A higher preconceptional paternal body mass index influences fertilization rate and preimplantation embryo development

Obesity and male fertility disorders

Often associated with obesity, male infertility represents a widespread condition that challenges the wellbeing of the couple. In this article, we provide a comprehensive and critical analysis of studies exploring the association between obesity and male reproductive function, to evaluate the frequency of this association, and establish the effects of increased body weight on conventional and biofunctional sperm parameters and infertility. In an attempt to find possible molecular markers of infertility in obese male patients, the numerous mechanisms responsible for infertility in overweight/obese patients are reviewed in depth. These include obesity-related functional hypogonadism, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, chronic inflammation, adipokines, irisin, gut hormones, gut microbiome, and sperm transcriptome. According to meta-analytic evidence, excessive body weight negatively influences male reproductive health. This can occurr through a broad array of molecular mechanisms. Some of these are not yet fully understood and need to be further elucidated in the future. A better understanding of the effects of metabolic disorders on spermatogenesis and sperm fertilizing capacity is very useful for identifying new diagnostic markers and designing therapeutic strategies for better clinical management of male infertility.

A ripple effect? The impact of obesity on sperm quality and function

Infertility affects approximately 15% of couples trying to conceive. Male-related causes account for roughly 50% of cases, with obesity emerging as a possible significant factor. Obesity, defined as a body mass index of 30.0 or higher, has become a widespread epidemic associated with numerous health issues, including a decrease of fertility. This review discusses the relationship between obesity and male infertility, particularly focusing on sperm quality and function. An overview of the literature suggests that obesity may influence the male reproductive system via disruptions in hormonal profiles, oxidative stress, and inflammation, leading to changes in sperm parameters. Several studies have discussed if obesity causes a decrease in sperm concentration, motility, and normal morphology, so far without a consensus being reached. However, available evidence suggests an impairment of sperm function in obese men, due to an increase in DNA damage and oxidative stress, impaired mitochondrial function and acrosome reaction in response to progesterone. Finally, the relationship between obesity and assisted reproductive technologies outcomes remains debatable, with conflicting evidence regarding the influence on fertilisation, pregnancy, and live birth rates. Therefore, the actual impact of obesity on human spermatozoa still needs to be clarified, due to the multiple factors potentially in play.

The "Bad Father": Paternal Role in Biology of Pregnancy and in Birth Outcome

Pregnancy is generally studied as a biological interaction between a mother and a fetus; however, the father, with his characteristics, lifestyle, genetics, and living environment, is by no means unrelated to the outcome of pregnancy. The half of the fetal genetic heritage of paternal derivation can be decisive in cases of inherited chromosomal disorders, and can be the result of de novo genetic alterations. In addition to the strictly pathological aspects, paternal genetics may transmit thrombophilic traits that affect the implantation and vascular construction of the feto-placental unit, lead to placenta-mediated diseases such as pre-eclampsia and fetal growth retardation, and contribute to the multifactorial genesis of preterm delivery. Biological aspects of immunological tolerance to paternal antigens also appear to be crucial for these pathologies. Finally, this review describes the biological findings by which the environment, exposure to pathogens, lifestyle, and nutritional style of the father affect fetal pathophysiological and epigenetic definition.

Effect of Paternal Body Mass Index on In Vitro Fertilization and Neonatal Outcomes among Oligozoospermia and Asthenospermia Patients

PURPOSE

Male overweight and obesity could affect sperm quality and reproductive health. However, the impact of body mass index (BMI) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes in oligospermia and/or asthenospermia patients is yet lacking. This study aims to assess the impact of paternal BMI on ART and neonatal outcomes among oligozoospermia and/or asthenospermia patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 2,075 couples undergoing their first fresh embryo transfer between January 2015 and June 2022 were recruited. Following the World Health Organization's (WHO's) categories, couples were stratified into three cohorts based on paternal BMI: normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m²), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m²), and obese (≥30.0 kg/m²). Modified Poisson regression models were used to assess the associations of paternal BMI with fertilization, in vitro embryonic development, and pregnancy outcomes. Logistic regression models were performed to investigate the associations of paternal BMI with pregnancy loss and neonatal outcomes. Furthermore, stratified analyses were performed based on fertilization methods, male infertility cause, and maternal BMI.

RESULTS

Higher paternal BMI is associated with a lower likelihood of achieving normal fertilized (p-trend=0.002), Day 3 transferable (p-trend=0.007), and high-quality embryos (p-trend=0.046) in IVF cycles, rather than in ICSI cycles. Paternal BMI of oligospermia or asthenospermia was negatively correlated with day 3 transferable (p-trend=0.013 and 0.030) and high-quality embryos (p-trend=0.024 and 0.027). Moreover, for neonatal outcomes, paternal BMI was positively associated with macrosomia (p-trend=0.019), large for gestational age (LGA) (p-trend=0.031), and very LGA (p-trend=0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggested that higher paternal BMI was associated with fetal overgrowth, reduced fertilization, and embryonic development potential. Among males with oligospermia and/or asthenospermia, the impact of overweight and obesity on the choice of fertilization method and the long-term effects on their offspring need to be further investigated.

The impact of obesity and metabolic health on male fertility: a systematic review

The impact of paternal obesity and metabolic disease on semen quality and fertility outcomes is not fully appreciated. With increasing obesity rates, researchers have studied the intricate relationship between paternal body mass index, metabolic health, and male fertility. This systematic review identified 112 articles in the MEDLINE database between 2013 and 2023 that investigated the effects of body mass index, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, exercise, weight loss medication, or bariatric surgery on semen parameters, sperm quality, or fertility outcomes. This review suggests that obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome have a negative impact on various parameters of male fertility, from semen quality to sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity. There is also mounting evidence that male obesity is correlated negatively with live births via both natural conception and assisted reproductive technologies. Lifestyle interventions, such as physical exercise, generally appear to improve male fertility markers; however, the type and intensity of exercise may play a crucial role. Pharmacologic treatments for weight loss, such as metformin and glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists, present a more complex picture, with studies suggesting both beneficial and detrimental effects on male reproductive health. Similarly, surgical interventions, such as gastric bypass surgery, show promise in improving hormonal imbalances but have mixed effects on semen parameters. Future research is needed to clarify these associations and inform clinical guidelines. In the interim, health practitioners should incorporate these insights into clinical practices, encouraging proactive lifestyle changes and providing targeted treatments to improve male reproductive health.

Sperm DNA damage: The possible link between obesity and male infertility, an update of the current literature

Obesity prevalence worldwide is increasing significantly. Whilst maternal obesity has clear detrimental impacts on fertility, pregnancy and foetal outcomes, more recently there has been an increasing focus on the role of paternal obesity in human fertility. Recent meta-analyses have indicated that obesity in men negatively affects basic sperm parameters such as sperm count, concentration and motility, increases the incidence of infertility and reduces the chances of conception. Sperm DNA damage, typically characterised by DNA strand breaks and oxidation of DNA nucleotides, is a specialised marker of sperm quality that has been independently associated with recurrent miscarriage, reduced assisted reproduction success and increased mutational loads in subsequent offspring. Whilst, there are still conflicting data in humans as to the association of obesity in men with sperm DNA damage, evidence from rodent models is clear, indicating that male obesity increases sperm DNA damage. Human data are often conflicting because of the large heterogeneity amongst studies, the use of body mass index as the indicator of obesity and the methods used for detection of sperm DNA damage. Furthermore, comorbidities of obesity (i.e., heat stress, adipokines, insulin resistance, changes in lipids, hypogonadism and obstructive sleep apnoea) are also independently associated with increased sperm DNA damage that is not always modified in men with obesity, and as such may provide a causative link to the discrepancies amongst human studies. In this review, we provide an update on the literature regarding the associations between obesity in men and fertility, basic sperm parameters and sperm DNA damage. We further discuss potential reasons for the discrepancies in the literature and outline possible direct and indirect mechanisms of increased sperm DNA damage resulting from obesity. Finally, we summarise intergenerational obesity through the paternal linage and how sperm DNA damage may contribute to the transmission.

Human oocyte area is associated with preimplantation embryo usage and early embryo development: the Rotterdam Periconception Cohort

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between oocyte area and fertilization rate, embryo usage, and preimplantation embryo development in order to establish if oocyte area can be a marker for optimal early embryo development.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2020, 378 couples with an indication for IVF (n = 124) or ICSI (n = 254) were included preconceptionally in the Rotterdam Periconception Cohort. Resulting oocytes (n = 2810) were fertilized and submitted to time-lapse embryo culture. Oocyte area was measured at the moment of fertilization (t0), pronuclear appearance (tPNa), and fading (tPNf). Fertilization rate, embryo usage and quality, and embryo morphokinetics from 2-cell stage to expanded blastocyst stage (t2-tEB) were used as outcome measures in association with oocyte area. Oocytes were termed "used" if they were fertilized and embryo development resulted in transfer or cryopreservation, and otherwise termed "discarded". Analyses were adjusted for relevant confounders.

RESULTS

Oocyte area decreased from t0 to tPNf after IVF and ICSI, and oocytes with larger area shrank faster (β - 12.6 µm²/h, 95%CI - 14.6; - 10.5, p < 0.001). Oocytes that resulted in a used embryo were larger at all time-points and reached tPNf faster than oocytes that fertilized but were discarded (oocyte area at tPNf in used 9864 ± 595 µm² versus discarded 9679 ± 673 µm², p < 0.001, tPNf in used 23.6 ± 3.2 h versus discarded 25.6 ± 5.9 h, p < 0.001). Larger oocytes had higher odds of being used (oocyte area at tPNf OR_used 1.669, 95%CI 1.336; 2.085, p < 0.001), were associated with faster embryo development up to the morula stage (e.g., t9 β - 0.131 min, 95%CI - 0.237; - 0.025, p = 0.016) and higher ICM quality.

CONCLUSION

Oocyte area is an informative marker for the preimplantation development of the embryo, as a larger oocyte area is associated with higher quality, faster developing embryos, and higher chance of being used. Identifying determinants associated with oocyte and embryo viability and quality could contribute to improved preconception care and subsequently healthy pregnancies.

Paternal preconception modifiable risk factors for adverse pregnancy and offspring outcomes: a review of contemporary evidence from observational studies

BACKGROUND

The preconception period represents transgenerational opportunities to optimize modifiable risk factors associated with both short and long-term adverse health outcomes for women, men, and children. As such, preconception care is recommended to couples during this time to enable them to optimise their health in preparation for pregnancy. Historically, preconception research predominately focuses on maternal modifiable risks and health behaviours associated with pregnancy and offspring outcomes; limited attention has been given to inform paternal preconception health risks and outcomes. This systematic review aims to advance paternal preconception research by synthesising the current evidence on modifiable paternal preconception health behaviours and risk factors to identify associations with pregnancy and/or offspring outcomes.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Maternity and Infant care, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ISI Proceedings were searched on the 5^th of January 2023, a date limit was set [2012-2023] in each database. A Google Scholar search was also conducted identifying all other relevant papers. Studies were included if they were observational, reporting associations of modifiable risk factors in the preconception period among males (e.g., identified as reproductive partners of pregnant women and/or fathers of offspring for which outcomes were reported) with adverse pregnancy and offspring outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Exposure and outcome heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, and results were summarised in tables.

RESULTS

This review identified 56 cohort and nine case control studies. Studies reported on a range of risk factors and/or health behaviours including paternal body composition (n = 25), alcohol intake (n = 6), cannabis use (n = 5), physical activity (n = 2), smoking (n = 20), stress (n = 3) and nutrition (n = 13). Outcomes included fecundability, IVF/ISCI live birth, offspring weight, body composition/BMI, asthma, lung function, leukemia, preterm birth, and behavioural issues. Despite the limited number of studies and substantial heterogeneity in reporting, results of studies assessed as good quality showed that paternal smoking may increase the risk of birth defects and higher paternal BMI was associated with higher offspring birthweight.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence demonstrates a role of paternal preconception health in influencing outcomes related to pregnancy success and offspring health. The evidence is however limited and heterogenous, and further high-quality research is needed to inform clinical preconception care guidelines to support men and couples to prepare for a health pregnancy and child.

Obesity and reproduction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The objective of this review is to highlight the recent literature on how obesity affects reproductive capacity in men and women.

RECENT FINDINGS

The relationship between fertility and obesity is complex and involves the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, neuroendocrine systems and adipose tissue. The exact pathophysiology of how obesity lowers fertility rates is unknown, but is likely multifactorial involving anovulation, insulin resistance and alterations in gonadotropins. In addition, there is controversy on whether oocyte quality or endometrial receptivity plays a larger role in obese infertile women. Data on effects of bariatric surgery and weight loss on obese infertile men and women are mixed.

SUMMARY

Obesity alters the hormonal profile, gonadotropin secretion, embryo development and in-vitro fertilization outcomes in both men and women.

Impact of paternal body mass index on assisted reproduction treatment outcomes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The aim was to provide updated evidence on the association of male body mass index (BMI) with outcomes of assisted reproduction technology (ART).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched. The review included observational studies in patients undergoing ART, that is, either in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and compared rate of clinical pregnancy and live birth based on different categories of male BMI. Quality of the pooled findings was assessed using the GRADE criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies were included in the review. Among subjects undergoing IVF, there were no significant differences in the rates of clinical pregnancy among overweight (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65, 2.96) and obese (OR 1.86, 95% CI: 0.75, 4.58) BMI, compared to normal male BMI. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the rates of live birth among overweight (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.13) and obese BMI (OR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.18) when compared to males with normal BMI. Further, among those undergoing ICSI, there were no significant differences in the odds of clinical pregnancy among overweight (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.73, 1.33) and obese (OR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.29). The odds of live births among overweight (OR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.05) and obese (OR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.84, 1.07) male BMI were statistically similar to males with normal BMI undergoing ICSI.

CONCLUSIONS

The low to very low-quality findings suggest no significant association of overweight and obese BMI with clinical pregnancy and live birth rates among couples undergoing either IVF or ICSI.

Abnormal BMI in Male and/or Female Partners Are Deleterious for Embryonic Development and Pregnancy Outcome During ART Process: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of BMI in male and/or female partners on embryo development and clinical pregnancy outcome during ART.

METHODS

Data of 11,130 cycles between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into Group A, B, C, and D based on couples' BMI values, also were divided into Group I, II, III and IV in IVF cycles and Group i, ii, iii, and iv in ICSI cycles. After grouping, inter-group indicators comparisons and logistic regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

In IVF cycles, CPR in Group I and Group III were higher than Group IV. In Group III, it was higher than Group II. The AR in Group IV was higher, but the LBR was lower than Group I, Group II, and Group III. Logistic regression analysis results suggested that AR in Group IV was higher than that in Group I in IVF cycles, whereas LBR was lower.In ICSI cycles, high-quality embryo rate in Group i and Group ii were both higher than that in Group iii and Group iv. The CPR in Group i was higher than Group ii and Group iv, and in Group iii was higher than Group ii and Group iv. The AR in Group i was lower than Group iii and Group iv, and AR in Group ii was lower than Group iv. LBR, in Group I it was higher than Group ii, Group iii, and Group iv. Logistic regression analysis results suggested CPR in Group ii was significantly lower than that in Group i. AR in Group iii was considerably higher than that in Group i. LBR in Group ii and Group iv were significantly lower than that in Group i.

CONCLUSION

Female higher BMI was not conducive to the formation of high-quality embryos in ICSI cycle. Female and/or male BMI affected AR and LBR more than CPR not only in IVF cycles, but also in ICSI cycles.