The effect of inner tube placement on resistance and work of breathing through tracheostomy tubes: a bench test

Tracheostomy decannulation protocol in patients with prolonged tracheostomy referred to a rehabilitation hospital: a prospective cohort study

Background

The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility of a standardized tracheostomy decannulation protocol in patients with prolonged tracheostomy referred to a rehabilitation hospital.

Methods

This prospective cohort study recruited conscious patients with prolonged tracheostomy who were referred to the pulmonary rehabilitation department of a tertiary rehabilitation hospital between January 2019 and December 2021. A pulmonary rehabilitation team used a standardized tracheostomy decannulation protocol developed by the authors. The primary outcome was the success rate of decannulation. Secondary outcomes included decannulation time from referral and reintubation rate after a follow-up of 3 months.

Results

Of the 115 patients referred for weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy decannulation over the study period, 80.0% (92/115) were finally evaluated for tracheostomy decannulation. The mean time of tracheostomy in patients transferred to our department was 70.6 days. After assessment by a multidisciplinary team, 57 patients met all the decannulation indications and underwent decannulation. Fifty-six cases were successful, and 1 case was intubated again. The median time to decannulation after referral was 42.7 days. Reintubation after a follow-up of 3 months did not occur in any patients.

Conclusions

A standardized tracheostomy decannulation protocol implemented by a pulmonary rehabilitation team is associated with successful tracheostomy decannulation in patients with prolonged tracheostomy. Not every tracheostomy patient must undergo upper airway endoscopy before decannulation. Tolerance of speaking valve continuously for 4 h can be used as an alternative means for tube occlusion. A swallow assessment was used to evaluate the feeding mode and did not affect the final decision to decannulate.

Trial registration: 2018bkky-121.

Comparison of tracheoscopy and portable chest X-Ray in the evaluation of infant tracheostomy tube position

OBJECTIVE

To compare tracheoscopy and chest radiograph measurements of tracheostomy tube position in infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Otolaryngology Department at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

All cases of pediatric patients who underwent tracheotomy at less than 1 year of age from 2014 to 2019 were reviewed. Patients were included if they had both intraoperative measurement of tracheostomy tube position relative to the carina by tracheoscopy and postoperative chest radiograph. Documented intraoperative findings were compared to measurements made on chest radiograph by an attending radiologist blinded to the intraoperative measurements.

RESULTS

The study included 66 patients; 30 patients (14:16, M:F) had available data. The mean distance from the distal tracheostomy tube to the carina measured by tracheoscopy was 8.88 mm (range, 3.5-20 mm) and measured radiographically was 11.71 mm (range, 2.4-23.3 mm). The mean difference between the measurements was 2.82 mm (p-value = 0.016). Ninety percent (n = 27) of patients had measurements that differed by greater than 2 mm; 53% (n = 16) had measurements that differed by 5 mm and 1% (n = 3) had measurements differing by greater than 10 mm.

CONCLUSION

In the infant population, significant discrepancy was found between direct tracheoscopy and chest radiograph measurements of the tracheostomy tube position. Measurements obtained by chest radiographs tend to overestimate the relative distance of the distal tracheostomy tube to the carina as compared to that of tracheoscopy. Clinical decisions regarding changes to tracheostomy tube sizes should mostly rely on tracheoscopy performed with the patient supine.

Advanced mechanical ventilation modes: design and computer simulations

In this paper, three different advanced mechanical ventilation modes, pressure regulated volume control ventilation (PRVC), proportional assist ventilation (PAV), and adaptive support ventilation (ASV) are designed and simulated on the computer via MATLAB/Simulink. In the algorithms of advanced ventilation modes, a closed-loop control structure is used and recursive least squares method is considered for the estimation of respiratory mechanics. The designed algorithms are then applied to the human respiratory system model for the active and/or passive patient cases. Simulation results show that such algorithms can be designed and simulated on the computer successfully. In addition, the simulation environment helps us to understand the working principles of the advanced modes and to see the results such as ventilator waveforms, the effect of the parameter changes. Moreover, it also allows us to improve and test the algorithms and strategies quickly and efficiently.

Tracheostomy decannulation methods and procedures for assessing readiness for decannulation in adults: a systematic scoping review

Despite the undisputable benefits of tracheostomy, it has been reported to have links with impaired communication, reduced quality of life and a risk of health complications such as bleeding, tracheal stenosis and in some cases resulting in mortality. There is a paucity of literature on tracheostomy decannulation methods and procedures, leaving the decision to expert opinion and institutional guidelines. This study aimed to map evidence on methods and procedures of tracheostomy decannulation in adults and assessment of readiness for decannulation, to reveal knowledge gaps and inform further research. We conducted a systematic search of peer reviewed and grey literature on PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Union Catalogue of Theses and Dissertations via SABINET Online, World Cat Dissertations and Theses via OCLC, WHO library and governmental websites from 1985 to present. Following title screening, abstract and full article screening was performed by two independent reviewers guided by the eligibility criteria. Data from included studies were extracted, collated, summarized and synthesized into the following themes: assessment, removal, monitoring and definition of failure of decannulation. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2011. Twenty-five out of 51 screened articles were eligible for data extraction. There was wide variation in the assessment methods employed across and within similar patient groups. The common themes that emerged in the assessment for readiness for decannulation are informed consent, clinical stability, airway patency, physiological decannulation, swallowing assessment, level of consciousness, effectiveness of cough and clearance of secretions. In conclusion, the current body of evidence is inadequate and requires further research, particularly validation of different parameters used. A protocol approach to decannulation may be inappropriate but rather an algorithmic approach using validated parameters.