1
|
Slessarev M, Bain KL, Basmaji J, Blydt-Hansen TD, Cooper J, D'Aragon F, Del Sorbo L, Evans A, Gordon AC, Klein G, Meade MO, Murphy N, Thomas HL, Weiss MJ, Weijer C, Harvey D. Developing Guidance for Donor Intervention Randomized Controlled Trials: Initial Discussions From the Canada-United Kingdom 2022 Workshop. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00692. [PMID: 38499505 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donor interventions, including medications, protocols, and medical devices administered to donors, can enhance transplantable organ quality and quantity and maximize transplantation success. However, there is paucity of high-quality evidence about their effectiveness, in part because of ethical, practical, and regulatory challenges, and lack of guidance about conduct of donor intervention randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS With the vision to develop authoritative guidance for conduct of donor intervention RCTs, we convened a workshop of Canadian-United Kingdom experts in organ donation and transplantation ethics, research, and policy to identify stakeholders, explore unique challenges, and develop research agenda to inform future work in this promising field. RESULTS Donor intervention trials should consider perspectives of broad group of stakeholders including donors, transplant recipients, and their families; researchers in donation and transplantation; research ethics boards; and healthcare providers and administrators involved in donation and transplantation. Unique challenges include (1) research ethics (living versus deceased status of the donor at the time of intervention, intervention versus outcomes assessment in different individuals, harm-benefit analysis in donors versus recipients, consent, and impact on research bystanders); (2) outcome data standardization and linkage; and (3) regulatory and governance considerations. CONCLUSIONS Donor intervention RCTs hold potential to benefit organ transplantation outcomes but face unique research ethics, outcome data, and regulatory challenges. By developing research agenda to address these challenges, our workshop was an important first step toward developing Canada-United Kingdom guidance for donor intervention RCTs that are poised to improve the quality and availability of transplantable organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marat Slessarev
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- The Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Ontario Health (Trillium Gift of Life Network), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Katie L Bain
- The Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - John Basmaji
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Tom D Blydt-Hansen
- Department of Pediatrics (Nephrology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jessie Cooper
- Department of Health Services Research and Management, School of Health & Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frédérick D'Aragon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Lorenzo Del Sorbo
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amy Evans
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Clinical Trials Unit, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony C Gordon
- Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London United Kingdom
| | - Gail Klein
- Centre for Clinical Trial Support, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maureen O Meade
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas Murphy
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- The Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Department of Philosophy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Helen L Thomas
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Clinical Trials Unit, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- The Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Transplant Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Mère-Enfant Soleil du CHU de Québec, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Charles Weijer
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Philosophy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Dan Harvey
- NHS Blood and Transplant, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moorlock G, Asgari E, Callaghan C, Draper H, Dupont P, Gilbert P, Nasralla D, Veitch P, Watson C, O'Neill S. The British Transplantation Society guidelines on ethics, law and consent in relation to deceased donors after circulatory death. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2024; 38:100803. [PMID: 37919138 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2023.100803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
The British Transplantation Society (BTS) 'Guideline on transplantation from deceased donors after circulatory death' has recently been updated and this manuscript summarises the relevant recommendations from chapters specifically related to law, ethics, donor consent and informing the recipient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Patty Gilbert
- Northern Ireland Kidney Patients' Association, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lucas A, Strachan PH, D'Aragon F, Sarti AJ, Meade MO. Transplant Recipient Preferences Regarding Organ Donor Research: Their Role in Consent and use of Their Data. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2023; 18:296-303. [PMID: 37309124 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231181438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Research on deceased organ donors has been hindered by concerns related to seeking research consent from transplant recipients. We undertook this qualitative study to elucidate solid organ transplant recipients views on organ donor research, their role in the consent for such research, and their preferences related to providing their data. We conducted interviews with 18 participants and three themes emerged from the data. The first centered around participant research literacy. The second described practical preferences of participating in research, and the third related to the connection between donor and recipient. We concluded that previously held views about the requirement for transplant recipients to have a consenting role in donor research is not always suitable.
Collapse
|
4
|
Moorlock G, Draper H. Proposal to support making decisions about the organ donation process. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023; 49:434-438. [PMID: 35953297 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel approach to permit members of the public opportunity to record more nuanced wishes in relation to organ donation. Recent developments in organ donation and procurement have made the associated processes potentially more multistaged and complex than ever. At the same time, opt-out legislation has led to a more simplistic recording of wishes than ever. We argue that in order to be confident that a patient would really wish to go ahead with the various interventions and procedures that now accompany organ donation, more nuanced information than a simple 'yes' or 'no' may be required. This is of particular importance for donation after circulatory death, where some interventions to facilitate donation occur when the patient is still alive. We propose the implementation of an online form to allow people to record more nuanced wishes in relation to donation, including an indication of competing wishes and how these should be weighed into decision-making. We argue that this approach will promote autonomous decision-making for the public, potentially reduce difficulties that family members encounter at the time of organ donation, and should make medical staff more confident that they are truly acting according to the wishes and best interests of their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Moorlock
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Heather Draper
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Escoto M, Issa F, Cayouette F, Consolo H, Chaudhury P, Dhanani S, Jiang W, Oniscu GC, Murphy N, Rockell K, Weiss MJ, Dieudé M. Research and Innovation in Organ Donation: Recommendations From an International Consensus Forum. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1446. [PMID: 37138559 PMCID: PMC10150888 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
This report provides recommendations from the Research and Innovation domain as part of the International Donation and Transplantation Legislative and Policy Forum (hereafter the Forum) to provide expert guidance on the structure of an ideal organ and tissue donation and transplantation system. The recommendations focus on deceased donation research and are intended for clinicians, investigators, decision-makers, and patient, family, and donor (PFD) partners involved in the field. Methods We identified topics impacting donation research through consensus using nominal group technique. Members performed narrative reviews and synthesized current knowledge on each topic, which included academic articles, policy documents, and gray literature. Using the nominal group technique, committee members discussed significant findings, which provided evidence for our recommendations. The Forum's scientific committee then vetted recommendations. Results We developed 16 recommendations in 3 key areas to provide stakeholders guidance in developing a robust deceased donor research framework. These include PFD and public involvement in research; donor, surrogate, and recipient consent within a research ethics framework; and data management. We highlight the importance of PFD and public partner involvement in research, we define the minimum ethical requirements for the protection of donors and recipients of both target and nontarget organ recipients, and we recommend the creation of a centrally administered donor research oversight committee, a single specialist institutional review board, and a research oversight body to facilitate coordination and ethical oversight of organ donor intervention research. Conclusions Our recommendations provide a roadmap for developing and implementing an ethical deceased donation research framework that continually builds public trust. Although these recommendations can be applied to jurisdictions developing or reforming their organ and tissue donation and transplantation system, stakeholders are encouraged to collaborate and respond to their specific jurisdictional needs related to organ and tissue shortages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Escoto
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Fadi Issa
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Florence Cayouette
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Prosanto Chaudhury
- Transplant Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada
- McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Sonny Dhanani
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Canada
| | - Wenshi Jiang
- Shanxi Provincial Organ Procurement and Allocation Center, People’s Republic of China
| | - Gabriel C. Oniscu
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Murphy
- Departments of Medicine and Philosophy, Western University, Canada
| | - Karen Rockell
- Liver Transplant Recipient/Co-Director and PPIE Lead, United Kingdom Organ Donation and Transplantation Research Network, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew J. Weiss
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Transplant Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Mère-Enfant Soleil du CHU de Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Mélanie Dieudé
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Department of Microbiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Hema-Quebec, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lennon C, Harvey D, Goldstein PA. Ethical considerations for theatre teams in organ donation after circulatory determination of death. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:502-507. [PMID: 36801100 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Transplant surgery is an area that gives rise to a number of ethical considerations. As medicine continues to expand the boundaries of what is technically possible, we must consider the ethical implications of our interventions, not solely on patients and society, but also on those asked to provide that care. Here, we consider physician participation in procedures required to provide patient care in the context of the ethical convictions held by the physician, with an emphasis on organ donation after circulatory determination of death. Strategies that can be used to mitigate any potential negative impact on the psychological well-being of members of the patient care team are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dan Harvey
- National Health Service Blood & Transplant, UK; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter A Goldstein
- Department of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Best foot forward: now is the time for Canadian ethical guidance on prospective interventional trials of antemortem interventions in organ donation. Can J Anaesth 2022; 69:1196-1202. [PMID: 35831739 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02288-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
|
8
|
De Beule J, Vandendriessche K, Pengel LHM, Bellini MI, Dark JH, Hessheimer AJ, Kimenai HJAN, Knight SR, Neyrinck AP, Paredes D, Watson CJE, Rega F, Jochmans I. A systematic review and meta-analyses of regional perfusion in donation after circulatory death solid organ transplantation. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2046-2060. [PMID: 34570380 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
In donation after circulatory death (DCD), (thoraco)abdominal regional perfusion (RP) restores circulation to a region of the body following death declaration. We systematically reviewed outcomes of solid organ transplantation after RP by searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries. Eighty-eight articles reporting on outcomes of liver, kidney, pancreas, heart, and lung transplants or donor/organ utilization were identified. Meta-analyses were conducted when possible. Methodological quality was assessed using National Institutes of Health (NIH)-scoring tools. Case reports (13/88), case series (44/88), retrospective cohort studies (35/88), retrospective matched cohort studies (5/88), and case-control studies (2/88) were identified, with overall fair quality. As blood viscosity and rheology change below 20 °C, studies were grouped as hypothermic (HRP, ≤20 °C) or normothermic (NRP, >20 °C) regional perfusion. Data demonstrate that RP is a safe alternative to in situ cold preservation (ISP) in uncontrolled and controlled DCDs. The scarce HRP data are from before 2005. NRP appears to reduce post-transplant complications, especially biliary complications in controlled DCD livers, compared with ISP. Comparisons for kidney and pancreas with ISP are needed but there is no evidence that NRP is detrimental. Additional data on NRP in thoracic organs are needed. Whether RP increases donor or organ utilization needs further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie De Beule
- Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Liset H M Pengel
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maria Irene Bellini
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - John H Dark
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Amelia J Hessheimer
- Department of General & Digestive Surgery, Institut Clínic de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques (ICMDM), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hendrikus J A N Kimenai
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon R Knight
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Arne P Neyrinck
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Anesthesiology and Algology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Paredes
- Donation and Transplant Coordination Unit, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christopher J E Watson
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,The NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Filip Rega
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Cardiac Surgery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ina Jochmans
- Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martin DE, Cronin AJ, Dalle Ave A, van Haren FMP, Locke JE, Miñambres E, Oniscu GC, Parent B. Addressing ethical confusion in deceased donation and transplantation research: the need for dedicated guidance. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2459-2468. [PMID: 34516693 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Innovative research in deceased donation and transplantation often presents ethical challenges for researchers and those responsible for ethical governance of research. These challenges have been recognized as potential barriers to the conduct of research. We review the literature to identify and describe ethical considerations that may cause confusion or uncertainty in the context of research involving potential deceased donors or deceased donor transplantation. We normatively examine these considerations and discuss their implications for the ethical conduct of research. In addition to the complexities of research involving critically ill, dying or recently deceased individuals, uncertainty may arise regarding the ethical status of various individuals who may be involved in research aimed at improving availability and outcomes of organ transplantation. Consequently, routine ethical guidelines for clinical research may fail to provide clear guidance with regards to the design, conduct and governance of some deceased donation or transplantation studies. Ethical uncertainty may result in delays or barriers to research, or neglect of important ethical considerations. Specific ethical guidance is needed to support research in deceased donation and transplantation as the ethical considerations that arise in the design and conduct of such research may not be addressed in the existing guidelines for human research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonia J Cronin
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Anne Dalle Ave
- Ethics Unit, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Frank M P van Haren
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.,Intensive Care Unit, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jayme E Locke
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Eduardo Miñambres
- Transplant Coordination Unit and Service of Intensive Care, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.,School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Gabriel C Oniscu
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Brendan Parent
- Division of Medical Ethics, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jochmans I, Hessheimer AJ, Neyrinck AP, Paredes D, Bellini MI, Dark JH, Kimenai HJAN, Pengel LHM, Watson CJE. Consensus statement on normothermic regional perfusion in donation after circulatory death: report from the European Society for Organ Transplantation's Transplant Learning Journey. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2019-2030. [PMID: 34145644 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in donation after circulatory death (DCD) is a safe alternative to in situ cooling and rapid procurement. An increasing number of countries and centres are performing NRP, a technically and logistically challenging procedure. This consensus document provides evidence-based recommendations on the use of NRP in uncontrolled and controlled DCDs. It also offers minimal ethical, logistical and technical requirements that form the foundation of a safe and effective NRP programme. The present article is based on evidence and opinions formulated by a panel of European experts of Workstream 04 of the Transplantation Learning Journey project, which is part of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Jochmans
- Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Amelia J Hessheimer
- Department of General & Digestive Surgery, Institut Clínic de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques (ICMDM), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arne P Neyrinck
- Anesthesiology and Algology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Paredes
- Donation and Transplant Coordination Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Irene Bellini
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - John H Dark
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Hendrikus J A N Kimenai
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Liset H M Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher J E Watson
- University of Cambridge, Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aaron B, Ginsberg J, Lesandrini J. Moving Beyond Standard Informed Consent for Interventional Organ Transplant Research. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2021; 21:108-110. [PMID: 33825627 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1891328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
|