Discontinuation of peri-operative gentamicin use for indwelling urinary catheter manipulation in orthopaedic surgery

Variation of Practice in Prophylactic Protocol to Reduce Prosthetic Joint Infection in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A National Survey in the United Kingdom

Purpose

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) has an enormous physiological and psychological burden on patients. Surgeons rightly wish to minimise this risk. It has been shown that a standardised, evidence-based approach to perioperative care leads to better patient outcomes. A review of current practice was conducted using a cross-sectional survey among surgeons at multiple centers nationwide.

Materials and Methods

An 11-question electronic survey was circulated to hip and knee arthroplasty consultants nationally via the BOA (British Orthopaedic Association) e-newsletter.

Results

The respondents included 56 consultants working across 19 different trusts. Thirty-four (60.7%) screen patients for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) preoperatively, with 19 (55.9%) would treating with antibiotics. Fifty-six (100%) screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and treat if positive. Only 15 (26.8%) screen for methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) or empirically eradicate. Zero (0%) routinely catheterise patients perioperatively. Forty-one (73.2%) would give intramuscular or intravenous gentamicin for a perioperative catheterisation. All surgeons use laminar flow theatres. Twenty-six (46.4%) use only an impervious gown, 6 (10.7%) exhaust pipes, and 24 (42.3%) surgical helmet system. Five different antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens are used 9 (16.1%) cefuroxime, 2 (3.6%) flucloxacillin, 19 (33.9%) flucloxacillin and gentamicin, 10 (17.9%) teicoplanin, 16 (28.6%) teicoplanin and gentamicin. Twenty-two (39.3%) routinely give further doses.

Conclusion

ASB screening, treatment and intramuscular gentamicin for perioperative catheterisation is routinely practiced despite no supporting evidence base. MSSA screening and treatment is underutilised. Multiple antibiotic regimens exist despite little variation in organisms in PJI. Practice varies between surgeons and centers, we should all be practicing evidence-based medicine.

Multi-year antimicrobial-resistance trends in urine Escherichia coli isolates from both community-based and hospital-based laboratories of an Australian local health district

OBJECTIVES

Efforts to monitor and combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are typically focused on the hospital-based laboratory setting. The aim of this study was to longitudinally examine and compare trends in AMR among urine Escherichia coli isolates from a private community-based laboratory and a public hospital-based laboratory in an Australian local health district.

METHODS

A total of 108 262 urine E. coli isolates from a public hospital-based laboratory (N = 34 103) and a private community-based laboratory (N = 74 159) in a single health district between 2007-2019 were analysed. Linear regression was used to identify significance of change in AMR rates in both laboratories independently and detect any significant interaction of each setting in proportional change over the study period.

RESULTS

Similar AMR trends were detected among urinary E. coli isolates in private community-based laboratory and public hospital-based laboratory settings over 12 y. AMR rates were consistently higher in the public hospital-based setting. Ampicillin was the only antibiotic for which the E. coli resistance trend did not significantly change over the time period in either laboratory setting. All other antibiotics showed a significant increase in AMR rates over time in both settings.

CONCLUSIONS

AMR rates in both the private community-based laboratory and public hospital-based laboratory settings increased over time and were consistently higher in the public hospital-based laboratory setting. Since private laboratories handle the vast majority of pathology volumes in community outpatient settings in Australia, interventions incorporating the community-based laboratory setting are critical to addressing AMR in the community.

A scoping review of global aminoglycoside antibiotic overuse: A potential opportunity for primary ototoxicity prevention

BACKGROUND

Aminoglycosides are widely used, broad-spectrum antibiotics with significant potential for ototoxicity. Global efforts to prevent ototoxicity must account for aminoglycoside overuse and non-prescription use.

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to a) estimate the prevalence of aminoglycoside overuse by synthesizing evidence on self-medication, over the counter (OTC) availability, and household antibiotic storage for later use, and to report the specific aminoglycosides used and the predictors of overuse, and b) leverage this information to comment on potential risk of ototoxicity.

METHODS

Two systematic search strings were conducted to extract peer-reviewed articles published from 2005 to 2020. The first focused on overuse of aminoglycoside antibiotics. The second focused on potentially ototoxic effects of aminoglycosides related to drug overuse.

RESULTS

A total of 26 articles were included (first search string: n = 21; second search string: n = 5). The prevalence of aminoglycoside self-medication was high and household storage and OTC availability of aminoglycosides was common. Gentamicin was the most commonly overused aminoglycoside. No studies provided information on antibiotic dosing or resultant toxicities, including ototoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited available evidence indicates that antibiotic overuse (self-medication, home storage, and non-prescription availability) is relatively common, especially in low resource settings, and that aminoglycoside antibiotics comprise a variable, but concerning, proportion of non-prescribed antibiotics. Additional evidence is needed to evaluate the relationship between these dispensing patterns and ototoxicity.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary catheter manipulation following arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Urinary catheter use in the peri- and post-operative phase following arthroplasty may be associated with urinary tract infection (UTI) and deep prosthetic joint infection (PJI). These can be catastrophic complications in joint arthroplasty. We performed a systematic review of the evidence on use of antibiotics for urinary catheter insertion and removal following arthroplasty.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched using the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search interface. Grey literature was searched. From 219 citations, six studies were deemed eligible for review. Due to study heterogeneity, a narrative approach was adopted. Methodological quality of each study was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme appraisal tool.

RESULTS

A total of 4696 hip and knee arthroplasties were performed on 4578 participants across all studies. Of these, 1475 (31%) were on men and 3189 (68%) on women. The mean age of study participants was 69 years. Three thousand four hundred and eighty-nine cases (74.3%) were related to hip arthroplasty and 629 (13.4%) to knee arthroplasty. Five hundred and seventy-eight (12.3%) were either hip or knee arthroplasty. Forty-five PJIs were reported across all studies (0.96%). Two studies found either no PJI or no statistical difference in the rate of PJI when no antibiotic prophylaxis was used for catheter manipulation. Another study found no statistical difference in PJI rates between patients with or without preoperative bacteriuria. Where studies report potential haematogenous spread from UTIs, this association can only be assumed. Increased duration of urinary catheterization is positively associated with UTI.

CONCLUSION

It remains difficult to justify the use of prophylactic antibiotics for catheter manipulation in well patients. Their use is not recommended for this indication.

Controversies in Perioperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Although clinical guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis across a wide array of surgical procedures have been proposed by multidisciplinary groups of physicians and pharmacists, clinicians often deviate from recommendations. This is particularly true when recommendations are based on weak data or expert opinion. The goal of this review is to highlight certain common but controversial topics in perioperative prophylaxis and to focus on the data that does exist for the recommendations being made.

Is Routine Urinary Screening Indicated Prior To Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty, and prevention is of great importance. The genitourinary tract is a potential source of bacterial seeding and one that can be easily managed. Despite little supportive evidence, routine urine screening and subsequent treatment before elective surgery in patients without symptoms has found its way into clinical practice in many countries. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to ascertain whether asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a risk factor for PJI and if so, whether preoperative antibiotic treatment is effective in reducing its risk.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane databases were searched using a systematic strategy. Selection of papers was exclusive to include only those which offered information about PJI rate specifically in patients with or without asymptomatic abnormal urinalysis or bacteriuria and/or information on whether ASB patients were preoperatively treated with antibiotics or not to be included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Six-hundred sixty-three papers were screened, and 10 papers were ultimately included (28,588 patients). Results show an increased risk of developing PJI among ASB patients (odds ratio = 3.64, 95% confidence interval = 1.40-9.42). However, most PJI microorganisms are unrelated to those previously found in the urine and preoperative antibiotic therapy does not influence PJI risk (odds ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval = 0.39-2.44).

CONCLUSION

Routine urinary screening prior to elective total joint arthroplasty and treatment of asymptomatic patients is not recommended.

Effects of low-dose epinephrine on perioperative hemostasis and inflammatory reaction in major surgical operations: a randomized clinical trial

Essentials Blood loss and immune reaction are closely related to morbidity and recovery after surgery. We studied the effect of epinephrine plus tranexamic acid on blood loss and immune reaction. Epinephrine plus tranexamic acid reduced postoperative total blood loss and immune reaction. Epinephrine plus tranexamic acid did not increase the incidence of complications.

SUMMARY

Background Hemostasis, thrombosis and surgical stress-induced immune reactions are important for perioperative morbidity and recovery after major surgical operations. Objectives To evaluate the effects of combined administration of low-dose epinephrine (LDEPI) and tranexamic acid (TXA) on perioperative blood loss, thromboembolic complications and inflammatory responses in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients/Methods Patients scheduled for THA (n = 195) were randomized into three interventions: intravenous LDEPI plus TXA (group IV); topical diluted epinephrine plus TXA (group TP); and TXA alone as control (group CT). The primary outcome was perioperative blood loss on postoperative day (POD) 1. Secondary outcomes included perioperative blood loss on POD 3, intraoperative blood loss, volume of drainage, transfusion values, coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters, inflammatory cytokine levels, cases of thrombosis, intravenous fluid on the operation day, and length of hospital stay. Results The mean calculated amounts of total blood loss in groups IV, TP and CT were 631.2 mL, 760.5 mL, and 825.6 mL, respectively, on POD 1; treatment effects (differences) were 194.4 mL (95% confidence interval [CI] 146.7-242.0) and 65.0 mL (95% CI 17.4-112.7). Groups IV and TP had lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin [IL]-1β) and higher levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, and showed faster development of coagulation and fibrinolysis (without change in peak levels), than group CT early postoperation. No differences were observed in transfusion, thromboembolic and other outcomes among the groups. Conclusion The combined administration of LDEPI and TXA was more effective in reducing perioperative blood loss and alleviating the inflammatory response than TXA alone, without increasing the incidence of thromboembolic and other complications.