1
|
Dieamant F, Petersen CG, Vagnini LD, Renzi A, Petersen B, Massaro F, Zamara C, Nicoletti A, Ricci J, Oliani AH, Oliveira JBA, Franco JG. Impact of Intracytoplasmic Morphologically Selected Sperm Injection (IMSI) on Birth Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JBRA Assist Reprod 2021; 25:466-472. [PMID: 34224237 PMCID: PMC8312289 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is generally accepted that the incidence of birth defects in spontaneously conceived children ranges between 2.0-4.0%. However, several studies have shown that babies born after assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures tend to present more congenital malformations than naturally conceived children, with 6.5% of the children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) presenting birth defects. The use of high magnification sperm selection before ICSI was introduced in the early 2000s to allow the identification of spermatozoa with low risk of sperm DNA damage. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) is expected to change the incidence of congenital malformations, although data on the incidence of birth defects in children conceived after IMSI are still scarce. METHODS A systematic review based on searches performed in electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) including articles published by February 2021 was conducted to identify trials comparing the neonatal outcomes of ICSI and IMSI. The outcome measured was the rate of birth defects in children born after ICSI or IMSI. Three trials were included as targets for data extraction and meta-analysis. RESULTS Our meta-analysis included 3907 children conceived after IMSI (1280) or ICSI (2627). The incidence of birth defects was statistically different, with 2.5% (32/1280) in IMSI and 4.5% (119/2627) in ICSI (RR=0.59; 95% CI=0.40-0.87; p=0.007). The results demonstrated that IMSI decreased the incidence of structural defects compared to ICSI - 2.2% (18/830) vs. 3.8% (78/2049) - in a statistically significant manner (RR=0.58; 95%CI=0.35-0.96; p=0.04). No significant difference was observed in chromosomal abnormalities (Trisomy 13; 18; 21 and Triple X) between children conceived after IMSI (8/830) or ICSI (19/2049) (RR=1.07; 95%CI=0.47-2.43; p=0.87). CONCLUSIONS IMSI seems to be an effective tool at reducing the incidence of structural defects compared to ICSI. However, IMSI does not change the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Dieamant
- Center for Human Reproduction Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.,Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Claudia G Petersen
- Center for Human Reproduction Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.,Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Laura D Vagnini
- Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Adriana Renzi
- Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Bruna Petersen
- Center for Human Reproduction Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.,Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Fabiana Massaro
- Center for Human Reproduction Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Camila Zamara
- Center for Human Reproduction Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Andreia Nicoletti
- Center for Human Reproduction Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Juliana Ricci
- Center for Human Reproduction Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Antonio H Oliani
- Faculdade de Medicina de Rio Preto (FAMERP), São José do Rio Preto, Brazil
| | - João Batista A Oliveira
- Center for Human Reproduction Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.,Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - José G Franco
- Center for Human Reproduction Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.,Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen L, Fang J, Jiang W, Wang J, Li D. Effects of the sperm DNA fragmentation index on the clinical and neonatal outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. J Ovarian Res 2020; 13:52. [PMID: 32359369 PMCID: PMC7196230 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-020-00658-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Most studies have mainly focused on the effects of the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) on fertilization, embryonic developmental potential and aneuploidy, pregnancy and abortion rates after in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and have remained controversial. However, few studies have reported the effects of sperm DFI on neonatal outcomes, including stillbirths, neonatal deaths, sex, gestational age, prematurity, birthweight, low birth weight (LBW) and birth defects in newborns. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of sperm DFI on the clinical and neonatal outcomes of ICSI cycles. Methods This retrospective study analysed a total of 2067 oocyte retrieval, 1139 transfer and 713 delivery cycles from conventional ICSI cycles, including 301, 469, and 214 live-born infants in groups segregated according to sperm DFI as the < 15%, 15–30% and > 30% groups, respectively. The clinical and neonatal outcomes were compared among the three groups. Results Sperm DFI did not significantly affect the rates of fertilization, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage or ongoing pregnancy. Sperm DFI did not increase the risk of stillbirths or neonatal deaths. The rates of stillbirths and neonatal deaths were not significantly different among the three groups. The sex, gestational age, prematurity, birthweight and LBW of newborns in the three groups were not significantly affected by sperm DFI. Moreover, sperm DFI did not increase the number of birth defects in children. Conclusions Sperm DFI did not affect the clinical or neonatal outcomes of ICSI cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linjun Chen
- Reproductive Medical Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan, Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China.
| | - Junshun Fang
- Reproductive Medical Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan, Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Weihua Jiang
- Reproductive Medical Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan, Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Wang
- Reproductive Medical Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan, Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Dong Li
- Reproductive Medical Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan, Road 321#, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hu S, Xu B, Huang B, Jin L. The impact of male infertility or intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique on perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 35:685-691. [PMID: 32295443 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1730802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of male infertility or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) technique on perinatal outcomes.Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study included patients with singleton live births after fresh-cycle embryo transfer that occurred between 1st January 2016 and 31st May 2018. The patients were divided into four groups: (1) IVF treatment without male infertility; (2) ICSI treatment without male infertility; (3) ICSI treatment with male infertility; and (4) IVF treatment with male infertility.Result: In total, 2118 patients were analyzed. When comparing perinatal outcomes between the four groups, there were significant differences with regard to gender proportions of offspring and GDM. No statistically significant differences were reported in the incidence of preterm birth, gestational hypertension, placenta previa, fetal malformation, macrosomia, or low birthweight. A separate multiple logistic regression model was performed for each abnormal perinatal outcome to eliminate confounding factors, with the exception of GDM, the above abnormal perinatal outcomes still did not differ significantly when comparing the four groups. However, the incidence of GDM was higher in the third group than it was in the first group. The proportion of male births was significantly decreased in the third and fourth groups.Conclusion: The results showed that ICSI may be associated with the risk of GDM in abnormal perinatal outcomes, but the risk is not due to male infertility. However, male infertility may reduce the proportion of male births.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiqiao Hu
- Reroductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Bei Xu
- Reroductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Bo Huang
- Reroductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lei Jin
- Reroductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gaspard O, Vanderzwalmen P, Wirleitner B, Ravet S, Wenders F, Eichel V, Mocková A, Spitzer D, Jouan C, Gridelet V, Martens H, Henry L, Zech H, d'Hauterive SP, Nisolle M. Impact of high magnification sperm selection on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35:1113-1121. [PMID: 29607458 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1167-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the deselection of spermatozoa presenting vacuole-like structures using IMSI (intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection) with ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) by means of neonatal outcomes. METHODS In a retrospective two-center analysis, a total of 848 successful IMSI or ICSI cycles ending with a live birth, induced abortion, or intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) were included. RESULTS The IMSI and ICSI groups included 332 and 655 babies or fetuses, respectively. The parents were older in the IMSI group than in the ICSI group (mothers were 35.1 vs 32.9 years, and fathers were 39.1 vs 36.2 years). The multiple pregnancy rate was higher in the IMSI group. The mean pregnancy duration and mean birth weight were almost identical in both groups. There was no significant difference in major congenital malformations between the two groups. However, this rate was decreased in the IMSI group compared to that in the ICSI group (1.8 vs 3.2%), the difference being mainly found in singletons (1.4 vs 3.3%). Boys were more often affected than girls in both groups. The percentages of chromosomal abnormalities did not differ between the IMSI and ICSI groups (0.6 and 0.8%). The reported congenital malformations mainly affected the heart, urogenital, and musculoskeletal systems. CONCLUSIONS In the present study, the malformation rates observed in the IMSI and ICSI groups were not significantly different, even if slightly lower after IMSI. However, the observed difference followed the same trends observed in previous reports, indicating the possible impact of IMSI on decreasing congenital malformation occurrences. This highlights the necessity to prospectively evaluate the impact of IMSI on neonatal outcome after IVF treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Gaspard
- Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
| | | | | | - Stéphanie Ravet
- Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Wenders
- Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Alice Mocková
- Department of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen and University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Caroline Jouan
- Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Virginie Gridelet
- Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.,GIGA I3, Center of Immunoendocrinology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Henri Martens
- GIGA I3, Center of Immunoendocrinology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Laurie Henry
- Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Herbert Zech
- IVF-Centers Prof. Zech, Bregenz, Austria.,IVF-Centers Prof. Zech, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sophie Perrier d'Hauterive
- Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Michelle Nisolle
- Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée - ULiège, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jose G Franco
- Center for Human Reproduction Prof. Franco Jr, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.,Paulista Center for Diagnosis Research and Training, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|