Comparison of outcomes of Holmium enucleation of the prostate for small- and moderate-sized prostates

Association of detrusor wall thickness (DWT) with lower urinary tract symptom severity in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a cross-sectional study

Background and objective

Benign prostatic hyperplasia manifests as lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and prostate gland enlargement, leading to bladder outlet obstruction with consequent structural and functional impacts on the bladder. Urodynamic studies are resource-intensive and invasive. Detrusor wall thickness (DWT) assessment offers a cost-effective, reproducible alternative for evaluating LUTS severity in males with bladder outlet obstruction, utilizing ultrasonographic examination.

Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study, conducted at a tertiary care center from May 2023 to January 2024, included 171 patients with LUTS who underwent transabdominal ultrasound for DWT measurements. LUTS severity, assessed using International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) classified participants into mild and moderate-to-severe symptom groups. Pearson's correlation coefficient assessed the association between DWT and IPSS, and an independent sample t-test compared means, using a significance level of 5% (P-value ≤0.05).

Results

This study involved participants aged 65.01±11.55 years with an IPSS score ranging from 1 to 35, with a mean for mild and moderate-to-severe symptom groups were 4±2.12 and 15.93±6.74, respectively. DWT mean of 1.64±0.38 mm for mild, and 2.4±0.43 mm for moderate to severe symptoms. Pearson's correlation (r=0.697, n=171, P<0.001) indicated a strong DWT-LUTS correlation and a significant DWT mean difference between mild and moderate-to-severe symptom groups was found via an independent t-test (P<0.001, 95% CI: -0.8970 to -0.6414).

Conclusion

The study establishes the value of transabdominal ultrasound-detected DWT as a cost-effective, noninvasive, and reproducible tool for assessing LUTS severity in males with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Evaluation of the efficiency of transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy according to prostate volume for patients with benign prostate hyperplasia

Background

This study evaluated the efficiency and safety of transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy (TUEB) using a spatula loop according to prostate volume.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 398 patients who underwent TUEB for benign prostatic hyperplasia at a single tertiary hospital between August 2018 and December 2022. The patients were divided into three groups according to estimated prostate volume (ePV): ≤40 mL (n = 67), 40-80 mL (n = 200), and ≥80 mL (n = 131). To compare the efficiency of TUEB, perioperative parameters including TUEB and enucleation efficiencies, were calculated as enucleated tissue weight per operation time and enucleated tissue weight per enucleation time, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative functional outcomes such as the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality-of-life (QoL) score, maximum flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual urine volume (PVR), were also compared.

Results

The IPSS total score, voiding sub-score, Qmax, and PVR improved after TUEB in all groups (all p < 0.05). The TUEB and enucleation efficiencies increased with increasing ePVs (all P < 0.001). When comparing the three prostate volume groups, there were no significant differences in functional outcomes within 12 months after TUEB (all-Bonferroni adjusted P > 0.017). A total of 57 patients experienced adverse events after TUEB, with no significant differences between the three groups (p = 0.507).

Conclusion

As prostate volume increases, the perioperative efficiency of TUEB is enhanced. Meanwhile, small prostates did not show significant differences in the improvement of functional outcomes and complications in comparison with larger prostates.

Adoption and Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utilization of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) using a large real-world cohort. We compare the safety, readmission, and retreatment rates of HoLEP to other widely used endoscopic surgical interventions for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) including transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), photoselective vaporization of the prostate, and prostatic urethral lift.

METHODS

Men who underwent endoscopic treatments for BPH from 2000 to 2019 were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database (n = 218,793). We compared the relative proportion of each procedure performed and annual physician volume data to identify trends in adoption and utilization. Readmission and retreatment rates were determined at both 30- and 90-days postoperation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between procedure type and outcomes.

RESULTS

HoLEP accounted for 3.2% (n = 6967) of all the BPH procedures performed between 2000 and 2019 and increased from 1.1% of the procedures in 2008 to 4% in 2019. Patients undergoing HoLEP had lower odds of 90-days readmission compared to TURP (Odds ratio (OR) 0.87, p = 0.025). HoLEP had similar odds of retreatment compared to TURP at both 1-year (OR 0.96, p = 0.7) and 2-years (OR 0.98, p = 0.9), while patients undergoing photoselective vaporization of the prostate and prostatic urethral lift were more likely to retreat within 2-years (OR 1.20, P < 0.001; OR 1.87, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

HoLEP is a safe therapy for BPH with lower readmission and comparable retreatment rates to the gold standard TURP. Despite this, the utilization of HoLEP has lagged behind other endoscopic procedures and remains low.

Incidence and risk factors for postoperative urinary incontinence after various prostate enucleation procedures: systemic review and meta-analysis of PubMed literature from 2000 to 2021

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk of urinary incontinence (UI) after various prostate enucleation procedures (PEP).

METHODS

PubMed was searched from January 2000 to July 2021 for studies investigating UI after PEP. The articles were divided into 5 subgroups: holmium, thulium, greenlight laser, electrocautery, and simple prostatectomy. Meta-analysis was performed to examine rate of stress (SUI), urge (UUI) or unspecified UI at short (< 3 months), intermediate (3-6 months), and long-term (> 6 months). The impact of age, prostate size, surgery time, laser time, postoperative nadir PSA level and technical modifications on UI was analyzed.

RESULTS

Most (69.4%) of 49 articles included employed holmium laser. There was no significant difference in incidence of short-, intermediate-, and long-term UI, SUI and UUI between five sub-groups and within different technical modifications. Although not statistically significant, the incidence of UI was higher (15%) at short-term with green-light and simple prostatectomy (95% CI 9-23 and 1-84), and higher (4%) at intermediate-term with holmium laser (95% CI 2-8). SUI was more prevalent at short-term with holmium laser (4%; 95% CI 2-5%), and at intermediate term with simple prostatectomy (3%; 95% CI 1-14). UUI was higher in the thulium group (10%, 95% CI 7-16). Increased age, surgery time, laser time and prostate size up to 80 cc were associated with higher UI. There was no correlation between postoperative PSA and UI.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in incidence of UI, SUI and UUI after various PEP. Patients age, prostate size, surgery and laser time are linearly associated with UI.

Holmium laser enucleation versus bipolar transurethral enucleation for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, which one is better?

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the overall efficacy and safety between holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHOD

We systematically searched electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) to identify eligible comparative studies as of July 2021. The parameters including perioperative results, complications, and functional outcomes were evaluated. RevMan version 5.4 was used for the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies involving 1725 patients were included. HoLEP had lower operative time (p = .03), shorter catheterization time (p = .007), lower bladder irrigation time (p = .01), and higher enucleation weight (p = .01) compared with B-TUEP. However, there were no significant differences between the techniques regarding the length of stay (LOS), hemoglobin drop, transfusion rates, and complications. Furthermore, no significant differences were also observed in postoperative functional outcomes at 1, 3, 6, 12, or 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

HoLEP has more advantages in perioperative parameters compared with B-TUEP, but no significant differences are found regarding functional outcomes and complications. Large-scale studies with long-term follow-up are required to compare the outcomes of these two techniques.