What is the role of laparoscopic surgery in intussusception?

Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Pediatric Intussusception: Analysis Using a National Inpatient Database in Japan

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery for pediatric intussusception has recently become more common as an alternative to open surgery. However, the differences in outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to compare short-term surgical outcomes and recurrence rates between patients treated with laparoscopic and open surgery for pediatric intussusception.

METHODS

Patients aged <18 years who underwent laparoscopic (n = 192) and open (n = 416) surgery for intussusception between April 2016 and March 2021 were retrospectively identified using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. Propensity-score overlap weighting analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. The outcomes included in-hospital morbidity, reoperation, readmission for intussusception, bowel resection, the diagnosis of Meckel's diverticulum, duration of anesthesia, postoperative length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic surgery group was older, heavier, and had fewer congenital malformations and emergency admissions than the open surgery group did. Overlap weighting analyses showed no significant differences in in-hospital morbidity (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.88 [0.35-2.23]), reoperation (1.88 [0.24-14.9]), readmission for intussusception within 30 days (0.80 [0.12-5.30]) and 1 year (0.90 [0.28-2.93]), bowel resection (0.69 [0.46-1.02]), the diagnosis of Meckel's diverticulum (0.97 [0.50-1.90]), duration of anesthesia (difference, 11 [-1-24] minutes), postoperative length of stay (difference, -1.9 [-4.2-0.4] days), or total hospitalization costs (difference, 612 [ -746-1970] US dollars) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large nationwide cohort, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between laparoscopic and open surgery. Laparoscopic surgery is an acceptable treatment option for pediatric intussusception.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Laparoscopic versus Open Reduction of Intussusception in Infants and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety between laparoscopic reduction (LR) and open reduction (OR) of intussusception in infants and children. Literature searches were conducted to identify studies having compared LR and OR for children with intussusception failed to enema reduction. Parameters such as operative time, time to oral intake, length of hospital stay, overall postoperative complications, and recurrence were pooled and compared by meta-analysis. Among the 502 pediatric participants included in the 11 studies, 275 had received LR and 227 received OR. There were shorter length of hospital stays and time to oral intake with the LR approach compared with OR. However, no significant difference was found between LR and OR in the secondary outcome, such as the overall postoperative complications and recurrence. LR is a feasible, safe, and effective surgical procedure alternative to OR for pediatric intussusception. Compared with OR, LR has the advantage of shorter hospital stay and faster time to oral intake. Besides, the overall postoperative complications may be slightly lower in LR. We conclude that LR should be considered an acceptable option for children.

Laparoscopic versus Open Pediatric Surgery: Three Decades of Comparative Studies

INTRODUCTION

 Despite its wide acceptance, the superiority of laparoscopic versus open pediatric surgery has remained controversial. There is still a call for well-founded evidence. We reviewed the literature on studies published in the last three decades and dealing with advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy compared to open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Studies comparing laparoscopic versus open abdominal procedures in children were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE. Reports on upper and lower gastrointestinal as hepatobiliary surgery and on surgery of pancreas and spleen were included. Advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery were analyzed for different types of procedures. Complications were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

 A total of 239 studies dealing with 19 types of procedures and outcomes in 929,157 patients were analyzed. We identified 26 randomized controlled trials (10.8%) and 213 comparative studies (89.2%). The most frequently reported advantage of laparoscopy was shorter hospital stay in 60.4% of studies. Longer operative time was the most frequently reported disadvantage of laparoscopy in 52.7% of studies. Clavien-Dindo grade I to III complications (mild-moderate) were less frequently identified in laparoscopic compared to open procedures (80.3% of studies). Grade-IV complications (severe) were less frequently reported after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis and more frequently after laparoscopic Kasai's portoenterostomy. We identified a decreased frequency of reporting on advantages after laparoscopy and increased reporting on disadvantages for all surgery types over the decades.

CONCLUSION

 Laparoscopic compared with open pediatric surgery seems to be beneficial in most types of procedures. The number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains limited. However, the number of reports on disadvantages increased during the past decades.

Laparoscopic versus open reduction of idiopathic intussusception in children: an updated institutional experience

Background

In the reduction of intussusception, due to the lack of randomized, controlled, and prospective clinical trials to confirm the superiority of the laparoscopic approach over open surgery, more evidence was needed. This study aimed to compare the results of laparoscopy and open reduction of idiopathic intussusception in children as well as to illustrate some skills for the reduction of intussusception laparoscopically.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed to evaluate outcomes for patients with idiopathic intussusception who were treated laparoscopically (LAP group) from January 2015 to December 2019 and to compare the outcomes with laparotomy (OPEN group) during the same period.

Results

During the period studied, there were 162 patients treated surgically for intussusception: 62 LAP and 100 OPEN. No statistical differences were found in demographic data, clinical symptoms and signs, duration of symptoms, location and types of intussusception between the two groups. Conversion to open procedure was required for 11 patients in the LAP group. The operation time and time to oral intake were shorter in the LAP group while the difference was not significant. If the 11 conversion cases were excluded, the operation time and time to oral intake were significantly shorter (P < 0.05) in the LAP group. The length of stay was significantly shorter in the LAP group (P < 0.05). Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates between the two groups were comparable (P = 1.0).

Conclusion

Laparoscopy was safe and effective in the treatment of pediatric idiopathic intussusceptions. Pediatric surgeons with sophisticated minimally invasive skills should choose laparoscopy as the first choice in the treatment of idiopathic intussusceptions.

Laparoscopic and open surgery methods in managing surgical intussusceptions: A randomized clinical trial of postoperative complications

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative complications of laparoscopic surgery (LS) with open surgery (OS) in surgical intussusception patients.

METHODS

From March 2015 to February 2018, infants between 6 to 24 months old had the clinical and sono-graphical signs of intussusception enrolled in this double-blind, randomized clinical trial. We divided surgical intussusception patients into two groups. In the LS group, we evaluated patients by direct laparoscopic observation, on-table hydrostatic enema, and mechanical reduction of intussusception. In the OS group, we performed the conventional technique. These patients were followed for 2 years after procedures for comparison of postoperative complications between the two groups.

RESULTS

We had 52 patients who needed surgical exploration (26 in each group). There were four (15%) and seven (27%) patients with self-reduced intussusception in LS and OS groups, respectively. The conversion rate was 31% (eight cases). Five cases (19%) in the LS group and four cases (15%) in the OS group needed bowel resections. Operating time was longer in the LS group (P ≤ 0.006), and the postoperative complication rate was higher in the OS group (P ≤ 0.021).

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopy is a screening tool to determine the need for OS in surgical intussusception patients. Laparoscopy reduces the incidence of OS and its complications.

Peter SD, Beres AL, Hu YY, Renaud EJ, Ricca R, Slidell MB, Taylor A, Smith CA, Miniati D, Sola JE, Valusek P, Berman L, Raval MV, Gosain A, Dellinger MB, Sømme S, Downard CD, McAteer JP, Kawaguchi A. Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this systematic review by the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee was to develop recommendations for the management of ileocolic intussusception in children.

METHODS

The ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases were queried for literature from January 1988 through December 2018. Search terms were designed to address the following topics in intussusception: prophylactic antibiotic use, repeated enema reductions, outpatient management, and use of minimally invasive techniques for children with intussusception. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Consensus recommendations were derived based on the best available evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 83 articles were analyzed and included for review. Prophylactic antibiotic use does not decrease complications after radiologic reduction. Repeated enema reductions may be attempted when clinically appropriate. Patients can be safely observed in the emergency department following enema reduction of ileocolic intussusception, avoiding hospital admission. Laparoscopic reduction is often successful.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding intussusception in hemodynamically stable children without critical illness, pre-reduction antibiotics are unnecessary, non-operative outpatient management should be maximized, and minimally invasive techniques may be used to avoid laparotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3-5 (mainly level 3-4) TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic Review of level 1-4 studies.

Laparoscopic Ileopexy Versus Laparoscopic Simple Reduction in Children with Multiple Recurrences of Ileocolic Intussusception: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Laparoscopy has been widely used in treatment of pediatric intussusception. However, controversy still exists on the best surgical approach for children with multiple recurrences. This cohort study is aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic ileopexy versus laparoscopic simple reduction for treatment of ileocolic intussusception with three or more episodes of recurrence in pediatric patients. Patients and Methods: This study enrolled 74 children with three or more recurrences of ileocolic intussusception treated at our department between January 2016 and June 2018. Of these children, 37 cases undergoing laparoscopic ileopexy were matched with 37 cases undergoing laparoscopic simple reduction according to age. Data on patient characteristics, duration of follow-up, operative parameters, and recurrence rate after laparoscopic operation were reviewed and analyzed. Results: Patient characteristics, including age, gender, weight, number of recurrences at surgery, clinical manifestations, and duration of follow-up, were well comparable between the two groups (each P > .05). During follow-up, recurrence occurred in 16 (43.24%) children undergoing laparoscopic simple reduction, whereas recurrence occurred in 1 (2.70%) case undergoing laparoscopic ileopexy. In comparison, laparoscopic ileopexy significantly decreased the risk of recurrence (P < .001). No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in terms of operative time, length of postoperative stay, and intra- and postoperative complications (each P > .05). No morbidity was documented in both groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic ileopexy is effective and safe as a surgical approach for multiple recurrences of ileocolic intussusception in pediatric patients. The underlying mechanisms are yet to be fully clarified.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for idiopathic intussusception in children: Comparison with conventional laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for idiopathic intussusception in children and compare the outcomes with conventional laparoscopy (CLS).

METHODS

Between January 2011 and December 2012, patients who underwent CLS for idiopathic intussusception were assigned into the group of CLS. Between January 2013 and March 2017, patients who underwent SILS were assigned to the group of SILS. For patients who failed to reduce by SILS, bimanual transabdominal approach was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were enrolled, including 7 and 16 patients in SILS and CLS, respectively. The mean age was similar in both group (22.4 ± 18.7 vs. 24.6 ± 18.6 months, p = 0.80). There is no difference in gender distribution. The main indication was radiological reduction failure in both groups (85.7% vs. 75%, p = 0.58). Ileocolic intussusception was found in 6 (85.7%) and 15 (93.8%) patients of SILS and CLS, respectively (p = 0.25). The level of intussusception was at ascending colon in 3 (42.9%) and 12 (75.0%) patients, respectively (p = 0.11). The operation time was similar in both groups (64.9 ± 53.7 and 70.9 ± 26.1 min, p = 0.79). There were 2 (28.6%) and 1 (6.2%) conversions, respectively (p = 0.15). For the two patients in SILS, the intussusception was successfully reduced by bimanual transabdominal approach. There was no significant difference in time to feeding (1.9 ± 1.1 vs. 1.4 ± 0.7 days, p = 0.21). The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 3.9 ± 1.6 and 3.1 ± 1.1 days, respectively (p = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

SILS for pediatric intussusception is technically feasible and has comparable results to CLS. Transabdominal bimanual reduction is applicable in cases of failed laparoscopic reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.