Cardiac output monitoring with thermodilution pulse‐contour analysis vs. non‐invasive pulse‐contour analysis

Can Currently Available Non-invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Monitors Replace Invasive Measurement With an Arterial Catheter?

Deviations from normal blood pressure (BP) during general anesthesia have been clearly linked to several adverse outcomes. Measuring BP accurately is therefore critically important for producing excellent outcomes in health care. Normal BP does not necessarily guarantee adequate organ perfusion however and adverse events have occurred even when BP seemed adequate. Invasive blood pressure monitoring has recently evolved beyond merely measuring BP. Arterial line-derived pulse contour analysis is used now to assess both cardiac output and stroke volume variation as indices of adequate intravascular volume. Confirmation of acceptable cardiac output with data derived from invasive intra-arterial catheters has become very important when managing high-risk patients. Newer devices that measure BP continuously and non-invasively in the digital arteries via a finger cuff have also become available. Many clinicians contemplate now if these new devices are ready to replace invasive monitoring with an arterial catheter. Unlike non-invasive devices, intra-arterial catheters allow frequent blood sampling. This makes it possible to assess vital parameters like pH, hemoglobin concentration, ionized calcium, potassium, glucose, and arterial partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide frequently. Non-invasive continuous BP measurement has been found to be unreliable in critically ill patients, the elderly, and patients with calcified arteries. Pulse contour-derived estimates of cardiac output and stroke volume variation have been validated better with data derived from arterial lines than that from the newer finger cuff monitors. Significant advances have been recently made with non-invasive continuous BP monitors. Invasive monitoring with an arterial line however remains the gold standard for measuring BP and assessing pulse contour analysis-derived hemodynamic variables in critically ill patients. In the future, non-invasive continuous BP monitors will likely replace intermittent oscillometers in the operating room and the postoperative period. They will however not eliminate the need for arterial catheterization in critically ill patients.

The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Background and Objectives: The effect of individualized hemodynamic management on the intraoperative use of fluids and other hemodynamic interventions in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate how the use of individualized hemodynamic management based on extended continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring modifies intraoperative hemodynamic interventions compared to conventional hemodynamic monitoring with intermittent non-invasive blood pressure measurements. Methods: Fifty adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I−III) who underwent spinal procedures in the prone position and were then managed with a restrictive fluid strategy were prospectively randomized into intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, individualized hemodynamic management followed a goal-directed protocol based on continuously non-invasively measured blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume variation. In the control group, patients were monitored using intermittent non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, and the choice of hemodynamic intervention was left to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Results: In the intervention group, more hypotensive episodes (3 (2−4) vs. 1 (0−2), p = 0.0001), higher intraoperative dose of ephedrine (0 (0−10) vs. 0 (0−0) mg, p = 0.0008), and more positive fluid balance (680 (510−937) vs. 270 (196−377) ml, p < 0.0001) were recorded. Intraoperative norepinephrine dose and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Individualized hemodynamic management based on data from extended non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring significantly modified intraoperative hemodynamic management and was associated with a higher number of hemodynamic interventions and a more positive fluid balance.

Haemodynamic effects of a 10-min treatment with a high inspired oxygen concentration in the emergency department: a prospective observational study

Previous studies show that prolonged exposure to a high inspired oxygen concentration (FiO₂) is associated with unfavourable haemodynamic effects. Until now, it is unknown if similar effects also occur after oxygen therapy of limited duration in the emergency department (ED).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the haemodynamic effects of a high FiO₂ administered for a limited duration of time in patients who receive preoxygenation for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in the ED.

DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

In a prospective cohort study, cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were measured using the Clearsight non-invasive CO monitoring system in patients who received preoxygenation for PSA in the ED. Measurements were performed at baseline, after 5 min of preoxygenation via a non-rebreathing mask at 15 /L min and after 5 min of flush rate oxygen administration.

OUTCOMES MEASURES

The primary outcome was defined as the change in CO (L/min) from baseline after subsequent preoxygenation with 15 L/min and flush rate.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included. Mean CO at baseline was 6.5 (6.0-6.9) L/min and decreased to 6.3 (5.8-6.8) L/min after 5 min of oxygen administration at a rate of 15 L/min, and to 6.2 (5.7-6.70) L/min after another 5 min at flush rate (p=0.037). Mean SV remained relatively constant during this period, whereas mean SVR increased markedly (from 781 (649-1067), to 1244 (936-1695) to 1337 (988-1738) dyn/s/cm^-5, p<0.001. Sixteen (27%) patients experienced a>10% decrease in CO.

CONCLUSION

Exposure of patients to a high FiO₂ for 5-10 min results in a significant drop in CO in one out of four patients. Therefore, even in the ED and in prehospital care, where oxygen is administered for a limited amount of time, FiO₂ should be titrated based on deficit whenever this is feasible and high flow oxygen should not be given as a routine treatment.

Contemporary Review of Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critical Care Setting

Hemodynamic assessment remains the most valuable adjunct to physical examination and laboratory assessment in the diagnosis and management of shock. Through the years, multiple modalities to measure and trend hemodynamic indices have evolved with varying degrees of invasiveness. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has long been considered the gold standard of hemodynamic assessment in critically ill patients and in recent years has been shown to improve clinical outcomes among patients in cardiogenic shock. The invasive nature of PAC is often cited as its major limitation and has encouraged development of less invasive technologies. In this review, the authors summarize the literature on the mechanism and validation of several minimally invasive and noninvasive modalities available in the contemporary intensive care unit. They also provide an update on the use of focused bedside echocardiography.

[Targeted hemodynamic monitoring in the operating theatre: what for and by what means?]

Goal directed hemodynamic monitoring and the balance in goal directed therapy between adequate fluid/volume therapy and the application of vasoactive or inotropic drugs are the basic elements of modern perioperative therapy.Surgical procedures should be accompanied by as few side effects and complications as possible. Nevertheless, the number of postoperative complications remains surprisingly high, despite of the modern surgical procedures. Anticipation of potential complications in the perioperative period and their rapid treatment build a core competence of anesthesiological action. Thus, it is clear that anesthesia plays a central role in this balancing act.This article aims to provide an overview of the application of the currently available perioperative goal directed hemodynamic monitoring. The current possibilities are discussed by using a case example and an outlook on the future of hemodynamic monitoring is given.

Noninvasive cardiac output measurement is inaccurate in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background

Noninvasive cardiac output (CO) measured using ClearSight™ eliminates the need for intra-arterial catheter insertion. The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of non-invasive CO measurement in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods

Twenty-eight patients undergoing elective transcatheter aortic valve implantation were prospectively enrolled in this study. The CO was simultaneously measured twice before and twice after valve deployment (total of four times) per patient, and the CO was compared between the ClearSight (CO_ClearSight) system and the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) thermodilution (CO_TD) method as a reference. The Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the percentage errors between the methods.

Results

A total of 112 paired data points were obtained. The percentage error between the CO_ClearSight and CO_TD was 43.1%. The paired datasets were divided into the following groups according to the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI): low (< 1,200 dyne s/cm⁵/m²) and normal (1,200–2,500 dyne s/cm⁵/m²). The percentage errors were 44.9% and 49.4%, respectively. The discrepancy of CO between CO_ClearSight and CO_TD was not significantly correlated with SVRI (r = −0.06, P < 0.001). The polar plot analysis showed the trending ability of the CO_ClearSight after artificial valve deployment was 51.1% which below the acceptable cut-off (92%).

Conclusions

The accuracy and the trending ability of the ClearSight CO measurements were not acceptable in patients with severe AS. Therefore, the ClearSight system is not interchangeable with the PAC thermodilution for determining CO in this population.

Simulating Radial Pressure Waveforms with a Mock Circulatory Flow Loop to Characterize Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems

PURPOSE

Mock circulatory loops (MCLs) can reproducibly generate physiologically relevant pressures and flows for cardiovascular device testing. These systems have been extensively used to characterize the performance of therapeutic cardiac devices, but historically MCLs have had limited use for assessing patient monitoring systems. Here, we adapted an MCL to include peripheral components and evaluated its utility for qualitative and quantitative benchtop testing of hemodynamic monitoring devices.

METHODS

An MCL was designed to simulate three physiological hemodynamic states: normovolemia, cardiogenic shock, and hyperdynamic circulation. The system was assessed for stability in pressure and flow values over time, repeatability, waveform morphology, and systemic-peripheral pressure relationships.

RESULTS

For each condition, cardiac output was controlled to the nearest 0.2 L/min, and flow rate and mean arterial pressure remained stable and repeatable over a 60-s period (n = 5, standard deviation of ± 0.1 L/min and ± 0.84 mmHg, respectively). Transfer function analyses showed that the systemic-peripheral relationships could be adequately manipulated. The results from this MCL were comparable to those from other published MCLs and computational simulations. However, resolving current limitations of the system would further improve its utility. Three pulse contour analysis algorithms were applied to the pressure and flow data from the MCL to demonstrate the potential role of MCLs in characterizing hemodynamic monitoring systems.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the development of robust analysis methods in conjunction with modified MCLs can expand device testing applications to hemodynamic monitoring systems. Properly validated MCLs can create a stable and reproducible environment for testing patient monitoring systems over their entire operating ranges prior to clinical use.

Accuracy of noninvasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring using ClearSight during one-lung ventilation

Noninvasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring may be clinically useful in patients who require continuous blood pressure monitoring in situations where arterial catheter placement is limited. Many previous studies on the accuracy of the noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitoring method reported various results. However, there is no research on the effectiveness of noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring during one-lung ventilation. The purpose of this study was to compare arterial blood pressure obtained through invasive method and noninvasive method by using ClearSight during one-lung ventilation.In this retrospective observational study, a total of 26 patients undergoing one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery at a single institution between March and July 2019 were recruited. All patients in this study were cannulated on their radial artery to measure continuously invasive blood pressures and applied ClearSight on the ipsilateral side of the cannulated arm. We compared and analyzed the agreement and trendability of blood pressure recorded with invasive and noninvasive methods during one-lung ventilation.Blood pressure and pulse rate showed a narrower limit of agreement with a percentage error value of around 30%. In addition, the tracking ability of each measurement could be determined by the concordance rate, all of which were below acceptable limits (92%).In noninvasive arterial blood pressure monitoring using ClearSight, mean blood pressure and pulse rate show acceptable agreement with the invasive method.