1
|
Bocchino AC, Pezzoli M, Martínez-Salamanca JI, Russo GI, Lo Giudice A, Cocci A. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction: Myths and realities. Investig Clin Urol 2023; 64:118-125. [PMID: 36882170 PMCID: PMC9995960 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20220327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
To review the evidence of clinical efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (Li-ESWT) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). A search on PubMed using Medical Subject Headings terms [((low intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy) OR (Li-ESWT)) AND (erectile dysfunction)] was conducted in August 2022, to obtain studies on the use of Li-ESWT for the treatment of ED. Its success rate in terms of International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score and Erection Hardness Score (EHS) improvement was recorded and analysed. A total of 139 articles were reviewed. Overall, 52 studies were included in the final review. 17 studies were on vasculogenic ED, 5 on post pelvic surgery ED, 4 specifically on ED in diabetic patients, 24 on non-specified origin ED and 2 on mixed pathophysiological origin ED. The mean age of patients was 55.87±7.91 (standard deviation) years and the duration of ED was 4.36±2.08 years. The mean IIEF-5 score went from 12.04±2.67 at baseline to 16.12±5.72, 16.30±3.26 and 16.85±1.63 respectively at 3, 6 and 12 months. The mean EHS went from 2.00±0.46 at baseline to 2.58±0.60, 2.75±0.46 and 2.87±0.16 respectively at 3, 6 and 12 months. Li-ESWT may be a safe and efficacy option for the treatment and cure of ED. Further studies are needed to assess which patients are more suitable for this procedure and which Li-ESWT protocol can lead to the best outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Pezzoli
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Cocci
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alonso-Isa M, García-Gómez B, González-Ginel I, García-Rayo-Encina C, Del Prado Caro-González M, Medina-Polo J, García-Rojo E, Romero-Otero J. Conservative Non-surgical Options for Erectile Dysfunction. Curr Urol Rep 2023; 24:75-104. [PMID: 36445614 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01137-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This study aimed to review recent evidence on conservative non-surgical options for erectile dysfunction (ED) in men. A narrative review of the literature was performed. A comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases was done. Papers in English language, published from May 2017 until May 2022, were included. Papers reporting basic research or animal research were excluded, as long as reviews or meta-analyses. Congress reports, clinical cases, or clinical trials protocols with no results were also excluded. RECENT FINDINGS We found a multitude of different treatment modalities for ED. We must take into account the type of patient, their comorbidities, the origin of their ED, and its severity in order to reproduce effective results using these therapies. Some of the treatments show good results with a good level of evidence (new IPDE5 formulations, intracavernous injections, shock wave therapy, hormonal theraphy, psycho-sexual theraphy). However, others (some new molecules, stem cell theraphy, platelet-rich plasma injections, oxygenation-based therapy, nutraceuticals), although some of them present promising results, require randomized studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up time to be able to establish firm recommendations. Regarding the conservative treatment of erectile dysfunction, in recent years, some therapies have been consolidated as effective and safe for certain types of patients. On the other hand, other treatment modalities, although promising, still lack the evidence and the necessary follow-up to be recommended in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Alonso-Isa
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital, 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Urology, HM Hospitales (Montepríncipe, Puerta del Sur, Sanchinarro), Madrid, Spain
- ROC Clinic, Madrid, Spain
| | - Borja García-Gómez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital, 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Urology, HM Hospitales (Montepríncipe, Puerta del Sur, Sanchinarro), Madrid, Spain
- ROC Clinic, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio González-Ginel
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital, 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Clara García-Rayo-Encina
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital, 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - María Del Prado Caro-González
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital, 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - José Medina-Polo
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital, 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Urology, HM Hospitales (Montepríncipe, Puerta del Sur, Sanchinarro), Madrid, Spain
- ROC Clinic, Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther García-Rojo
- Department of Urology, HM Hospitales (Montepríncipe, Puerta del Sur, Sanchinarro), Madrid, Spain
- ROC Clinic, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Romero-Otero
- Department of Urology, HM Hospitales (Montepríncipe, Puerta del Sur, Sanchinarro), Madrid, Spain.
- ROC Clinic, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
New Frontiers of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Medicine in Urology from Bench to Clinical Studies. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10030675. [PMID: 35327477 PMCID: PMC8945448 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10030675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
A shock wave (SW), which carries energy and propagates through a medium, is a type of continuous transmitted sonic wave that can achieve rapid energy transformations. SWs have been applied for many fields of medical science in various treatment settings. In urology, high-energy extracorporeal SWs have been used to disintegrate urolithiasis for 30 years. However, at lower energy levels, SWs enhance the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), chemoattractant factors, and the recruitment of progenitor cells, and inhibit inflammatory molecules. Low energy extracorporeal shock wave (LESW) therapy has been used in urology for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), overactive bladder, stress urinary incontinence, and erectile dysfunction through the mechanisms of anti-inflammation, neovascularization, and tissue regeneration. Additionally, LESW have been proven to temporarily increase tissue permeability and facilitate intravesical botulinum toxin delivery for treating overactive bladders in animal studies and in a human clinical trial. LESW assisted drug delivery was also suggested to have a synergistic effect in combination with cisplatin to improve the anti-cancer effect for treating urothelial cancer in an in vitro and in vivo study. LESW assisted drug delivery in uro-oncology is an interesting suggestion, but no comprehensive clinical trials have been conducted as of yet. Taken together, LESW is a promising method for the treatment of various diseases in urology. However, further investigation with a large scale of clinical studies is necessary to confirm the real role of LESW in clinical use. This article provides information on the basics of SW physics, mechanisms of action on biological systems, and new frontiers of SW medicine in urology.
Collapse
|
4
|
Tao R, Chen J, Wang D, Li Y, Xiang J, Xiong L, Ji J, Wu J, Zhou S, Jia C, Lv J, Yang J, Tang Q. The Efficacy of Li-ESWT Combined With VED in Diabetic ED Patients Unresponsive to PDE5is: A Single-Center, Randomized Clinical Trial. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:937958. [PMID: 35813628 PMCID: PMC9259797 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.937958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Phosphodiesterase type 5-inhibitors (PDE5is) are the first-line treatment for patients with diabetes mellitus-induced erectile dysfunction (DMED), however, some patients are non-responser to PDE5is. We performed a perspective, randomized, comparative study to explore the efficacy of low intensity extracorporeal shock wave treatment (Li-ESWT) combined with vacuum erectile device (VED) in the treatment of DMED patients who were unresponsive to PDE5is. METHODS One hundred and five eligible patients were randomly divided into three groups: group A (VED), group B (Li-ESWT) and group C (VED plus Li-ESWT). Follow-up was conducted at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the end of treatment. The erectile function was estimated by the international index of erectile function-erectile function domain (IIEF-EF), erection hardness score (EHS), sexual encounter profile questions 2 and 3 (SEP2 and SEP3) and global assessment question 1 and 2 (GAQ1 and GAQ2) before and after treatment. The changes of five points in IIEF-EF were calculated as the minimal clinical important difference (MCID), which was considered as the main index of efficacy. RESULTS The MCID was achieved in 14.7%, 14.7% and 17.6% patients in group A at the follow up on 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks, respectively (36.4%, 39.4% and 36.4% in group B; 36.4%, 51.5%, and 66.7% in group C). There were significant differences in the percentage of MCID cases between group A and group C at the follow up on 12 weeks (P<0.001), as well as that between group B and group C (P=0.014). Additionally, comparison in MCID within group C showed that there were significant differences between 4 weeks and 12 weeks follow-up (P=0.014). CONCLUSION Our findings indicated the combined therapy Li-ESWT and VED was more beneficial to shift turn PDE5is non-responders to responders for moderate patients with DMED than VED or Li-ESWT monotherapy. Moreover, this study provided evidence that patients with DMED who failed after taking oral PDE5is could attempt to opt for an alternative physicotherapy (Li-ESWT or VED) prior to more invasive alternatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongzhen Tao
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianhuai Chen
- Department of Andrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Dujian Wang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yunpeng Li
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Xiang
- Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Lei Xiong
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Junbiao Ji
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jie Wu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shuang Zhou
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Chunping Jia
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianlin Lv
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Urology, Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Urology, People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Kizilsu Kirgiz Autonomous Prefecture, Xinjiang, China
- *Correspondence: Qinglai Tang, ; Jie Yang,
| | - Qinglai Tang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- *Correspondence: Qinglai Tang, ; Jie Yang,
| |
Collapse
|