The CHA2DS2-VASc risk score predicts successful endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke

Efficacy of bumetanide in animal models of ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to describe the efficacy of bumetanide in improving infarct volume, brain edema, and behavioral outcomes in animal models of cerebral ischemia. Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to February 2024 (INPLASY:202430023). Data on the animal species, stroke model, drug dose, time of treatment, method of administration, study quality, and outcomes were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis. The combined standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects models. Thirteen eligible studies involving >200 animals fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analyses demonstrated that bumetanide treatment significantly reduced cerebral infarct volume (SMD: -0.42; 95% CI: -0.75, -0.09; p < 0.01; n = 186 animals) and consistently relieved brain edema (SMD: -1.39; 95% CI: -2.06, -0.72; p < 0.01; n = 64 animals). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that bumetanide treatment reduced infarct volume in transient but not permanent cerebral ischemia models. When administered after the stroke, it was more effective than treatment initiation before the stroke. Eight studies assessed the effect of bumetanide on behavioral function and the results showed that bumetanide treatment significantly improved neurobehavioral deficits (SMD: -2.35; 95% CI: -2.72, -1.97; p < 0.01; n = 250 animals). We conclude that bumetanide appears to be effective in reducing infarct volume and brain edema and improving behavioral recovery in animal models of cerebral ischemia. This mechanism needs to be confirmed through further investigation.

Clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with and without atrial fibrillation receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor

We report a retrospective analysis of a nationwide health database to study the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2I) use and the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes among heart failure (HF) patients with and without atrial fibrillation (AF) stratified by CHA2DS2-VASc score. The outcome of this study was on the development of adverse events, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular (CV) death, and all-cause mortality. By dividing the number of adverse events by the total person-years, the incidence rate was calculated. The hazard ratio (HR) was estimated by the Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 95% confidence interval (CI) was also presented to show the risk of adverse events for HF patients with and without AF taking SGLT2I. SGLT2I users had a lower risk of AMI (adjusted HR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.74, 0.94), CV death (adjusted HR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.42, 0.51), and all-cause death (adjusted HR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.37, 0.41). Considering HF patients without AF and SGLT2I as the reference group, HF patients without AF but with SGLT2I had a reduced risk of adverse outcomes of 0.48 (95% CI = 0.45, 0.50), and HF patients with AF and SGLT2I had the decreased hazard ratio of 0.55 (95% CI = 0.50, 0.61). The adjusted HR of adverse outcomes for HF patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score less than 2 and SGLT2I without and with AF relative to HF patients without AF nor SGLT2I were 0.53 (95% CI = 0.41, 0.67) and 0.24 (95% CI = 0.12, 0.47), respectively. Compared to HF patients with no history of AF and SGLT2I, if patients additionally with SGLT2I and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2, the risk of the adverse outcomes was reduced with adjusted HR of 0.48 (95% CI = 0.45, 0.50); if patients additionally with AF and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2, the risk of the adverse outcomes was decreased with adjusted HR of 0.88 (95% CI = 0.80, 0.97); if patients additionally with AF, SGLT2I, and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2, the risk of the adverse outcomes was diminished with adjusted HR of 0.52 (95% CI = 0.47, 0.58). We concluded that SGLT2I has a protective effect in HF patients, and the risk reduction is greater with a score of < 2 and without AF.

Effect of current smoking on ischemic events in patients with atrial fibrillation taking vitamin K antagonist

Purpose

We investigated the association between current smoking and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) prescribed vitamin K antagonist (VKA).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study at 71 centers in Japan. The inclusion criterion was taking a VKA for AF. Exclusion criteria were mechanical heart valves or history of pulmonary thrombosis or deep vein thrombosis. Consecutive patients were registered in February 2013 and followed until February 2017. The primary outcomes included ischemic events and major bleedings. The secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 7826 patients were included, with a mean age of 73 years; 5274 (67%) were men. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of current smokers relative to non-current smokers for ischemic events and major bleedings were 1.64 (1.05-2.57) and 1.09 (0.72-1.65), respectively. The adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of current smokers relative to non-current smokers for ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and all-cause mortality were 1.65 (1.03-2.64), 0.52 (0.12-2.15), and 1.26 (0.83-1.92), respectively.

Conclusions

There were significant associations between current smoking and ischemic events or ischemic stroke in patients with AF on VKA.