Interchromosomal effect: Report of a father and son, bearing different translocations of the same chromosome, and a review of the current literature

Swimming trapper decreases the proportion of chromosomally unbalanced spermatozoa in human Robertsonian translocation carriers

BACKGROUND

Carriers of reciprocal translocations often have more unbalanced spermatozoa and higher DNA fragmentation rates, elevating reproductive risk. The simple swim-up method (SSUM) can decrease the amount of spermatozoa with abnormal chromatin structure and fragmented DNA, however, it has limited efficacy in eliminating chromosomally unbalanced sperm.

METHODS

The spermatozoa of eight Robertsonian translocation (Rob) carriers were split into three groups: original raw semen group (control group); SSUM and swimming trapper method group (STM) processed semen samples. After different semen preparation procedures, semen qualities, sperm chromosomal aneuploidy, and sperm fragmented DNA were evaluated.

RESULTS

Although spermatozoa with higher motility was obtained by both SSUM and STM, the population of faster forward moving sperm was greater with STM as compared to SSUM. While the rates of DNA fragmentation were statistically much lower in both groups than ejaculated semen sample, our data showed better effect on the decrease of DNA fragmentation index (DFI) after selection by STM for patients who have high DFI (>20%) in neat semen. For all patients, significant decrease in the frequency of chromosomally unbalanced spermatozoa was observed after selection using STM. Although similar trends can be seen in the SSUM group, a significant difference was identified in one patient only.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of swimming trapper (STM) is superior for enriching high-motile and genetically competent sperm in comparison with SSUM.

Does reciprocal translocation affect the meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes?

This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the effect of chromosomal reciprocal translocation on meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. A total of 744 reciprocal translocation carriers and 875 non-carriers were included in this study. A total of 6,832 blastocysts were biopsied and tested by next-generation sequencing. Blastocysts from the carrier group were classified into five subgroups according to the theoretical segregation pattern of quadrivalent structure. For carrier patients, normal meiotic segregation products of the non-translocation chromosome were classified after excluding the segregation modes of the quadrivalent structure. The proportion of normal non-translocation chromosome meiotic segregation products was similar between the carrier and noncarrier groups (p = 0.69). The generalized Estimation Equation revealed that there was no correlation between reciprocal translocation and meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. Moreover, subgroup analyses showed that the segregation modes of quadrivalent structure (p = 0.00) and carrier's gender (p = 0.00) may affect the meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. In conclusion, reciprocal translocation does not directly reduce the proportion of normal segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. The difference among subgroups of different quadrivalent segregation patterns implied that interchromosomal effect may exist but the high incidence of chromosomal abnormalities for reciprocal translocation carriers should not be attributed to interchromosomal effect.

PGT for structural chromosomal rearrangements in 300 couples reveals specific risk factors but an interchromosomal effect is unlikely

RESEARCH QUESTION

What factors affect the proportion of chromosomally balanced embryos in structural rearrangement carriers? Is there any evidence for an interchromosomal effect (ICE)?

DESIGN

Preimplantation genetic testing outcomes of 300 couples (198 reciprocal, 60 Robertsonian, 31 inversion and 11 complex structural rearrangement carriers) were assessed retrospectively. Blastocysts were analysed either by array-comparative genomic hybridization or next-generation sequencing techniques. ICE was investigated using a matched control group and sophisticated statistical measurement of effect size (φ).

RESULTS

300 couples underwent 443 cycles; 1835 embryos were analysed and 23.8% were diagnosed as both normal/balanced and euploid. The overall cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were 69.5% and 55.8%, respectively. Complex translocations and female age (≥35) were found to be risk factors associated with lower chance of having a transferable embryo (P < 0.001). Based on analysis of 5237 embryos, the cumulative de-novo aneuploidy rate was lower in carriers compared to controls (45.6% versus 53.4%, P < 0.001) but this was a 'negligible' association (φ < 0.1). A further assessment of 117,033 chromosomal pairs revealed a higher individual chromosome error rate in embryos of carriers compared to controls (5.3% versus 4.9%), which was also a 'negligible' association (φ < 0.1), despite a P-value of 0.007.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that rearrangement type, female age and sex of the carrier have significant impacts on the proportion of transferable embryos. Careful examination of structural rearrangement carriers and controls indicated little or no evidence for an ICE. This study helps to provide a statistical model for investigating ICE and an improved personalized reproductive genetics assessment for structural rearrangement carriers.

Verification of a cryptic t(Y;15) translocation in a male with an apparent 45,X karyotype

Background

A rare disease is that an individual with a non-chimeric karyotype of 45,X develops into a male. We explored the genetic aetiology of an infertile male with an apparent 45,X karyotype, which was subsequently verified as cryptic translocation between chromosomes Y and 15.

Methods

DNA was extracted from the patient's peripheral blood. A range of genetic testing was performed, including conventional chromosomal karyotyping, short tandem repeat (STR) analysis for azoospermia factor (AZF) region, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with specific probes groups of DXZ1/DYZ3, DYZ3/D15Z1/PML and SRY/D15Z1/PML, and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for genomic copy number variations (CNVs).

Results

The patient was found to have an apparent 45,X karyotype. STR analysis showed that he possessed a short arm of the Y chromosome, including the SRY gene; however, he was missing the long arm of the Y chromosome, including AZFa + b + c and Yqter. A FISH assay of DXZ1 and DYZ3 probes showed a green signal of the X centromere and a red of the Y centromeric signal on a D-group-sized chromosome. By FISH assaying with D15Z1 and DYZ3 probes, chromosomes 15 and Y centromeric signals appeared closely on a single chromosome, as the PML control probe ascertained. A further FISH assay with D15Z1 and SRY probes revealed a signal of the SRY gene at the end of one arm of chromosome 15. The result of the CMA indicated a deletion with an approximate size of 45.31 Mb spanning from Yq11 to Yter.

Conclusion

Our study enriched the karyotype-phenotype correlation of Y and 15 chromosomes translocation. It strengthened the critical roles of molecular genetic techniques in identifying the chromosomal breakpoints and regions involved. Genetic aetiology can guide early intervention in childhood and assisted reproduction in adulthood.