Chlorhexidine cleaning of re-usable bougies

Synergistic effect of chlorhexidine and azoles on candida biofilm on titanium surface

BACKGROUND

Candida infections of orthopedic implants are one of the most detrimental orthopedic implant-related complications with unsuccessful treatment and a poor prognosis. Most orthopedic Candida infections form biofilms and have resistance to the commonly used antifungal agents. This study aimed to develop a novel combination of normally prescribed drugs against Candida biofilm on orthopedic implants.

METHODS

We cultured 26 clinical isolates of Candida strains to form biofilm without titanium sheets or on titanium sheets, which are the most commonly used materials for permanent or orthopedic implants. The checkerboard method was used to evaluate the synergistic effects of chlorhexidine (CHL) and azoles on these Candida biofilms. For the evaluation of synergistic effects, we constructed the cell viability assay by fluorescence staining and CFU reduction hot map of Candida.

RESULTS

Twenty-six clinical isolates of Candida strains formed biofilm in 96-well plates without titanium sheets, and we selected 9 of them to form biofilm on titanium sheets in 24-well plates. In Candida biofilm formed in 96-wells, the synergistic rates of CHL with fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were 61% (16/26), 65% (17/26), and 23% (6/26), respectively. When compared to the blank control group, CHL monotherapy significantly inhibited biofilm formation on titanium sheets (P < 0.05). We demonstrated 100% synergistic rates of the CHL and fluconazole combination against Candida biofilm formation on titanium sheets, and the minimum inhibitory concentration of CHL and FLU decreased four- to eight-fold.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that CHL combined with azoles inhibited the Candida biofilm formation 96-wells or on titanium sheets and has the potential to control the infections of orthopedic implants.

Keyboard cleanliness: a controlled study of the residual effect of chlorhexidine gluconate

A controlled trial of once daily cleaning of computer keyboards in an intensive care unit was performed comparing 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-70% isopropyl alcohol (CHG) and a chlorine dioxide-based product used as a standard in our hospital. A study before and after the introduction of once daily keyboard cleaning with CHG in the wider hospital was also completed. Cleaning with CHG showed a sustained and significant reduction in bacterial colony forming units compared with the chlorine dioxide-based product, demonstrating its unique advantage of maintaining continuous keyboard cleanliness over time.

Superiority of chlorhexidine 2%/alcohol 70% wipes in decontaminating ultrasound equipment

Ultrasound equipment is known to act as a reservoir for potentially pathogenic organisms. The aims of these studies were to establish current cleaning practices, to review the extent of bacterial contamination of ultrasound equipment in our hospital, to establish an effective cleaning regimen and to ensure that cleaning does not cause damage. A questionnaire was sent to all acute NHS hospitals in England to establish current cleaning practices. A review of our current practice was performed to establish the extent of bacterial contamination of ultrasound equipment currently in use. Laboratory studies compared cleaning the probes with soap and water with decontaminating with a chlorhexidine 2% and alcohol 70% wipe, including quantifying the residual effect. Accelerated aging was performed on the probe and staff surveyed to establish potential problems with using the wipes on the probe. The survey revealed that a variety of cleaning methods were used to decontaminate ultrasound probes; 57% of our ultrasound machines were contaminated with bacteria. The laboratory studies showed superiority of the chlorhexidine and alcohol wipes over soap and water due to a residual effect, both immediately after cleaning and after 24 hours. The staff survey demonstrated no apparent change in function of the probe after cleaning with the chlorhexidine wipes. Cleaning ultrasound probes with chlorhexidine and alcohol wipes is effective and provides additional protection against bacterial contamination due to its residual effect, and appears in the short term to have no detrimental effect on the probe.