A comparison of two techniques for induction of anaesthesia with target-controlled infusion of propofol

Efficacy and safety of propofol target-controlled infusion combined with butorphanol for sedated colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

Propofol is a short-acting, rapid-recovering anesthetic widely used in sedated colonoscopy for the early detection, diagnosis and treatment of colon diseases. However, the use of propofol alone may require high doses to achieve the induction of anesthesia in sedated colonoscopy, which has been associated with anesthesia-related adverse events (AEs), including hypoxemia, sinus bradycardia, and hypotension. Therefore, propofol co-administrated with other anesthetics has been proposed to reduce the required dose of propofol, enhance the efficacy, and improve the satisfaction of patients receiving colonoscopy under sedation.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) in combination with butorphanol for sedation during colonoscopy.

METHODS

In this controlled clinical trial, a total of 106 patients, who were scheduled for sedated colonoscopy, were prospectively recruited and assigned into three groups to receive different doses of butorphanol before propofol TCI: Low-dose butorphanol group (5 μg/kg, group B1), high-dose butorphanol group (10 μg/kg, group B2), and control group (normal saline, group C). Anesthesia was achieved by propofol TCI. The primary outcome was the median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol TCI, which was measured using the up-and-down sequential method. The secondary outcomes included AEs in perianesthesia and recovery characteristics.

RESULTS

The EC50 of propofol for TCI was 3.03 μg/mL [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.83-3.23 μg/mL] in group B2, 3.41 μg/mL (95%CI: 3.20-3.62 μg/mL) in group B1, and 4.05 μg/mL (95%CI: 3.78-4.34 μg/mL) in group C. The amount of propofol necessary for anesthesia was 132 mg [interquartile range (IQR), 125-144.75 mg] in group B2 and 142 mg (IQR, 135-154 mg) in group B1. Furthermore, the awakening concentration was 1.1 μg/mL (IQR, 0.9-1.2 μg/mL) in group B2 and 1.2 μg/mL (IQR, 1.025-1.5 μg/mL) in group B1. Notably, the propofol TCI plus butorphanol groups (groups B1 and B2) had a lower incidence of anesthesia AEs, when compared to group C. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in the rates of AEs in perianesthesia, including hypoxemia, sinus bradycardia, hypotension, nausea and vomiting, and vertigo, among group C, group B1 and group B2.

CONCLUSION

The combined use with butorphanol reduces the EC50 of propofol TCI for anesthesia. The decrease in propofol might contribute to the reduced anesthesia-related AEs in patients undergoing sedated colonoscopy.

Developmental and cardiac toxicities of propofol in zebrafish larvae

Propofol, a commonly used anesthetic, is convenient to use, induces quick effect, enables rapid recovery, and is widely accessible given its stable supply. However, its adverse effects are a concern. Reportedly, propofol exhibits a significant inhibitory effect on the respiratory and circulatory systems. Furthermore, intravenous administration of this drug results in hypotension, rapid heart rate, and respiratory failure. Because many pregnant women are administered propofol during childbirth, it may have a significant negative effect on the development of infants. Propofol can cause considerable developmental neurotoxicity and has known activity on the heart. However, the underling mechanisms of these toxicities remain unclear. In the present study, zebrafish embryos were exposed to propofol at different concentrations (0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 20 μg/ml) to determine its developmental and cardiac toxicities. Propofol exposure decreased the survival rate and hatchability of zebrafish embryos. Additionally, the embryo malformation rate increased in a concentration-dependent manner. Different types of malformations were observed following propofol administration. The proportion of pericardial cysts increased, whereas the heart rate and size decreased with an increase in propofol concentration. The quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction revealed that propofol significantly altered the expression of genes related to cardiac development and functions in zebrafish. Collectively, our findings indicate that propofol exposure induces significant developmental and cardiac toxicities in zebrafish.