1
|
Vohra LM, Virji SN, Arain H, Abedin I, Zeeshan S. Early post-operative outcome of pre-pectoral implant-based immediate total breast reconstruction with Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl™) mesh - low cost solution for a low-middle income country. BMC Surg 2024; 24:245. [PMID: 39217330 PMCID: PMC11365160 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02540-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of breast cancer in Pakistan has been rising with approximately one third of these patients requiring mastectomy. Among breast reconstruction treatment options, the use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) for pre-pectoral breast implant surgery has proven effective with improved cosmetic outcome. However, due to high cost it cannot be regularly implemented in a developing country like Pakistan. An alternative to ADM, Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl™, Ethicon) mesh has been introduced in pre-pectoral breast reconstructive surgery which has shown to be almost 10 times lower in cost. We set out to determine the frequency of early postoperative complications when using Polyglactin 910 mesh for pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction surgery. METHODS A single centre, retrospective, chart review was conducted, and a total 28 women were included in the study. Thirty-two pre-pectoral implant-based mastectomies with Polyglactin 910 mesh were performed. Early post-operative outcomes (within 12 months of procedure) including duration of antibiotic use, post-operative infection, implant displacement, flap necrosis, seroma formation, wound dehiscence, hematoma formation, capsular contracture and reconstruction failure, were recorded. RESULTS Only 4 (12.5%) women experienced early post-operative morbidity. One patient developed a wound dehiscence, which eventually led to reconstruction failure and removal of the implant. Another patient had seroma formation and flap necrosis. None of the patients developed postoperative implant displacement, hematoma formation or capsular contracture in the early post-operative period. CONCLUSION This study reveals that early post-operative outcomes with Polyglactin 910 mesh in breast reconstructive surgery are few, thus making it a cost effective, reliable, and safe treatment option, especially in developing countries like Pakistan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lubna Mushtaque Vohra
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan
| | - Safna Naozer Virji
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
| | - Hameeda Arain
- Medical College Aga Khan University, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan
| | - Iman Abedin
- Medical College Aga Khan University, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan
| | - Sana Zeeshan
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caputo GG, Pisano G, Albanese R, Mura S, Scarabosio A, Contessi Negrini F, Parodi PC. Immediate Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after J-Pattern Skin-Reducing Mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 154:233e-236e. [PMID: 37647526 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000011028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY Skin-reducing mastectomy for single-stage reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure used in women with large and ptotic breasts. This study describes a new technique, the J-pattern skin-reducing breast reconstruction with prepectoral implant and acellular dermal matrix (Braxon fast), which is indicated for patients with large and ptotic breasts who would benefit from a breast reduction and need a mastectomy for curative or prophylactic purposes. The authors present a case series of 35 breasts of 19 women who underwent this procedure from January of 2021 through December of 2022 at the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of the University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, in Udine, Italy, with a median follow-up of 15 months. The advantages of the J scar consist of a reduced risk of skin necrosis, a reduced bottoming-out rate, simplification of the surgical design, and lower impact of scars not involving the medial quadrants of the breast. Patients were administered the BREAST-Q 2.0 postoperative questionnaire at 3 months postoperatively, which showed a high average level of satisfaction with the reconstruction. This surgical technique is a valid option for patients who have voluminous breasts and adequate pinch test results who wish to undergo immediate heterologous reconstruction along with curative or prophylactic mastectomy. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenda Giorgia Caputo
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia of Udine
| | - Gaetano Pisano
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia of Udine
| | - Roberta Albanese
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia of Udine
| | - Sebastiano Mura
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia of Udine
| | - Anna Scarabosio
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia of Udine
| | - Filippo Contessi Negrini
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia of Udine
| | - Pier Camillo Parodi
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia of Udine
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tettamanzi M, Arrica G, Ziani F, Manconi A, Beatrici E, Trignano C, Rubino C, Trignano E. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Prosthesis and Acellular Dermal Matrix: A New Technique of ADM Implantation and Fixation. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e5895. [PMID: 38881959 PMCID: PMC11177808 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Background Direct-to-implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction has proven to be an oncologically safe technique and linked to better overall results. The introduction of new surgical techniques has prompted us to develop an acellular dermal matrix fixation technique that reduces the rate of complications and implant loss. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent DTI prepectoral breast reconstruction with two different techniques of acellular dermal matrix fixation to the chest wall. Descriptive statistics were reported using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and means and SDs for continuous variables. Pearson chi-square test was used to compare differences in categorical variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the predictors of complications. Results From October 2019 to March 2023, 90 DTI breast reconstructions were performed, 43 using the standard technique and 47 using the new technique. The new technique demonstrated a significant reduction of major complications (P = 0.010), namely seroma (13.9% versus 2.3%), skin necrosis (9.3% versus 2.3%), implant loss (7% versus 0%), wound dehiscence (9.3% versus 0%), and infection (4.7% versus 0%). Compared with the standard technique, the new one reduced the risk of complications by 76% (OR 0.24; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.68; P = 0.007) and 73% (aOR 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.92; P = 0.037), at univariable and multivariable regression models. No other significant predictor of complications was identified. Conclusions The procedure performed with the proposed modality proved to be advantageous. Careful fixation of the prosthetic implant and the placement of two drains, were the keys to a drastic reduction in complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matilde Tettamanzi
- From the Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Giovanni Arrica
- From the Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Federico Ziani
- From the Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Anna Manconi
- From the Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Edoardo Beatrici
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Trignano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Corrado Rubino
- From the Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Emilio Trignano
- From the Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rubenstein RN, Kim M, Plotsker EL, Chu JJ, Bell T, McGriff D, Allen R, Dayan JH, Stern CS, Coriddi M, Disa JJ, Mehrara BJ, Matros E, Nelson JA. Early Complications in Prepectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2766-2776. [PMID: 38245651 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14861-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prepectoral implant placement for postmastectomy breast reconstruction has increased in recent years. Benefits of prepectoral reconstruction may include lack of animation deformities and reduced postoperative pain, but its complication profile is currently unclear. This study aimed to examine the complication profile of prepectoral tissue expanders (TEs) to determine factors associated with TE loss. METHODS A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent immediate prepectoral TE reconstruction from January 2018 to June 2021. The decision to use the prepectoral technique was based on mastectomy skin quality and patient comorbidities. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative details were evaluated. Outcomes of interest included TE loss, seroma, hematoma, infection/cellulitis, mastectomy skin flap necrosis requiring revision, and TE exposure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with TE loss. RESULTS The study identified 1225 TEs. The most frequent complications were seroma (8.7%, n = 106), infection/cellulitis (8.2%, n = 101), and TE loss (4.2%, n = 51). Factors associated with TE loss in the univariate analysis included ethnicity, history of smoking, body mass index, mastectomy weight, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the multivariate regression analysis, only mastectomy weight had a positive association with TE loss (odds ratio, 1.001; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION Prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction can be performed safely with an acceptable early complication profile. The study data suggest that increasing mastectomy weight is the most significant factor associated with TE loss. Further research examining the quality of the soft tissue envelope and assessing patient-reported outcomes would prove beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn N Rubenstein
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Minji Kim
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ethan L Plotsker
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jacqueline J Chu
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tajah Bell
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - De'von McGriff
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert Allen
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph H Dayan
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carrie S Stern
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelle Coriddi
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph J Disa
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Babak J Mehrara
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan Matros
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Antoniazzi E, De Grazia A, Dell'Antonia F, Pasquali S, Burelli P, Rizzetto C, Berna G. Immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction in nipple-sparing mastectomy with Wise-pattern incision in large and ptotic breasts: Our experience and short-term results. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 91:154-163. [PMID: 38412604 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current breast cancer treatment trends advocate nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) as the preferred technique for selected patients. A considerable and ptotic breast is often considered a relative contraindication for NSM due to the increased risk of skin and nipple necrosis. METHODS A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) after NSM with Wise-pattern incision between February 2020 and February 2023 at our institution. This procedure was offered to patients with grade II or III ptosis or large breasts eligible for NSM for therapeutic or prophylactic purpose. Exclusion criteria comprised a preoperative nipple-sternal notch distance greater than 30 cm, previous radiotherapy, pinch test <1 cm, body mass index (BMI) greater than 34 and active smoke. We present our short-term results with this technique. RESULTS During the study period, 62 patients (76 breasts) had NSM with Wise-pattern incision. Patients had immediate PPBR with implant or tissue expander, both entirely wrapped with ADM. The median age of the patients was 57.0 years [The Interquartile Range (IQR 50.0-68.6)] with a median BMI of 25.5 (IQR 23.3-28.4). The median mastectomy specimen weight was 472 g (341-578). Median implant volume was 465 g (IQR 370-515). Major complications occurred in 8 patients (10.5%). Three patients experienced total nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis (3.9%), and partial NAC necrosis occurred in 2 patients (2.6%). Two patients developed implant infection (2.6%). Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between major complications and the mastectomy specimen weight (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION If oncologically indicated, NSM with Wise-pattern incision and immediate PPBR can safely be performed in selected patients with large and ptotic breasts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Antoniazzi
- Plastic Surgery Unit, "Ca' Foncello" Regional Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy.
| | - A De Grazia
- Plastic Surgery Unit, "Ca' Foncello" Regional Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | - F Dell'Antonia
- Plastic Surgery Unit, "Ca' Foncello" Regional Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | - S Pasquali
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Cattinara Hospital-Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina (ASUGI), University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - P Burelli
- Breast Surgery Unit, "Ca' Foncello" Regional Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | - C Rizzetto
- Breast Surgery Unit, "Ca' Foncello" Regional Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | - G Berna
- Plastic Surgery Unit, "Ca' Foncello" Regional Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Graziano FD, Plotsker EL, Rubenstein RN, Haglich K, Stern CS, Matros E, Nelson JA. National Trends in Acellular Dermal Matrix Utilization in Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153:25e-36e. [PMID: 37092982 PMCID: PMC11305089 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implant-based reconstruction is the most common method of immediate breast reconstruction in the United States, with acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) playing a significant role in implant support and coverage. This study evaluated recent national trends in ADM use in immediate breast reconstruction and assessed patient characteristics and 30-day complication rates. METHODS The authors queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for all patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2020. Primary outcomes were major surgical and medical complications, as well as ADM use per year. Subset analysis was performed to compare patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction with ADM in 2015 versus 2020. RESULTS In 39,800 immediate breast reconstructions, ADMs were used in 55.5% of cases ( n = 22,087). ADM usage increased annually from 2015 through 2020. Direct-to-implant reconstruction was significantly associated with ADM use ( P < 0.001). Compared with the no-ADM cohort, there was a significantly increased rate of return to the operating room for any reason ( P < 0.001). When comparing the 2015 and 2020 ADM cohorts, the 2020 ADM cohort had a significantly higher rate of superficial infections. Obesity, smoking history, and insulin-dependent diabetes were independent risk factors for superficial wounds in patients receiving ADM. CONCLUSIONS ADM use in immediate breast reconstruction increased significantly from 2015 to 2020, likely reflecting national trends in increasing direct-to-implant and prepectoral breast reconstruction. Obesity, smoking history, and insulin-dependent diabetes were independent risk factors for superficial wound infections in the ADM cohort. Patients with ADM had a slight increased incidence of return to the operating room. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis D. Graziano
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ethan L. Plotsker
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robyn N. Rubenstein
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kathryn Haglich
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Carrie S. Stern
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Evan Matros
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonas A. Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tellarini A, Garutti L, Corno M, Tamborini F, Paganini F, Fasoli V, Di Giovanna D, Valdatta L. Immediate post-mastectomy prepectoral breast reconstruction with animal derived acellular dermal matrices: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 86:94-108. [PMID: 37716255 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Animal-derived acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are increasingly being used in prepectoral direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction. However, the indications and complication profile associated with this type of reconstruction remain unclear. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the available literature on the use of animal-derived ADM in prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction. METHODS Three different literature databases, namely, PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase were screened using the following keywords: "immediate" AND "pre-pectoral" OR "prepectoral" AND "ADM breast reconstruction." Animal-derived ADM used (porcine - Braxon® and non-Braxon® - and bovine - Surgimend®) anthropometric information, clinical data, and complications profile were considered. RESULTS A total of 340 articles were initially identified, of which only 45 articles (5089 patients and 6598 reconstructed breasts) satisfied our inclusion criteria. The most widely used ADM was Braxon® in the context of conservative mastectomies. In most studies, a subcutaneous layer > 1 cm and lack of previous radiotherapy were considered prerequisites for this type of reconstruction. An increased risk of complications was found in smokers, patients who underwent radiation treatment, patients with high breast volumes, and patients with cancers requiring axillary dissection. Data related to the role of diabetes, high body mass index, and breast implant size on surgical outcomes were instead inconcludent. Age was not directly proportional to the complications. CONCLUSION The complications associated with different animal-derived ADMs are generally comparable. The profile of patients required for eligibility for this type of reconstruction appears to have been identified and is in line with current recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annachiara Tellarini
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
| | - Leonardo Garutti
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Martina Corno
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Federico Tamborini
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; Microsurgery and Hand Surgery Unit, ASST Settelaghi Varese, Varese, Italy
| | - Ferruccio Paganini
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Veronica Fasoli
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Danilo Di Giovanna
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Luigi Valdatta
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nolan IT, Farajzadeh MM, Boyd CJ, Bekisz JM, Gibson EG, Salibian AA. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 86:251-260. [PMID: 37793198 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are commonly used in prepectoral breast reconstruction. However, ADM is associated with high cost and potentially infection and seroma. Comparative studies on prepectoral reconstruction with and without ADM are limited to small, single-institution series. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of prepectoral reconstruction with and without ADM. A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies comparing prepectoral reconstruction with and without ADM using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Pooled rates of patient demographics and outcomes were analyzed. Meta-analytic effect size estimates were calculated for reconstructive complications in studies comparing reconstruction with and without ADM. In total, 515 reconstructions from four studies were included. Most cases were nipple-sparing mastectomies and utilized tissue-expander reconstructions. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the rate of complications between cohorts with and without ADM. Short-term complications included reconstructive failure (1.2% in ADM cohort and 2.8% in no-ADM), seroma (1.2% and 8.3%, respectively), hematoma (1.2% and 2.1%), infection (4.7% and 4.2%), and mastectomy flap ischemia and/or necrosis (2.4% and 5.2%). Long-term complications included rippling (3.3% in ADM and 5.1% in no-ADM cohorts) and capsular contracture (6.8% and 3.4%, respectively). This meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in the rate of complications between cases with and without ADM. However, the outcomes data from no-ADM reconstruction mostly reflect robust mastectomy flaps. Surgeon discretion as informed by specific clinical scenarios should guide decisions regarding the use of ADM in prepectoral breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian T Nolan
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60607, United States
| | - Matthew M Farajzadeh
- Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States
| | - Carter J Boyd
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95816, United States
| | - Jonathan M Bekisz
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95816, United States
| | - Ella G Gibson
- Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States
| | - Ara A Salibian
- Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cazzato V, Renzi N, Bottosso S, De Grazia A, Pasquali S, Di Lecce C, Martellani F, Zanconati F, Ramella V, Papa G. How Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix Influences the Development of the Breast Capsule 1 Year after Implantation: A Histopathological Analysis. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e5400. [PMID: 38025625 PMCID: PMC10656090 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Background In prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) the acellular dermal matrix (ADM)'s integration capacity into the tissue is known. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of the ADM on development and composition of the peri-implant breast capsule in a dynamic setting of breast tissue expansion during two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction. Methods This is a prospective single-center study in which 50 patients who underwent mastectomy and breast reconstruction with prepectoral tissue expander and Braxon ADM (group A) and submuscular tissue expander (group B) were enrolled. One-year post implantation hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry analyses were done on capsule tissue samples. Results The analysis conducted on H&E-stained samples showed a significant reduction of cellular density and a decrease of the cellular infiltration in capsules of ADM-covered expanders compared with naked expander capsules (P < 0.05). The immunohistochemical analyses showed that group A capsules presented significantly less M1 CD68+ macrophages (P < 0.05), lower alfa-SMA expression levels, and a lower number of myofibroblasts (P < 0.05) compared with group B capsules. Presence of lymphatic vessels was minimally detected in both groups. Conclusions The ADM presence around the prepectoral tissue expander influences the development of the peri-implant capsule, causing a significant reduction of the number of cells and inflammatory infiltrate, especially M1 macrophages and myofibroblasts. The ADM Braxon is therefore effective in creating a noninflamed capsule around the implant and in dynamic tissue conditions, and such an environment is maintained in time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vito Cazzato
- From the Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nadia Renzi
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Stefano Bottosso
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Alessia De Grazia
- From the Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Silvia Pasquali
- From the Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Claudia Di Lecce
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Fulvia Martellani
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Zanconati
- From the Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Vittorio Ramella
- From the Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Giovanni Papa
- From the Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pili N, Pasteris A, Serra PL, Sini G, Pinna M, Trignano E, Rubino C. Comparative evaluation using PRO of an algorithm of one-stage immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction versus two-stage reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 84:487-495. [PMID: 37418847 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction has proven to be an oncologically safe technique, but there are some conditions that do not allow its performance. The introduction of new surgical techniques and the recent COVID-19 pandemic have pushed us to introduce a breast reconstruction algorithm in our clinical practice. This allows a one-stage immediate reconstruction for all patients, regardless of their anatomical characteristics, the type of implants used, and the need for postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS A total of 40 patients were recruited and divided into two cohorts, 20 patients underwent immediate one-stage breast reconstruction in the period between October 2019 and January 2021, and 20 patients completed the two-stage reconstructive process in the period prior to October 2019. During the follow-up at 6 months, all patients who had completed the reconstructive process filled out the Breast-Q Reconstruction Module Pre and Postoperative scales questionnaire. The outcomes of the questionnaires were compared between the two cohorts, and statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS Statistics 20 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS The analysis of patient-reported outcomes showed that patients from the one-stage group reported better outcomes in all items evaluated. We did not find statistically significant differences concerning the rate of complications and length of hospital stay between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The analysis of the results shows that the outcomes reported by patients who completed breast reconstruction according to our algorithm are statistically better than those with the two-stage technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Pili
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy.
| | - Andrea Pasteris
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - Pietro L Serra
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - Germana Sini
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - Michela Pinna
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - Emilio Trignano
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - Corrado Rubino
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Trust of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, 10, 07100 Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pompeo FSD, Firmani G, Paolini G, Amorosi V, Briganti F, Sorotos M. Immediate Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Using an ADM with Smooth Round Implants – A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 80:56-65. [PMID: 36989882 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) is well established and used in candidates for nipple/skin-sparing mastectomies; it is based on many different matrices and a great variability in breast implant selection. We describe our experience and clinical outcomes using Braxon® ADMs and smooth round breast implants. Females aged 18-80 years who underwent mastectomies with immediate prepectoral reconstruction between April 2019 and April 2021 were prospectively included. Complications were classified as mastectomy-related (hematoma, necrosis) or reconstruction-related (seroma, infection, red breast syndrome). Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess correlation between complication rate and selected variables, which were analyzed per breast with Kruskal-Wallis H test. Fifty-eight patients (102 breasts) received 45 bilateral and 12 unilateral procedures. Drains collected 485.9 cc [range: 100-1260] and were removed 15.7 days [range: 6-29] postoperatively. We report 41 complications (40.2%): 33 mastectomy-related, 8 reconstruction-related. Reoperation occurred in 14 patients: 7 wound debridement and revisions under local anesthesia; and 7 explantation. Implant loss rate was 6.8%. Mastectomy and reconstruction complications were not correlated with any variable. In conclusion, we found prepectoral reconstruction with Braxon® ADMs and smooth round implants to be associated with acceptable complication rates that are not influenced by any patient- or surgery-related factors. Drainage volume is comparable to other breast implant reconstructive techniques, but drains are left in place for longer.
Collapse
|
12
|
Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 89:694-702. [DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
13
|
Bassetto F, Pandis L, Facchin F, Azzena G, Vindigni V. Braxon®-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction: A decade later. Front Surg 2022; 9:1009356. [PMID: 36420412 PMCID: PMC9677958 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1009356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
We are sitting on the cusp of the bioengineered breast era, in which implant-based breast reconstruction is seeing a growing trend and biotechnology research progressively empowers clinical practice. As never before, the choice of biomaterials has acquired great importance for achieving reconstructive outcomes, and the increase in the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) in the field of senology tells us a story of profound upheaval and progress. With the advent of prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR), plenty of devices have been proposed to wrap the silicone prosthesis, either completely or partially. However, this has caused a great deal of confusion and dissent with regard to the adoption of feasible reconstructive strategies as well as the original scientific rationale underlying the prepectoral approach. Braxon® is the very first device that made prepectoral implant positioning possible, wrapping around the prosthesis and exerting the proven ADM regenerative potential at the implant–tissue interface, taking advantage of the body's physiological healing mechanisms. To date, the Braxon® method is among the most studied and practiced worldwide, and more than 50 publications confirm the superior performance of the device in the most varied clinical scenarios. However, a comprehensive record of the working of this pioneering device is still missing. Therefore, our aim with this review is to lay a structured knowledge of surgery with BRAXON® and to provide a decision-making tool in the field of PPBR through a complete understanding on the very first device for prepectoral, one decade after its introduction.
Collapse
|
14
|
Berna G, De Grazia A, Antoniazzi E, Romeo M, Dell’Antonia F, Lovero S, Marchica P, Rizzetto C, Burelli P. Novel three-dimensional acellular dermal matrix for prepectoral breast reconstruction: First year in review with BRAXON®Fast. Front Surg 2022; 9:970053. [PMID: 36132205 PMCID: PMC9483029 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.970053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Implant-based breast reconstruction is part of breast cancer treatment, and increasingly optimized reconstructive procedures exploit highly biocompatible materials to ensure enhanced aesthetic-functional results. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are collagen-based materials that made prepectoral implant placement possible, thanks to their bioactive antifibrosis action. Recently, the first three-dimensional ADM, BRAXON®Fast, has been produced. Its 3D design represents the technological evolution of BRAXON® ADM, a flat collagen matrix, and allows for a time-saving complete wrapping of the synthetic prosthesis, thus creating a total biological interface on the implant with patient's tissues. Here, we report our experience on the first 23 eligible patients who received BRAXON®Fast-assisted prepectoral reconstruction. On a total of 27 breasts, the overall complication rate was 11.1%, including one minor seroma (3.7%), one case of necrosis (3.7%), and one implant removal due to infection. As new-generation devices, 3D ADMs showed an effective performance, allowing to reduce the overall exposure time for implant preparation and providing an optimal safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Berna
- Plastic Surgery Department, Ospedale Ca’ Foncello, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
- Correspondence: Giorgio Berna
| | - Alessia De Grazia
- Plastic Surgery Department, Ospedale Ca’ Foncello, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Elisa Antoniazzi
- Plastic Surgery Department, Ospedale Ca’ Foncello, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Marco Romeo
- Plastic Surgery Department, Ospedale Ca’ Foncello, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Francesco Dell’Antonia
- Plastic Surgery Department, Ospedale Ca’ Foncello, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Stefano Lovero
- Plastic Surgery Department, Ospedale Ca’ Foncello, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchica
- Plastic Surgery Department, Ospedale Ca’ Foncello, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Christian Rizzetto
- Breast Unit, Ospedale Ca’ Foncello, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Paolo Burelli
- Breast Unit, Ospedale Ca’ Foncello, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pre-Pectoral One-Stage Breast Reconstruction with Anterior Coverage Using Superior Anterior Biological Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) and Inferior Anterior Dermal Sling Support. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58080992. [PMID: 35893107 PMCID: PMC9331557 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58080992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) implants has enhanced breast reconstruction. ADM is a biotechnologically designed human tissue of bovine or porcine origin in which tissue processing removes cellular antigens. In this case report, we describe the use of ADM in one-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction. Skin-reduction breast reconstruction with a prepectoral implant was performed. We created a combined dermal pocket using the inferior dermal flap, sutured with a patch of acellular dermal matrix to continue its extension until the upper pole, to cover the implant. This technique offers single-stage immediate reconstruction, with a decreased requirement for ADM and increased use of vascularized tissue and implant support. Additionally, in the pre-pectoral space, decreased pain postoperatively and less anatomic disruption is offered.
Collapse
|
16
|
Oyonate H, Raigosa M, Descarrega J, Fontdevila J. Acellular Dermal Matrix Pre-pectoral Breast Implant for High-Quality Cosmetic Result. Indian J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-022-03512-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
17
|
Klinger F, Lisa A, Testori A, Vaccari S, Bandi V, Lorenzano V, Klinger M, Tinterri C, Vinci V. Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: A single center comparison between different procedures. Front Surg 2022; 9:935410. [PMID: 35923444 PMCID: PMC9339688 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.935410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe increased incidence of conservative mastectomy operations (nipple- and skin- sparing) has increased the frequency of immediate breast reconstructions (IBR). In order to guarantee patients the best possible aesthetic outcome, the least chance of complications and moreover, the least postoperative pain, the technique with prepectoral prosthetic pocket was recently reconsidered with the use of ADM. This is the first study using Fortiva® in prepectoral breast reconstruction, and it compares the outcomes of three different patient populations (undergoing retromuscular, prepectoral and prepectoral reconstruction with ADM). The authors suggest that prepectoral breast reconstruction with ADM may bring benefits compared to the current standard technique (retromuscular) as well as compared to the prepectoral reconstruction without ADM.MethodsRetrospective data analysis of patients who underwent mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction with silicone implants (DTI), performed by a team of breast surgeons and plastic surgeons. Logistic factor regressions were performed in order to investigate the effects of the three different intervention techniques on the incidence of complications. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the differences in the occurrence of each complication. Mann Whitney test was used to compare the averages of referred pain. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.ResultsA total of 67 patients underwent DTI reconstruction, of which 43 with retromuscular prosthesis, 13 prepectoral and 11 prepectoral with ADM. We found a significantly lower incidence of surgical complications with ADM, exclusively in comparison with retromuscular reconstruction (p = 0.028). It emerges prepectoral reconstruction with ADM involves significantly less visibility of the implant than both the prepectoral surgery without ADM (p = 0.013) and the retromuscular technique (p = 0.029). Finally, postoperative pain referred at twelfth month is significantly less relevant in the group with prepectoral prosthesis and ADM, both in the group with retromuscular (p < 0.001) and prepectoral without ADM (p = 0.001).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction with ADM is a safe and reliable technique, able to exceed some type of limits imposed by prepectoral reconstruction. Moreover, it provides benefits if compared to the current standard technique. In the future, this technique could also be added to it, after a proper selection of patients in pre- and intraoperative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Klinger
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisa
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Testori
- Thoracic Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Vaccari
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Bandi
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Valerio Lorenzano
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Klinger
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Corrado Tinterri
- Breast Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeriano Vinci
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: Valeriano Vinci
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
de Vita R, Villanucci A, Buccheri EM, Pozzi M. Extended Clinical Experience with Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Polyurethane Implant Positioning (BRAND4P method). Clin Breast Cancer 2022; 22:e623-e628. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
19
|
Invited Response on: Commentary on "Skin Reducing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Large Ptotic Breasts". Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45:3054-3055. [PMID: 33625527 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02188-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
20
|
Roberts K, Mills N, Metcalfe C, Lane A, Clement C, Hollingworth W, Taylor J, Holcombe C, Skillman J, Fairhurst K, Whisker L, Cutress R, Thrush S, Fairbrother P, Potter S. Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050886. [PMID: 34848516 PMCID: PMC8634330 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure following mastectomy. IBBR techniques are evolving rapidly, with mesh-assisted subpectoral reconstruction becoming the standard of care and more recently, prepectoral techniques being introduced. These muscle-sparing techniques may reduce postoperative pain, avoid implant animation and improve cosmetic outcomes and have been widely adopted into practice. Although small observational studies have failed to demonstrate any differences in the clinical or patient-reported outcomes of prepectoral or subpectoral reconstruction, high-quality comparative evidence of clinical or cost-effectiveness is lacking. A well-designed, adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to compare the techniques, but breast reconstruction RCTs are challenging. We, therefore, aim to undertake an external pilot RCT (Best-BRA) with an embedded QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) to determine the feasibility of undertaking a trial comparing prepectoral and subpectoral techniques. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Best-BRA is a pragmatic, two-arm, external pilot RCT with an embedded QRI and economic scoping for resource use. Women who require a mastectomy for either breast cancer or risk reduction, elect to have an IBBR and are considered suitable for both prepectoral and subpectoral reconstruction will be recruited and randomised 1:1 between the techniques.The QRI will be implemented in two phases: phase 1, in which sources of recruitment difficulties are rapidly investigated to inform the delivery in phase 2 of tailored interventions to optimise recruitment of patients.Primary outcomes will be (1) recruitment of patients, (2) adherence to trial allocation and (3) outcome completion rates. Outcomes will be reviewed at 12 months to determine the feasibility of a definitive trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the National Health Service (NHS) Wales REC 6 (20/WA/0338). Findings will be presented at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN10081873.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty Roberts
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Mills
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Athene Lane
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Clare Clement
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jodi Taylor
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Holcombe
- Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Joanna Skillman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Katherine Fairhurst
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Lisa Whisker
- Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ramsey Cutress
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Steven Thrush
- Breast Unit, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, Worcestershire, UK
| | | | - Shelley Potter
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Breast Care Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Maruccia M, Elia R, Tedeschi P, Gurrado A, Moschetta M, Testini M, Giudice G. Prepectoral breast reconstruction: an ideal approach to bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. Gland Surg 2021; 10:2997-3006. [PMID: 34804886 DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) has increased its popularity in the last years because of its aim to minimise the chances of developing breast cancer in high-risk patients. Women undergoing this procedure must be considered highly demanding patients given the need to combine aesthetical, functional and preventive desires. This study aims to present the authors' experience in performing BRRM followed by single-stage prepectoral reconstruction (PPBR) with implant completely covered by acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and to report indications, surgical techniques, functional and aesthetic results. Methods A single-centre prospective data collection was carried out from January 2017 to January 2021 of patients at high risk of developing breast cancer undergoing BRRM and immediate PPBR with ADM. Patients were subdivided into two groups according to the breast shape: Group A had small and medium size breasts and Group B had large and ptotic breasts. Oncological and surgical outcomes were collected. Satisfaction with reconstruction and related quality of life were evaluated through the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Results A total of twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen patients were included in group A and six patients in group B. Average follow-up was 18.4 months. Minor complications occurred in four breasts: one seroma, one hematoma and two cases of wound dehiscence. Capsular contracture was not observed. All patients were satisfied with the final result according to the post-operative BREAST-Q questionnaire. Conclusions Immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction could represent the ideal reconstruction option after BRRM and should be offered to all women that fulfil the inclusion criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Maruccia
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, Bari, Italy
| | - Rossella Elia
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Tedeschi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, Bari, Italy
| | - Angela Gurrado
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Moschetta
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, Bari, Italy
| | - Mario Testini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Giudice
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Patel R, Somogyi RB. Comparing post-surgical outcomes of pre-pectoral versus dual-plane direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without increasing the use of acellular dermal matrix. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 75:1123-1129. [PMID: 34916161 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction when performed using the dual-plane technique can be associated with increased postoperative pain, longer recovery, functional impairment, and animation deformity. These issues can be avoided by using the pre-pectoral technique that traditionally uses larger pieces of the acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and results in increased costs. It is unclear how these two methods compare when the technique is modified to avoid the use of additional ADM. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction using a dual-plane or pre-pectoral technique between January 2014 and December 2019. Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction was performed using a partial anterior coverage technique, and therefore no additional ADM was used per case as compared to the dual-plane technique. Rates of post-surgical complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Of 77 patients, 48 (86 breasts) underwent dual-plane reconstruction, whereas 29 (48 breasts) underwent pre-pectoral reconstruction. Mean follow-up time for the dual-plane and pre-pectoral groups was 23.3 and 8.7 months, respectively (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in the rates of any of the short-term post-surgical outcomes between the two groups: seroma (14% vs 6.3%, p = 0.175); hematoma (2.3% vs 4.2%, p = 0.617); skin/nipple necrosis (7% vs 10.4%, p = 0.522); wound skin infection (2.3% vs 2.1%, p = 1.0); wound dehiscence (4.7% vs 2.1, p = 0.654); and implant loss (1.2% vs 8.3%, p = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS Pre-pectoral reconstruction using a partial anterior coverage technique appears to be a safe alternative to dual-plane reconstruction when considering short-term post-surgical complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruchit Patel
- School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ron B Somogyi
- Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Assessing Postsurgical Outcomes with Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review and Meta-analysis Update. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3825. [PMID: 34712539 PMCID: PMC8547925 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background: Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is an alternative to subpectoral/dual-plane reconstruction. Methods: This study examined outcomes of prepectoral reconstruction using a meta-analysis of data pooled with data from our previous review. Thirty studies were included. Results: Explantation, seroma, and infection were the most common complications with no animation deformity reported. Significantly lower odds of infection were observed with prepectoral compared with dual-plane reconstruction. Conclusions: Current literature suggests that prepectoral reconstruction may be associated with lower rates of postsurgical infections.
Collapse
|
24
|
Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with TiLOOP® Bra Pocket - a single-centre retrospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 75:104-111. [PMID: 34635454 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prepectoral implant-based reconstruction using synthetic meshes is feasible with good outcomes. We present our data using TiLOOP® Bra Pocket, a novel ready-to-use mesh pocket which acts as an internal bra and prevents the implant from dislocating or twisting. MATERIALS AND METHODS A single-centre retrospective cohort study was performed to assess short-term complication rates and cosmetic outcomes in patients with prepectoral implant-based reconstruction using the TiLOOP® Bra Pocket. The primary endpoint was complication rates during the first 6 months. The secondary endpoint was the cosmetic outcome after 6 to 12 months, which was judged by two breast surgeons using the Harvard score. RESULTS A total of 63 breasts (43 patients) were reconstructed using the TiLOOP® Bra Pocket between 2018 and 2020, 57 were immediate reconstructions. The overall complication rate was 30,2% (n = 19/63). Major complications occurred in seven breasts (n = 7/63; 11,1%) and minor complications occurred in 12 breasts (12/63; 19,0%). The unplanned revision rate was 12,7%. The cosmetic outcome was good (Harvard score: mean 3, range 1-4; SD 0,75). Seventeen cosmetic complications were observed (17/63; 27,0%) and six cosmetic revision surgeries were performed (6/63; 9,5%). CONCLUSION The use of the TiLOOP® Bra Pocket is convenient and standardized because the pocket is preformed and does not require to be sewn first. Cosmetic outcome is good; however, the surgical morbidity needs to be addressed in future reconstructions. Careful patient selection and preparation techniques are vital in order to achieve acceptable complication rates and satisfying cosmetic results.
Collapse
|
25
|
Looking beyond the prepectoral breast reconstruction experience: a systematic literature review on associated oncological safety and cancer recurrence incidence. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s00238-021-01868-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
26
|
Understanding the Evidence and Improving Outcomes with Implant-Based Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148:437e-450e. [PMID: 34432700 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the risks, benefits, and safety profile of prepectoral breast reconstruction. 2. Have knowledge of primary immediate and delayed prepectoral breast reconstruction techniques and secondary procedures required. 3. Describe data on outcomes of prepectoral breast reconstruction. SUMMARY Once considered to have an unacceptable complication profile, prepectoral breast reconstruction is increasing in popularity because of decreased surgical invasiveness and postoperative pain and the absence of animation deformity. Short-term outcomes studies comparing prepectoral breast reconstruction to partially submuscular techniques demonstrate similarly acceptable rates of postoperative complications. Aesthetic outcomes demonstrate similar rates of capsular contracture but increased rippling and implant palpability of the upper pole. Postoperative functional data are limited but overall show decreased pain and more rapid return of function but equivalent satisfaction on the BREAST-Q. Long-term aesthetic data and rates of revision are lacking.
Collapse
|
27
|
Do We Need Support in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction? Comparing Outcomes with and without ADM. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3745. [PMID: 34386310 PMCID: PMC8354628 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background: The majority of two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction has been described utilizing acellular dermal matrix (ADM). Although reports of prepectoral breast reconstruction without ADM exist, there is a paucity of comparative studies. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients undergoing immediate prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction with tissue expanders from 2017 to 2019. Short-term reconstructive and aesthetic complications were compared between cases that utilized ADM for support and those that did not. Results: In total, 76 cases (51 patients) were identified, of which 35 cases utilized ADM and 41 did not. Risk factors and demographics were similar between the two cohorts with the exception of body mass index, which was higher in the ADM cohort (29.3 versus 25.4, P = 0.011). Average follow-up length was also longer in patients who received ADM (20.3 versus 12.3 months, P < 0.001). Intraoperative expander fill was higher in patients who did not receive ADM (296.8 cm3 versus 151.4 cm3, P < 0.001) though final implant size was comparable in both cohorts (P = 0.584). There was no significant difference in the rate of any complication between the ADM and no ADM cohorts (25.7% versus 17.1%, respectively P = 0.357), including major mastectomy flap necrosis (P = 0.245), major infection (P = 1.000), seroma (P = 0.620), expander explantation (P = 1.000), capsular contracture (P = 1.000), implant dystopia (P = 1.000), and rippling (P = 0.362). Conclusions: Immediate two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with tissue expanders has comparable rates of short-term complications with or without ADM support. Safety of prepectoral expander placement without ADM may warrant more selective ADM use in these cases.
Collapse
|
28
|
Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147:580-584. [PMID: 33620924 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY Prepectoral breast reconstruction has minimized morbidity and dynamic deformities associated with submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction. However, reliance on implant coverage with acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant reconstruction remains limited by high material costs. The authors describe a technique in which anterior implant coverage in prepectoral reconstruction is split into acellular dermal matrix inferolaterally and synthetic, absorbable mesh superiorly. Use of acellular dermal matrix inferiorly provides coverage and reinforces the inframammary fold, whereas the absorbable mesh is trimmed and sutured to the acellular dermal matrix at the appropriate tension to support the implant and relieve pressure on mastectomy flaps. A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive prepectoral one-stage breast reconstructions using this technique at a single institution. Patient demographics, mastectomy and reconstruction characteristics, reconstructive outcomes, and cost of support materials were queried and analyzed. Eleven patients (21 breasts) underwent prepectoral immediate implant reconstruction with Vicryl and acellular dermal matrix anterior coverage. Average mastectomy weight was 775.8 g. Smooth, round cohesive implants were used in all cases and average implant size was 514.5 ml. Overall complication rates were low and included one minor infection (4.8 percent) and one case of minor mastectomy flap and partial nipple necrosis each (4.8 percent). Calculated cost savings of Vicryl and acellular dermal matrix anterior coverage was up to $3415 in unilateral and $6830 in bilateral cases. Prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix inferiorly and Vicryl mesh superiorly is a safe technique that decreases material costs associated with support materials and allows the surgeon to precisely control the implant pocket and position. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, IV.
Collapse
|
29
|
Walker NJ, Park JG, Maus JC, Motamedi V, Rebowe RE, Runyan CM, Tucker SL. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in High-Body Mass Index Patients. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 87:136-143. [PMID: 33560000 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of body mass index (BMI) on complication rates in prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is not well established. The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates between different BMI groups in subpectoral and prepectoral reconstruction. METHODS A single-surgeon, 4-year, retrospective review was performed of consecutive prosthetic breast reconstructions. During this time, the senior author's practice shifted from a subpectoral to prepectoral technique. Patients were stratified into BMI subgroups (<25, 25-35, and >35 kg/m2) and complication rates were analyzed. A survey was administered to blinded medical personnel and patients comparing esthetic results. RESULTS Implant-based reconstructions were performed in 195 patients (103 subpectoral and 92 prepectoral). No significant difference in major complication rate was observed between techniques. Among patients with BMI greater than 35 kg/m2, implant exposure occurred at a significantly higher rate in the prepectoral group (P = 0.04). In patients with BMI greater than 25 kg/m2, minor asymmetry was more prevalent with prepectoral reconstruction (12.3% vs 0%; P = 0.02). Regardless of technique, the odds of reoperation increased by 7% per point increase in BMI, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07; odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.15).A total of 66 survey responses were received. Physicians rated esthetic results more positively than patients did. Patients with a BMI of less than 25 kg/m2 were rated better than other BMI groups in nearly all categories. The position of submuscular reconstruction was rated significantly better than prepectoral. CONCLUSIONS There is a trend toward higher complication rates in prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction with increasing BMI. Nonetheless, the technique appears to be safe, with comparable clinical and cosmetic results.
Collapse
|
30
|
Review of Outcomes in Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction with and without Surgical Mesh Assistance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147:305-315. [PMID: 33177453 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the past decade, surgeons have increasingly advocated for a return to prepectoral breast reconstruction with claims that surgical mesh (including acellular dermal matrix) can reduce complication rates. However, numerous surgical and implant advancements have occurred in the decades since the initial prepectoral studies, and it is unclear whether mesh is solely responsible for the touted benefits. METHODS The authors conducted a systematic review of all English language articles reporting original data for prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Articles presenting duplicate data were excluded. Complications were recorded and calculated on a per-breast basis and separated as mesh-assisted, no-mesh prior to 2006, and no-mesh after 2006 (date of first silicone gel-filled breast implant approval). Capsular contracture comparisons were adjusted for duration of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 58 articles were included encompassing 3120 patients from 1966 to 2019. The majority of the included studies were retrospective case series. Reported complication outcomes were variable, with no significant difference between groups in hematoma, infection, or explantation rates. Capsular contracture rates were higher in historical no-mesh cohorts, whereas seroma rates were higher in contemporary no-mesh cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Limited data exist to understand the benefits of surgical mesh devices in prepectoral breast reconstruction. Level I studies with an appropriate control group are needed to better understand the specific role of mesh for these procedures. Existing data are inconclusive but suggest that prepectoral breast reconstruction can be safely performed without surgical mesh.
Collapse
|
31
|
Bojanic C, Samaras S, Chishimba MM, Malata CM. First use of Braxon® acellular dermal matrix for complex revision aesthetic breast surgery-revision augmentation mastopexy. J Surg Case Rep 2021; 2021:rjab256. [PMID: 34211692 PMCID: PMC8241462 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjab256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) have ushered in a paradigm shift in prosthetic breast reconstruction; however, there has hitherto been no reported use of Braxon® ADM in aesthetic breast surgery. Here, we describe the case of a 42-year-old woman who presented for revision of her bilateral aesthetic augmentation-mastopexy following multiple revision surgeries. The predominant concerns were persistent pain, implant malposition and a wide intermammary distance. Her predicament was worsened by inability to tolerate monopolar diathermy owing to a spinal stimulator-the least invasive operation was sought and Braxon® ADM met this criterion. The procedure was a success, and she remains symptom-free, with soft breasts and stable implant positions. Braxon® ADM, with its preformed shape, total implant-wrapping design and easy suture fixation, lends itself to easy use in cosmetic breast surgery. Its role in cosmetic breast surgery has yet to be established, but this case marks the beginning of this endeavor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Bojanic
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stavros Samaras
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Charles M Malata
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Belmonte BM, Campbell CA. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86:S585-S592. [PMID: 34100818 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prepectoral acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted breast reconstruction has demonstrated improved pain scores, faster return to full range of motion, and an appropriate postoperative safety profile when compared with cohorts with submuscular implant placement; however, there are limited data on aesthetic outcomes. Basic science biointegration research has previously demonstrated faster ADM incorporation with fenestrated compared with confluent ADM. We report the safety profile of anterior support meshed ADM prepectoral breast reconstruction and analyze predictive factors for aesthetic outcomes after gel implant placement. METHODS All consecutive immediate staged prepectoral expander-to-implant breast reconstructions with more than 6 months of follow-up were compared with a partially submuscular cohort for demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. All patients 1 to 3.5 years after gel implant placement were evaluated for the impact of clinical characteristics on aesthetic outcomes. RESULTS Two hundred twenty-four prepectoral tissue expander placements were compared with 535 partially submuscular tissue expanders with no significant differences in demographics. There was increased wound dehiscence repaired in clinic and insignificantly decreased seromas with prepectoral expander placement. One hundred sixty breasts were reconstructed with gel implants, and 12 underwent autologous reconstruction during the conduct of the study. The remaining 21 patients were continuing expansion, and 3 succumbed to disease progression. Regression analysis of 86 breast reconstructions showed that a body mass index of greater than 30, fat grafting, and highly cohesive anatomic implants decreased rippling, whereas radiation increased capsular contracture (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Prepectoral meshed ADM breast reconstruction has an equivalent safety profile to partially submuscular ADM-assisted reconstruction and early aesthetic ratings comparable with other published accounts of implant-based reconstruction. Radiated skin envelopes carry higher capsular contracture rates. Thin patients have a higher risk of visible rippling, whereas fat grafting and higher cohesivity implants are associated with less rippling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briana M Belmonte
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Meattini I, Becherini C, Bernini M, Bonzano E, Criscitiello C, De Rose F, De Santis MC, Fontana A, Franco P, Gentilini OD, Livi L, Meduri B, Parisi S, Pasinetti N, Prisco A, Rocco N. Breast reconstruction and radiation therapy: An Italian expert Delphi consensus statements and critical review. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 99:102236. [PMID: 34126314 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Breast conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiation therapy (RT) or mastectomy have shown comparable oncological outcomes in early-stage breast cancer and are considered standard of care treatments. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) targeted to both the chest wall and regional lymph nodes is recommended in high-risk patients. Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OBCS) represents a significant recent improvement in breast surgery. Nevertheless, it represents a challenge for radiation oncologists as it triggers different decision-making strategies related to treatment volume definition and target delineation. Hence, the choice of the best combination and timing when offering RT to breast cancer patients who underwent or are planned to undergo reconstruction procedures should be carefully evaluated and based on individual considerations. We present an Italian expert Delphi Consensus statements and critical review, led by a core group of all the professional profiles involved in the management of breast cancer patients undergoing reconstructive procedures and RT. The report was structured as to consider the main recommendations on breast reconstruction and RT and analyse the current open issues deserving investigation and consensus. We used a three key-phases and a Delphi process. The final expert panel of 40 colleagues selected key topics as identified by the core group of the project. A final consensus on 26 key statements on RT and breast reconstruction after three rounds of the Delphi voting process and harmonisation was reached. An accompanying critical review of available literature was summarized. A clear communication and cooperation between surgeon and radiation oncologist is of paramount relevance both in the setting of breast reconstruction following mastectomy when PMRT is planned and when extensive glandular rearrangements as OBCS is performed. A shared-decision making, relying on outcome-based and patient-centred considerations, is essential, while waiting for higher level-of-evidence data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy.
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy
| | - Marco Bernini
- Breast Surgery Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Bonzano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic Foundation & PhD School in Experimental Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Department of Oncology and Haematology (DIPO), University of Milan & Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | - Maria Carmen De Santis
- Radiation Oncology Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | - Antonella Fontana
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Latina, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont & Radiation Oncology Unit, AOU "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | - Silvana Parisi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy
| | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Radiation Oncology Service, ASST Valcamonica, Esine, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy; Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Group (COBCG), Italy
| | - Agnese Prisco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, ASUFC, Udine, Italy; Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group, Italy
| | - Nicola Rocco
- Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements (G.RE.T.A.), Milan, Naples, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
An Argument for the Safety of Immediate Device Reconstruction following Mastectomy during the COVID-19 Crisis. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3627. [PMID: 34036031 PMCID: PMC8140773 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Although oncologic surgery is deemed urgent during the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical guidelines in reconstructive surgery have been unclear. Utilizing propensity-matched pre-pandemic data and our institutional experience during the crisis, we aimed to assess the safety of immediate device reconstruction following mastectomy to aid in decision-making during the pandemic.
Collapse
|
35
|
Gentile P, Bernini M, Orzalesi L, Sordi S, Meattini I, Lessi F, Kothari A, Calabrese C. Titanium-coated polypropylene mesh as innovative bioactive material in conservatives mastectomies and pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. Bioact Mater 2021; 6:4640-4653. [PMID: 34095622 PMCID: PMC8144114 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast reconstruction is rapidly evolving, thanks to the growing acceptance of synthetic meshes as innovative biomaterials. 276 patients undergoing mastectomy (total of 328 mastectomies) were analyzed in a retrospective observational study to evaluate the pre-pectoral immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) using an implant wrapped with Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TCPM) vs. patients treated with tissue expander (TE), equally placed pre-pectorally (and wrapped with the same TCPM in 74.3% of the control group’ breasts). 163 patients, of the study group (SG), underwent mastectomy and pre-pectoral IBR with implant wrapped with TCPM, in a one-step surgery, called direct-to-implant technique (DTI), while 113 patients control group (CG) underwent mastectomy and TE. DTI technique has been performed in 192 breasts of the SG while TE procedure in 136 breasts of the CG. The BREAST-Q questionnaire has been provided before the treatment and 2 years later. Baker scale has been used to evaluate capsular contracture. Oncologic, surgical, and aesthetic outcomes along with BREAST-Q scores were analyzed. Additionally, a histologic evaluation was conducted in 11 capsules' samples randomly chosen (6 derived from SG patients and 5 derived from CG). Complications were recorded in 43 cases (29SG-14CG): 8 skin-nipple necrosis (5SG-3CG), 8 wound dehiscence (6SG-2CG), 3 hematomas (1SG-2CG), and 24 infections (8SG-16CG). Grade IV capsular contracture was detected in 9 breasts (1SG-8CG), whereas 254 breasts were grade I (110SG-144CG), 33 (10SG-23CG) grade II, and 32 (4SG-28CG) grade III. Implant wrinkling was detected in 18 cases (10SG-8CG) after 30 months. The local tumor recurrence rate was 5.8%. Three recurrences were on the nipple-areola complex (1.9%). SG patients showed significantly higher rates in the BREAST-Q overall Satisfaction with Outcome (74.1), overall Satisfaction with Breasts (69.1), Psychosocial Well-being (81.9), and Sexual Well-being (63.1), versus CG's patients (p < 0.05). Histological analysis showed a process of normal tissue repair with a complete mesh integration and normal healing. Conservative mastectomies with pre-pectoral IBR assisted by TCPM proved themselves oncologically safe, biologically integrated into native tissues, and highly accepted in terms of quality of life guaranteeing a more natural and aesthetic breast appearance. Core tip This retrospective observational study provided clinical and histological outcomes of the pre-pectoral IBR using an implant wrapped with TCPM vs. patients treated with TE, equally placed pre-pectorally. The efficacy of IBR using an implant wrapped with TCPM was confirmed by the cosmetic results obtained and by a rate of side effects comparable to TE. All the histological analyses performed confirmed the TCPM mesh complete integration with the physiological aspects of healing: The Collagen 1 and 3 expressions did not differ, between TCPM and NO TCPM samples to confirm a process of healing overlapping to perfect device incorporation and normal healing. This retrospective observational study, reports the results of pre-pectoral immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) using a prosthesis wrapped with Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TCPM) vs. patients treated with tissue expander (TE) equally placed pre-pectorally (and wrapped with the same TCPM in 74% of the control group), with the aim to reduce the risk of reconstruction failure after conservative mastectomy. The primary end-points of the study were the clinical outcomes. These outcomes were: the incidence of perioperative and postoperative complications (safety profile), quality of life (QoL) at 2 years after surgery, measured as the change between the pre- and post-op BREAST-Q scores, the aesthetic outcomes, and the capsular contracture grade. Two methods for the clinical analysis of the results have been used: Surgical-Team and patient self-evaluation. The Surgical-team evaluation was an objective evaluation based on clinical assessment, using a scale of six degrees (excellent, good, discreet, enough, poor, inadequate). The subjective patient-based self-evaluation applied the same six degrees. Moreover, secondary end-point of the study, was a histopathological capsule assessment to evaluate the integration of the TCPM in the mastectomy flap as a bioactive material. Histological, and bio-molecular evaluation of TCPM samples were analyzed. In particular, Hematoxylin-eosin staining of post-operative biopsies of wrapping tissue TCPM mesh was performed focusing on the collagen presence and fibroblasts amount and specifically, on the complete healing and TCPM incorporation without side effects. Additionally, the immunofluorescence using specific markers CD 45 and Collagen 1, and immunohistochemistry using CD 45 on paraffin samples were performed. The endpoint was to evaluate the grade of inflammation represented by the number of lymphocytes in the treated site, and the eventual different collagen type expression (Collagen 1 and Collagen 3) in tissues underwent and not to radiotherapy and during the use of TCPM. Analyzing the side effects with the use of t-test, the complication rate between SG and CG did not showed statistically significant differences (p=0,8472), although it was slightly higher in the SG. Despite the study group was bigger than the control group (+42%) the side effects' number did not statistically differ, confirming the safety and reliability of the TCPM procedure during DTI. Overall Satisfaction with Breasts, Psychosocial Well-being, and Sexual Well-being scores were all significantly increased after sub-cutaneous pre-pectoral DTI immediate reconstruction with TCPM mesh (p < 0.05) compared to CG. Mean satisfaction with the overall aesthetic result was high after breast reconstruction (8.72) in patients who underwent DTI pre-pectoral immediate reconstruction (SG) after 2 years from surgery. The histological analysis of fragments of implant's wrapping tissue incorporating TCPM mesh displayed complete incorporation of the mesh with physiological aspects of healing. The immunochemistry concluded the Collagen 1, and 3 expressions did not differ, with statistical significance, between TCPM and NO TCPM samples, showing a process of physiological healing overlapping to perfect device incorporation, confirming that TCPM was a bioactive material. Conservative mastectomies with pre-pectoral IBR assisted by TCPM are resulted oncologically safe preserving breast appearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Gentile
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, 00133, Italy
| | - Marco Bernini
- Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Orzalesi
- Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Sordi
- Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Ashutosh Kothari
- Breast Surgery Unit, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
"To Pre or Not to Pre": Introduction of a Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Assessment Score to Help Surgeons Solving the Decision-Making Dilemma. Retrospective Results of a Multicenter Experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147:1278-1286. [PMID: 33973934 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implant-based reconstruction is the most performed breast reconstruction, and both subpectoral and prepectoral approaches can lead to excellent results. Choosing the best procedure requires a thorough understanding of every single technique, and proper patient selection is critical to achieve surgical success, in particular when dealing with prepectoral breast reconstruction. METHODS Between January of 2014 and December of 2018, patients undergoing mastectomy and eligible for immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction with tissue expander or definitive implant, were selected. The Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Assessment score was applied to evaluate patient-related preoperative and intraoperative risk factors that could influence the success of prepectoral breast reconstruction. All patients were scored retrospectively, and the results obtained through this assessment tool were compared to the records of the surgical procedures actually performed. RESULTS Three hundred fifty-two patients were included; 112 of them underwent direct-to-implant immediate reconstruction, and 240 underwent the two-stage procedure with temporary tissue expander. According to the Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Assessment score, direct-to-implant reconstruction should have been performed 6.2 percent times less, leading to an increase of 1.4 percent in two-stage reconstruction and 4.8 percent in submuscular implant placement. CONCLUSIONS To date, there is no validated system to guide surgeons in identifying the ideal patient for subcutaneous or retropectoral breast reconstruction and eventually whether she is a good candidate for direct-to-implant or two-stage reconstruction. The authors processed a simple risk-assessment score to objectively evaluate the patient's risk factors, to standardize the decision-making process, and to identify the safest and most reliable breast reconstructive procedure. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, IV.
Collapse
|
37
|
Bojanic C, Lawrence A, Mitrasinovic S, Samaras S, Fopp LJ, Forouhi P, Malata CM. Indications and Pitfalls of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Braxon Ⓡ Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM): A preliminary plastic surgical experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74:1931-1971. [PMID: 33972202 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C Bojanic
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
| | - A Lawrence
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
| | - S Mitrasinovic
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
| | - S Samaras
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
| | - L J Fopp
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
| | - P Forouhi
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
| | - C M Malata
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom; Cambridge Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom; School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge & Chelmsford, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mura S, Caputo GG, Miotti G, Contessi Negrini F, Fin A, Rampino Cordaro E, Guarneri GF, Zanin C, D'Angelo M, Tullio A, Parodi PC. Direct-to-implant, prepectoral breast reconstruction with Braxon ® dermal matrix: A single-center experience with 111 cases. Breast J 2021; 27:412-414. [PMID: 33550687 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.14193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Mura
- DAME (Department of Medical Area), Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Glenda Giorgia Caputo
- DAME (Department of Medical Area), Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Giovanni Miotti
- DAME (Department of Medical Area), Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Filippo Contessi Negrini
- DAME (Department of Medical Area), Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fin
- DAME (Department of Medical Area), Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Emanuele Rampino Cordaro
- DAME (Department of Medical Area), Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Gianni Franco Guarneri
- DAME (Department of Medical Area), Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Chiara Zanin
- DAME (Department of Medical Area), Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Matteo D'Angelo
- DAME (Department of Medical Area), Institute of Hygiene and Clinical Epidemiology, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Annarita Tullio
- DAME (Department of Medical Area), Institute of Hygiene and Clinical Epidemiology, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Pier Camillo Parodi
- DAME (Department of Medical Area), Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dual-Plane Retro-pectoral Versus Pre-pectoral DTI Breast Reconstruction: An Italian Multicenter Experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45:51-60. [PMID: 32860077 PMCID: PMC7886728 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01892-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background The use of conservative mastectomies has risen significantly during the last few years. The reconstructive choice of direct-to-implant reconstruction has become more practicable with modern mastectomy techniques. The initial trend in Italian centers was to use dual-plane hybrid reconstruction. However, a high level of complications has been registered. From 2015 onward, in our centers, a pre-pectoral approach has been adopted. The authors sought to describe the Italian trend to gradually discard the sub-pectoral technique with lower lateral pole coverage of the prosthesis using ADMs comparing it with the pre-pectoral approach with ADMs, without any muscle dissection, in terms of complication rates. Materials and Methods A multicenter retrospective clinical study was performed from January 2010 to June 2018. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups: Cases with an ADM-only coverage pre-pectoral reconstruction made up the first group (Group 1). Those with the retro-pectoral muscular position + ADM implant coverage comprised the second one (Group 2). Complications such as seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, reconstruction failure, animation deformity and capsular contracture were recorded. Results We performed 716 direct-to-implant reconstructions: 509 were partially sub-pectoral and 207 were pre-pectoral. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Incidence of complications was higher in dual-plane reconstructions. There were statistical significant differences in the rates of seroma and hematoma. Conclusion Using the pre-pectoral approach, the authors have experienced favorable aesthetics and superior clinical and functional outcomes. Retro-pectoral muscular ADM implant coverage has to be considered only in specific complicated second-stage surgeries. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00266-020-01892-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
40
|
Salgarello M, Pagliara D, Barone Adesi L, Visconti G, Wild JB, Matey P. Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction With Prepectoral Micropolyurethane Foam-Coated Implant: Analysis of Patient Satisfaction. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 21:e454-e461. [PMID: 33627298 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immediate implant reconstruction after mastectomy with submuscular implant placement is widely used in order to avoid implant exposure, capsular contracture and poor aesthetic result. Postoperative complications can be reduced by maintain mastectomy flap thickness and asses flap vascularity with near infrared imaging. The prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane implants has been utilized with encouraging results. Postoperative patient satisfaction was assessed with the BREAST-Q scores in patients who underwent prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane implants. Additionally the impact of mastectomy flap thickness on breast reconstruction was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Breast Q-scores of satisfaction with the breast, the postoperative outcome and physical well-being of the chest in 70 patients underwent immediate implant breast reconstructions with prepectoral polyurethane implant were retrospectively reviewed. The correlation between mastectomy flap thickness and satisfaction with breast was analyzed. RESULTS At 12-month follow-up the mean Q-score for satisfaction with breast was 71.73 (standard deviation: 13.31), and for physical well-being chest was 70.73 (standard deviation: 7.94). A positive linear correlation between mastectomy flap thickness and satisfaction with the breast was identified. CONCLUSIONS The postoperative Q-scores are encouraging in the use of polyurethane prepectoral implants in immediate breast reconstruction, especially in patients with "thick" mastectomy flaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Salgarello
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Unità di Chirurgia Plastica, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Domenico Pagliara
- Mater Olbia Hospital, Strada Statale 125 Orientale Sarda, 07026 Olbia (SS), Italy.
| | - Liliana Barone Adesi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Unità di Chirurgia Plastica, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Visconti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Unità di Chirurgia Plastica, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | | | - Pilar Matey
- New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
A Sustainable Approach to Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Using Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3392. [PMID: 33564601 PMCID: PMC7861958 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction provides an alternative to submuscular reconstruction, but the increased acellular dermal matrix (ADM) required has the potential to lead to increased costs and decreased supply of this limited-resource material. We present a method for prepectoral reconstruction utilizing skin-graft meshing techniques to increase the surface area of usable ADM. Methods: Forty-four patients underwent this technique from February 2019 to February 2020. Patient characteristics, operative details, and outcomes, including complications and patient satisfaction utilizing the BREAST-Q, were analyzed. Cost analysis relative to projected cost of nonmeshed techniques was performed. Results: There were 20 unilateral and 24 bilateral procedures, for a total of 68 breast reconstructions. Mean age was 45.9 years (32–71). Mean implant volume was 485 cm3 (265–800), and one sheet of ADM was used for each breast with an average surface area of 161 cm2. Median follow-up was 350 days (212–576). Minor complications included an infection treated with oral antibiotics. Major complications included one axillary hematoma and one delayed implant loss. One patient underwent revision for asymmetry. Mean BREAST-Q score was 47.4/60. Cost ranged from $4113 to 5025 per breast, compared with the projected $9125–18250 per breast for other techniques in the literature. Conclusions: In contrast to previously described uses of ADM in prepectoral reconstruction, meshing maximizes resource utilization by expanding the coverage of a single sheet. Early findings demonstrate minimal complications and high patient satisfaction, suggesting the approach has potential to provide the benefits of prepectoral reconstruction while responsibly preserving product availability and tempering healthcare costs.
Collapse
|
42
|
Caputo GG, Zingaretti N, Kiprianidis I, Zanfisi C, Domenici L, Parodi PC, Governa M. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 21:344-351. [PMID: 33308993 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In conservative mastectomies, in which the native skin envelope is preserved, positioning an implant in the submuscular plane commonly leads to functional consequences like upper limb movement impairment and animation phenomena. In recent years, however, a new conservative prepectoral breast reconstruction technique has been proposed, with demonstrated surgical safety and aesthetic effectiveness. The aim of our study was to explore and compare the functional and aesthetic outcomes of the prepectoral/acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-wrapped implant procedure versus subpectoral/ADM-assisted reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective nonrandomized comparative study of 94 patients (121 breasts) undergoing direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after skin-/nipple-sparing and skin reduction was conducted from February 2013 to October 2017. Fifty-five patients (group A) received subpectoral ADM-assisted reconstruction with dual-plane implant positioning, and 39 patients (group B) received prepectoral partially or totally ADM-wrapped implant reconstruction. Patients were allocated to either group A or B depending on the mastectomy flap thickness and vitality, as assessed clinically during the operation. Details of rehabilitation program, postoperative pain at 72 hours, postoperative analgesic therapies, demographic data, and complications were recorded. Upper limb function was assessed before and 1 month after surgery by a physiatrist according to a precise protocol. Patients were asked to fill in the BREAST-Q reconstruction questionnaire after surgery to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS Differences in upper limb function between groups, namely flexion (P = .03), abduction (P = .003), internal rotation (P = .02), and external rotation (P = .05), were statistically significant. Although most patients required postoperative rehabilitation, the individual rehabilitation intervention frequency was greater in the subpectoral group (91% in group A vs 74% in group B). There was also a significant difference in postoperative pain (within 72 hours), with less pain perceived in the prepectoral group (P = .01). Furthermore, prepectoral patients reported slightly better postoperative quality of life than subpectoral patients, particularly in the domains of sexual well-being (P = .005) and satisfaction with breast (P = .002). CONCLUSION In our case series, prepectoral implant positioning with partial or total ADM coverage led to less impairment of upper limb function in terms of flexion, abduction, and internal and external rotation, and also reduce the need for rehabilitation. Furthermore, as a result of the less invasive procedure, prepectoral patients had less immediate postoperative pain and were more satisfied with breast appearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenda Giorgia Caputo
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
| | - Nicola Zingaretti
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Zanfisi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Lavinia Domenici
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pier Camillo Parodi
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Maurizio Governa
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burn Center
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Masià J. The largest multicentre data collection on prepectoral breast reconstruction: The iBAG study. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:848-860. [PMID: 32786089 PMCID: PMC7540676 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives In the last years, prepectoral breast reconstruction has increased its popularity, becoming a standard reconstructive technique by preserving pectoralis major anatomy and functionality. Nevertheless, the lack of solid and extensive data negatively impacts on surgeons’ correct information about postoperative complication rates and proper patient selection. This study aims to collect the largest evidence on this procedure. Methods A multicentre retrospective audit, promoted by the Barcelona Hospital, collected the experience of 30 centers on prepectoral breast reconstruction with Braxon ADM. The study had the scientific support of INPECS and IIB societies which provided the online database Clinapsis. Results A total of 1450 procedures were retrospectively collected in a 6‐year period. Mean age 52.4 years, BMI 23.9, follow‐up 22.7 months. Reconstruction was carried out after a tumor in 77.1% of the cases, 20.1% had prophylactic surgery, 2.8% had revisions. Diabetes, smoke, and immunosuppression had an influence on complications occurrence, as well as implant weight. Capsular contracture was associated with postoperative radiotherapy, but the overall rate was low (2.1%). Complications led to implant loss in 6.5% of the cases. Conclusions The international Braxon Audit Group multicentre data collection represents a milestone in the field of breast reconstruction, extensively improving the knowledge on this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaume Masià
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Should Obesity Be Considered a Contraindication for Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145:619-627. [PMID: 32097293 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000006540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prepectoral implant-based reconstruction reemerged as a viable approach following recent advances in reconstructive techniques and technology. To achieve successful outcomes, careful patient selection is critical. Obesity increases the risk of complications and has been suggested as a relative contraindication for prepectoral breast reconstruction. METHODS Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent immediate two-stage implant-based reconstruction at the authors' institution was performed. Only women having a body mass index of 30 kg/m or greater were included. Patient demographics, operative details, and surgical outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral reconstruction were compared. RESULTS One hundred ten patients (189 breasts) who underwent prepectoral and 83 (147 breasts) who underwent subpectoral reconstruction were included. Complications were comparable between the two groups. Twelve devices (6.4 percent), including implants and tissue expanders, required explantation in the prepectoral group, and 12 devices (8.2 percent) required explantation in the subpectoral group (p =0.522). Final implant-based reconstruction was achieved in 180 breasts (95.2 percent) in the prepectoral group and 141 breasts (95.9 percent) in the subpectoral group. Regardless of type of reconstruction (prepectoral or subpectoral), for each point increase in body mass index, the odds of complications and device explantation increased by 3.4 percent and 8.6 percent, respectively; and the optimal cutoff to predict higher complications and explantation rates was a body mass index of 34.8 kg/m and 34.1 kg/m, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Obesity increases complications and failure rates in a positive correlation; however, complications and final reconstruction rates are comparable between the prepectoral and subpectoral groups. The authors believe that obesity should not be a contraindication for prepectoral breast reconstruction but that care should be taken in patients with a body mass index above 35 kg/m. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
|
45
|
Fin A, De Biasio F, Mura S, Massarut S, Zaccaria G, Parodi PC. Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Meshed ADM. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2020; 29:81-87. [PMID: 34026670 DOI: 10.1177/2292550320933687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction has been widely reassessed in recent years and is taking on an increasingly important role in the field of immediate breast reconstruction. We report here a case series of 32 patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast carcinoma and prepectoral breast reconstruction involving an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) treated by means of a skin-graft mesher in our hospital from January 2015 to March 2016. The indications for this type of reconstruction were body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m2; no history of radiotherapy; no active smokers; moderate grade breast; and good viability of mastectomy flap: normal skin colour, active bleeding at the fresh cut edges, and thicker than 1 cm mastectomy flaps; the viability of lower thicknesses was ascertained by the fluorescent dye indocyanine green xenon-based imaging technology (4 patients). The mean age of the patients was 56.4 years (range: 39-77 years). Their mean BMI was 27.4 kg/m2. Until the end of follow-up (mean: 17 months), major complications requiring reoperation occurred in 9% of patients and minor complications in 22% of patients. The mean of the 3 pain visual analogue scale scores taken in the first 24 hours after surgery was 1.8. Mean duration of hospital stay has been 2.2 days. Our complication rate was similar to those reported in other studies on prepectoral breast reconstruction featuring total ADM coverage of the implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Fin
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area, University of Udine, Italy
| | - Fabrizio De Biasio
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area, University of Udine, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Mura
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area, University of Udine, Italy
| | - Samuele Massarut
- Department of Breast Surgery, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), Aviano, Pordenone
| | - Giovanna Zaccaria
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Pier Camillo Parodi
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area, University of Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Berna G, Cagli B, Persichetti P, Cogliandro A, Silan F, Maritan M, Dell'Antonia F. Feasibility study on equine acellular pericardium matrix (APM): A new tool for breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73:2150-2155. [PMID: 32513644 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The advent of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for lower pole coverage allows immediate reconstructions with improved aesthetic outcomes and faster recovery. This study describes for the first time, the use of a new acellular pericardium matrix (APM) in implant-based breast reconstruction and characterises its safety profile. Equity is a membrane with a natural cross-linked structure with many of the properties of ADMs, but improved resistance and reduced thickness. A retrospective data collection of all Equity APM reconstructions was conducted at two Italian hospital centres with substantial experience using biomaterials. Between May 2013 and October 2018, a total of 63 APM-assisted breast reconstructions were performed in 55 women. The reconstructed breasts were small to medium and the mean implant weight was 285 g, ranging from 145 g to 685 g. Two patients were previously irradiated while seven received post-operative radiation; five were active smokers and six were hypertensive. Complications included visibility in the upper pole (9.5%), seroma (1.6%), dehiscence, infection and necrosis (3.2% for each). Implant loss occurred in 3.2% of the cases. The patients were highly satisfied, reporting scores above 50 for each section of the Breast-Q questionnaire. With an acceptable complication rate, the use of the equine APM can be considered safe with satisfactory aesthetic results. Although the retrospective nature of this study limits its clinical impact, the use of Equity can be considered a viable alternative to thicker and expensive ADMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Berna
- Ca' Foncello Hospital, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, via S. Ambrogio di Fiera, n. 37, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
| | - Barbara Cagli
- Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Roma, Italy
| | - Paolo Persichetti
- Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Roma, Italy
| | - Annalisa Cogliandro
- Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Silan
- Ca' Foncello Hospital, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, via S. Ambrogio di Fiera, n. 37, 31100, Treviso, Italy
| | - Monia Maritan
- Ca' Foncello Hospital, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, via S. Ambrogio di Fiera, n. 37, 31100, Treviso, Italy
| | - Francesco Dell'Antonia
- Ca' Foncello Hospital, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, via S. Ambrogio di Fiera, n. 37, 31100, Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Liu J, Hou J, Li Z, Wang B, Sun J. Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Capsular Contracture of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Arm Meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44:735-742. [PMID: 31919627 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-019-01603-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large number of clinical studies have suggested that acellular dermal matrix (ADM) can decrease the incidence of capsular contracture in implant-based breast reconstruction. Yet, there is currently no high-level epidemiological evidence to prove this. The goal of this meta-analysis was to clarify the efficacy of ADM in capsular contracture, and provide a reference value for plastic surgeons. METHODS We systematically performed a search on PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify eligible studies from inception up to October 1, 2019. A random-effects model was used to obtain a pooled incidence rate. We conducted subgroup analysis according to geographic region, type of ADM, body mass index (BMI), duration of follow-up, and proportion of participants who have received radiotherapy. RESULTS A total of 18 studies involving 2941 cases were included. Overall, the pooled incidence rate of capsular contracture was 2.4% (95% CI 1.2-3.9%). The results from subgroup analyses indicated an even lower incidence in North America (1.6%, 95% CI 0.5-3.3%) and in human-derived ADM (HADM) (1.2%, 95% CI 0.2-3.0%). In addition, the results showed that the patients with BMI < 24, or who have received radiotherapy, were more prone to capsular contracture. CONCLUSION The application of ADM can effectively reduce the incidence of capsular contracture in implant-based breast reconstruction. And we infer that it might also apply to breast augmentation. However, additional high-quality trials are warranted to corroborate the findings of this meta-analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Collapse
|
48
|
Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction in Large Ptotic Breasts. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44:664-672. [PMID: 31970455 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01616-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction is increasingly offered to breast cancer patients, as the one-stage technique has proved surgical and oncological safety and aesthetic effectiveness. Nevertheless, there are limited data on outcomes after pre-pectoral breast reconstruction in large and ptotic breasts. The aim of the paper is to present the authors' experience in performing Wise pattern mastectomy with pre-pectoral implant and complete acellular dermal matrix (ADM) coverage as a single-stage procedure in patients with large ptotic breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of protective collected data from January 2017 to June 2019 of patients who presented with large and ptotic breasts undergoing skin-reducing mastectomy and immediate pre-pectoral breast reconstruction with complete ADM coverage and inferior dermal sling was performed. Oncological and surgical outcomes were collected. Satisfaction with reconstruction and related quality of life were evaluated through BREAST-Q questionnaire. RESULTS Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The average patient age was 55.6 years, and the mean body mass index was 31.2. Mean follow-up was 23.2 months from the initial reconstruction. One patient experienced seroma, and two cases of wound dehiscence at the T junction were observed and treated conservatively with no implant loss. All patients were satisfied with the final reconstruction. CONCLUSION The Wise pattern skin-reducing mastectomy and pre-pectoral breast reconstruction could be offered to patients presenting with large and ptotic breasts. Future studies should better define long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Collapse
|
49
|
Cuomo R. Submuscular and Pre-Pectoral ADM Assisted Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2020; 56:E256. [PMID: 32466619 PMCID: PMC7353845 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56060256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives: Breast cancer treatment has deeply changed in the last fifty years. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) were introduced for breast reconstruction, with encouraging results, but with conflicting reports too. The present paper aims to summarize the current data on breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrices. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the literature regarding the use of ADM-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction. Results: The main techniques were analyzed and described. Conclusions: Several authors have recently reported positive results. Nevertheless, an increased complications' rate has been reported by other authors. Higher cost compared to not-ADM-assisted breast reconstruction is another concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cuomo
- Santa Maria Alle Scotte Hospital, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Mario Bracci Street, 53100 Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Polotto S, Bergamini ML, Pedrazzi G, Arcuri MF, Gussago F, Cattelani L. One-step prepectoral breast reconstruction with porcine dermal matrix-covered implant: a protective technique improving the outcome in post-mastectomy radiation therapy setting. Gland Surg 2020; 9:219-228. [PMID: 32420245 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2020.01.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) applied on implant-assisted immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) involves a marked increase in complication rate. The recent opportunity of performing an ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) raised the hypotesis of a protective interaction between ADM and periprosthetic tissues under PMRT. Methods We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of a cohort of consecutively treated patients undergone one-step PPBR between January 2015 and September 2018. The aim is to examine complication rate and aesthetic satisfaction of patients, in order to evaluate if this reconstructive technique could be recommendable in PMRT setting. Group 1 comprised 158 patients not submitted to PMRT and Group 2 twenty-eight patients undergone PMRT. Results All post-operative complications were not statistically different between the two groups, except for capsular contracture (P=0.011). We obtained very high percentages in all BREAST-Q categories in Group 2 patients: satisfaction with breasts 86.8±13.9, satisfaction with implants 6.5±3.0, high satisfaction for no adverse effects of radiation 15.7±6.8. According to multivariate analysis no risk factor was significantly associated with complications. Conclusions We may conclude that one-step PPBR with porcine ADM followed by PMRT is well tolerated, with no significant risk of adverse outcomes, at least in the short-term follow-up. These promising outcomes warrant further studies to examine the existence of a protective effect due to ADM integration with subcutaneous tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Polotto
- Breast Surgical Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma (PR), Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Pedrazzi
- Neuroscience Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma (PR), Italy
| | - Maria F Arcuri
- Breast Surgical Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma (PR), Italy
| | - Francesca Gussago
- Breast Surgical Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma (PR), Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|