Prognostic factors in metastatic germ-cell cancer

Bone Metastases in Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: A 20-Year Retrospective Analysis

Background: Non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) represent a rare yet the most prevalent malignancy among young men. Bone metastases (BMs) are exceedingly uncommon in this neoplasm, and available data regarding the initial disease presentation, survival outcomes, and prognostic significance of BMs are limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 40 NSGCT patients with BMs treated between 2001 and 2021 in our tertiary care center. The cohort was stratified into synchronous (n = 29) and metachronous (n = 11) groups based on the presence of BM at diagnosis or only at relapse, respectively. We assessed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease presentation, and treatments. Results: After a median follow-up of 93 months, the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 37.6% and 53.9% in the synchronous group and 18.2% and 36.4% in the metachronous group, respectively. At the initial diagnosis, most patients were classified into the IGCCCG poor prognostic group (n = 34, 85%). BMs were mostly asymptomatic (n = 23, 57.5%), involved the spine (n = 37, 92.5%), and could become visible only after disease response (n = 4, 10%). A pathological examination of resected bone lesions after first-line treatment revealed necrosis (n = 5, 71.4%), teratoma, or seminoma (both n = 1, 14.3%). At first relapse, eight patients in the synchronous group did not experience bone recurrence, while eight patients experienced recurrence at the initial affected bone site. Conclusions: In NSGCT patients, BMs often present asymptomatically and may initially be unnoticed. However, these patients may have a poorer prognosis compared to those in the IGCCCG poor prognostic group. Further studies including control groups are needed to assess the independent prognostic significance of BMs.

Outcomes of relapsed clinical stage I versus de novo metastatic testicular cancer patients: an analysis of the IGCCCG Update database

BACKGROUND

Active surveillance after orchiectomy is the preferred management in clinical stage I (CSI) germ-cell tumours (GCT) associated with a 15 to 30% relapse rate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the IGCCCG Update database, we compared the outcomes of gonadal disseminated GCT relapsing from initial CSI to outcomes of patients with de novo metastatic GCT.

RESULTS

A total of 1014 seminoma (Sem) [298 (29.4%) relapsed from CSI, 716 (70.6%) de novo] and 3103 non-seminoma (NSem) [626 (20.2%) relapsed from CSI, 2477 (79.8%) de novo] were identified. Among Sem, no statistically significant differences in PFS and OS were found between patients relapsing from CSI and de novo metastatic disease [5-year progression-free survival (5y-PFS) 87.6% versus 88.5%; 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) 93.2% versus 96.1%). Among NSem, PFS and OS were higher overall in relapsing CSI patients (5y-PFS 84.6% versus 80.0%; 5y-OS 93.3% versus 88.7%), but there were no differences within the same IGCCCG prognostic groups (HR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.70-1.12). Relapses in the intermediate or poor prognostic groups occurred in 11/298 (4%) Sem and 112/626 (18%) NSem.

CONCLUSION

Relapsing CSI GCT patients expect similar survival compared to de novo metastatic patients of the same ICCCCG prognostic group. Intermediate and poor prognosis relapses from initial CSI expose patients to unnecessary toxicity from more intensive treatments.

Predicting Outcomes in Men With Metastatic Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors (NSGCT): Results From the IGCCCG Update Consortium

The classification of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) plays a pivotal role in the management of metastatic germ cell tumors but relies on data of patients treated between 1975 and 1990.

Glycan Analysis as Biomarkers for Testicular Cancer

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force does not recommend routine screening for testicular cancer (TC) in asymptomatic men, essentially because serological testicular cancer (TC) biomarkers are not reliable. The main reason is that two of the most important TC biomarkers, α-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), are not produced solely due to TC. Moreover, up to 40% of patients with TC do not have elevated serological biomarkers, which is why serial imaging with CT is the chief means of monitoring progress. On the other hand, exposure to radiation can lead to an increased risk of secondary malignancies. This review provides the first comprehensive account of the applicability of protein glycoprofiling as a promising biomarker for TC with applications in disease diagnostics, monitoring and recurrence evaluation. The review first deals with the description and classification of TC. Secondly, the limitations of current TC biomarkers such as hCG, AFP and lactate dehydrogenase are provided together with an extensive overview of the glycosylation of hCG and AFP related to TC. The final part of the review summarises the potential of glycan changes on either hCG and AFP as TC biomarkers for diagnostics and prognostics purposes, and for disease recurrence evaluation. Finally, an analysis of glycans in serum and tissues as TC biomarkers is also provided.