Utility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer

Comparing survival outcomes between neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy within T2N1M0 stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on SEER database

BACKGROUND

Guideline recommendations for the application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in T2N1M0 stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR + /HER2-) breast cancer are ambiguous. The debate continues regarding whether NACT or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) offers superior survival outcomes for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female patients diagnosed with HR + /HER2- breast cancer at T2N1M0 stage between 2010 and 2020, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and divided into two groups, the NACT group and the ACT group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to establish balanced cohorts between groups, considering baseline features. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model were executed to assess the efficacy of both NACT and ACT in terms of overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). A logistic regression model was employed to examine the association between predictive variables and response to NACT.

RESULTS

After PSM, 4,682 patients were finally included. K-M curves showed that patients receiving NACT exhibited significantly worse OS and BCSS when compared with patients undergoing ACT. Multivariable Cox analysis indicated that not achieving pathologic complete response (non-pCR) after NACT (versus ACT), was identified as an adverse prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.36-1.83) and BCSS (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.44-2. 02). The logistic regression model revealed that low tumor grade independently predicted non-pCR.

CONCLUSION

Among T2N1M0 stage HR + /HER2- patients, OS and BCSS of NACT were inferior to ACT. Patients who attained non-pCR after NACT demonstrated significantly worse survival outcomes compared with those who received ACT.

Individual and area level factors associated with the breast cancer diagnostic-treatment interval in Queensland, Australia

BACKGROUND

Delays to breast cancer treatment can lead to more aggressive and extensive treatments, increased expenses, increased psychological distress, and poorer survival. We explored the individual and area level factors associated with the interval between diagnosis and first treatment in a population-based cohort in Queensland, Australia.

METHODS

Data from 3216 Queensland women aged 20 to 79, diagnosed with invasive breast cancer (ICD-O-3 C50) between March 2010 and June 2013 were analysed. Diagnostic dates were sourced from the Queensland Cancer Registry and treatment dates were collected via self-report. Diagnostics-treatment intervals were modelled using flexible parametric survival methods.

RESULTS

The median interval between breast cancer diagnosis and first treatment was 15 days, with an interquartile range of 9-26 days. Longer diagnostic-treatment intervals were associated with a lack of private health coverage, lower pre-diagnostic income, first treatments other than breast conserving surgery, and residence outside a major city. The model explained a modest 13.7% of the variance in the diagnostic-treatment interval [Formula: see text]. Sauerbrei's D was 0.82, demonstrating low to moderate discrimination performance.

CONCLUSION

Whilst this study identified several individual- and area-level factors associated with the time between breast cancer diagnosis and first treatment, much of the variation remained unexplained. Increased socioeconomic disadvantage appears to predict longer diagnostic-treatment intervals. Though some of the differences are small, many of the same factors have also been linked to screening and diagnostic delay. Given the potential for accumulation of delay at multiple stages along the diagnostic and treatment pathway, identifying and applying effective strategies address barriers to timely health care faced by socioeconomically disadvantaged women remains a priority.

Use of axillary ultrasound to guide breast cancer management in the genomic assay era

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy is conventionally offered to non-stage IV breast cancer patients with metastatic nodes. However, the RxPONDER trial showed that chemotherapy can be omitted in selected patients with 1-3 metastatic nodes if the 21-gene assay recurrence score is ≤25. We aimed to investigate if axillary ultrasound can identify this group of patients with limited nodal burden so that they can undergo upfront surgery followed by gene assay testing, to potentially avoid chemotherapy.

METHODS

T1-3, node positive, hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer patients ≥50 years old with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were reviewed from 2 centres. Patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bilateral cancers were excluded. Number of ultrasound-detected abnormal axillary nodes, demographic and histological parameters were correlated with the number of metastatic nodes found on ALND.

RESULTS

138 patients were included, 59 (42.8%) and 79 (57.2%) patients had 1-3 and >3 metastatic nodes on ALND respectively. On logistic regression and ROC analysis, the number of ultrasound-detected abnormal nodes was significant (p < 0.001) for predicting limited nodal burden (ROC AUC = 0.7135). Probabilities of <4 metastatic nodes with ultrasound cut-offs of 5, 6 and 8 abnormal nodes were 0.057, 0.026 and 0.005 respectively, with 100% specificity.

CONCLUSION

A cut-off of ≤5 ultrasound-detected abnormal nodes can distinguish between patients with limited versus high nodal burden, with high specificity. Hence, incorporating the number of abnormal ultrasound-detected nodes into clinical practice may prove useful in guiding between upfront surgery and gene assay testing or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this group of patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-metastatic breast cancer: The surgeon's perspective

Breast cancer is the most common non-skin cancer in Australia, affecting 1 in 7 women by the age of 85 years. Current management of early breast cancer is becoming increasingly variable and complex. The typical range of treatments include some combination of surgery, chemotherapy and targeted therapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in carefully selected patients can facilitate increased rates of breast conservation therapy, and when successful, offers improved cosmesis due to less extensive resection of tissue. A neoadjuvant approach also provides biological insight into a patient's tumour, prognostication based on a patient's response to therapy, as well as enabling their treating oncologist to personalise adjuvant strategies based on the presence or absence of residual cancer at surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become an integral element in the provision of breast conserving surgery to selected early-stage breast cancer patients. Appreciating the indications and understanding the likely outcomes from NACT in select situations, can result in significant improvements in patient tailored care.

Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the immune microenvironment of gynaecological tumours

Purpose: To assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in gynaecological tumors, with a focus on understanding the potential for enhanced combination therapies.Methods: We systematically queried the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, encompassing reviews, clinical trials, and case studies, to undertake a thorough analysis of the impact of NACT on the TIME of gynaecological tumors.Results: NACT induces diverse immune microenvironment changes in gynaecological tumors. In cervical cancer, NACT boosts immune-promoting cells, enhancing tumor clearance. Ovarian cancer studies yield variable outcomes, influenced by patient-specific factors and treatment regimens. Limited research exists on NACT's impact on endometrial cancer's immune microenvironment, warranting further exploration. In summary, NACT-induced immune microenvironment changes display variability. Clinical trials highlight personalized immunotherapy's positive impact on gynaecological tumor prognosis, suggesting potential avenues for future cancer treatments. However, rigorous investigation is needed to determine the exact efficacy and safety of combining NACT with immunotherapy.Conclusion: This review provides a solid foundation for the development of late-stage immunotherapy and highlights the importance of therapeutic strategies targeting immune cells in TIME in anti-tumor therapy.

Neoadjuvant Doxorubicin-Paclitaxel Combined Chemotherapy in Patients with Inoperable Stage III Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 10 Years of Follow-Up in Vietnam

INTRODUCTION

The combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AP) is widely used in our country for the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer as well as metastatic breast cancer. The AP regimen has shown promise as a neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer that improves pathological complete response (pCR), increases the rate of conservative surgery, and improves the survival of patients. However, up to now, no research has evaluated the response of this regimen for the neoadjuvant treatment of advanced breast cancer, especially with a 10-year period of follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis reviewed 126 patients with inoperable stage III breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for a maximum of six courses followed by surgery. pCR was evaluated. Survival was analyzed for all breast cancer patients using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank models.

RESULTS

Of 126 women treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the overall pCR rate was 25.4% and was significantly higher in patients with tumor stage cT1-T2, hormone receptor-negative (HR-negative), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease. Patients achieving pCR had significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Ten-year DFS rates were 43.8% vs. 25.0% (p = 0.030) and 10-year OS rates were 59.4% vs. 28.9% (p = 0.003) for patients with pCR and non-pCR, respectively. The cumulative 10-year DFS was 19.6% for patients with HR-negative disease and 37.3% for those with HR-positive disease. Achieving pCR was associated with improved 10-year OS and DFS. Several clinicopathological features were closely associated with pCR in the inoperable stage III breast cancer patients who were treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Achieving pCR was associated with improved 10-year OS and DFS. Patients with advanced breast cancer with HR-negative and HER2-positive status who benefited from the AP neoadjuvant therapy regimen were significantly more likely to achieve pCR.

Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Quantitative Parameters on Automated Breast Ultrasound Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study was aimed at evaluating the role of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the early prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer treated with NAC were included. The standard for evaluation of response to NAC was based on surgery within 21 d of completing treatment. The patients were classified as having a pathological complete response (pCR) and a non-pCR. All patients underwent CEUS and ABUS 1 wk before receiving NAC and after two treatment cycles. The rising time (RT), time to peak (TTP), peak intensity (PI), wash-in slope (WIS) and wash-in area under the curve (Wi-AUC) were measured on the CEUS images before and after NAC. The maximum tumor diameters in the coronal and sagittal planes were measured on ABUS, and the tumor volume (V) was calculated. The difference (∆) in each parameter between the two treatment time points was compared. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the predictive value of each parameter.

RESULTS

∆V, ∆TTP and ∆PI were independent predictors of pCR. The CEUS-ABUS model achieved the highest AUC (0.950), followed by those based on CEUS (0.918) and ABUS (0.891) alone.

CONCLUSION

The CEUS-ABUS model could be used clinically to optimize the treatment of patients with breast cancer.

The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the tumor immune microenvironment in gastrointestinal tumors

In recent years, numerous studies have demonstrated that the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is capable of regulating the growth of tumors, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells in the TIME can affect the prognosis and treatment responses of patients. Consequently, therapies targeting these immune cells have emerged as important antitumor treatments. As a crucial componet of the perioperative treatment of malignant tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) can improve the surgical resection rate and prognosis of patients and is a suitable clinical model to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy on the TIME. To provide a rationale for developing valid combinational therapies, this review summarizes the impact of NACT on the TIME, the relationship between tumor-infiltrating immune cells and treatment responses of patients, and the prognostic value of these infiltrating immune cells.

Analysis of robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy using the da Vinci SP system

BACKGROUND

As patients tend to be diagnosed with breast cancer at an early stage, the demand for better cosmetic outcomes has increased. Several studies revealed that robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM) shows favorable outcomes. The aim of the study was to reveal the feasibility of RNSM using the da Vinci single-port (SP) system with a minimal incision, hidden in the arm.

METHODS

From 2018 to 2021, 81 cases (70 patients) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathologic characteristics, operative outcomes, and postoperative complications were evaluated. The operative outcomes were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The median age was 42 years (range, 26-60 years). Bilateral RNSM was performed in 11 (27.2%) patients. The median size of the initial skin incision was 40 mm (range, 20-55 mm). Immediate reconstruction with direct-to-implant was performed in 54 (66.7%) patients and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps in 15 (18.5%) patients. Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo Classification III occurred in six (7.5%) patients. Patients reconstructed with a DIEP flap had large breasts with more severe ptosis, yet grade III complications did not occur.

CONCLUSIONS

RNSM using the SP system can be applied for curative and risk-reducing mastectomy, regardless of breast size or ptosis grade.

Efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide in anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Our study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of anthracycline plus taxane (AT)-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with or without cyclophosphamide in the treatment of breast cancer.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled studies comparing the efficacy and safety of AT-based NAC with or without cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients.

Results

Four eligible studies with 2,302 individuals were ultimately included in the quantitative analysis. After applying the AT-based NAC regimen, the overall rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) and breast conserving surgery in all included subjects were 26.5% and 70.6%, respectively. The rates of pCR [risk ratio (RR): 1.35; 95% CI: 0.75, 2.45; P=0.32], breast-conserving surgery (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.19; P=0.17) and clinical response (RR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.19; P=0.15) in patients in the cyclophosphamide group were similar to those in the control group. However, participants in the cyclophosphamide group had a lower no clinical response rate than those in the control group (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.87; P<0.001). Subjects in the cyclophosphamide group had significantly lower rates of infection (RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.79; P<0.001) and diarrhea (RR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.68; P<0.001) and higher rates of thrombocytopenia (RR: 3.38; 95% CI: 1.96, 5.84; P<0.001), sensory/motor neuropathy (RR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.39; P=0.03) and nausea/vomiting (RR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.06; P=0.009) than those in the control group.

Conclusions

The AT-based NAC regimen with or without cyclophosphamide had similar clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients. The addition of cyclophosphamide might increase the risks of thrombocytopenia, sensory/motor neuropathy and nausea/vomiting.

Clinical Effects of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Treating Breast Cancer

Objective: To explore clinical effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in treating breast cancer. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed among 26 breast cancer patients receiving NAC. Chemotherapeutic effects were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) grading, and Miller and Payne (MP) grading. Results: After chemotherapy, the percentage of tumor cells was significantly reduced, but chemotherapeutic period possessed no dramatic influence on curative effects. Among 20 patients with complete data, 2 achieved clinically complete response (CR), 10 showed partial response (PR), 4 had stable disease (SD), and 4 exhibited progress disease (PD). The total effective rate (CR + PR) of NAC was 60% (12/20). Besides, evaluation results from RECIST were generally in line with those from JBCS grading and MP grading. Conclusion: NAC is effective among the majority of patients with breast cancer. In addition, tumor size determined through clinical palpation is generally in accordance with responses to chemotherapy, and consistent performance is observed for three systems in grading responses to chemotherapy.

Changes in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as Surrogate Marker for Changes in Ki-67 Index Due to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate possible correlation between changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and Ki-67 index as a result of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with invasive breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between February 2016 and October 2017, 87 patients with breast cancer underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (b = 0 and 800 sec/mm²) before and after NAC. ADC and tumor diameter before and after NAC were compared to the Ki-67 index determined from biopsy or surgical specimens.

RESULTS

Ki-67 index did not correlate significantly with ADC before NAC (p = 0.862) or afterwards (p = 0.292), nor did it correlate with tumor diameter before (p = 0.545) or afterwards (p = 0.478). However, change in ADC as a result of NAC correlated inversely with change in Ki-67 index (r = -0.326, p = 0.002). The percentage change in Ki-67 index did not correlate with the percentage change in ADC (p = 0.404). Similarly, the change in Ki-67 index or percentage change in that index did not correlate with the change in tumor diameter (p = 0.075) or percentage change in tumor diameter (p = 0.233).

CONCLUSION

Comparison of pre- and post-NAC ADC can be used to estimate the change in Ki-67 index in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Network-based approach to identify biomarkers predicting response and prognosis for HER2-negative breast cancer treatment with taxane-anthracycline neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Objective

This study aims to identify effective gene networks and biomarkers to predict response and prognosis for HER2-negative breast cancer patients who received sequential taxane-anthracycline neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Transcriptome data of training dataset including 310 HER2-negative breast cancer who received taxane-anthracycline treatment and an independent validation set with 198 samples were analyzed by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) approach in R language. Gene ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways analysis were performed for the selected genes. Module-clinical trait relationships were analyzed to explore the genes and pathways that associated with clinicopathological parameters. Log-rank tests and COX regression were used to identify the prognosis-related genes.

Results

We found a significant correlation of an expression module with distant relapse–free survival (HR = 0.213, 95% CI [0.131–0.347], P = 4.80E−9). This blue module contained genes enriched in biological process of hormone levels regulation, reproductive system, response to estradiol, cell growth and mammary gland development as well as pathways including estrogen, apelin, cAMP, the PPAR signaling pathway and fatty acid metabolism. From this module, we further screened and validated six hub genes (CA12, FOXA1, MLPH, XBP1, GATA3 and MAGED2), the expression of which were significantly associated with both better chemotherapeutic response and favorable survival for BC patients.

Conclusion

We used WGCNA approach to reveal a gene network that regulate HER2-negative breast cancer treatment with taxane-anthracycline neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which enriched in pathways of estrogen signaling, apelin signaling, cAMP signaling, the PPAR signaling pathway and fatty acid metabolism. In addition, genes of CA12, FOXA1, MLPH, XBP1, GATA3 and MAGED2 might serve as novel biomarkers predicting chemotherapeutic response and prognosis for HER2-negative breast cancer.

Patient-reported outcomes with neoadjuvant vs adjuvant systemic therapy for operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) is used for large operable or highly proliferative breast cancers. It is not known whether psychological outcomes differ according to the treatment sequence (chemotherapy or surgery first) or tumour response.

METHODS

This was a planned analysis of a multi-institutional single arm longitudinal study of patients considering NAST for operable breast cancer. Participants completed patient reported outcome questionnaires before and after the decision about NAST, between chemotherapy and surgery, and 12 months after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine women enrolled. Fourteen of 51 (28%) who received NAST experienced pathological complete response (pCR). Patients who had surgery first (n = 7) had higher baseline anxiety, and a greater decrease in anxiety at 12 months follow up, compared with patients who received NAST (n = 50) (a decrease from baseline of 34 pts vs 17 points; p = 0.033). Distress declined at a similar rate in surgery first and NAST groups. Mean satisfaction with decision score post-decision was significantly lower in the adjuvant group compared with NAST (22 vs 26, p = 0.02). No differences were seen between patients with pCR vs residual cancer in: distress, anxiety, satisfaction with decision, fear of progression, and decision regret.

CONCLUSION

Most patients in this study proceeded with NAST when their surgeon offered it as an option. This exploratory analysis suggests that patients who chose surgery first tended to be more anxious, and had lower satisfaction with their decision, than those who had NAST. In patients who had NAST, lack of pCR does not appear to correlate with adverse psychological outcomes.

Response to immunohistochemical markers' conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: association between imaging and histopathologic analysis

BACKGROUND

Breast ultrasound and mammography were used in the detection of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between clinical and pathological responses with breast density and IHC marker conversion to understand how this information might be used in the future to direct treatment.

METHODS

We included 119 patients who underwent CNB and followed NACT. The breast density assessment was based on the mammography examination performed at the time of diagnosis. We evaluated the clinical and pathological responses to NACT by the UICC and Miller-Payne grading systems, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 119 patients who met the inclusion criteria, patients with high pre-treatment IHC markers levels showed higher expression of IHC markers regardless of the post-treatment IHC marker level at baseline. However, breast and node tumor sizes before and after NACT were negatively correlated with hormone receptor conversion and positively correlated with Ki-67 conversion (P < 0.05). Patients with low BD were more likely to have a cCR, pCR, TNBC, and postmenopausal status than those with a high BD (P < 0.05). BD was significantly associated with PR and Ki67 conversion but not ER conversion.

CONCLUSION

Our prospective observational study demonstrated that IHC marker conversion could be used to identify lesion size changes and BD. We also found that a high BD was linked to clinical and pathological responses, molecular subtype, and menopausal status. In the future, additional studies are required to validate the predictive value identified by this research.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-metastatic breast cancer: a study on practice trends in a regional cancer treatment service

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used for managing locally advanced and high risk non-metastatic breast cancer.

AIMS

To describe trends in NACT use, assess compliance to best practice recommendations and determine treatment response rates in a regional cancer treatment service.

METHODS

In this retrospective cross- sectional study, electronic records of patients who underwent NACT in centres covered by the MidCentral Regional Cancer Treatment Service in 2013 and 2017 were reviewed. Data pertaining to patient demographics, disease status, compliance to best practice recommendations and treatment outcomes were extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

Of a total of 502 referrals for non-metastatic breast cancer, 34 underwent NACT with the estimated NACT rate rising from 3.85% (2013) to 9.92% (2017). Compliance to practice recommendations improved in all domains (pre-treatment tumour and axillary evaluation, marker placement, multidisciplinary discussion). Overall, NACT was well tolerated with only three patients experiencing treatment limiting toxicity. Response rates mirror published data (complete response: 29.4%, partial: 61.8%) with higher responses registered in HER2 positive and triple negative subtypes. Discordance between radiological and pathological response was 28%, with imaging overestimating response in five out of seven cases. Of the 11 (32%) patients who initially underwent breast conserving surgery, six required a second surgery.

CONCLUSION

NACT is increasingly used in the Regional Cancer Treatment Service, with improving compliance to practice recommendations. These results are reassuring and can be used to help patients develop a realistic expectation towards NACT.

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: the Westmead experience

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) can be used to treat breast cancer. Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a surrogate marker for improved survival. This study examined response in the breast and axilla to NAST and identified features associated with pCR.

METHODS

Patients undergoing NAST and surgery between January 2012 and June 2016 by surgeons at Westmead Breast Cancer Institute were identified. Patients with inflammatory or metastatic disease were excluded. Data were analysed to identify factors predictive of pCR.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were identified. Mean age was 49 years. Forty-one patients had axillary metastases identified prior to NAST. Eighty-three patients received chemotherapy alone, six endocrine therapy alone and two had both. Thirty-seven patients had mastectomy and 54 had breast-conserving surgery. The overall breast pCR rate was 29% higher in patients with triple-negative (50%) or HER2-positive (39%) disease and lower in luminal disease (11.6%, P = 0.001). Forty percent of node-positive patients became node negative. The only variable associated with pCR was tumour biology. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer were more likely to have axillary pCR than those with luminal cancer (odds ratio: 28, P = 0.00005).

CONCLUSION

pCR in either the breast or axilla was most likely to be achieved in patients with HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancers. In patients with luminal cancers, the goal of NAST is best considered to facilitate surgical options rather than obtaining a pCR.

A survey of Australian and New Zealand clinical practice with neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) has become an established treatment option for women with operable breast cancer.

AIM

We aimed to better understand NAST treatment patterns, barriers and facilitators in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS

We undertook a cross-sectional survey of the current clinical practice of Australian and New Zealand breast cancer specialists. Questions included referral patterns for NAST, patient selection, logistics, decision making and barriers.

RESULTS

Of 207 respondents, 162 (78%) reported routinely offering NAST to selected patients with operable breast cancer (median 9% of patients offered NAST). Specialty, location, practice type, gender or years of experience did not predict for offering NAST. In all, 45 and 58% wanted to increase the number of patients who receive NAST in routine care and in clinical trials respectively. Facilitators included the multidisciplinary team meeting and access to NAST clinical trials. Specialist-reported patient barriers included: patient desire for immediate surgery (63% rated as important/very important); lack of awareness of NAST (50%); concern about progression (43%) and disinterest in downstaging (32%). Forty-three per cent of participants experienced system-related barriers to the use of NAST, including other clinicians' lack of interest (27%); lack of clinical trials (24%) and unacceptable wait for a medical oncology appointment (37%).

CONCLUSION

This group of Australian and New Zealand clinicians are interested in NAST for operable breast cancer in routine care and clinical trials. Patient- and system-related barriers that prevent the optimal uptake of this treatment approach will need to be systematically addressed if NAST is to become a more common approach.

Alterations of biomarker profiles after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: tumor heterogeneity should be taken into consideration

Tumor biomarkers including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and Ki-67 are routinely tested in breast cancer patients and their status guides clinical management and predicts prognosis. A few retrospective studies have suggested that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer may change the status of biomarker expression, which in turn will affect further management of these patients. In this study we take advantage of a relatively large cohort and aim to study the effect of NAC on biomarker expression and explore the impact of tumor size and lymph node involvement on biomarker status changes. We collected 107 patients with invasive breast cancer who received at least three cycles of NAC. We retrospectively performed and scored the immunohistochemistry (IHC) of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67 using both the diagnostic core biopsies before NAC and excisional specimens following NAC. HER2 gene status was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization for cases with IHC result of 2+. We demonstrated that there was a significant decrease in expression of PR (P = 0.013) and Ki-67 (P = 0.000) in post-NAC specimens compared to pre-NAC core biopsies. In addition, cases with large tumor size (≥2cm) and cases with lymph node metastasis were more frequently to have biomarker changes. Finally we studied cases with HER2 status changes after NAC treatments in detail and emphasized the nature of tumor heterogeneity.

A single-center, randomized, parallel controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety aspects of three anthracycline-based regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety aspects of three anthracycline-based regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer. Five-hundred and one patients with clinical stage I–III invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with either CEFci arm (5-Fu 200 mg/m² daily by 24-h continuous infusion and epirubicin 100 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² intravenous bolus on day 1), CEF arm (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m², epirubicin 100 mg/m², and 5-Fu 600 mg/m² i.v. on day 1), or EC arm (epirubicin 100 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² i.v. on day 1). The pathologic responses to chemotherapy were assessed according to the Miller and Payne grading system (MP). A total of 485 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population. Breast pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 18.9 % (31/164) in CEFci arm, 15.0 % (24/160) in CEF arm, and 12.4 % (20/161) in EC arm (P = 0.266). MP grading system 4/5 response rate was significantly higher in CEFci arm than that in CEF arm and EC arm (44.5, 31.3 and 27.3 %, respectively, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference on grade III/IV neutropenia among three arms (P = 0.538), but thrombocytopenia, decreased hemoglobin, and elevated aminotransferase appeared to be observed more in CEFci arm (P = 0.040, 0.059, and 0.073, respectively). CEFci did not reach a higher pCR rate compared with CEF or EC in patients with primary breast cancer. The potential advantage of CEFci in improving pathologic response still requires further research. The accompanied hematologic and biochemical toxicities, and the catheter-related complications should also be noted.

A Decision Aid for Women Considering Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Operable Invasive Breast Cancer: Development and Protocol of a Phase II Evaluation Study (ANZ1301 DOMINO)

Background

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is offered to selected women with large and/or highly proliferative operable breast cancers. This option adds further complexity to an already complex breast cancer treatment decision tree. Patient decision aids are an established method of increasing patient involvement and knowledge while decreasing decisional conflict. There is currently no decision aid available for women considering neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Objective

We aimed to develop a decision aid for women diagnosed with operable breast cancer and considered suitable for neoadjuvant systemic therapy, and the protocol for a multicenter pre-post study evaluating the acceptability and feasibility of the decision aid.

Methods

The decision aid was developed through literature review, expert advisory panel, adherence to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards, and iterative review. The protocol for evaluation of the decision aid consists of the following: eligible women will undertake a series of questionnaires prior to and after using the decision aid. The primary endpoint is decision aid acceptability to patients and investigators and the feasibility of use. Secondary endpoints include change in decisional conflict, participant knowledge, and information involvement preference. Feasibility is defined as the proportion of eligible participants who use the decision aid to help inform their treatment decision.

Results

This study has recruited 29 out of a planned 50 participants at four Australian sites. A 12-month recruitment period is expected with a further 12-months follow-up.

Conclusions

The decision aid has the potential to allow patients with operable breast cancer, who have been offered neoadjuvant systemic therapy, decreased decisional conflict, and greater involvement in the decision. If this study finds that an online decision aid is feasible and acceptable, it will be made widely available for routine clinical practice.

Trial Registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12614001267640; http://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx?searchTxt=ACTRN12614001267640&isBasic=True (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6gh7BPZdG)