Gradient sperm selection for reproductive techniques in cattle: Is Isolate a suitable replacement for Percoll?

A simple and fast alternative method to remove glycerol from chicken semen after cryopreservation

A concentration of 11% of glycerol is the standard one for sperm cryopreservation in chickens, however, the presence of just 2% glycerol already causes severe fertility reduction, suggesting the necessity of removing glycerol before artificial insemination (AI). The major approach developed for this purpose is serial dilution followed by centrifugation (SDC), which demands special equipment (such as a refrigerate room) to maintain post-thaw semen at 4 °C, besides being time consuming. Therefore, we attempted to develop a simple method to remove glycerol from chicken frozen-thawed semen based on a colloidal gel, Percoll, which is ordinarily used to select motile and viable sperm in mammals as well as in fresh chicken semen. In this study, we used a Percoll based glycerol removal solution (GRS) containing sucrose to avoid frozen-thawed sperm suffering from osmotic stress. Subsequently, several conditions including GRS compositions (GRS A, B, C and D) and centrifugation temperatures (4 and 20 °C) were compared by their influence on sperm in vitro parameters. Afterwards, GRS A and D were selected for fertility evaluation, compared to conventional SDC method. Our results showed that the fertility with GRS A at both 4 and 20 °C were higher than GRS D (p < 0.05) and similar or even superior to the fertility obtained with SDC method. Altogether, our novel GRS protocol is a valuable method for chicken sperm cryobanking policy, supported by its notable results of fertility as well as saving 44% of time, with a simple equipment at flexible operation temperatures of 4 or 20 °C.

Sperm selection techniques in cattle: Microfilter device versus conventional methods

Microfluidics and microfilter devices have been developed to mimic the characteristics of the female reproductive tract, minimizing the risk of sperm damage. This study aimed to compare the use of a microfilter device versus conventional methods for sperm selection used in in vitro fertilization (IVF). For selecting spermatozoa, the pooled samples were processed in a microfilter device, swim-up and mini-Percoll gradient. Kinematic and morphometric parameters, vitality and DNA damage were analysed before and after sperm selection. After selection, 10,000 motile spermatozoa per oocyte were used in IVF drops. Embryos were assessed at three (cleavage rate) and seven (blastocyst rate) days post-IVF. Results of sperm kinematic parameters including average path velocity, velocity straight line, curvilinear velocity, linearity, lateral head displacement with the microfilter device were superior to density gradient (p < 0.05), but similar to swim-up method. Likewise, sperm DNA damage was significantly reduced using the microfilter device and swim-up method. Regarding the total sperm recovery rate post selection, results with the microfilter device (17.64%) and mini-Percoll gradient (18.27%) were higher than with swim-up method (6.52%). However, the cleavage and blastocyst rates were the lowest using the microfilter device. In conclusion, sperm selection using the microfilter device and swim-up method can improve kinematic parameters, although the mini Percoll gradient was the most efficient method for embryo production.

Adverse effects of in vitro manipulation of spermatozoa

Development of in vitro reproduction techniques has not only offered some infertile couples the possibility to have a child, it also revolutionized animal reproduction. Although in vitro reproduction techniques for humans or domestic and non-domestic animals have been designed to mimic in vivo conditions, modifications due to environmental effects or in vitro manipulation of gametes and embryos are unavoidable. For male gametes, in vitro manipulations include techniques to select spermatozoa, cryopreservation and other incubation procedures, during which spermatozoa may be exposed to oxidative stress and other insults that may damage their functions and DNA. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of key studies reporting sperm damage during in vitro manipulation, with particular focus on effects on DNA integrity, a fundamental factor for fertilization and transmission of paternal genetic information to offspring.

Bovine epididymal spermatozoa treatment for in vitro fertilization: Heparin accelerates fertilization and enables a reduction in coincubation time

This study aimed to establish a protocol for in vitro embryo production using epididymal sperm (EP). Samples were obtained from ejaculated sperm (EJ) and the epididymis of 7 Gir bulls. First, the effect of heparin (+) on the viability, longevity (Experiment 1) and fertilization rates (Experiment 2) of the EP was evaluated. In experiment 2, a pool of EP and EJ sperm (n = 7) was coincubated with cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) for 0, 3, 6, 12 and 18 h, and the fertilization rate (FR) was evaluated. A third experiment was performed to test sperm treatments for IVP using the Percoll (P) or PureSperm (PS) gradients or a spTALP wash for sperm selection. Cleavage, blastocyst rate (BR) and embryo sex were evaluated. In experiment 4, embryos were produced using 6, 12, and 18 h of sperm-oocyte coincubation. The cleavage, BR, and total number and percentage of apoptotic cells were determined. Heparin affected EP viability, longevity and FR. After 6 h, 82% of the oocytes were fertilized in the EP+ group, a higher value (P<0.05) than that in the EJ (19%) and EP- (42%) groups. At 12 and 18 h, FR remained higher in the EP+ group, and a gradual increase in polyspermy was observed. The use of a P or PS gradient yielded a similar BR on D7 (54% and 52%), which was higher than the rate obtained using the washing method (37%). The embryos produced by EP and selected in a P or PS gradient resulted in a sex deviation in favor of male embryos (P>0.05). No differences (P>0.05) were observed among the groups that were coincubated for 6, 12 and 18 h with respect to embryo production, kinetics of development, total cell number and percentage of apoptotic cells. In conclusion, IVF time can be reduced to 6 h without affecting embryo production and quality. In addition, EP sperm selection can be performed by either a PS or P gradient.