Level of agreement between cardiac output measurements using Nexfin®and thermodilution in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

Accuracy and trending ability of finger plethysmographic cardiac output monitoring in late pregnancy

PURPOSE

Individuals in late pregnancy are at risk of significant hemodynamic variations, especially during Cesarean delivery. Although non-invasive monitoring might enable the early detection of variations in cardiac output (CO), clinical validation is lacking.

METHODS

In a prospective, single-center study, we measured CO simultaneously with finger plethysmography and transthoracic echocardiography in 100 third-trimester pregnant individuals in the supine and left lateral decubitus (LLD) positions.

RESULTS

A Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean (standard deviation) bias of 1.36 (1.04) L·min-1 in the supine position (95% limits of agreement, -0.68 to 3.4 L·min-1; percent error, 26.6%), indicating overestimation by finger plethysmography. The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.51). Regarding the changes in CO induced by the supine-to-LLD transition, the concordance rate in a four-quadrant plot was 98.3% (95% CI, 91.1 to 99.9%).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a poor reliability of finger plethysmography for static measurement of CO. Nevertheless, finger plethysmography had a reasonably high concordance rate for the detection of CO changes secondary to positional changes in late-pregnant individuals. STUDY REGISTRATION DATE: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT03735043); registered 8 November 2018.

Indirect CT venography of the lower extremities: impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement and examination quality

OBJECTIVES

Indirect computed tomography venography (CTV) is often the next imaging modality for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) when sonography is inconclusive. Our aim was to investigate the impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement (CE) and examination quality in CTV.

METHODS

Patients with clinical suspicion or clinical mimics of DVT in one large hospital were enrolled. Age, sex, body weight, height, heart rate, systolic blood pressure and cardiac output were registered. CTV of the popliteal veins was obtained at 30 s intervals at 30-210 s delays. The proportions of examinations with CE exceeding predefined cut-offs were estimated and subjective examination quality was rated. Changes in CE with time, and associations between patient factors and time to peak contrast enhancement (TPCE) were modelled with mixed effects non-linear and linear regression, respectively.

RESULTS

The CE increased with increasing scan delay and reached a plateau from 120 to 210 s. The percentages of examinations achieving enhancement above cut-offs across all thresholds from 70 to 100 HU were higher at 120 s compared to 90 s (p < 0.001). After 120 s, there were no differences across scan delays for any thresholds. No patient factors showed a significant effect on TPCE. The percentage of examinations rated as acceptable was higher at 120 s compared to 90 s (p < 0.001). After 120 s, there were no statistically significant differences across scan delays.

CONCLUSIONS

No patient factors were associated with TPCE in CTV. A fixed scan delay of 120-210 s yielded the best examination quality.

KEY POINTS

• Contrast enhancement reached a plateau at scan delay between 90 and 120 s. • A scan delay of 120-210 s yielded the best examination quality. • No patient factors were associated with time to peak contrast enhancement.

Noninvasive cardiac output measurement is inaccurate in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background

Noninvasive cardiac output (CO) measured using ClearSight™ eliminates the need for intra-arterial catheter insertion. The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of non-invasive CO measurement in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods

Twenty-eight patients undergoing elective transcatheter aortic valve implantation were prospectively enrolled in this study. The CO was simultaneously measured twice before and twice after valve deployment (total of four times) per patient, and the CO was compared between the ClearSight (CO_ClearSight) system and the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) thermodilution (CO_TD) method as a reference. The Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the percentage errors between the methods.

Results

A total of 112 paired data points were obtained. The percentage error between the CO_ClearSight and CO_TD was 43.1%. The paired datasets were divided into the following groups according to the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI): low (< 1,200 dyne s/cm⁵/m²) and normal (1,200–2,500 dyne s/cm⁵/m²). The percentage errors were 44.9% and 49.4%, respectively. The discrepancy of CO between CO_ClearSight and CO_TD was not significantly correlated with SVRI (r = −0.06, P < 0.001). The polar plot analysis showed the trending ability of the CO_ClearSight after artificial valve deployment was 51.1% which below the acceptable cut-off (92%).

Conclusions

The accuracy and the trending ability of the ClearSight CO measurements were not acceptable in patients with severe AS. Therefore, the ClearSight system is not interchangeable with the PAC thermodilution for determining CO in this population.

Intraoperative Monitoring of the Obese Patient Undergoing Surgery: A Narrative Review

With the increasing prevalence of obesity in the population, anaesthetists must confidently manage both the pathophysiological and technical challenges presented in bariatric and non-bariatric surgery. The intraoperative period represents an important opportunity to optimise and mitigate risk. However, there is little formal guidance on what intraoperative monitoring techniques should be used in this population. This narrative review collates the existing evidence for intraoperative monitoring devices in the obese patients. Although a number of non-invasive blood pressure monitors have been tested, an invasive arterial line remains the most reliable monitor if accurate, continuous monitoring is required. Goal-directed fluid therapy is recommended by clinical practice guidelines, but the methods tested to assess this had guarded applicability to the obese population. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide (CO₂) monitoring may offer additional benefit to standard capnography in this population. Individually titrated positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvres improved intraoperative mechanics but yielded no benefit in the immediate postoperative period. Depth of anaesthesia monitoring appears to be beneficial in the perioperative period regarding recovery times and complications. Objective confirmation of reversal of neuromuscular blockade continues to be a central tenet of anaesthesia practice, particularly relevant to this group who have been characterised as an "at risk" extubation group. Where deep neuromuscular blockade is used, continuous neuromuscular blockade is suggested. Both obesity and the intraoperative context represent somewhat unstable search terms, as the clinical implications of the obesity phenotype are not uniform, and the type and urgency of surgery have significant impact on the intraoperative setting. This renders the generation of summary conclusions around what intraoperative monitoring techniques are suitable in this population highly challenging.

Effect of Systemic Vascular Resistance on the Reliability of Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of systemic vascular resistance (SVR) on the reliability of the ClearSight system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) for measuring blood pressure (BP) and cardiac output (CO).

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

BP, measured using ClearSight and an arterial line, and CO, measured using ClearSight and a pulmonary artery catheter, were recorded before (T1) and two minutes after phenylephrine or ephedrine administration. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare BP and CO measurements at T1. A polar plot was used to assess trending abilities. Patients were divided into the following three groups according to the SVR index (SVRI) at T1: low (<1,200 dyne s/cm⁵/m²), normal (1,200-25,00 dyne s/cm⁵/m²), and high (>2,500 dyne s/cm⁵/m²). The bias in BP and CO was -4.8 ± 8.9 mmHg and 0.10 ± 0.81 L/min, respectively, which was correlated significantly with SVRI (p < 0.05). The percentage error in CO was 40.6%, which was lower in the normal SVRI group (33.3%) than the low and high groups (46.3% and 47.7%, respectively). The angular concordance rate was 96.3% and 95.4% for BP and 87.0% and 92.5% for CO after phenylephrine and ephedrine administration, respectively. There was a low tracking ability for CO changes after phenylephrine administration in the low-SVRI group (angular concordance rate 33.3%).

CONCLUSION

The ClearSight system showed an acceptable accuracy in measuring BP and tracking BP changes in various SVR states; however, the accuracy of CO measurement and its trending ability in various SVR states was poor.

Perioperative non-invasive versus semi-invasive cardiac index monitoring in patients with bariatric surgery - a prospective observational study

Background

In morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, the combination of obesity-related comorbidities, pneumoperitoneum and extreme posture changes constitutes a high risk of perioperative hemodynamic complications. Thus, an advanced hemodynamic monitoring including continuous cardiac index (CI) assessment is desirable. While invasive catheterization may bear technical difficulties, transesophageal echocardiography is contraindicated due to the surgical procedure. Evidence on the clinical reliability of alternative semi- or non-invasive cardiac monitoring devices is limited. The aim was to compare the non-invasive vascular unloading to a semi-invasive pulse contour analysis reference technique for continuous CI measurements in bariatric surgical patients.

Methods

This prospective observational study included adult patients scheduled for elective, laparoscopic bariatric surgery after obtained institutional ethics approval and written informed consent. CI measurements were performed using the vascular unloading technique (Nexfin®) and semi-invasive reference method (FloTrac™). At 10 defined measurement time points, the influence of clinically indicated body posture changes, passive leg raising, fluid bolus administration and pneumoperitoneum was evaluated pre- and intraoperatively. Correlation, Bland-Altman and concordance analyses were performed.

Results

Sixty patients (mean BMI 49.2 kg/m²) were enrolled into the study and data from 54 patients could be entered in the final analysis. Baseline CI was 3.2 ± 0.9 and 3.3 ± 0.8 l/min/m², respectively. Pooled absolute CI values showed a positive correlation (r_s = 0.76, P < 0.001) and mean bias of of − 0.16 l/min/m² (limits of agreement: − 1.48 to 1.15 l/min/m²) between the two methods. Pooled percentage error was 56.51%, missing the criteria of interchangeability (< 30%). Preoperatively, bias ranged from − 0.33 to 0.08 l/min/m² with wide limits of agreement. Correlation of CI was best (r_s = 0.82, P < 0.001) and percentage error lowest (46.34%) during anesthesia and after fluid bolus administration. Intraoperatively, bias ranged from − 0.34 to − 0.03 l/min/m² with wide limits of agreement. CI measurements correlated best during pneumoperitoneum and after fluid bolus administration (r_s = 0.77, P < 0.001; percentage error 35.95%). Trending ability for all 10 measurement points showed a concordance rate of 85.12%, not reaching the predefined Critchley criterion (> 92%).

Conclusion

Non-invasive as compared to semi-invasive CI measurements did not reach criteria of interchangeability for monitoring absolute and trending values of CI in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Trial registration

The study was registered retrospectively on June 12, 2017 with the registration number NCT03184272.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include: contextualization in an adiposity-based chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current health care arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory, with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPG) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, the Obesity Medicine Association, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists boards of directors in adherence to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPG, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include contextualization in an adiposity-based, chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based, and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current healthcare arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence-based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Clearsight™ use for haemodynamic monitoring during the third trimester of pregnancy - a validation study

BACKGROUND

We assessed the validity of Clearsight™ as a non-invasive cardiac output and stroke volume monitoring device, comparing it with transthoracic echocardiography measurements during the third trimester of pregnancy.

METHODS

Measurements obtained from Clearsight™ were compared with those from echocardiography as the gold standard. The precision and accuracy of the Clearsight™ was measured using the Bland and Altman method. Clinical agreement with echocardiography was assessed using the agreement tolerability index.

RESULTS

Measurements were recorded from 44 pregnant women with a median [IQR range] gestational age of 33 [30-37] weeks. We found that Clearsight™ measurements presented a systematic overestimation of cardiac output, with mean bias [CI 95%] of 2.7 [2.3-3.0] L/min, with limits of agreement of  -0.1 to 5.4 L/min. It overestimated stroke volume, with a bias of 29.5 [25.0-33.4] mL and a limit of agreement of -1.6 to 60.1 mL. In addition, the analysis of cardiac output showed a percentage of error of 41% and intra-class correlation [CI 95%] of 0.37 [0.17 to 0.53, P <0.001]. For stroke volume, the percentage of error was 40% and intra-class correlation 0.16 [-0.1 to 0.34; P=0.27]. We found that agreement tolerability index scores were unacceptable. We evaluated the ability of the device to track changes in cardiac output by inducing a left lateral decubitus position, but the analysis was inconclusive.

CONCLUSION

The agreement between Clearsight™ and the echocardiography measurements of cardiac output and stroke volume were not within an acceptable range in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Pulse-contour derived cardiac output measurements in morbid obesity: influence of actual, ideal and adjusted bodyweight

The non-invasive Nexfin cardiac output (CO) monitor shows a low level of agreement with the gold standard thermodilution method in morbidly obese patients. Here we investigate whether this disagreement is related to excessive bodyweight, and can be improved when bodyweight derivatives are used instead. We performed offline analyses of cardiac output recordings of patient data previously used and partly published in an earlier study by our group. In 30 morbidly obese patients (BMI > 35 kg/m²) undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass, cardiac output was simultaneously determined with PiCCO thermodilution and Nexfin pulse-contour method. We investigated if agreement of Nexfin-derived CO with thermodilution CO improved when ideal and adjusted—instead of actual- bodyweight were used as input to the Nexfin. Bodyweight correlated with the difference between Nexfin-derived and thermodilution-derived CO (r = −0.56; p = 0.001). Bland Altman analysis of agreement between Nexfin and thermodilution-derived CO revealed a bias of 0.4 ± 1.6 with limits of agreement (LOA) from −2.6 to 3.5 L min when actual bodyweight was used. Bias was −0.6 ± 1.4 and LOA ranged from −3.4 to 2.3 L min when ideal bodyweight was used. With adjusted bodyweight, bias improved to 0.04 ± 1.4 with LOA from −2.8 to 2.9 L min. Our study shows that agreement of the Nexfin-derived with invasive CO measurements in morbidly obese patients is influenced by body weight, suggesting that Nexfin CO measurements in patients with a BMI above 35 kg/m² should be interpreted with caution. Using adjusted body weight in the Nexfin CO-trek algorithm reduced the bias.