1
|
Gonçalves-Sánchez J, Ramírez-Santos T, López DE, Gonçalves-Estella JM, Sancho C. Assessing the Effectiveness of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Reducing Audiogenic Reflex Seizures in the GASH/Sal Model of Epilepsy. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1121. [PMID: 38791083 PMCID: PMC11117828 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12051121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug indicated as monotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy and as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial seizures. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of both acute and repeated ESL administration against reflex audiogenic seizures, as shown by the Genetic Audiogenic Seizures Hamster from Salamanca (GASH/Sal). Animals were subject to the intraperitoneal administration of ESL, applying doses of 100, 150 and 200 mg/kg for the acute study, whereas a daily dose of 100 mg/kg was selected for the subchronic study, which lasted 14 days. In both studies, the anticonvulsant effect of the therapy was evaluated using neuroethological methods. To assess the safety of the treatment, behavioral tests were performed, hematological and biochemical liver profiles were obtained, and body weight was monitored. In addition, the ESL levels in blood were measured after the acute administration of a 200 mg/kg dose. Treatment with ESL caused a reduction in seizure severity. No statistically significant differences were detected between the selected doses or between the acute or repeated administration of the drug. To summarize, the intraperitoneal administration of ESL is safe and shows an anticonvulsant effect in the GASH/Sal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Gonçalves-Sánchez
- Department of Cell Biology and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Dolores E. López
- Department of Cell Biology and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jesús M. Gonçalves-Estella
- Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Consuelo Sancho
- Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fernández-Anaya S, Villanueva V, Serratosa JM, Rico-Villademoros F, Rojo R, Sarasa P. Initial monotherapy with eslicarbazepine acetate for the management of adult patients with focal epilepsy in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Neurosci 2023; 133:430-440. [PMID: 33993841 DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2021.1925667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY To assess the effectiveness, overall tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as an initial or early monotherapy treatment of adult patients with focal epilepsy under real-world practice conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS We focused on real-world longitudinal studies that included or separately reported the results of at least one of the efficacy outcomes of interest. A DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used with the presentation of the 95% confidence intervals of the estimate. RESULTS 5 studies met our selection criteria and were included in the quantitative synthesis. All studies were observational and uncontrolled studies, and all but one were retrospective studies. The pooled proportion of patients who were seizure-free for the entire study period was 64.6% (95% CI, 45.7 to 79.8) at month 6 and 56.6% (95% CI, 50.2 to 62.8) at month 12. Pooled retention rates were 95.0% (95% CI, 90.3 to 97.5) at 6 months and 83.6% (95% CI, 73.9 to 90.1) at 12 months. The pooled proportion of patients who reported at least one adverse event was 27.2% (95% CI, 21.7 to 33.6), and the pooled proportion of patients who discontinued ESL due to adverse events was 8.9% (95% CI 6.2 to 12.6). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that initial or early monotherapy with ESL is effective and well-tolerated for the management of adult patients with focal epilepsy in clinical practice, with results that are at least similar to those reported in the pivotal randomized clinical trial of ESL monotherapy. No new safety signals with ESL have been identified in this systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vicente Villanueva
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - José M Serratosa
- Epilepsy Unit/Neurology Service, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz and IIS Fundación Jiménez Díaz UAM, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Rosa Rojo
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trinka E, Rocamora R, Chaves J, Moreira J, Ikedo F, Soares-da-Silva P. Long-term efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: An open-label extension study. Epilepsia 2020; 61:2129-2141. [PMID: 32944934 PMCID: PMC7693183 DOI: 10.1111/epi.16666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) monotherapy during long‐term treatment. Methods An open‐label extension (OLE) study was conducted in adults completing a phase 3, randomized, double‐blind, noninferiority trial, during which they had received monotherapy with either once‐daily ESL or twice‐daily controlled‐release carbamazepine (CBZ‐CR) for newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. In the OLE study, all patients received ESL (800‐1600 mg/d) for 2 years. Primary efficacy outcome was retention time (from baseline of the OLE study). Secondary efficacy assessments included seizure freedom rate (no seizures during the OLE study) and responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction from baseline of double‐blind trial). Safety assessments included evaluation of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results Of 206 randomized patients, 96 who received ESL in the double‐blind trial (ESL/ESL) and 88 who received CBZ‐CR in the double‐blind trial (CBZ‐CR/ESL) were treated with ESL monotherapy (89.3% overall). Treatment retention time was similar between groups, with low probability of ESL withdrawal overall (<0.07 at any time). After 24 months, the probability of ESL withdrawal was 0.0638 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.0292‐0.1366) in the ESL/ESL group and 0.0472 (95% CI = 0.0180‐0.1210) in the CBZ‐CR/ESL group. Seizure freedom rates were 90.6% (ESL/ESL) and 80.7% (CBZ‐CR/ESL; P = .0531). Responder rates remained >80% in both groups throughout the study. Incidence of serious TEAEs was similar between groups (7.3% vs 5.7%; 0% vs 1.1% possibly related), as were the incidences of TEAEs considered at least possibly related to treatment (17.7% vs 18.2%) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation (3.1% vs 4.5%). The types of TEAEs were generally consistent with the known safety profile of ESL. Significance ESL monotherapy was efficacious and generally well tolerated over the long term, including in patients who transitioned from CBZ‐CR monotherapy. No new safety concerns emerged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugen Trinka
- Department of Neurology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.,Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision-Making, and Health Technology Assessment, Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria
| | - Rodrigo Rocamora
- Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.,Epilepsy Monitoring Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.,Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - João Chaves
- University Hospital Center of Porto, S. António Hospital, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Patrício Soares-da-Silva
- Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., Coronado, Portugal.,Pharmacology and Therapeutics Unit, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,MedInUP-Center for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines, University Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Eslicarbazepine acetate (Zebinix®), a voltage-gated sodium channel blocker, is a once-daily, orally administered anti-seizure medication available in the EU for use as monotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed focal-onset seizures and as adjunctive therapy in adults, adolescents and children aged > 6 years with focal-onset seizures. In adult patients, adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate was generally associated with a significant decrease in seizure frequency and an increase in responder rate compared with placebo. The drug was also an effective monotherapy agent in adult patients, demonstrating noninferiority to controlled-release carbamazepine, in terms of seizure freedom rates. In paediatric patients, eslicarbazepine acetate provided seizure control when administered as adjunctive therapy, with the benefits appearing to be dependent on age and dose. The antiepileptic efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive therapy or as monotherapy was maintained during longer-term extension studies, with each extension study period being up to 2 years. Oral eslicarbazepine acetate was generally well tolerated when administered as adjunctive therapy or monotherapy in adult patients and when administered as adjunctive therapy in paediatric patients, with most adverse events being of mild or moderate intensity. In conclusion, with the convenience of once-daily administration, eslicarbazepine acetate is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment option for adults, adolescents and children aged > 6 years with focal-onset seizures.
Collapse
|
5
|
Giráldez BG, Garamendi‐Ruiz I, Zurita J, García A, Querol R, Campos D, Cabeza‐Alvarez C, Serrano P, López‐González FJ, Molins A, Serratosa JM. Clinical outcomes of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy for focal-onset seizures: A multicenter audit. Acta Neurol Scand 2019; 140:422-428. [PMID: 31498422 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2019] [Revised: 08/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) monotherapy in routine clinical practice for the treatment of focal-onset seizures. METHODS Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in patients older than 16 years treated with ESL as first-line monotherapy or converted to ESL monotherapy from polytherapy or other monotherapy. Outcomes included 1-year retention rate, seizure-free rates after 6 and 12 months of monotherapy treatment, and safety/tolerability issues. RESULTS A total of 256 patients were included (106 first-line and 150 conversion to monotherapy; 56 patients aged >65 years). Overall, the 1-year retention rate was 79% (72.7% in the ≥65 years subgroup) and seizure-free rates at 6 and 12 months were 59.3% and 55.3% (72.2% and 67.3% in the ≥65 years subgroup), without significant differences when comparing first-line vs conversion-to-ESL monotherapy groups (P = .979). However, the conversion group was heterogeneous and included 43 (29.1%) patients that were seizure free the year prior ESL introduction. A substantially higher proportion of patients remained seizure free for the entire follow-up among those who initiated ESL due to tolerability problems compared with those treated due to inadequate seizure control (71.4% vs 37.3%). Overall, 62 of 256 (24.2%) patients reported AEs (39.3% in >65 years subgroup) and led to discontinuation in 20/256 (7.8%) patients (12.5% in >65 years subgroup). Commonly reported AEs were somnolence (6.6%), dizziness (6.3%), and headache (4.3%). Hyponatremia was recorded in five patients, the majority (4/5) of whom were older than 65 years. CONCLUSIONS Eslicarbazepine acetate was effective and well-tolerated as first-line or conversion to monotherapy in a clinical setting in adult and elderly patients with focal-onset seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jorge Zurita
- Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor Madrid Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Pedro Serrano
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica (IBIMA) Hospital Regional Universitario Málaga Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Villanueva V, Bermejo P, Montoya J, Massot-Tarrús A, Galiano ML, Toledo M, Rodriguez-Uranga JJ, Bertol V, Mauri JÁ, Poza JJ, Bonet M, Castro-Vilanova MD, Ruiz-Giménez J, López-González FJ, Rodríguez-Osorio X, Tortosa-Conesa D, Ojeda J, Giner P, Garcés M, Alvarez BM, Quiroga-Subirana P, Esteve P, Baiges JJ, Hampel K. MONOZEB: Long-term observational study of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy. Epilepsy Behav 2019; 97:51-59. [PMID: 31181429 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) when used as monotherapy for 1 year or more in routine clinical use in patients with focal seizures in epilepsy clinics in Spain. METHODS This is a retrospective, observational, noninterventional study. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had focal seizures, and started on ESL ≥1 year before database closure. Primary endpoint was the following: proportion seizure-free for ≥6 months at 1 and 2 years. Secondary endpoints included retention on ESL monotherapy at 1 and 2 years, seizure frequency change, seizure worsening, and side effects. Other analyses included seizure freedom from baseline to 1 and 2 years and outcomes in special populations. RESULTS Four hundred thirty-five patients were included (127 on first-line monotherapy and 308 converting to ESL monotherapy): median daily dose was 800 mg at all time points; 63.2% were seizure-free at 1 year, 65.1% at 2 years, and 50.3% for the entire follow-up. Mean duration of ESL monotherapy was 66.7 months; retention was 88.0% at 1 year and 81.9% at 2 years. Mean reduction in seizure frequency was 75.5% at last visit. Over the entire follow-up, seizure worsening was seen in 22 patients (5.1%), side effects in 28.0%, considered severe in 1.8%, and leading to discontinuation in 5.7%. Dizziness, hyponatremia (sodium <135 mEq/l), and somnolence were the most frequent side effects. Outcomes in special populations (patients aged ≥65 years and those with psychiatric history or learning difficulty) were consistent with the overall population. CONCLUSIONS Patients with focal seizures taking ESL monotherapy had excellent retention, high seizure-free rates, and good tolerability up to 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pedro Bermejo
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Manuel Toledo
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Pau Giner
- Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kevin Hampel
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Epilepsy is a serious chronic neurological disorder manifested by an enduring symptomatic predisposition to seizures. Newly diagnosed individuals face increased morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic costs. Anti-epileptic drug therapy is the treatment usually prescribed, which has efficacy in seizure control and mitigating long-term mortality. AREAS COVERED Safety of anti-epileptic drug therapy in adults with a focus in newly diagnosed patients. Areas covered include the most commonly experienced adverse drug effects, as well as those with the highest impacts on drug tolerability, quality of life, morbidity and mortality. Evidence was also reviewed to identify clinical strategies to improve the safety of anti-epileptic drug therapy. EXPERT OPINION Anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are mostly effective and well tolerated. However, a lack of standardised reporting of adverse drug effects in trials and in clinical practice provides an obstacle for evaluation of which adverse drug effects need to be prioritised in management. Improvement in the reporting of cognitive and other effects, as well as improved precision medicine and pharmacogenomics to target the incidence of high-mortality idiosyncratic reactions, will help to reduce the harm of AEDs in people newly diagnosed with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Sharma
- a Department of Neuroscience , Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Patrick Kwan
- a Department of Neuroscience , Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne , Australia.,b Department of Medicine , Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia.,c School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine , Monash University , Melbourne , Australia
| |
Collapse
|