How clinical registries can make a difference in hip fracture care

Alliance for the development of the Argentinian Hip Fracture Registry

Age expectancy has significantly increased over the last 50 years, as well as some age-related health conditions such as hip fractures. The development of hip fracture registries has shown enhanced patient outcomes through quality improvement strategies. The development of the Argentinian Hip Fracture Registry is going in the same direction.

INTRODUCTION

Age expectancy has increased worldwide in the last 50 years, with the population over 64 growing from 4.9 to 9.1%. As fractures are an important problem in this age group, specific approaches such as hip fracture registries (HFR) are needed. Our aim is to communicate the Argentinian HFR (AHFR) development resulting from an alliance between Fundación Trauma, Fundación Navarro Viola, and the Argentinian Network of Hip Fracture in the elderly.

METHODS

Between October 2020 and May 2021, an iterative consensus process involving 5 specialty-focused meetings and 8 general meetings with more than 20 specialists was conducted. This process comprised inclusion criteria definitions, dataset proposals, website deployment with data protection and user validation, the definition of hospital-adjusted registry levels, implementation planning, and sustainability strategies.

RESULTS

By June 2021, we were able to (1) outline data fields, including epidemiological, clinical, and functional dimensions for the pre-admission, hospitalization, discharge, and follow-up stages; (2) define three levels: basic (53 fields), intermediate (85), and advanced (99); (3) identify 21 benchmarking indicators; and (4) make a correlation scheme among fracture classifications. Simultaneously, we launched a fundraising campaign to implement the AHFR in 30 centers, having completed 18.

CONCLUSION

AHFR development was based on four pillars: (1) representativeness and support, (2) solid definitions from onset, (3) committed teams, and (4) stable funding. This tool may contribute to the design of evidence-based health policies to improve patient outcomes, and we hope this experience will help other LMICs to develop their own tailored-to-their-needs registries.

Multi-state analysis of hemi- and total hip arthroplasty for hip fractures in the Swedish population-Results from a Swedish national database study of 38,912 patients

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures are a common problem of the elderly population with significant mortality and morbidity. The choice between total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty depends on multiple factors including comorbidity. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) provides a unique opportunity to study mortality and revision rates in this population. Linkage with government databases allow for in-depth research into the factors that influence risk of revision surgery and death in the hip fracture patient.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data was linked between SHAR, Statistics Sweden and the National Board of Health and Welfare. Data was collected on 38,912 patients who received a fracture-related hip arthroplasty between 2005 and 2012. A multistate analysis was performed and three states were identified: primary hip surgery and alive (state 1), revision after primary hip surgery (state 2) and death (state 3). These were marking points in the longitudinal outcome study.

RESULTS

38,912 patients who received an arthroplasty for an acute hip fracture were included. By the end of the study period 1309 (3.4%) of these patients underwent a revision and 17,365 (45.1%) patients died. Patients with THA had a reduced risk of death from primary operation compared to hemiarthroplasty (HR = 0.49) and a decreased revision risk (HR = 0.69). Female patients had a statistically significant reduced mortality (HR = 0.6) compared to men. There was no statistically significant difference in risk of revision surgery between direct lateral and posterior approach.

CONCLUSION

We identified an influence of type of surgery, sex, age and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) on risk of revision and mortality. Males, greater comorbidity burden and older patients had higher mortality risks. The posterior approach did not have a significant influence on revision risk. Further research could include all patients who had reoperation(s) to further strengthen our findings. Patients who had a THA had lower revision rate and mortality. The latter is likely due to selection.