP. A diagnosis of severe eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis was also made based on the scoring system and algorithm used in the Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Results

Treatment with benralizumab (30 mg), formoterol-fluticasone combination via pressurized metered inhaler (1000 μg), and leukotriene receptor antagonist improved the asthma symptoms and exacerbations so the short-term prednisolone was stopped; however, nasal congestion and olfactory dysfunction (hyposmia) persisted, and peripheral blood eosinophil count (peak, 1500 cells/μL) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (peak, 42 ppb) became elevated. Swapping the benralizumab for monthly tezepelumab (210 mg) improved not only the asthma symptoms but also the nasal congestion, olfactory dysfunction, eosinophil count (<300 cells/μL), and fractional exhaled nitric oxide level [8ppb].

Conclusion

Changing from benralizumab to tezepelumab improved asthma symptoms, nasal obstruction, and olfactory dysfunction in elderly, female, Japanese patient with AERD and CRSwNP.

Biologics Reduce Symptoms of Alcohol Intolerance Better than Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with N-ERD and Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is associated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and NSAID hypersensitivity. An overproduction of leukotrienes characterizes the pathomechanism of the disease. N-ERD patients often report breathing difficulties after consuming alcohol. These symptoms have been observed in patients receiving either aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD), therapy with the biologics dupilumab (anti-IL-4Ra antibody) and omalizumab (anti-IgE antibody), or intranasal corticosteroid treatment (INCS).

METHODS

This retrospective, real-world study assessed the severity of alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related respiratory symptoms in CRSwNP/N-ERD patients 3-6 months after ATAD, biologic (dupilumab or omalizumab), or INCS therapy. A total of 171 patients (98 women and 73 men) were enrolled in the study. All groups received standard INCS therapy. Sixty-three patients were treated with ATAD; 48 received biologics (dupilumab n = 31; omalizumab n = 17); and 60 received INCS only and served as a control group. Alcohol-dependent symptoms and typical CRS symptoms (alcohol-independent) were quantified using visual analog scales (VAS).

RESULTS

ATAD and biological therapy significantly reduced VAS scores for alcohol dependence and CRS symptoms. In the control group receiving INCS, only non-alcohol dependent CRS symptoms improved significantly (p < 0.05). The most significant differences in pre/post scores were observed in patients receiving dupilumab, with the most significant improvement in alcohol-dependent and CRS symptoms (dupilumab > omalizumab > ATAD).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study shows that alcohol-related respiratory symptoms are a relevant parameter in CRSwNP/N-ERD patients. Patients benefit more from biologic therapy than from ATAD in terms of their alcohol-related symptoms and other CRS symptoms. Future studies should include placebo-controlled oral alcohol challenge.

Updated epithelial barrier dysfunction in chronic rhinosinusitis: Targeting pathophysiology and treatment response of tight junctions

Tight junction (TJ) proteins establish a physical barrier between epithelial cells, playing a crucial role in maintaining tissue homeostasis by safeguarding host tissues against pathogens, allergens, antigens, irritants, etc. Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that abnormal expression of TJs plays an essential role in the development and progression of inflammatory airway diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with or without nasal polyps. Among them, CRS with nasal polyps is a prevalent chronic inflammatory disease that affects the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, leading to a poor prognosis and significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Its pathogenesis primarily involves dysfunction of the nasal epithelial barrier, impaired mucociliary clearance, disordered immune response, and excessive tissue remodeling. Numerous studies have elucidated the pivotal role of TJs in both the pathogenesis and response to traditional therapies in CRS. We therefore to review and discuss potential factors contributing to impair and repair of TJs in the nasal epithelium based on their structure, function, and formation process.

EUFOREA/EPOS2020 statement on the clinical considerations for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps care

Following the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) treatment algorithm for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), patients suffering from severe uncontrolled CRSwNP are recommended to receive oral corticosteroids, (revision) sinus surgery, systemic biologicals and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization (ATAD). Given the major differences in indications, outcomes, practical considerations, risks and costs of these key pillars of treatment, there is a growing need to define criteria for each treatment option and list the clinically relevant and major considerations for them. This EUFOREA document therefore provides an expert panel overview of the expected outcomes, specific considerations and (contra)indications of the five major treatment arms of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP: oral corticosteroids, primary and revision sinus surgery, biological treatment and ATAD. This overview of treatment considerations is needed to allow physicians and patients to consider the different options in the context of providing optimal and personalized care for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP. In conclusion, the five major treatment options for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP have intrinsic advantages, specific indications and considerations that are of importance to the patient, the physician and the society. This EUFOREA statement supports the unmet need to define criteria for the indication of every treatment pillar of CRSwNP.

Brazilian guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps ‒ 2024 update

INTRODUCTION

Biologics targeting type 2 inflammation have revolutionized the way we treat patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). Particularly in severe and difficult-to-control cases, these drugs have provided a new reality for these patients, allowing for the effective and safe treatment of extensive diseases that were not completely managed with the typical strategy of surgery and topical medications.

OBJECTIVES

The experience achieved with the approval of these medications by ANVISA for use in CRSwNP and the knowledge obtained regarding outcomes, adverse effects, and the ideal patient profile prompted the update of the previously published guideline, with a detailed review of the most recent scientific literature, the personal experiences of experts, and the adaptation to the reality of the Brazilian healthcare system, both public and private.

RESULTS

We proposed a new eligibility criterion for biologics in patients with CRSwNP based on four pillars of indication: the impact of the disease on the patient's life, whether in the presence of specific symptoms or in overall quality of life; the extent of sinonasal disease; the presence of type 2 comorbidities, considering other associated diseases that may also benefit from anti-T2 biologics, and the presence of biomarkers to define type 2 inflammation, especially those associated with worse disease prognoses.

CONCLUSIONS

This innovative and pioneering method has two major advantages. First, it ensures a comprehensive evaluation of patients; second, it is flexible, as advancements in our understanding of the disease and changes in cost-effectiveness can be addressed by simply adjusting the required score for indication, without the need to modify the entire evaluation scheme.

["Radical" versus "functional" surgery of the paranasal sinuses-A contradiction?]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The terms "functional" and "radical" paranasal sinus surgery were often considered to be different operations which were mutually exclusive. This overview aims to look at the basics of these terms and surgical procedures and to work out the resulting surgical concepts for clinically relevant indications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Selective literature analysis using the data base PubMed, corresponding textbooks and resulting secondary literature regarding functional and radical or extended paranasal sinus surgery. Similarly, the current literature regarding clinically relevant indications for sinus surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Modern pathophysiological knowledge, anatomically and pathophysiologically substantiated endoscopic surgical procedures and the usage of up to date technical possibilities have resulted in concepts which combine functional and so-called radical or extended surgery of the paranasal sinuses that complement each other and sometimes even overlap. The preoperative diagnosis and definition of underlying diseases are decisive and should be as precise as possible, as the extent and surgical details mainly depend on them: a sole creation of free drainage pathways, an additional creation of anatomical access for subsequent topical treatment or a complete (radical) removal of a pathological process.

Lipocalin-2 promotes neutrophilic inflammation in nasal polyps and its value as biomarker

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. The role of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of CRSwNP has attracted more attention in recent years, due to its association with more severe disease and reduced steroid responsiveness. Lipocalin-2 (LCN2) has been found to modulate neutrophils infiltration in other neutrophilic inflammation including inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriasis. The aim was to evaluate the expression and regulator role of LCN2 in neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP, and its role as a potential biomarker predicting non-eosinophilic CRSwNP (neCRSwNP).

METHODS

Bioinformatic analysis, immunostainings, real-time PCR and ELISA were used to analyze the expression and location of LCN2 in nasal tissues. The expression of proinflammatory mediators were assessed in nasal tissues and secretions. LCN2 production in human nasal epithelial cells (HNECs) and neutrophils, as well as its role in neutrophilic inflammation was evaluated by in vitro experiments.

RESULTS

LCN2 was mainly located in neutrophils and HNECs of nasal polyps. LCN2 expression was also significantly higher in the polyp tissue and nasal secretions from patients with neCRSwNP. The LCN2 levels were positively correlated with type 3 inflammation markers, including G-CSF, IL-8, and IL-17. LCN2 expression could be upregulated by IL-17 A and TNF-α in HNECs, and LCN2 could also promote the expression of IL-8 in dispersed polyp cells and HNECs.

CONCLUSIONS

LCN2 could serve as a novel biomarker predicting patients with neCRSwNP, and the increased expression of LCN2 may participate in the pathogenesis of neCRSwNP.

Type 2 Biomarkers for the Indication and Response to Biologics in CRSwNP

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Three biologics targeting type 2 inflammation have been approved for the treatment of severe and uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Nevertheless, around 40-60% of patients do not respond well to these biological treatments. Selecting appropriate patients is crucial to improve treatment outcome of biologics. This review summarizes the literature data on type 2 biomarkers, with a specific focus on the indication to biologics for severe CRSwNP.

RECENT FINDINGS

No consensus has been reached on how to define mucosal type 2 inflammation in CRSwNP. Clinical markers (e.g., 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score, Lund-Mackay CT score (LMS), ethmoid/maxillary sinus CT score, and CT-radiomics), nasal secretion biomarkers (e.g., eosinophil cationic protein and interleukin-5), blood and nasal cytology eosinophil counts, and nasal swab eosinophil peroxidase activity have been reported to be associated with type 2 inflammation in CRSwNP. The time duration since the last surgery, SNOT-22 score at 1 week of treatment, and baseline serum osteoprotegerin levels might indicate the response to dupilumab. LMS and asthma control test scores were found to have moderate predictive value for acceptable improvement after 24-week treatment of omalizumab. High blood eosinophil levels at baseline were associated with treatment response to mepolizumab and benralizumab. Although several clinical and biological markers might be associated with type 2 inflammation and response to biologics in patients with CRSwNP, their validity requires further investigation. Identifying clinically applicable biomarkers for biologic treatment holds significant promise for advancing personalized approaches to biologics and optimizing treatment outcomes for patients with CRSwNP.

Practical recommendations for managing severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the era of biologics

Objective

We conducted a national survey to understand how rhinology practice has changed with the advent of biologics and how this affected patients with uncontrolled, severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). We aimed to analyse the results of the survey and infer practical recommendations for clinical practice.

Methods

A group of ear, nose, and throat specialists (ENTs) experienced in the management of CRSwNP developed a 74-question survey. ENTs from rhinology centres authorised to prescribe biologics in the context of the national health system were invited to answer it between 01/05/2022 and 31/07/2022. The responses underwent descriptive analyses, and the authors discussed the results and derived practical recommendations for clinical practice.

Results

ENTs working in rhinology centres changed their practices coinciding with the advent of biologics. CRSwNP evaluations have become more complex because they involve diagnostic confirmation, determining the patients' immunologic profile, and other factors. We observed heterogenous behaviours in practice that may be conditioned by the novelty of the topic. The results of the survey were used to develop practical recommendations for ENTs and are summarised herein.

Conclusions

Clinical practice in rhinology outpatient clinics has changed profoundly in the era of biologics. Our practical recommendations for clinicians working in rhinology centres are expected to help standardise practice and improve care.

Two-year results of tapered dupilumab for CRSwNP demonstrates enduring efficacy established in the first 6 months

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is an anti-T2-inflammatory biological registered for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), indicated by integrated CRS-care pathways when optimal medico-surgical treatment yields insufficient CRS control. This study aims to evaluate long-term results with focus on established therapeutic efficacy while tapering dupilumab.

METHODS

Real-life, prospective observational cohort study in single tertiary referral center with add-on dupilumab as primary biological treatment in adult (≥18 years) biological-naïve CRSwNP patients per the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS)2020-indication with a 2-year follow-up. Tapering (increasing interdose interval) applied every 24 weeks, conditional to sufficient treatment response and CRS control.

RESULTS

Mean scores (s.d.) of all co-primary outcomes improved significantly from baseline ( 228) to the 48 ( 214) and 96-weeks ( 99) timepoints: Nasal Polyp Score (0-8) improved from 5,3 (1,9) to 1,4 (1,8) and 1,3 (1,7); SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 (0-110) improved from 53,6 (19,6) to 20,2 (15,4) and 21,2 (15,6); Sniffin'Sticks-12 identification test (0-12; 0-6 anosmia, 7-10 hyposmia, 11-12 normosmia) improved from 3,7 (2,4) to 7,7 (2,9) and 7,3 (3,04); Asthma Control Test (5-25; >19 indicating well-controlled asthma) improved from 18,5 (4,8) to 21,8 (3,8) and 21,4 (3,9). Tapering was feasible in 79,5% of the patients at the 24-weeks timepoint, and in 93,7% and 95,8% at the 48- and 96-weeks timepoints, respectively. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated no significant alterations of individual co-primary outcome mean-scores from 24 weeks onward.

CONCLUSION

This first long-term real-life prospective observational cohort study shows high therapeutic efficacy of dupilumab for severe CRswNP in the first 2 years. Therapeutic efficacy is principally established within 24 weeks and endures while tapering dupilumab conditional to treatment response and CRS control.

[Diagnosis and treatment of asthma: a guideline for respiratory specialists 2023 - published by the German Respiratory Society (DGP) e. V.]

The management of asthma has fundamentally changed during the past decades. The present guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma was developed for respiratory specialists who need detailed and evidence-based information on the new diagnostic and therapeutic options in asthma. The guideline shows the new role of biomarkers, especially blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled NO (FeNO), in diagnostic algorithms of asthma. Of note, this guideline is the first worldwide to announce symptom prevention and asthma remission as the ultimate goals of asthma treatment, which can be achieved by using individually tailored, disease-modifying anti-asthmatic drugs such as inhaled steroids, allergen immunotherapy or biologics. In addition, the central role of the treatment of comorbidities is emphasized. Finally, the document addresses several challenges in asthma management, including asthma treatment during pregnancy, treatment of severe asthma or the diagnosis and treatment of work-related asthma.

Novel insights into central compartment atopic disease - a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) is a newly recognized variant subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although CCAD has been reported to be correlated with allergy, there is still a considerable gap in our knowledge regarding CCAD.

AREAS COVERED

We have conducted a thorough analysis of the literature on CCAD. This review provides current understanding and therapeutic strategies of CCAD. In this article, we will review the clinical presentations and parameters, allergy-related etiology, endotypes, and recommended management of CCAD.

EXPERT OPINION

CCAD is considered as an aeroallergen-driven type 2/eosinophilic inflammatory pattern. Although CCAD can be diagnosed by endoscopy and radiology, as well as allergen test, pathogenesis and management strategies leave much to be desired, and further studies are needed.

Current and emerging biological therapies for Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps with type 2 inflammation

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), especially CRSwNP with type 2 inflammation, remains the most difficult-to-treat subtype with high prevalence worldwide. The emergence of biologics has the potential to fulfill the unmet medical needs of patients with CRSwNP driven by type 2 inflammation.

AREAS COVERED

A current review of the literature was performed to overview current and emerging biological therapies in the treatment of CRSwNP.

EXPERT OPINION

In an era of precision medicine, biologics have been given expectations to provide customized therapies to patients with CRSwNP, particularly those with refractory CRSwNP. Large clinical trials and real-world experiences are both essential for the application of biologics. Moreover, to make biological therapy more tailored to patients, an in-depth understanding of the different mechanisms of biologics, further elucidating the relationship between biologics and conventional medical and surgical treatments, and identifying predictive biomarkers warrant thorough investigations.

Biologicals in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps – position of the Polish Society of Otorhinolaryngologists –Head and Neck Surgeons and the Polish Society of Allergology experts

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has a significant impact on the well-being and social functions of the patient. The generalized inflammatory process with the formation of nasal polyps and excess eosinophils in the mucosa of the paranasal sinuses is called type 2 inflammation, which is mediated by Th2 lymphocytes – cells of the immune system responsible for chronic inflammatory processes. Today, we also know the key pro-inflammatory mediators against which new drugs have been developed, the so-called biological drugs, are produced in cell lines. In this document, we present currently available biologicals approved for the treatment of patients with T2-related chronic rhinosinusitis.

Cystatin SN in type 2 inflammatory airway diseases

Cystatin SN, encoded by CST1, belongs to the type 2 (T2) cystatin protein superfamily. In the past decade, several publications have highlighted the association between cystatin SN and inflammatory airway diseases including chronic rhinosinusitis, rhinitis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. It is, therefore, crucial to understand the role of cystatin SN in the wider context of T2 inflammatory diseases. Here, we review the expression of cystatin SN in airway-related diseases with different endotypes. We also emphasize the physiological and pathological roles of cystatin SN. Physiologically, cystatin SN protects host tissues from destructive proteolysis by cysteine proteases present in the external environment or produced via internal dysregulated expression. Pathologically, the secretion of cystatin SN from airway epithelial cells initiates and amplifies T2 immunity and subsequently leads to disease. We further discuss the development of cystatin SN as a T2 immunity marker that can be monitored noninvasively and assist in airway disease management. The discovery, biology, and inhibition capability are also introduced to better understand the role of cystatin SN in airway diseases.

Subjective symptoms as predictors for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the Chinese population

PURPOSE

To evaluate the putative association between subjective symptoms and eosinophilic inflammation in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with CRSwNP who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were prospectively enrolled. The Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22 scores (SNOT-22), EuroQol 5-dimensional Questionnaire scores (ED-5D), and Lund-Mackay scores by computed tomography (CT) were obtained. Patients were grouped as eosinophilic CRSwNP (eCRSwNP) and non-eosinophilic CRSwNP (neCRSwNP). ECRSwNP was defined if tissue eosinophils of nasal polyps were greater than or equal to 8/HPF according to positive major basic protein (MBP) staining, and neCRSwNP otherwise.

RESULTS

Thirty neCRSwNP and 72 eCRSwNP patients were included. ECRSwNP patients had higher incidences of asthma (p = 0.001), allergic rhinitis (p = 0.001), and ethmoid-to-maxillary opacification ratio on CT scans (p < 0.001), whereas the proportion of purulent discharge (p < 0.001) and maxillary sinus score (p = 0.002) was higher in the neCRSwNP patients. There were no significant differences between patients on the mains of the EQ-5D health utility values and total SNOT-22 score. However, eCRSwNP patients had higher SNOT-22 scores of sneezing (p = 0.006), runny nose (p < 0.001), and ear/facial domain (p = 0.012), and lower scores of thick nasal discharge (p = 0.015) and blockage (p = 0.042). Sneezing, thick nasal discharge, and blockage/congestion of nose were recognized as independent factors of CRSwNP.

CONCLUSION

Sneezing was an independent predictor of eCRSwNP, and thick nasal discharge and blockage/congestion of nose were independent predictors of neCRSwNP.

Effects of Pendrin Protein in Nasal Epithelial Cells on Mucin Production in the Context of Type 2 Inflammation

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous disease. The pathogenesis of chronic sinusitis is still unclear; however, the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are commonly affected by type 2 inflammation, which is caused by Th2 cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-5, IL-4, and IL-13. Previous studies have shown that pendrin promotes local infiltration of neutrophils through the production of human neutrophil elastase (HNE), which is essential for the secretion of mucin 5AC (MUC5AC) in chronic inflammatory diseases of the lower respiratory tract. This study investigated pendrin expression and its relationship to mucin in type 2 inflammation. Methods: A total of 40 patients (10 CRS patients with nasal polyps,10 CRS patients without nasal polyps, and 20 nasal septum deviation patients) were included in this study and were divided into the CRS group and the NC group. A normal nasal mucosa tissue culture model was established in vitro. IL-13 was used to stimulate primary cultures of human nasal epithelial cells (HNECs). Western blot (WB), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) were used to detect the expression of pendrin, MUC5AC, and MUC5B. After transfecting HNECs with siRNA pendrin or negative control (NC), EGF receptor (EGFR), HNE, MUC5AC, and MUC5B expression were analyzed using qRT-PCR, WB, or ELISA in terms of their relationships with pendrin. Pendrin expression in the tissue was also analyzed. Results: After IL-13 stimulation, pendrin, MUC5AC, and MUC5B expression levels were upregulated; the optimal concentration of IL-13 was 50 ng/mL. The expression levels of HNE, EGFR, MUC5AC, and MUC5B were downregulated after transfection with siRNA pendrin-1650. Pendrin expression in the NC group was lower than in the CRS group. Conclusion: IL-13 is implicated in the inflammation of nasal mucosa, and pendrin is closely related to the excessive secretion of mucin. The expression of mucin is downregulated after transfection with siRNA pendrin. There is a positive relationship between pendrin and EFGR/HNE. Moreover, pendrin plays an important role in type 2 inflammation.

Biologics for Nasal Polyps: Synthesizing Current Recommendations into a Practical Clinical Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has been traditionally managed with a combination of topical and systemic medical therapy as well as endoscopic sinus surgery. The emergence of biologic therapies that target specific aspects of the inflammatory cascade has ushered in a potentially new paradigm in the management options available for CRSwNP.

PURPOSE

To summarize the current literature and recommendations supporting the use of available biologic therapies for CRSwNP and to develop an algorithm to aid clinical decision-making regarding treatment selection.

METHODS

A review of available literature and studies that demonstrated the clinical efficacy of biologic agents for the treatment of CRSwNP informing current CRSwNP consensus algorithms.

RESULTS

Current biologic medications target immunoglobulin E, interleukins, or interleukin receptors implicated in the Th2 inflammatory cascade. Institution of biologic therapy is now an option for patients who have disease refractory to topical medical therapy and endoscopic sinus surgery, those who cannot tolerate surgery, or patients with other comorbid Th2 diseases. Response to treatment should be monitored at 4-6 months and 1 year after initiating therapy. Across multiple indirect comparisons, dupilumab appears to have the largest therapeutic benefit across multiple subjective and objective outcomes. The choice of therapeutic agent also depends on drug availability, patient tolerance, presence of comorbid illnesses, and cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologics are emerging as an important option in the management of patients with CRSwNP. While more data is required to fully inform indications, treatment selection, and health economics related to their use, biologics may offer robust symptom relief to patients who have failed other interventions.

The Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Biomarkers in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refers to an inflammatory disease of the sinonasal mucosa, with a significant economic burden and impact on quality of life. The diagnosis of CRS is conventionally made on careful history and physical examination, including nasoendoscopic assessment which requires technical expertise. There has been increasing interest in using biomarkers in the non-invasive diagnosis and prognostication of CRS, tailored to the disease inflammatory endotype. Potential biomarkers currently being studied can be isolated from peripheral blood, exhaled nasal gases or nasal secretions, as well as sinonasal tissue. In particular, various biomarkers have revolutionized the way in which CRS is managed, revealing new inflammatory pathways where novel therapeutic drugs are employed to curb the inflammatory process, which may be different from one patient to the next. Biomarkers that have been extensively studied in CRS, such as eosinophil count, IgE, and IL-5, have been associated with a T_H2 inflammatory endotype which correlates with an eosinophilic CRSwNP phenotype that predicts a poorer prognosis, tends to recur after conventional surgical treatment, but responds to glucocorticoid treatment. Newer biomarkers that demonstrate potential, such as nasal nitric oxide, can support a diagnosis of CRS with or without nasal polyps, especially when invasive tests such as nasoendoscopy are unavailable. Other biomarkers such as periostin can be used to monitor disease course after treatment of CRS. With a personalized treatment plan, the management of CRS can be individualized, optimizing treatment efficiency and reducing adverse outcomes. As such, this review aims to compile and summarize the existing literature regarding the utility of biomarkers in CRS in terms of diagnosis and prognostication, and also makes recommendations for further studies to fill current knowledge gaps.