Lest we forget: learning and remembering in clinical practice

Adverse events with arterial catheters in intensive care units: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

The installation of an arterial line is one of the invasive procedures performed for hemodynamic monitoring and, even with its clear importance in intensive care, it is still an invasive procedure and liable to cause harms to the patients.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the adverse events associated with the use of arterial catheters in critically-ill patients in the world scientific production.

METHODOLOGY

The present scoping review was conducted according to the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist was used for reporting. The research question was "Which adverse events related to the use of arterial catheters in patients admitted to intensive care are more evident in the literature?". Data collection took place in the following databases: LILACS; MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL, EBSCOhost; and WEB OF SCIENCE.

RESULTS

Through the search strategies, 491 articles were found in the databases. After exclusion of duplicates, peer analysis of titles and abstracts, full reading and screening of lists of references, the final sample of studies included was 38 articles. The main harms cited by the publications were as follows: limb ischemia, thrombosis, hemorrhage, accidental removal, inadvertent connection of inadequate infusion solution, pseudoaneurysm and bloodstream infection.

CONCLUSIONS

It was evidenced that patients are subjected to risks of adverse events from the insertion moment to removal of the arterial catheter, focusing on the infusion solution used to fill the circuit, the type of securement and dressings chosen, as well as the Nursing care measures for the prevention of bloodstream infection.

Serratus Plane Block in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The serratus plane block is a regional anesthesia technique awaiting efficacy and safety evaluation in breast cancer surgery, but evidence is unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the analgesic effectiveness of serratus plane block vis-à-vis general anesthesia and paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery. We searched for randomized controlled trials in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science with no language limitation, comparing the serratus plane block with multimodal analgesia or the thoracic paravertebral block in breast cancer surgery. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method in combination with a random-effects model was used to pool data. We included 12 randomized controlled trials (799 patients). Compared with multimodal analgesia, pooled outcomes favored the use of serratus plane block for effectively alleviating acute postoperative pain severity at multiple time points. The serratus plane block also resulted in decreased postoperative analgesic consumption of 28.81mg (95% confidence interval [CI]: -51.20, -6.43), decreased intraoperative fentanyl consumption of -56.46 mg (95% CI: -79.61, -33.30), increased duration of postoperative anesthesia of 243.85 min (95% CI: 104.38, 383.31), and reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting with a log relative risk of -1.07 (95% CI: -1.90, -0.24). Compared with the thoracic paravertebral block, the serratus plane block was not statically worse for all of the outcomes assessed. No adverse effects were reported. The serratus plane block effectively alleviates acute postoperative pain, reduces the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and improves perioperative anesthesia outcomes in breast cancer surgery, and it may represent an alternative to thoracic paravertebral block.

Radial artery cannulation decreases the distal arterial blood flow measured by power Doppler ultrasound

Radial arterial cannulation is a popular technique for continuous hemodynamic monitoring in an area of anesthesia and intensive care. Although the risk for invasive monitoring is considerable, there is scarce information about the change in blood flow of cannulated vessel after the catheterization. In the current investigation, we evaluated the change in the cannulated arterial blood flow. Six volunteers (study 1) and eight post-surgical patients (study 2) were enrolled into the studies. In the study 1, the both side of diameter of radial artery (RA), ulnar artery (UA) and dorsal branch of radial artery (DBRA) of participants were measured using power Doppler ultrasound (PDU) with or without proximal oppression. In the study 2, the diameter of RA, UA and DBRA of the both intact and cannulated side were compared. Study 1: The diameter of RA was 3.4 (0.52) [mean (SD)] mm and the proximal oppression significantly decreased the diameter to 1.8 (0.59) mm. The diameter of DBRA measured by PDU also decreased 2.0 (0.60)-1.3 (0.59) mm. Study 2: There was no difference between the diameters of right and left RA, however, the UA was larger [3.4 (0.60) vs. 2.8 (0.83) mm] and the DBRA was narrower [1.4 (0.43) vs. 2.0 (0.47) mm] in the cannulated side. The diameters of DBRA were different between the intact and cannulated side in the patients. Although there is no information of relationships between cause of severe complication and decreased flow, significant reduction of blood flow should be concerned.