A prospective observational study of maternal oxygenation during remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia use in labour

Remifentanil at a Relatively Elevated Dose in Active Phase is Safe and More Suitable Than Fixed Lower Dose for Intravenous Labor Analgesia

Background

Intravenous labor analgesia is recommended as an alternative for parturients who have contraindications to epidural analgesia. There are several opioid analgesics and different administering regimens used in the clinic. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of two intravenous remifentanil dosage regimens in the first labor stage.

Patients and Methods

One hundred and fifteen parturients with a contraindication to epidural analgesia but were willing to receive systemic labor analgesia were randomized into group A received a fixed dose of remifentanil throughout the first stage of labor, and group B received an elevated dose of remifentanil during the active phase of the first stage both by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Maternal numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score and oxygen desaturation, sedation efficacy, satisfaction, as well as maternal and fetal adverse reactions were recorded and compared.

Results

The mean NRS pain scores before analgesia and in the latent phase showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, during the active phase, group B demonstrated significantly lower mean NRS pain scores and lowest pain score compared to group A (P < 0.05). Furthermore, group B exhibited higher overall sedation scores and satisfaction scores in comparison to group A (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups was similar (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Relatively elevated intravenous dosage of remifentanil with PCA during the active phase in the first stage of labor is safe and more effective than a fixed-dosage regimen for labor analgesia.

Trial Registration

This study was registered with ChiCTR on 24/08/2021 with trial identification number: ChiCTR2100050247. First participant was recruited on 31/08/2021. The last patient was recruited on 12/08/2022.

Side Effects of Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Remifentanil Compared with Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labour Analgesia - A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Epidural analgesia is considered a gold standard in obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia. However, in situation when it is contraindicated, unwanted by the patient or simply unavailable, remifentanil can be an excellent alternative. The goal of our study is to analyse the side effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with remifentanil compared with epidural analgesia during delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included 155 pregnant women in term for birth, divided into 2 groups: a remifentanil group (RG), and an epidural group (EG). Patients in the RG received intravenous PCA with remifentanil, while patients in the ЕG received epidural analgesia with programmed intermittent bolus dosing. Our primary outcome was maternal safety; the secondary outcome was neonatal safety.

RESULTS

The results present a significantly lower SaO2 value of the parturients in the RG (96.95 ± 1.4 vs 98.22 ± 0.6), and a significantly higher respiratory rate per minute in the EG at all time points after the onset of analgesia (20.85 ± 1.4 vs 18.67 ± 0.9). There was more frequent sedation, nausea and vomiting in the RG, while in the EG there was a more elevated temperature, itching and irregularities in the CTG record. Regarding the newborn, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the Apgar scores, pH, pCO2, pO2, and bicarbonate, while there was a significantly lower value of the base excess in the RG group.

CONCLUSION

PCA with remifentanil is safe for the mother, foetus and the newborn, with minimal side effects. Continuous respiratory monitoring, oxygen supply and following of all consensus recommendations are mandatory.

Analysis of Physiological Respiratory Variable Alarm Alerts Among Laboring Women Receiving Remifentanil

BACKGROUND

Remifentanil may be used by laboring women for analgesia, despite controversy because of potential apneas. We evaluated candidate variables as early warning alerts for apnea, based on prevalence, positive predictive rate, sensitivity for apnea event detection, and early warning alert time intervals (lead time) for apnea.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of respiratory physiological data that had been collected during a prospective IRB-approved study of laboring women receiving IV patient-controlled boluses of remifentanil 20 to 60 μg every 1 to 2 minutes. Analyzed data included the respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), pulse oximetry (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and the Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI; Capnostream 20; Medtronic, Boulder, CO) that had been recorded continuously throughout labor. We defined immediate early warning alerts as any drop in a variable value below a prespecified threshold for 15 seconds: RR < 8 breaths per minute (bpm), EtCO2 < 15 mm Hg, and SpO2 < 92%. We defined alerts as "sustained" when the value remained below the threshold for ≥ 10 further seconds. The IPI value (1 to 10; 10 = healthy patient, ≤4 = immediate attention required, 1 = dire condition) was generated from a proprietary algorithm using RR, EtCO2, SpO2, and HR parameters. Apnea was defined as maximal CO2 < 5 mm Hg for at least 30 consecutive seconds.

RESULTS

We counted 62 apneas, among 10 of 19 (52.6%) women who received remifentanil (total dose 1725 ± 1392 μg, administered over 160 ± 132 minutes). We counted 331 immediate early warning alerts for the variables; 271 (82%) alerts were sustained for ≥10 seconds. The positive predictive value of alerts for apnea was 35.8% (99% confidence interval [CI]: 27.1-45.6), 28.9% (99% CI: 20.8-38.7), 4.3% (99% CI: 1.9-9.6), and 24.6% (99% CI: 18.3-32.2) for RR, EtCO2, SpO2, and IPI, respectively. The sensitivity for apnea event detection was 100% (99% CI: 90.3-100) for RR (<8 bpm) and IPI (≤4); 75.8% (99% CI: 59.8-86.9) for EtCO2 <15 mm Hg; and 14.5% (99% CI: 6.5-29.4) for SpO2 <92%. We found a statistically significant difference in the timing of RR, EtCO2, SpO2, and IPI alerts for apnea; Friedman's Q = 33.53; P < .0001. The EtCO2 had a median (interquartile range) lead time of -0.2 (-12.2 to 0.7) seconds, and SpO2 had a median (interquartile range) lead time of 40.0 (40.0 to 40.0) seconds.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of women receiving IV remifentanil for labor analgesia experienced apneas. Alerts for EtCO2 (<15 mm Hg), RR (<8 bpm), and IPI (≤4) detected most apneas, whereas SpO2 alerts missed the majority of apneas. All variables had a low positive predictive rate, demonstrating the limitations of the respiratory monitors utilized as early warning surveillance for apneas in this setting.